6 Myths About Abortion
1. Abortion is prohibited by the Bible. Regardless of what the Bible says about abortion, it shouldn’t matter. United States is not a theocracy in the traditional sense. Despite this, given the conviction of abortion opponents that abortion is a violation of God’s Word, it may come as a surprise that neither the Old Testament nor the New Testament address abortion—not even a single word about the practice. In addition, the Old Testament is not averse to discussing women’s bodies in general. Menstruation receives a great deal of attention.
As to how the writers (or Author) could prescribe what should happen to a woman who attempts to assist her husband in a battle by grasping the other man’s testicles (her hand should be chopped off), yet did not believe that abortion warranted even a passing mention, it is puzzling.
Midwives would have been well-versed in the art of inducing a miscarriage.
Most current interpretations of this verse argue that it makes a distinction between producing a preterm birth (fine) and causing a miscarriage (death punishment), which is consistent with the interpretation of abortion opponents today.
- Given the fact that anti-abortion exegetes are just now discovering evidence for an absolute biblical prohibition on abortion in this very obscure text, one has to question why no one else has noticed it before.
- The New Testament provided God with a second opportunity to express himself clearly on the subject of abortion.
- He didn’t say anything about abortion, however.
- Opponents of abortion argue that young girls and women are routinely coerced or harassed into terminating unwanted pregnancies.
- The 64 percent figure comes from a 2004 article in Medical Science Monitor by Vincent M.
- Coleman, James J.
Reardon, titled “Induced Abortion and Traumatic Stress: A Preliminary Comparison of American and Russian Women.” Rue, Coleman, Rue, and Reardon were the first to report the figure.
For example, according to its Web site, the name was “selected from a baby names book” for its ability to seem welcoming while yet being scholarly.
A number of additional false studies have appeared in Medical Science Monitor, an online publication, including pieces maintaining the debunked vaccine-autism link.
However, there are a lot of issues with the research in question, which was actually not about coercion but rather about comparing the post-abortion suffering experienced by American and Russian women.
They were also considerably more white and middle-class than the average population of women who had abortions, and they were reporting on abortions that occurred a decade earlier.
“Health difficulties” following the abortion were reported by 33% of those who had one, which might indicate anything.
In an unusual twist, the American women, but not the Russian women, revealed that they had experienced a great deal of abuse and trauma in their lives prior to the abortion.
In a 2005 poll conducted by the Guttmacher Institute, 1,209 women were asked about their reasons for having an abortion.
(This is a significant decrease from a comparable study conducted in 1987, in which 24 percent of women stated the wishes of their husbands/partners and 8 percent mentioned the wants of their mothers/grandmothers).
Anti-abortion literature is replete with accounts of women who have been seriously hurt or even died in abortion clinics.
Steven Brigham has been involved in court disputes in a number of states.
There are, without a doubt, more substandard clinics out there.
Abortion, on the other hand, is incredibly safe.
A total of eight women died as a result of abortions in 2009.
What about Viagra, you ask?
Legislators, on the other hand, are not asking for a ban on Viagra.
Women die at a rate of 8.8 deaths per 100,000 in this group.
(Also, the maternal death rate is increasing in the United States, despite the fact that it is decreasing across the world.) Strangely, no one has suggested that obstetricians be required to read pregnant people scripts about the hazards that lie ahead before sending them home for 24 hours to consider whether or not they want to proceed with the pregnancy or not.
There are an excessive number of abortions.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, abortion rates dropped by 13 percent in 2011 compared to the previous year, mostly as a result of increased access to birth control and longer-acting birth control techniques such as the IUD.
However, the majority of the time, what people are saying is that women are too casual about sex and contraception.
As Will Saletan points out, it is impossible to condemn abortion as immoral and to maintain that the optimal number of abortions is zero, without also criticizing the particular woman who has put herself in this predicament and now wishes to do something wrong in order to get herself out of it.
Abortion is racially discriminatory.
The advertisement, which featured an attractive young black child dressed in a charming pink frock, stated that “The Most Dangerous Place for an African American Is in the Womb.” An image of a tiny black child with the caption “Black Children Are an Endangered Species” was shown on billboards in Atlanta the year before.
- However, the claim that abortion is racist is one that is frequently heard in the pro-life movement.
- It doesn’t make much sense when stated in this manner.
- Because abortion opponents may portray the procedure as a kind of slavery or genocide, they can claim to be anti-racists without having to understand anything about the lives of black women or do anything to help remedy the massive and still-unabated consequences of slavery and segregation.
- That’s what they usually say: women are the “other victim” of abortion, and only the abortion providers should be prosecuted with a crime.
- I realize that the idea of putting women on trial for abortion seems far-fetched right now.
- However, the groundwork is already being laid.
Many women have been jailed and some have been imprisoned for drug use or other inappropriate behavior while pregnant, even when no negative consequences have resulted and even when the legislation was plainly intended for another reason (to protect living children from meth labs, for example).
They were successful in getting the federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act passed, which made causing the killing of embryos and fetuses a separate crime from causing damage to the pregnant woman, as well as variants of that law passed in numerous states across the country.
In light of the growing restrictions on abortion, as well as the embryo and fetus being recognized as legal persons in an expanding number of areas of the law, it is becoming increasingly difficult to argue that a pregnant woman’s actions during pregnancy should not be subject to judicial scrutiny.
and Learning to Drive, as well as a poet, writer, and Nation magazine columnist.
She currently resides in New York City.
Katha Pollitt has copyright protection for the year 2014. All intellectual property rights are retained. Continue reading this: Dear Conservative Brothers and Sisters: Do you want to see fewer abortions? Tolerate Contraception in Moderation
Get The Brief.Sign up to receive the top stories you need to know right now.
For your protection, we’ve sent a confirmation email to the address you supplied. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin getting our emails. You should receive a confirmation email within 10 minutes. If you do not receive a confirmation email, please check your spam folder.
Sign up to receive the finest parenting information, news and resources. View SampleMore Must-Read Stories From TIME
- Inside Facebook’s African Sweatshop
- sThe True StoryBehind Netflix’sInventing Anna
- Column: To put an end to gerrymandering, we must change the way we elect members of Congress. The Tobacco Giant That Won’t StopFunding Anti-Smoking Programs for Kids
- Because of the nature of Trump’sTRUTH social media platform, it will struggle to compete with mainstream social media. The Untold Story Behind the Kanye Documentary Films Two Decades in the Making
- Pediatricians who work with transgender youth are being subjected to harassment. It’s possible that you’ll need lifesaving treatment
Contact [email protected]
Biblical views on abortion: an Episcopal perspective
In order to identify the biblical and traditional attitudes about abortion, a great deal of scholarly effort has been done. It is necessary to enquire as to what was said and why it was stated, as well as what the context was, and to inquire as to what was not mentioned. Several of the results found in academic literature are discussed in this section of the discussion guide. Although the word “abortion” is not used in the Bible, the book has several passages that address the subject. The most prominent text is Exodus 21:22-25, which is found in the Hebrew Bible.
- After that, a distinction is drawn between the punishment to be exacted for the loss of the fetus and the penalty to be exacted for the harm to the woman.
- If the lady is harmed or killed, however, the law of “lex talionis” is enforced, which means “life for life, eye for eye, and so on.” The narrative has fairly limited significance to the contemporary abortion issue as it deals with accidental and not purposeful pregnancy termination.
- Under the convenant, the mother is regarded as a person, but the fetus is regarded as property.
- This paragraph provides no support for the parity argument, which holds that a woman and a fetus are of equal religious and moral worth.
- Thus, the biblical portrayal of a person is that of a complex, many-sided creature with the god-like power and duty to make decisions.
- When it comes to the subject of abortion, the one individual who certainly matches this description of personhood is the woman who is expecting a child.
- According to biblical standards, this is a god-like choice.
These are connected, since if one does not feel that the fetus is a person until a particular age the act must be characterized differently than if one considers the fetus a person from conception.
- P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Ladriere, P. Rev Fr Sociol. 1982
- Rev Fr Sociol French
- Abortion: a handbook to making ethical decisions about the procedure. Maguire MR, Maguire DC.Maguire MR, et al.Maguire MR, et al. Conscience. September 1983
- 4(5):1-15. Abortion ethics, 1983, PMID:12178929
- Conscience, 1983, PMID:12178929
- Conscience, 1983, PMID MJ Fromer. MJ Fromer. MJ Fromer. Nursing Outlook, April 1982, 30(4):234-40. PMID: 7041095 for Nursing Outlook, 1982. Abortion is the life-giving breath. Joling RJ.Joling RJ.Joling RJ. Med Trial Tech Q, vol. 21, no. 2, 1974, pp. 199-232. The Medical Trial Technology Quarterly, 1974, PMID:4613988 A dualist theory of abortion: the idea of personhood and the concept of the self as an experiencing subject are discussed in detail. Himma KE.Himma KE.Himma KE.Himma KE. The Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2005, 31(1):48-55. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.000828.J Med Ethics, 2005, PMID:15634753 PMC article that is completely free. Review
What does the Bible say about abortion? – Friends of Care Net
When it comes to abortion, what does the Bible have to say? The explanation is that the word abortion does not appear anywhere in the Bible. That does not imply that it is deafeningly silent on the subject, for it has a great deal to say about the beginning of life. The Bible is unequivocal in its assertion that the unborn child is a precious life. Psalm 139, written by King David, is a magnificent illustration of this. Thirteen Because You made my inmost being; You knitted me together in my mother’s womb.
- I was not concealed from You when I was created in the secret spot, or when I was knitted together in the depths of the ground, because my frame was not hidden from You.
- You saw my unformed body before it was formed.
- And he isn’t the only one.
- Keep in mind that you used to sculpt me like clay.
- In the words of the prophet Jeremiah, “He did not murder me while I was in the womb; else, my mother would have become my grave” (20:17).
- It is in texts like these and others that the Bible recognizes the existence and worth of unborn infants.
- “He himself provides everyone with life, breath, and everything else,” Paul asserts in Romans (Acts 17:25).
- To be sure, none of the biblical authors claimed to be speaking on behalf of science.
- As a result, they speak from a position of common theological sense.
- Instead, they are all a part of a life-long continuum that begins at the time of conception and continues until death.
- The length of one’s life is not determined by one’s size or distance from the birth canal.
When God begins the process of creating life, he acts in a certain way. The fact is that God not only creates human life, but He is also intimately involved in the process. When the Bible speaks of God knowing certain people when they are still in the womb, this is confirmed. As an illustration,
- Jacob and Esau: “The kids jostled around inside her, and she wondered aloud, “Why is this happening to me?” Jacob and Esau: As a result, she went to the Lord to enquire. ‘Two countries are in your womb, and two peoples from inside you will be divided
- One people will be stronger than the other, and the elder will serve the younger,’ the Lord said to her. When the time came for her to give birth, she discovered that she was carrying twin boys in her womb.” (Genesis 25:22-24)
- Jeremiah: “Before I made you in the womb, I knew you
- Before you were born, I set you aside
- I designated you as a prophet to the nations” (Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you)
- In the book of Jeremiah, verse 5, David says, “Your eyes beheld my unformed body
- All the days set for me were recorded in your book before one of them came into being.” According to Psalm 139:16, Paul says, “God, who separated me from my mother’s husband and called me by his kindness,” John the Baptist says, “he will be great in the sight of the Lord. and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born” (Galatians 1:15). Matthew 1:20
- Jesus says to Joseph, “Joseph son of David, do not be frightened to take Mary home as your wife, for what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit” (Luke 1:15).
Even if none of us can claim to be Jeremiah or Paul, we can still be confident in God’s plan for our lives if we follow his lead. “From one man, He created all the nations, so that they may populate the entire globe; and He set out their assigned times in history, as well as the boundaries of their territories,” writes Paul. God did everything in order for them to seek Him and, if they do, to reach out for Him and locate Him” (Acts 17:26-27). The Bible, on the other hand, will not allow us to stop here.
- This is a significant step forward.
- His voice resounds from the summit of Mount Sinai: “You must not murder” (Exodus 20:3).
- The Bible teaches us about a God who is always ready to come to the help of those who are in need as we turn the pages of the pages of the Bible.
- Israel performed hymns in which God was described as “a father to the fatherless” and “a protector of widows,” among other things (Psalm 68:5).
- A person who is unable to protest is rendered helpless.
- Furthermore, God asks that his people emulate Him by defending the vulnerable and the fatherless, as well as defending those who are persecuted or impoverished.
- “Save those who are being dragged away to death; keep those who are stumbling toward slaughter at bay” (Prov.24:11).
- In an attempt to explain their actions, many people in society ask themselves, “Who is my neighbor?” God prefers that the church deal in kindness rather than technicalities, according to Luke 10:29.
What Does the Bible Actually Say about Abortion?
After a United Methodist pastor in Birmingham, Alabama called Dave Barnhart posted something on social media concerning abortion critics in 2020, the post garnered much attention from people on both sides of the abortion question. He stated that the “unborn” are a very handy group to organize around since they make no demands of you and are not ethically complicated—in contrast to people in jail, those suffering from addictions, and those imprisoned in poverty, he stated that they are. “You may love the unborn and advocate for them without putting your own riches, power, or privilege at risk, without re-imagining societal institutions, without apologizing to anybody, and without making reparations to anyone,” says the author.
- A resounding and resolute statement, to be sure.
- That, at the very least, is true of a large number of people inside the movement.
- Nonetheless, first and foremost, let us consider what Jesus and the scriptures truly state on the matter of abortion.
- Abortion is not referenced in the Bible at all, unlike homosexuality and a number of other matters that tend to inspire and upset conservative Christians.
- The absence of numerous prohibitions against it is something we are disappointed about.
- Which is a rigorous legal code for an ancient tribe that did not have a police force, a complex court system, or any of the social or restrictive institutions that we take for granted today.
- Of course, this does not rule out the possibility that abortion is referenced in the Bible.
“I curse the man who broke the news to my father, telling him, ‘A child has been born to you, a son,’ making him overjoyed in the process.
The anti-abortion movement does not, perhaps predictably, make use of biblical references, but another passage from Jeremiah is most certainly one of them.
This is primarily due to the fact that it is one of the few that they can discover.
It is a reference to a specific plan for one man rather than a general approach to biology and reproduction, and it is a reference to God’s vision as well as the significance of Jeremiah and his purpose on earth.
Psalm 139 has another another frequently quoted passage, this one again mentioning the womb.
I thank you for creating me in such a dreadfully and beautifully way.
When I was being created in secrecy, delicately woven in the bowels of the ground, my frame was not concealed from you.
My unformed material was visible to your gaze.
But, once more, what exactly is being said?
The Christian concept is that God is aware of everything, including ourselves, and understands who and what we are.
She is aware of the kindness and purity that exist in her heart, as well as the harshness of others who criticize her.
The tale of Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, which appears in the New Testament, is another biblical reference that is commonly used in opposition to abortion.
But, more importantly, does it have anything to say regarding the issue of abortion?
First and foremost, it just depicts movement in the womb, and second, it is a reference to individuals who are not conventional, not normal, and who are not like the rest of us in terms of appearance.
It is not intended to be a guide to female reproduction.
Exodus 21:22, on the other hand, is a passage in the Bible that does make specific reference of the fetus.
If a woman gets injured during a conflict and later miscarries her child, the punishment is a fine, which is only a money payment.
For better or worse, the life and well-being of the mother are far more important than the lives and well-being of her unborn kid.
However, in recent years, the anti-abortion movement, which was a pillar of the Donald Trump presidency, has become increasingly ideologically conservative, and it tends to be strongly supportive of the military and an aggressive foreign policy.
Inconsistency and inconsistency are inherent in the human condition.
Abortion is not a holocaust; the Holocaust, on the other hand, was.
That’s all there is to it when it comes to the Bible.
Instead of requiring abortion rights, it is more accurate to state that the Bible does not have anything relevant to say on the matter.
In my experience, I have never encountered someone who believes that abortion is either good or desired; nonetheless, most individuals would argue that any sort of surgery or medical intervention is either good or desirable.
The situation is made much more problematic by the fact that, in the instance of abortion, the “potential” for life is unquestionably there.
However, these are not the fundamental causes of abortion in general, and the answer is not to restrict women’s freedom, but rather to create communities in which persons with disabilities do not encounter prejudice and in which gender equality is the absolute standard.
Female patients are subjected to a barrage of humiliation and degradation outside of clinics, which is truly appalling.
Then there are some who persist on distributing millions of flyers depicting graphic, bloody images of abortions, even if it means shoving them through the front doors of private houses where it is possible that children may come into contact with them.
Violence has unquestionably occurred, and it has included kidnapping, assault, attempted murder, murder, arson, bombings, and stalking, among other acts of violence.
Attacks have also been carried out in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and other countries.
As recently as late November 2015, a shooting at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs claimed the lives of three individuals and wounded numerous more.
It occurs even in Canada, which is regarded as a peaceful and moderate country.
In 1997, a sniper opened fire on Manitoba doctor Jack Fainman, an obstetrician who also performed abortions, while he was sitting in his living room.
He was able to live, but his injuries prevented him from returning to his previous profession as a doctor.
The anti-abortion movement has been tainted by violence, ugliness, and intolerance, and all indications are that these emotions and attitudes are only getting worse.
It’s also a rather recent development.
After three years of deliberation and debate, the Southern Baptist Convention, perhaps the most influential conservative denomination in North America, passed a resolution urging “Southern Baptists to work for legislation that will allow the possibility of abortion under such circumstances as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformity, and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of a mother.” The reference to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother who is carrying the fetus leaves the door wide open for abortion rights to be granted under certain circumstances.
- The exponential expansion of severe resistance to abortion among evangelical Christianity is also brought into sharp focus, making it appear incredibly current.
- In the United States, Republican politicians may hold a variety of positions on a variety of issues, but opposition to abortion has almost become a sacrament in the reactionary catechism of thought.
- A major element of control may be seen in all Christian resistance to abortion, a belief that women do not deserve autonomy and are instead vessels and vehicles for children.
- Aside from the apparent offensiveness of it all, it’s just not scriptural in the first place.
- Jesus’ mother, Mary, instructs him to perform his first miracle, the turning of water into wine, at the behest of a woman.
It is Mary who says, “He has shown strength with his arm; he has scattered the proud in their hearts.” In his reign, he has deposed the mighty from their thrones and exalted the lowly; in his reign, he has provided food for the hungry while sending the wealthy away empty.” Jesus is concerned with the humanity and equality of all people.
This magnificent rebel should not be reduced to a poster or a slogan that is used to harm half of the world’s population, causing them to become powerless and destitute in their own country.
All intellectual property rights are retained.
On November 3, 2021, the following correction was made: Clayton Waagner’s last name was misspelled in a previous version of this article.
Michael Coren is the author of seventeen books, four of which have been bestsellers, which have been published in twelve different languages worldwide. He is also an ordained minister in the Anglican Church of Canada, in addition to being an award-winning columnist. He currently resides in Toronto.
Join our community
Awarded journalism and online events are available at thewalrus.ca, as well as award-winning, independent, fact-checked journalism and online events. Our information is free and open to the public, but as a registered charity, we are unable to carry out our mission without the support of readers like you. You can contribute to The Walrus’s work online for as little as $5 per month. Interested? All supporters will receive a complimentary tote bag, as well as access to unique updates and the opportunity to become a part of the community that drives the work we do here.
Be part of The Walrus.
Donations made on a monthly basis will obtain a charity tax receipt.
What does the Bible really say about abortion?
As he makes his way outside St. John’s Church, which is across Lafayette Park from the White House, President Donald Trump carries a Bible on June 1, 2020, in Washington. (Photo courtesy of AP photographer Patrick Semansky) — The Royal National Society (RNS) One of the most memorable images in contemporary politics is that of President Donald Trump, who is widely considered to be the most profane person to have ever occupied the White House, holding a Bible in front of a boarded-up St. John’s Lafayette Church, a symbol of his unwavering commitment to his evangelical Christian supporters.
It is this same urge that has pushed Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative Catholic, to the threshold of the United States Supreme Court of the United States of America However, regardless of the president’s own personal morality, the argument goes, he supports “biblical ideals” and, as a result, may be considered as a representative of God.
- This gap is never more clear than in the argument over abortion and the alleged “right to life” of the unborn child.
- God warns Noah in Chapter 9 after the flood, “Whoever bleeds the blood of a human, by a human shall that person’s blood be spilt,” since “God created humans in his own image,” according to the Bible.
- Given that humans were made in the image of God, life is safeguarded, but the penalty for slaughter is much greater death.
- The Bible, on the other hand, is devoid of any mention of human rights.
- The dispute over the right to life is not mainly focused on the death sentence, but rather on abortion as a matter of principle.
- Abortion, on the other hand, is never referenced once in the whole corpus of biblical law.
- (Image courtesy of AP Photographer Alex Brandon) It is certain that the practice existed in antiquity.
Assyrians, who were predominantly known for their harshness in combat rather than for their care for the lives of the defenseless, were the only people in the ancient Near East who publicly denounced it.
The prophet Jeremiah blames the day he was born, as well as the man who informed his father of his birth, “since he did not murder me in the womb so that my mother would have become my tomb,” according to the prophet.
“When individuals who are fighting damage a pregnant woman such that she has a miscarriage but no other harm happens,” according to the text of Exodus’ 21st chapter (in Hebrew), there is a pecuniary punishment imposed on the perpetrators.
If the kid was not completely developed when it was born, the punishment is monetary, as was customary for property offences.
On the issue ofwhenthe fetus reaches this stage, opinions have fluctuated through the centuries.
If it has, abortion is no longer an option.
Modern medicine permits greater awareness of stages of development within the womb.
As far as abortion itself goes, the Jewish historian Josephus, writing at the end of the first century CE, claims that the Law of Moses — that is, the first five books of the Hebrew Bible or Old Testament — forbids abortion and regards it as infanticide, but there is no such law in the Bible.
There is no discussion of abortion in the New Testament.
RELATED: Is Kamala Harris anti-Catholic?
It simply says nothing about it.
It was a dangerous procedure, not to be undertaken lightly.
But for whatever reason, the Bible provides no definitive ruling on the subject.
Such putative rights have a place in modern discussion.
Christians can point to a long tradition of condemnation of abortion, dating back to the period just after the New Testament, and may reasonably feel that this tradition carries weight.
But Christians who turn to Scripture to trump a political debate with the force of biblical authority should be reminded that the Bible does not actually say anything at all on the topic.
(John J. Collins is Holmes Professor of Old Testament at Yale Divinity School and author of “What Are Biblical Values? What the Bible Says on Key Ethical Issues.” The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)
Jews, outraged by restrictive abortion laws, are invoking the Hebrew Bible in the debate
When Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, a Republican, signed into law one of the nation’s most severe abortion laws in May, she cited her religious beliefs as justification. ‘This legislation stands as a strong witness to Alabamians’ sincerely held belief that every life is valuable and that every life is a sacred gift from God,’ Governor Ivey said in a statement. When it comes to abortion access, this is a well-worn line of argument for the Republican Party. Kirk Cox, speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates, used biblical passages when he spoke out against a proposed law that would loosen limitations on late-term abortions in the state.
- “You stood by and watched as I was made in complete isolation as I was weaved together in the darkness of the womb,” she says.
- Nevertheless, for many Jewish religious authorities, such interpretations are troublesome, if not downright disrespectful.
- “It makes me apoplectic,” she adds.
- They’re exploiting my sacred scripture to justify stripping me of my liberties in a way that is both planned and craven,” says the author.
- It’s not simply that the United States shouldn’t be deriving legal authority from lyrical language, according to Ruttenberg.
- Contrary to orthodox Christians who think that a fetus symbolizes a human existence and that abortion is murder because it ends that life, Jews do not believe that fetuses have souls and thus feel that ending a pregnancy is not a crime.
- According to research conducted by the Pew Research Center, Jews are highly supportive of abortion rights (83 percent).
” What you need to know about abortion legislation: Abortion is allowed in which states?
Wade, the historic 1973 decision by the United States Supreme Court that established a woman’s right to an abortion, has been the target of Republican efforts to reverse it for decades.
All over the South, restrictive abortion legislation is being approved.
However, what is sometimes overlooked in the discussion is how Jews, who read the Hebrew Bible – which is referred to in Christian circles as the Old Testament — claim that their faith condones abortion in their own tradition.
When the mother’s life is in danger, the baby may even insist on it being done. “This is a significant achievement for us,” Ruttenberg adds. “We are unequivocal in our support for a woman’s right to choose.” Also, the separation of church and state is something we are quite clear about.”
What Jewish lawmakers say about abortion rights
Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., likes to joke that she took tikkun olam so seriously that she ended up in politics as a result of her devotion. Tickkun olam – Hebrew for “repair the world” – is a call to action in the Jewish faith, a notion defined by acts of compassion and service that contribute to the healing of the world. Wasserman Schultz, the first Jewish woman elected to represent Florida in Congress, believes her religious beliefs influence her political decisions on a daily basis.
” Therefore, when I consider a woman’s right to choose her own reproductive options, I consider the Jewish tradition that I’ve been taught, which holds that existing life should take precedence over potential life, and that a woman’s life and pain should take precedence over the life of an unborn child.
It is in Exodus Chapter 21, verses 22-23 that the strongest argument in the Hebrew Bible for abortion is found: “If people are fighting and someone hits a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows.” In the event of significant harm, you will be required to take a life for a life.” In this text, the phrase “gives birth prematurely” might refer to a miscarriage in which the fetus is stillborn.
Because there is no expectation that the person who caused the miscarriage would be held criminally accountable for murder, Jewish scholars say that a fetus is not regarded to be a separate person or to have a separate soul.
From conception till delivery, the fetus is regarded “mere fluid,” according to the Talmud, and remains as a part of the mother until she gives birth after the 40-day mark has passed.
Rabbi Elizer Waldenberg, a notable authority on Jewish law who died in 2006, noted in Tzitz Eliezer, his primary work, that “it is apparent that in Jewish law an Israelite is not susceptible to the death penalty for feticide.” An Israeli lady was granted permission to have a therapeutic abortion, despite the fact that her life was not in danger.
- This principle also enables a woman to seek an abortion, particularly if her own life is in danger.
- Her response is, “I’m not going to tell you that your interpretation of Scripture is erroneous,” she adds.
- During her 24 years as a member of the United States Senate representing California, Barbara Boxer was one of the most renowned Jewish senators in the country.
- However, that is precisely what they are – personal opinions, not anything on which everyone else should remark or on which legislation should be enacted.
and I believe I am demonstrating respect for religion by stating that I would fight for your rights regardless of your religious beliefs.”
Religious freedom concerns
According to Rabbi Michael Adam Latz of Minneapolis, the battle for abortion rights – as well as legislators who use their religious beliefs as justifications for passing specific legislation — is part of a bigger debate. That shouldn’t be a source of concern only for Jews, whose tradition teaches something different from Evangelical Christianity, according to him. Anyone who believes in religious liberty should be concerned about this. Although Latz acknowledges that there are others who disagree with him, he believes that imposing one faith tradition on a country that prides itself on religious plurality is “not truly how a democracy runs,” but rather how a theocracy functions.
Sheila Katz, the CEO of the National Council of Jewish Women, echoes this attitude in her speech.
When males try to exert control over women’s bodies, she adds, it gets her enraged.
According to her, “as Jews, we understand that real religious freedom is a shield to defend all religions, never a sword to discriminate.” “A lot of the time, it feels like religion is being used to discriminate – and that is not something we support, no matter what subject we are discussing.” Latz has spent a significant amount of time advocating about women’s rights, both from the pulpit and in informal talks with members of his church.
The directness with which he communicates, he claims, can catch some people off guard.
“This is only the most recent chapter.
Abortion felt like only option
According to at least one Jewish activist, this is especially true in this case. She didn’t necessarily want an abortion, but she felt she had no other option because she was pregnant. Nancy Litz didn’t want to get pregnant in 1967, and it was her first pregnancy. Litz, then a freshman in college, decided that terminating her pregnancy was a necessity six years before the Roe v. Wade decision would secure a woman’s access to a safe and legal abortion. In addition to her father’s death, her mother, who had always dreamt of going away to college herself, was going through what Litz characterized as “a brutally terrible period in her own life,” which she described as “a horribly traumatic point in her own life.” She had no idea that she was ruining a human life when she did what she did.
The lives of the individuals I already knew and loved were far more important to me than the lives of the people I met and fell in love with.” A friend introduced Litz to a doctor, who she claims informed her he was driven to conduct the unlawful treatment because he had daughters of his own who were college age and he didn’t want them to risk their lives in a risky, back-alley operation in the hope of escaping their predicament.
52 years later, Litz resides in St.
Her abortion experience was not horrible, and there were no long-term ramifications from it.
She is concerned about the possibility of Roe being reversed, as well as the way other religious leaders are framing the discussion surrounding abortion.
Litz shared his thoughts.
Litz converted to Judaism in his final years.
Even if she had been involved in the church at the time of her pregnancy, she doesn’t believe she would have sought advice from a minister since, in the 1960s, abortion was not something that was freely discussed.
She recalls that the media was preoccupied for a period of time with a woman who had traveled all the way to Japan in order to obtain abortion services.
Abortion in the United States would not be eliminated if Roe v.
This is what occurs after that.
Litz, like many other campaigners, is sure that criminalizing abortion would not stop it; rather, it will make it more lethal.
Several years after her abortion, Litz was moved to tears when she learned that in 1967, botched abortions were responsible for 42 percent of all maternal deaths in the United States.
Litz says she is frequently congratulated privately by other women who have had abortions, women who comment on her bravery and honesty, acknowledging that they would never be able to share their experiences publicly in the same manner she does.
We, as people of religion who have differing precise convictions about the significance of terminating a pregnancy, should be equally free to communicate our truth, why can’t we?
My disappointment is that the extreme right wing conservatives, that particular portion of Christianity, have taken over the entire issue. They position themselves as speaking on behalf of all persons of religion, while in reality, this is not the case.”