Why Did They Put Jesus On The Cross?

Why Was Jesus Crucified?

1. As recorded in the gospels, the primary accusation leveled against Jesus was that he claimed to be the Jewish King of Kings.
2. As soon as the Roman soldiers put on a purple robe and put on a crown of thorns on his head, it was clear that they were making fun of the idea.
3. This was also the charge that was written on the sign that was placed at the top of the cross.

However, the accusation was unfounded.The plot against Jesus had been devised by his opponents, who had twisted the meaning of ancient Jewish prophecies about the coming of the Messiah.A great future leader who would appear during a period of extreme desperation and crisis, known as the End Times, was described in those prophecies as ″the Messiah″ (or Last Days).

1. He would, with the assistance of God, overthrow all evil oppressors and establish a perfect kingdom on earth, where all righteous people would be able to live in peace and joy for all of eternity.
2. A large number of people believed that the End Times had already arrived and that the Messiah would soon appear during the years when Jesus was growing up.
3. This belief was particularly strong in Galilee, the region of Palestine where Jesus lived, and in other parts of the country as well.

In addition, when John the Baptist began proclaiming that all of the prophecies about the Messiah would be fulfilled soon after, the belief in him grew even stronger.Those prophecies, on the other hand, could be interpreted in various ways.Some scriptures, such as Isaiah 53, portray the Messiah as a devout, non-violent individual who will pave the way for the new kingdom by sacrificing himself to atone for humankind’s sins in order to bring about the return of the kingdom.Another set of scriptures describes him as a future descendant of King David, and the new kingdom is depicted as a refined version of David’s original kingdom.

Many common people interpreted these allusions to King David as implying that the Messiah would be primarily a military leader whose first act would be to organize a revolt against the hated Romans and drive them out of the country.The Romans were well aware of the widespread dissatisfaction in the country and the widespread expectation of a liberator.Throughout their empire, riots and uprisings were more common in Palestine than in any other part of the world.They were constantly on the lookout for potential rebel leaders because of the ongoing unrest.

When Jesus first began his ministry, he did not refer to himself as the Messiah in any way.He most likely realized that doing so would be risky, because even though he had made it clear that he had no plans to engage in military action, the authorities could have misinterpreted his intentions and arrested him regardless of whether he intended to do so.In Matthew 16:20, Jesus warns his disciples not to tell anyone that he is the Christ, which serves as an example of his caution.Messiah is the Aramaic word for Christ, and the word Christ is the English equivalent of that word.) In spite of his public silence about his plans, however, his teachings and miraculous cures soon began to draw large crowds, and within a short period of time, many people in Galilee began to suspect that he might be the Messiah.

• So when he and his disciples traveled to Jerusalem to attend the annual Passover festival, they were joined by a large group of followers who accompanied them on the journey.
• Due to the possibility that other groups of festival-goers joined the procession along the way, it is unclear how large the procession ultimately became.
• The procession, however, had grown in size by the time it reached Jericho, as many people in the city had heard about it and had gathered along the roadside to watch Jesus pass by as he traveled through town.

According to Luke 19:11, many of the travelers believed that the new and perfect Kingdom of God would be established at any time during the final stage of the journey to Jerusalem.This is an indication of the high level of excitement that exists among the members of the group at this particular time.In fact, the excitement lasted right up until the end of the journey, so that when Jesus finally arrived in Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, a large and enthusiastic crowd greeted him and welcomed him into the city.He became enraged at the dishonest merchants in the temple courtyard shortly after he arrived, and he launched a physical attack against them shortly after arriving.Some biblical scholars, on the lookout for hidden meanings, have contended that he was actually attempting to incite an uprising in the city when he said this.According to some, God was supposed to intervene and establish a new kingdom through divine intervention in his absence.

However, according to the gospels, Jesus’ primary concern during this time was preparing his disciples for his impending death and resurrection.Christians frequently hold the Jews responsible for his death.However, it is most likely that the Jewish religious leaders, who had managed to retain some of their power by cooperating with the Romans, should bear the brunt of the blame.These leaders were aware of the large crowds that had gathered around Jesus, and they were well aware that many people believed he was the Messiah.

1. ″They feared him because the entire crowd was astonished by his teaching,″ according to Mark 11:18.
2. However, their ultimate concern was probably more profound, because if a growing number of people came to believe that Jesus was the Messiah, he could eventually pose a serious threat to their authority, which they were clearly concerned about.
3. ″They were afraid of the crowd,″ according to Mark 12:12, which indicates that these religious leaders were initially hesitant to arrest Jesus.

However, at some point, they came to the conclusion that they needed to get rid of him.They were able to apprehend him late at night when there was no crowd to defend him because of the assistance of Judas Iscariot.After interrogating him until the wee hours of the morning, they handed him over to the Romans, accusing him of claiming to be a king in his own right.Under Roman law, anyone who claimed to be a king was considered to be in rebellion against the emperor and was punished accordingly.

1. The traditional method of punishment was crucifixion.
2. Nevertheless, the crucifixion couldn’t take place until the Roman governor Pontius Pilate gave the final approval, and the gospels indicate that he was apprehensive about doing so.
3. Apparently, he came to the conclusion that Jesus was innocent.
4. If he truly desired it, he had the authority to release Jesus from his captivity.
5. However, in his role as governor, he frequently required the cooperation of the Jewish community.
6. Moreover, in the end, he was more concerned with appeasing them than he was with saving Jesus.

As a result, the gospels place almost all of the blame for the crucifixion on the shoulders of the Jewish leaders.However, some scholars believe that the Romans should be held just as much, if not more, responsible for the events of the day.In fact, the Bible states in John 18:3 that Roman soldiers participated in Jesus’ initial arrest, implying that the Romans were involved in the matter almost from the beginning.Their military commanders kept a close eye on the city at all times, but especially during festivals and celebrations.You can imagine how easily they could have mistook Jesus for a political agitator or even a potential rebel leader.

Even a minor threat would get their attention, and they were usually quick to react to it.In most cases, when Jewish leaders wanted to kill someone, they would dispatch their henchmen to assemble a mob and stone the victim to death, according to tradition.Crucifixion was a Roman method of punishment, and it is an undeniable fact that it was Roman soldiers, not Jewish soldiers, who nailed Jesus to the cross in the first place.

In light of these considerations, some scholars believe that the Romans were the real perpetrators, and that the gospel writers attempted to conceal this by blaming the Jewish leaders instead of the Christians.The gospels were written during a period in which Christians were attempting to avoid conflict with the Romans, and placing the blame on the Romans could have exacerbated tensions between the two groups.It would have been far more convenient to place the blame on the Jews.

Other scholars, while acknowledging that the Romans played a role, believe that the Jewish leaders should bear the majority of the responsibility.These leaders were almost certainly terrified of Jesus, much more so than the Romans were.However, they would not have wanted the general public to hold them responsible for his death.To try to avoid this, they could have persuaded the Romans into believing that Jesus was a troublemaker, which would have allowed them to execute Jesus.A middle-of-the-road viewpoint holds that both groups, Jewish leaders and Romans, played significant roles.However, unless and until new evidence is discovered, there will almost certainly always be disagreement about who should bear the brunt of the blame.

In any case, the crucifixion can be explained as a natural consequence of the political circumstances that prevailed in Palestine at the time.In contrast to this, many Christians believe that Jesus’ suffering and death were pre-ordained by God as part of a divine plan in which Jesus was required to suffer and die as a sacrifice in order to atone for everyone’s sins.

Other Topics

• As recorded in the gospels, the primary accusation leveled against Jesus was that he claimed to be the Jewish king. As soon as the Roman soldiers put on a purple robe and put on a crown of thorns on his head, it was clear that they were making fun of him. On the sign at the top of the cross, there was also a fee inscribed on it. It turned out, however, that the accusation was incorrect. It was manufactured by the adversaries of Jesus, who twisted the meaning of ancient Jewish prophecies concerning the arrival of the Messiah to create their own narrative. A great future leader who would arrive at a moment of intense despair and disaster, known as the End Times, was described in those prophecies as the Messiah (or Last Days). He would, with the assistance of God, vanquish all wicked tyrants and establish a perfect kingdom on earth, in which all good people would be able to dwell in peace and joy for all eternity. A large number of people believed that the End Times had already arrived and that the Messiah would emerge shortly during the years when Jesus was growing up. Those who resided in Galilee, the region of Palestine where Jesus lived, were particularly firm in their conviction in the resurrection of Jesus. In addition, when John the Baptist began announcing that all of the prophecies regarding the Messiah would be fulfilled shortly after, the belief in him grew even more intense. However, many interpretations can be made of those prophecies. The Messiah, according to certain texts, such as Isaiah 53, is depicted as a devoted, non-violent person who would clear the way for the new kingdom by offering himself as a sacrifice to atone for the sins of humanity. Other texts characterize him as a future descendant of King David, and the new kingdom is shown as a pure version of David’s first kingdom. Many common people saw these allusions to King David as implying that the Messiah would be primarily a military commander whose first act would be to raise a rebellion against the despised Romans and drive them out of the land. The Romans were well aware of the widespread dissatisfaction in the nation, as well as the widespread expectation of a benevolent conqueror or liberator. Throughout their reign, riots and revolutions were more common in Palestine than in any other portion. Because of the ongoing instability, they were on the watch for prospective rebel leaders at all times. In his early ministry, Jesus did not refer to himself as the Messiah in any formal way. Even though he plainly did not want to engage in any form of military action, he may have known that doing so would be risky, since the authorities may have misinterpreted his intentions and detained him as a result. A good illustration of his caution may be seen in Matthew 16:20, where it says that ″he urged his followers not to tell anybody that he was the Messiah.″ Messiah is the Aramaic term for Christ, which is translated as Christ in English.) In spite of his public silence on his plans, however, his teachings and miraculous cures quickly started to draw great audiences, and within a short period of time, many people in Galilee began to suspect that he may be the Messiah. So when Jesus and his disciples traveled to Jerusalem to observe the yearly Passover celebration, they were joined by a huge group of followers who followed them on their journey. Because more groups of festival-goers may have joined the procession along the way, it’s unclear how large the procession ultimately grew. However, by the time it arrived at Jericho, it appeared to be huge enough to draw considerable attention, as many people in the city had heard that it was on its way and had gathered along the route to watch Jesus pass by. Following the teaching of Jesus in Luke 19:11, many travelers believed that God’s new perfect Kingdom would be established at any time during the last portion of their journey. This is an indicator of the high degree of enthusiasm that exists among the members of the group during this particular time of year. In fact, the enthusiasm lasted right up until the conclusion of the journey, so that when Jesus finally arrived in Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, a great and enthusiastic throng greeted him as he entered the city. He became enraged at the dishonest merchants in the temple courtyard shortly after he arrived, and he began a violent attack on them shortly after arriving. Theoretically, he was attempting to incite an insurrection in the city, say some biblical scholars who are on the lookout for hidden meanings. According to others, God was supposed to intervene and establish a new kingdom by divine intervention in his vision. However, according to the gospels, Jesus’ primary focus during this time was preparing his followers for his impending death and ascension into heaven. Christians frequently attribute his killing to Jewish conspirators. It seems likely that the Jewish religious leaders, who had managed to retain part of their influence by working with the Romans, should bear the brunt of this responsibility. There were large throngs surrounding Jesus, and these authorities were well aware that many people believed he was the Messiah. ″They terrified him because the entire audience was awestruck by his teaching,″ according to Mark 11:18. They were presumably most concerned about the possibility that a rising number of people might come to think that Jesus was the Messiah, and that this would pose a severe threat to their power. ″They were scared of the throng,″ according to Mark 12:12, which indicates that these religious leaders were originally hesitant to detain Jesus. Nonetheless, they eventually came to the conclusion that they needed to fire him. They were able to apprehend him late at night when there was no throng to protect him because of Judas Iscariot’s assistance. They gave him over to the Romans after interrogating him into the wee hours of the morning and accusing him of pretending to be a king. Anyone claiming to be a king was considered to be a rebel against the emperor under Roman law. Crucifixion was the standard method of punishment. Nevertheless, the crucifixion couldn’t take place until the Roman governor Pontius Pilate granted the final approval, and the gospels say that he was apprehensive about giving the order. Apparently, he came to the conclusion that Jesus was guilty. If he truly desired it, he possessed the authority to liberate Jesus from his prison. The participation of the Jewish leaders was necessary, however, given his capacity as governor. Und he was more concerned with appeasing them than he was in saving Jesus in the end. As a result, the gospels place almost all of the guilt for the crucifixion on the shoulders of the Jewish authorities. However, other academics believe that the Romans should be held just as much, if not more, responsible. In fact, the Bible states in John 18:3 that Roman troops participated in Jesus’ original arrest, implying that the Romans were involved in the situation practically from the start. In addition to keeping a tight eye on the city, their military leaders were particularly vigilant during festivals. Someone like Jesus may have easily been taken in by the crowds as an advocate for political change or even a possible rebellion leader. Even a tiny threat would get their attention, and they were typically fast to respond to it. In most cases, when Jewish leaders desired to assassinate someone, they would dispatch their minions to assemble a mob and stone the target to death. Crucifixion was a Roman means of punishment, and it is an undeniable truth that it was Roman troops, not Jewish soldiers, who nailed Jesus on the cross on Good Friday. As a result of these considerations, some academics believe that the Romans were the true perpetrators, and that the gospel authors attempted to conceal this by blaming the Jewish leaders. Considering that the gospels were written during a time when Christians were attempting to avoid conflict with the Romans, placing the responsibility on the Romans could have exacerbated the situation. It would have been far more convenient to point the finger upon the Jews instead. Other academics, although acknowledging that the Romans had a role, believe that the Jewish leaders should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the Holocaust. These leaders were very certainly terrified of Jesus, far more so than the Romans were of them. He died in a car accident, and his family would not have wanted the general public to hold them responsible. Instead, they might have persuaded the Romans into believing that Jesus was a troublemaker, allowing them to expel him without a struggle. Both parties, Jewish leaders and Romans, are considered to have played significant roles, according to a compromise viewpoint There will, however, almost certainly always be dispute over who should bear the brunt of the guilt, unless and until fresh information comes to light. However, the crucifixion might be interpreted as a logical consequence of the political situation that existed in Palestine at the time of Christ’s execution. In contrast to this, many Christians believe that Jesus’ suffering and death were pre-ordained beforehand, as part of a divine plan in which Jesus was required to suffer and die as a sacrifice in order to atone for everyone’s sins.

Nota bene: For further information on the crucifixion, please see this page about Why Jesus Was Crucified.

Why did Jesus go to the cross?

1. In reaction to some Christian hymns and lyrics that state things like, ″The sole reason Jesus went to the cross was for me,″ this article was written.
2. It was all due of His unfailing affection for me!″ When we read Mark 14:35, which explains what Jesus did in the Garden of Gethsemane, we are confronted with a significant theological difficulty.
3. As he moved closer to the earth, he prayed, hoping that the hour would pass him by if it were possible.

We could say to yourself, ″Oh, no!Jesus, how could You ever entertain the notion of not dying for my sins in order to spare me from eternal damnation?″Do You really don’t care about me?″ However, as we continue to read Mark’s story, we see that this was not at all what Jesus was thinking about.

1. During His time in Gethsemane, Jesus speaks nothing concerning His disciples’ salvation.
2. Jesus would have discussed the problem with His disciples if He had been hesitating in Gethsemane over the decision of whether or not to rescue His people (who certainly would have urged Jesus not to go to the cross).
3. Instead, Jesus prayed to God the Father about the prospect of escaping the pain that lied ahead of Him, and He completed his prayer by saying, ″Not what I desire, but what You want″ (not what I want, but what You want) (Mark 14:36).

As a matter of fact, Jesus was going to the crucifixion for the same fundamental reason that He had initially come to earth as God incarnate: it was the Father’s desire, and Jesus was completely dedicated to carrying out the Father’s plan.We have a tendency to conceive of the cross as being all about us.We believe that the entire purpose of Jesus’ death on the cross was to free us from our sins.However, from Jesus’ point of view, the crucifixion was all about God.

It was Jesus’ desire to serve His Father that led to His death on the cross.His greatest concern at Gethsemane was not the fact that He was the Good Shepherd, willing to lay down His life for His sheep (John 10:11; 15:13; 1 John 3:16), although this was a consideration.His greatest concern was with carrying out God’s plan in his life.While He was hanging on the cross, Jesus’ thoughts were captivated by God, as he said, ″My God, My God, why have You deserted Me?″ rather than ″Oh you wicked people of the world, why did you commit so much wickedness that I had to suffer like this in order to redeem you?″ Please understand that Jesus never ″waffled″ or pondered not going to the crucifixion; rather, Jesus was asking the Father if there was another way, while remaining firm in His desire to obey the Father’s plan for Him at the same time.

Jesus’ plea to be saved from the pain of the crucifixion was not expressed in a vacuum without concern for the salvation of His apostles and disciples.Throughout His ministry, He had frequently reassured His people of His love for them and the conviction that they would be saved.However, when Jesus was confronted with the most excruciating anguish and suffering that anybody could possibly endure—the payment of an enormously huge punishment for all of the sins of the whole human race—he experienced immense tension and emotional pressure.’If there is any other way,’ he pleaded, the Father’s will may be done without having to go through the awful pain of the crucifixion.

• Despite this, when everyone else would have backed out, Jesus went forward and died on the cross, completely surrendering to the will of His Father.
• As a result, from a theological standpoint, it is most true to state that Jesus went to the crucifixion in order to carry out the Father’s will, and that the Father sent Jesus to the crucified in order to free the world from sin.
• When it comes to John 3:16, it does not read, ″Jesus loved the world so much that He died on the cross to pay the penalty for everyone’s sin.″ ″For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whomever believes in Him will not perish but will have eternal life,″ the verse states.

A major reason for God’s sending Jesus to the cross was his incredible love for people all across the world (cf.Rom 5:8).In contrast to mainstream evangelical theology, which holds that there is little or no distinction between the Father and Jesus, the crucifixion can only be understood in the context of Jesus’ relationship with the Father.As an example, we should remember that it is incorrect and self-centered for us to conceive of things as if they are just concerned with ourselves.When Jesus went to the cross, He was not completely obsessed with us; rather, He was completely captivated with God (the Father).We, too, must be completely consumed by the desire to carry out God’s plan.

If we are, it will result in us doing what is best for our fellow man, since God loves humanity more than any of us could ever hope to be able to love him.Do you like what you’ve read so far?Purchase a cup of coffee for me.

Why Did Jesus Have to Die on the Cross?

1. It is not obvious why Jesus had to die on a cross, despite the fact that crucifixion was the most severe method of execution in Roman times, and therefore a suitable punishment for the crimes of all mankind at the time.
2. According to all evidence, the crucifixion was the only death that could bring about the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophesies, or predictions, regarding the Messiah’s death.
3. Numbers Chapter 21 is a historical account of a foreshadowing of Jesus’ crucifixion.

God had already rescued the Israelites from slavery in Egypt, according to the Bible.In the process, he had successfully navigated them across the Red Sea and drowned the Egyptian army that had pursued them.In the desert, He gave them with water and supernatural sustenance, known as manna, which appeared on the ground like dew in the early morning hours.

1. He even assisted them in defeating their adversaries.
2. However, the people became impatient and began to talk disparagingly about God and Moses, their leader.
3. They expressed dissatisfaction with Moses for leading them out to perish.

They claimed to despise the manna that God provided for them.Despite the fact that God had rescued them several times, they did not trust He would aid them this time.They chose despondency over faith, and in doing so, they dishonored the name of God.God then sent deadly snakes among them as a punishment for their sins.

A large number of Israelites were bitten and perished as a result.After that, the people went before Moses and confessed their sins to his face.They implored with Moses to urge God to send the snakes away, but Moses refused to listen.God responded by instructing Moses to carve a brass serpent and mount it on a pole as a memorial.

People who had been bitten and then stared upon the bronze snake were cured of their wounds.This episode was brought up by Jesus in connection with His own mission on earth.He stated that he would have to be picked up in the same way that Moses raised a serpent in the wilderness in order for Him to be saved.Jesus would be nailed on a cross (a pole) in order for those who believed in Him to be granted eternal life (John 3:14-15).

• Another chapter from the book of Isaiah foreshadows the way in which Jesus would be killed.
• According to his prophecy, the future Messiah would be ″pierced″ or ″pierced through″ as a punishment for our sins (Isaiah 53:5).
• King David foretold that the Messiah would die a horrible death.

It was written in his journal that bad men would pierce His hands and feet, that His heart would melt like wax within Him, that His life would be poured out like water while others looked on and gloated over Him, and that His heart and life would be spilled out like water.Almost every bone in his body would be out of alignment, and his tongue would become stuck to the roof of his mouth (Psalm 22:14-18).Despite the fact that Psalm 22 mentions a crucifixion, this method of death was unknown during David’s day.God only inspired David to be able to articulate what would eventually happen to Jesus because he had received divine inspiration.’I will pour forth on the house of David and the residents of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and intercession,’ the prophet Zechariah said.The LORD, who stretched out the heavens and laid the foundations of the earth, and who creates man’s spirit inside him, announces…

I, the one who has been pierced, will be looked at by them, and they will lament for him as one would mourn for an only child, and they will cry bitterly for him as one would grieve for a firstborn son (Zech.12:10 NIV).This verse not only foretold the way in which the Messiah would die, but it also foretold the identity of the person who would die: the Lord God Himself.Although we do not know why God selected crucifixion as the means of death for His Son, we do know that this method of death was a fulfillment of the Old Testament predictions regarding the Messiah’s arrival.

1. We also know that Jesus, God’s only Son, paid the punishment for all of mankind’s sins, including yours and mine, by His death on the cross.
2. We thank God for this gift.
3. Copyright courtesy of Jeanne Dennis, who has given permission for this usage.

Why was Jesus crucified?

1. Answer to the question There is an earthly cause for Jesus’ death, as well as a heavenly motive for his death.
2. Simply expressed, the worldly explanation for this is that mankind is a bad bunch of people.
3. God is good, and this is the heavenly reason for this.

The reason Jesus was crucified on this world was because mankind is bad.Men of evil plotted against Him, falsely accused Him, and assassinated Him.The officials of Israel had a variety of motives for wanting Jesus to be put to death on the cross.

1. They were envious of His adoring audience (Matthew 27:18).
2. Because they were concerned that Jesus would garner an excessive following, the Roman authorities may descend on the nation, forcing them to lose their positions, they sought to prevent this from happening (John 11:48).
3. They despised the fact that Jesus brought out their wrongdoing in such a prominent manner (Matthew 23).

And when He claimed to be the Son of God, they felt He was blaspheming (Luke 22:66–71).However, all of these arguments were only manifestations of their fundamental disbelief (John 5:46).Because the Romans were in charge of carrying out Jesus’ crucifixion, he was crucified rather than stoned, hung, drowned, or otherwise punished.The Roman Empire used the crucifixion as a means of execution to make a public spectacle of someone and to dissuade others from committing the same sin.

It was customary to affix the accusations against the condemned to the cross of the condemned.Pilate nailed the accusation ″King of the Jews″ to Jesus’ crucifixion, and he died as a result (Matthew 27:37).The Jewish leaders manufactured this claim in order to provoke the Roman governor into ordering Jesus’ execution.’If you let this man go, you are no friend of Caesar,’ the Jewish leaders sang over and over again.″ John 19:12 adds, ″From that point on, Pilate sought to release Jesus go, but the Jewish leaders continued chanting, ‘If you let this man go, you are no friend of Caesar.’″ Anyone who seeks to be a king is in direct opposition to Caesar.″ In order to avoid being perceived as harboring a challenger to Caesar, Pilate had to act quickly.

The divine cause for Jesus’ crucifixion is that God is good.A plan had been devised by God to redeem sinners, and Jesus was the Lamb of God who was sent to take away the sins of the world (John 1:29).Despite the fact that the act of crucifying Jesus was wicked, the crucifixion was nonetheless God’s intention to atone for sin on the part of mankind.″In fact, Herod and Pontius Pilate convened in this city with the Gentiles and the people of Israel in order to plot against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, and they conspired against him.″ They carried out what your power and will had determined should take place beforehand″ (Acts 4:27–28).

• In the instance of the crucifixion, it was not a matter of evil getting out of hand.
• ″You would have no power over me if it were not for the fact that it was granted to you from on high,″ Jesus said Pilate (John 19:11).
• The powers of darkness were given heavenly authorization to carry out their plans (Luke 22:53).

God permitted the enmity, the plot, the false charges, the sham trials, and the death of His Son to take place on the earth.God exploited the bad desires of evil men to accomplish the greatest good possible: the provision of redemption for all of mankind via the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.Because of this, Isaiah 53:10 says, ″It was the LORD’s desire that He be crushed and that He be put to grief.″ The outcome was glorious: ″He bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors″ (verse 12).There is nothing in the Old Testament prophesy that necessitates that the Messiah be crucified in order to save the world.At the same time, there are indications in the Law and the Prophets about the manner of His death that we can deduce.When Paul writes in Galatians 3:13, he is referring to the death of Christ and applying Deuteronomy 21:22–23.

The crucifixion made it possible for the ″pierce″ predicted in Zechariah 12:10 to take place (cf.John 19:37).Blood is spilt during the crucifixion process, which is essential for the offering of a sacrifice (Hebrews 9:22; cf.Leviticus 17:11).

1. It is possible to avoid the shattering of bones during crucifixion (Exodus 12:46; cf.
2. John 19:36).
3. Furthermore, the crucifixion of Christ corresponds exactly to the depiction of David’s agony in Psalm 22, which is found in the Bible.

Every one of us has committed crimes, and we are all deserving of death; nonetheless, Christ died in our place.In Romans 3:25–26, the apostle Paul says that He was publicly executed and that His blood was shed on our behalf: ″Through the shedding of his blood, God offered Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, to be received only through faith.In order to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus, he did this in order to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, because he had forbeared in leaving the sins committed previously unpunished—he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time in order to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.″ After all is said and done, the reason that Jesus was crucified is the explanation that each of us must come to comprehend and accept by faith: Jesus was killed to pay the penalty for my sin, allowing me to be forgiven and restored to right standing with God.Return to the previous page: Questions regarding Jesus Christ What was the reason for Jesus’ crucifixion?

Subscribe to the

Question of the Week

Get our Question of the Week emailed to your inbox every weekday morning! Got Questions Ministries is a trademark of Got Questions Ministries, Inc., registered in the state of California in the year 2002. All intellectual property rights are retained. Policy Regarding Personal Information The information on this page was last updated on January 4, 2022.

Why Did They Crucify Jesus?

1. When I hear the various sweet-sounding clichés that are thrown about nowadays, one that I hear frequently is that Jesus was crucified because he was incredibly inclusive and gentle.
2. It is reported that Jesus was crucified because he welcomed the outcasts.
3. He was slain because he was hanging around with prostitutes and half-breds, among other things.

He was slain because he was showing such bravery in his love, and his opponents couldn’t take it any longer.There is a lot of truth in these remarks.All of those who have a true understanding of Christ will embrace his great grace, rejoice the expansiveness of his mercy, and cringe at the thought of being among people who do not understand what it means to be forgiven or to forgive others.

1. However, this does not imply that the platitude is accurate, nor does it imply that it is harmless.
2. The ideals of our society have been absorbed by many Christians, many churches, and not a few once-proud Christian organizations, to the point that emotion is confused for theology and slogans are mistaken for biblical interpretation.
3. Jesus was executed because of his godlike behavior and his wild claims to deity, which is something that the gospel authors all across the world strive to downplay or embellish.

Matthew 26:63-66 is a biblical passage.But Jesus remained deafeningly silent.When asked whether he was Jesus Christ, the high priest said, ″I adjure you by the living God, tell us whether you are the Christ, the Son of God.″ ″You have stated that you would do so,″ Jesus responded.Nevertheless, I assure you that from this time forward, you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and ascending on the clouds of sky.″ Then the high priest tore his garments and cried out, ″He has spoken blasphemy against the Most High.″ What further witnesses do we require?

You have now been exposed to his blasphemy.″How do you feel about it?″ They responded, ″He is deserving of death.″ In Luke 15:2, the people expressed displeasure with Jesus for dining with sinners and tax collectors (Luke 15:2), but they executed him because he claimed to be God’s Son and the King of Israel.Matthew 27:39-43 (NASB) ″You who would demolish the temple and restore it in three days, spare yourselves!″ said others who went by, shaking their heads.Let us know whether you are the Son of God by coming down from the crucifixion.″ Likewise, the top priests, together with the scribes and the elders, made fun of him, saying: ″He rescued others, but he cannot save himself.″ His title is ″King of Israel,″ and if he can come down from the cross today, we will accept him as our Messiah.

He puts his confidence in God; let God deliver him now, if that is what he chooses.Because Jesus declared, ″I am the Son of God.″ Although Jesus’ teachings on Torah repeatedly infuriated Jewish rabbis, it was his self-identification that prompted them to murder him.″It was for this reason that the Jews were attempting to assassinate him even more, since not only was he violating the Sabbath, but he was also addressing God as his own Father, thereby elevating himself to the status of God.″ (See also John 5:18.) ″Jesus said to them, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.’″ ″Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.″ As a result, they gathered stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and fled from the temple″ (John 8:58-59).Rather than assuming that Jesus was most despised because he was so kind and forgiving, we should remember that the Jews stated unequivocally, ″It is not for a good work that we are going to stone you, but for blasphemy, because you have declared yourself to be God″ (John 10:33).

• Is it possible that Jesus shook the delicate scruples of the ostensibly religious?
• Yes.
• Did his soft heart cause the hard-hearted to become enraged?

Yes.Did he annoy the gatekeepers by extending forgiveness to any sinner who repents and believes in Jesus?He did, in fact, do so.But let us not trade away the scandal of the gospel story for a sloppily prepared bowl of populist mush.The claims to Lordship, the posture of authority, the exalted titles, the exercise of Messiahship, the presumed right to forgive, the way in which Jesus placed himself at the center of Israel’s story, the delusions of grandeur, the acceptance of worship, and the audacity of man claiming to be God were the things that infuriated the establishment the most.Jesus did not die because the nasties in Jerusalem couldn’t stand the sight of a beefed-up version of Sesame Street, as some believe.

The reason he died was because he behaved and spoke in the manner of the incarnate Son of God, and because he refused to deny that he was the incarnate Son of God when the world despised him for being that Son of God.He holds a PhD from the University of Leicester and serves as senior pastor of Christ Covenant Church in Matthews, North Carolina.He also serves on the council of The Gospel Coalition and is an associate professor of systematic theology at Reformed Theological Seminary in Philadelphia (Charlotte).He is the author of a number of books, including the bestseller Just Do Something.

1. Kevin and his wife, Trisha, have nine children: Ian, Jacob, Elizabeth, Paul, Mary, Benjamin, Tabitha, Andrew, and Susannah.
2. Kevin and Trisha have nine children: Ian, Jacob, Elizabeth, Paul, Mary, Benjamin, Tabitha, Andrew, and Susannah.

Jesus, King of the Jews – Wikipedia

1. The King of the Jews (or the King of the Judeans) is a title that Jesus is given both at the beginning of his life and at the conclusion of it in the New Testament.
2. Basileus ton Ioudaion ( v ) is how this is expressed in the Koine Greek of the New Testament, for example, in John 19:3.
3. In the New Testament, both instances of the title culminate in dramatic outcomes in the narratives.

In the Gospel of Matthew’s account of Jesus’ birth, the Biblical Magi, who had traveled from the east, address Jesus as ″King of the Jews,″ prompting Herod the Great to order the Massacre of the Innocents.The use of the title ″King of the Jews″ at the close of the stories of all four canonical Gospels, in the narrative of the Passion of Jesus, leads to charges against Jesus, which ultimately result in his execution and burial.During Jesus’ crucifixion, the Latin inscription (in John 19:19), which in English translates to ″Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews,″ was written in three languages: Hebrew, Latin, and Greek, according to John 19:20.

1. The initialism INRI (Latin: Isus Nazarenus, Rx Idaerum) represents the Latin inscription, which in English translates to ″Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Aside from the Magi, Pontius Pilate, and the Roman troops, gentiles are the only ones who refer to Jesus as ″King of the Jews″ throughout the New Testament.
2. The Jewish authorities, on the other hand, refer to Jesus as ″Christ,″ which literally translates as ″Messiah.″ Despite the fact that the phrase ″King of the Jews″ is used in the majority of English translations, the phrase ″King of the Judeans″ has also been used (see Ioudaioi).

In the nativity

1. The Biblical Magi visit King Herod in Jerusalem during the tale of Jesus’ birth in the Gospel of Matthew, and in Matthew 2:2 they inquire about the whereabouts of ″him who is born King of the Jews.″ Herod inquires of the ″leading priests and professors of the law″ in Bethlehem of Judea, who inform him of the situation.
2. Herod, who considers the title his own, is troubled by the matter, and in Matthew 2:7–8, he interrogates the Magi regarding the precise hour of the Star of Bethlehem’s arrival.
3. Herod sent the Magi to Bethlehem, instructing them to alert him if they come across the child’s crib.

Following their discovery of Jesus and presentation of their gifts, the Magi, having been warned in a dream not to return to Herod, returned to their homeland in a different manner.Joseph has a dream in which an angel appears to him and tells him that he must take Jesus and Mary to Egypt (Matthew 2:13).When Herod discovers that he has been outwitted by the Magi, he orders the execution of all boys under the age of two in Bethlehem and its surrounding areas.

1. (Matthew 2:16; Mark 2:16)

In the Passion narratives

1. Throughout the narratives of Jesus’ Passion, the title ″King of the Jews″ is employed on three separate occasions throughout the narrative.
2. At least four Gospels claim that the title was applied to Jesus when he was interrogated by Pilate, and that his execution was carried out on the basis of that charge, as recorded in Matthew 27:11, Mark 15:2, Luke 23:3, and John 18:33.
3. On the cross at Ellwangen Abbey in Germany, the acronyms for ″Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews″ are written in three languages (as in John 19:20) in the shape of a cross.

The conversation between Jesus and Pilate revolves upon the terms ″king″ and ″kingdom,″ as well as the role of the Jews in accusing Jesus of being a king and accusing him of being a kingdom.In Mark 15:2, Jesus only affirms to Pilate that he is the King of the Jews and does not say anything further about it.His statement ″My kingdom is not of this world″ (John 18:36) suggests that the king’s charge did not start with Pilate, but rather with ″others.″ In John 18:34, Jesus implies that the king’s accusation did not originate with Pilate, but rather with ″others.″ Jesus, on the other hand, does not explicitly reject that he is the King of the Jews.

1. A sign that will be put on the cross of Jesus is described in the New Testament as ″Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews″ by Pilate in the New Testament.
2. According to John 19:21, the Jews instructed Pilate not to write ″King of the Jews,″ but rather to write that Jesus had only claimed that title; but, Pilate went ahead and wrote it anyway.
3. ″What I have written, I have written,″ Pilate says in response to the objection, according to John’s account.

According to Matthew 27:29–30, Mark 15:17–19, and John 19:2–3, after Jesus’ trial before Pilate and after the episode of the flagellation of Christ, the soldiers mock Jesus as the King of Jews by donning a royal purple robe (which signifies royal status) and placing a Crown of Thorns on his head, as well as beating and mistreating him.It is important to note that the Judeans’ continuing dependence on the title ″king″ in order to push accusations against Jesus is a significant factor in their ultimate decision to crucify him.During the trial of Jesus in John 19:12, Pilate requests that Jesus be released.The Jews, however, oppose, stating that ″if thou release this man, thou art not Caesar’s friend: every one that maketh himself a king speaketh against Caesar,″ bringing Caesar’s power to the center of the discussion.

The Jews then scream out in John 19:12, as follows: ″He must be executed!Caesar is the only monarch we have.″ In this context, the early Church’s use of the phrase ″King of the Jews″ after Jesus’ death was not without risk, because the word may have led to their arrest and punishment as followers of Jesus, who was accused of possible revolt against the Roman Empire.Luke 23:36–37 is the only place that the title is used in its complete form.When the soldiers come up to Jesus on the crucifixion, they insult him and give him vinegar.

They tell him, ″If thou are the King of the Jews, rescue thyself.″ This occurs after Jesus has carried his cross to Calvary and been nail to the cross.Similarly, in Matthew 27:42, the Jewish priests refer to Jesus as ″King of Israel,″ stating, ″He is the King of Israel; let him now down from the cross, and we will believe in him.″

King of the Jews vs King of Israel

1. In the New Testament, the title ″King of the Jews″ is solely used by gentiles, such as the Magi, Pontius Pilate, and Roman troops, and is never used by Jews themselves.
2. The Jewish leadership, on the other hand, prefers the title ″King of Israel,″ which appears in Matthew 27:42 and Mark 15:32.
3. From Pilate’s standpoint, the title ″King″ (regardless of whether it refers to Jews or Israel) is particularly problematic since it indicates the possibility of a revolt against the Roman Empire.

In the Gospel of Mark, the difference between King of the Jews and King of Israel is made purposefully, distinguishing between the two meanings of the phrase by Jews and gentiles, and establishing a clear separation between them.

INRI and ΙΝΒΙ

1. It is represented by the initialism INRI, which is derived from the Latin inscription IESVS NAZARENVS REX IVDORVM (Isus Nazarenus, Rx Idaerum), which means ″Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews″ in English translation (John 19:19).
2. In John 19:20, it is stated that this document was written in three languages–Hebrew, Latin, and Greek–and that it was nailed to Jesus’ crucifixion.
3. For example, the initialism (Ioudain) is written in the Greek language, and it represents the phrase v (Ioudain ho Nazraîos ho basileos tôn Ioudain) in the English language.

Pedro González de Mendoza discovered what was believed to be the original tablet, which had been carried to Rome by Saint Helena, mother of Emperor Constantine, in 1492.The discovery was hailed with great joy by the religious community.

Western Christianity

1. Traditionally, in Western Christianity, most crucifixes and many depictions of Jesus’s crucifixion include a plaque or parchment placed above his head, which is known as a titulus, or title, and which bears only the Latin letters INRI.
2. The letters INRI are occasionally carved directly into the cross and are usually placed just above the head of Jesus.
3. When referring to the Eastern Church, the title ″King of Glory″ (tês Dóxs) may be employed.

Eastern Christianity

1. In Eastern Christianity, the Greek letters are used by both the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Eastern Catholic specific churches sui iuris, which are based on the Greek form of the inscription .
2. While some representations change the title to ″ho Basileùs toû kósmou,″ ″The King of the World,″ or ″ho Basileùs tês Dóxs,″ this does not imply that this is what was written, but rather that it reflects the tradition that icons depict the spiritual reality rather than the physical reality of the figure.
3. The Romanian Orthodox Church uses the acronym INRI since it is the same in Romanian as it is in Latin, and it is easier to remember (Iisus Nazarineanul Regele Iudeilor) For example, the Russian Orthodox Church uses the acronym INTsI (in Church Slavonic: ис нaрнин, р деск) or the title Tsar Slávy (Tsar Slávy, ″King of Glory″) to refer to the Russian monarch.

Versions in the gospels

	Matthew	Mark	Luke	John
Verse	Matthew 27:37	Mark 15:26	Luke 23:38	John 19:19–20
Greek Inscription	οὗτός ἐστιν Ἰησοῦς ὁ βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων	ὁ βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων	ὁ βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων οὗτος	Ἰησοῦς ὁ Ναζωραῖος ὁ βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων
Transliteration	hûtós estin Iēsûs ho basileùs tôn Iudaéōn	ho basileùs tôn Iudaéōn	ho basileùs tôn Iudaéōn hûtos	Iēsûs ho Nazōraêos ho basileùs tôn Iudaéōn
English translation	This is Jesus, the King of the Jews	The King of the Jews	This is the King of the Jews	Jesus the Nazarene, the King of the Jews
Languages			Hebrew, Latin, Greek
Full verse in KJV	And set up over His head His accusation written, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS	And the superscription of His accusation was written over, THE KING OF THE JEWS.	And a superscription also was written over Him in letters of Greek, and Latin, and Hebrew, THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.	And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Other uses of INRI

• Any offensive term or phrase is denoted by the word inri in Spanish, and it is most commonly encountered in the fixed statement por más/mayor inri (meaning ″for more/greater insult″), which idiomatically translates as ″to add insult to injury″ or ″to make matters worse.″ The capitalization para más INRI can occasionally make its origins more obvious, for example. With the addition of various extensions, the initials INRI have been reinterpreted (backronyms). Marcello Reghellini de Schio claimed in an 1825 book on Freemasonry that the Rosicrucians attributed the alchemical meanings to the letters ″INRI″: Several sources use the Latin phrase Igne Natura Renovatur Integra (″by fire, nature renews itself″)
• other sources use the phrase Igne Natura Renovando Integrat
• Latin Igne Nitrum Roris Invenitur (″the nitre of dew is discovered by fire″)
• Hebrew Iamin, Nour, Rouach, Iebeschal
• the Greek words (″water,″ ″fire,″ ″wind,″ and ″earth″ — the four elements)
• and the

1. Later writers have linked them to Freemasonry, Hermeticism, or neo-paganism as the source of these occurrences.
2. In his book The Temple of Solomon the King, Aleister Crowley discusses the Augoeides, which he claims was written by ″Frater P.″ of the A.A.: ″For since Intra Nobis Regnum deI, all things are in Ourself, and every Spiritual Experience is a more or less full Revelation of Him.″ The Latin phrase Intra Nobis Regnum deI literally translates as ″Within Us, the Kingdom of God.″ INRI is interpreted as ″Iron Nails Ran In″ by Leopold Bloom, the supposedly Catholic, ethnically Jewish protagonist of James Joyce’s novel Ulysses, who is also a Catholic.
3. The same notion is conveyed by a character in Ed McBain’s novel Doors, published in 1975.

The majority of Ulysses translations retain ″INRI″ while creating a new misconception, such as the French phrase Il Nous Refait Innocents, which translates as ″he makes us innocent again.″

Gallery

Biblical scenes

• In Matthew 2:2, the Magi come to Herod to inquire about the newborn King of the Jews. In Mark 15:2, Pilate is accused of trying and handing over Jesus, the King of the Jews. In John 19:2–3, Jesus with a royal purple robe is mocked and beaten as the King of the Jews. In Luke 23:36–37, Jesus, on the cross, is mocked as the King of the Jews. In John 19:2–3, Jesus with a royal purple robe

INRI examples

• There’s an old Latin cross with a stylised INRI plaque on it in a cornfield outside the Austrian town of Mureck. There’s also a detail from The Small Crucifixion, a painting by Matthias Grünewald from around 1510, on display at the National Gallery of Art in Washington.

See also

• Christ (title)
• Christ the King
• Ichthys
• Jesus in Christianity
• Kings of Israel and Judah
• Jesus’ names and titles in the New Testament
• Christ (title)
• Christ the King
• Jesus was put on trial by the Sanhedrin
• Titulus Crucis is a Latin phrase that means ″Christ’s Cross.″
• Heresy in three languages
• Matthew 2, Matthew 27, Mark 15, Luke 23, John 19, and other related Bible passages

References

Notes

Citations

1. In 2007, Boxall published on page 125. In 2007, France published on page 1048. In 2007, Boxall published on page 125. in 2007 Boxall published on page 125. in 2007 Boxall published on page 1048 (See also Hengel 2004, p. 46
2. Luke 22:67, 23:1, and other passages.) Brown 1994, pp. 78–79.
3. Binz 2004
4. Ironside 2006
5. Brown 1988, pp. 32–33.
6. De Bles 1925
7. Aslanoff 2005
8. ″inri″. Diccionario de la lengua espaola
9. ″inri″. Diccionario de la lengua espaola
10. ″inri″. Diccionario de la lengua espaola
11. ″inri″. Diccionario (in Spanish). The Real Academia Espanola is a Spanish academic institution. The following are citations: de Schio 1825, p. 12
12. Crowley 1909, p. 160
13. Bloom 1989, p. 335
14. Ellmann 2010
15. McBain 2017
16. Szczerbowski 1998
17. Crowley 1909
18. Bloom 1989
19. Crowley 1909
20. de Schio 1825
21. Crowley 1909
22. de Schio 1825
23. Crowley 1909
24. de Schio 1825
25. de Schio 1825
26. de Schio 1825
27. de Schio 1825

Sources

• A. Andreopoulos, A. Andreopoulos, A. Andreopoulos, A. (2005). The Transfiguration in Byzantine Theology and Iconography: A Study of the Metamorphosis ISBN 978-0-88141-295-6
• Aslanoff, Catherine
• St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press
• ISBN 978-0-88141-295-6 (2005). 0-88141-130-2
• Binz, Stephen. The Feasts of Jesus Christ: The Incarnate God. ISBN 0-88141-130-2. (2004). The names of Jesus are listed here. ISBN 1-58595-315-6
• OCLC 56392998
• Bloom, Harold. Mystic, CT: Twenty-Third Publications
• ISBN 1-58595-315-6
• (1989). The middle of the twentieth century. Vol. 9 of The Art of the Critic is available now. 978-0-87754-502-6
• Boxall, Ian. Chelsea House. ISBN 978-0-87754-502-6. (2007). The New Testament books are covered in detail in this SCM study guide. In London, SCM Press has published a book with the ISBN 978-0-334-04047-7 and the OCLC number 171110263. * Brown, R.E., et al (1988). A Concise Commentary on the Gospel of John and the Epistles of John. Commentary in a nutshell. 0-8146-1283-5
• Brown, R.E., ed., Liturgical Press, ISBN 978-0-8146-1283-5
• Brown, R.E., ed., Liturgical Press, ISBN 978-0-8146-1283-5
• Liturgical Press, ISBN 978-0-8146-1283-5 (1994). Introduction to the Christology of the New Testament. 978-0-8264-7190-1
• Crowley, Aleister, Bloomsbury Academic, ISBN 978-0-8264-7190-1 (March 1909). ″The Temple of Solomon the King,″ as the phrase goes. The Autumnal Equinox. Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, 1 (1): 160
• De Bles, A., 1 (1): 160
• Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, 1 (1): 160
• Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, 1 (1): 160 (1925). How to Tell the Difference Between Saints in Art Based on Their Costumes, Symbols, and Attributes Art Culture Publications, New York, ISBN 978-0-8103-4125-8
• de Schio, Marcello Reghellini
• de Schio, Marcello Reghellini (1825). In the spirit of the Franche-dogma Maçonnerie’s (in French). H. Tarlier and Maud Ellmann are published in Brussels (2010). In the Nets of Modernism are Henry James, Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, and Sigmund Freud, among other writers and thinkers. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-139-49338-3
• France, R. T. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-139-49338-3
• (2007). Matthew’s Gospel is a collection of stories about Jesus’ life and teachings. OCLC 122701585
• Hengel, Martin, ed., Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, ISBN 978-0-8028-2501-8. (2004). Studies on the early history of Christianity. Ironside, H.A., A&C Black, ISBN 0-567-04280-4
• A&C Black, ISBN 0-567-04280-4
• A&C Black, ISBN 0-567-04280-4 (2006). Ironside Expository Commentaries Series, by John Ironside. 978-0-8254-9619-6 (Kregel Publications)
• Lanciani, R.A. (Lanciani, R.A., et al., eds., Kregel Publications, ISBN 978-0-8254-9619-6 (Kregel Publications)
• Lanciani, R.A. (1902). The history of Rome’s archaeological sites, as well as news on the city’s antiquity collections (in Italian). E. Loescher and Ed. McBain are the authors of Vol. I. (2017). ″Second Part.″ Doors. ISBN 978-1-78854-045-2
• Mihálycsa, Erika
• ISBN 978-1-78854-045-2
• (2017). ″’Weighing the point’: A Few Points on the Writing of Finitude in Ulysses″ is a piece written by James Joyce. Joyce’s Temporalities are being read. ISBN 978-90-04-34251-4
• Quigley, Megan. ISBN 978-90-04-34251-4. (2015). Modernist Fiction and Vagueness: Philosophical, Formal, and Linguistic Considerations Robbins, V.K., ed., Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-316-19566-6
• Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-316-19566-6
• Robbins, V.K. (1996). Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretations is a guide to exploring the texture of texts. The Bloomsbury Academic edition has the ISBN 978-1-56338-183-6 and the Senior, Donald (1985). Volume 1: The Passion of Jesus as Told in the Gospel of Matthew M. Glazier, ISBN 0-89453-460-2
• Szczerbowski, Tadeusz, ISBN 0-89453-460-2 (1998). ″Language Games in Translation: Etymological Reinterpretation of Hierograms″ is an article published in the journal Translation Studies. Jürg Strässler’s article (ed.). Tendenzen in Europäischer Linguistik: Proceedings of the 31st Linguistischen Kolloquium, Bern 1996, p. 157. Linguistiche Arbeiten, vol. 381, p. 381–391. ISBN 9783110913767
• Strecker, G.
• Horn, F.W., eds., Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 9783110913767
• ISSN 0344-6727
• Strecker, G.
• Horn, F.W. (2000). The New Testament’s theology is discussed here. Presbyterian Publishing Corporation, ISBN 978-0-664-22336-6
• Weiss, R. Presbyterian Publishing Corporation, ISBN 978-0-664-22336-6
• Weiss, R. (1969). The Renaissance’s Discovery of Classical Antiquity was a watershed moment in history. Project for an electronic history book. Humanities Press, ISBN 978-80-13-01950-9
• ISBN 978-80-13-01950-9

Pilate’s court – Wikipedia

Pilate’s court refers to the trial of Jesus in the praetorium before Pontius Pilate, which was preceded by the Sanhedrin Trial, which is recorded in the canonical gospels.According to the Gospel of Luke, Pilate discovers that Jesus, being from Galilee, falls within the authority of Herod Antipas, and thus he resolves to hand Jesus up to Herod.After interrogating Jesus and obtaining only a few responses, Herod concludes that Jesus poses no threat and sends him back to Pilate.It has been pointed out that Pilate appears as an advocate for Jesus rather than as a judge in an official court, which is a significant distinction.In the Gospel of John (18:28-19:13), Pilate’s ″to-ing and fro-ing,″ that is, his back and forth movement from within the praetorium to the outer courtyard, implies that he is ″wavering in his beliefs.″

Background

Pilate was subservient to the Roman legate in Syria in his capacity as prefect of Roman Judea.Pilate was a Roman general who lived on the seaside at the city of Caesarea Maritima.When he needed to be in Jerusalem, he made use of the palace compound erected by Herod the Great, which served as his praetorium, or administrative headquarters.The palace, which was located in the western section of the upper city and functioned as a pleasant ho