Who Saw Jesus First After He Resurrected

To Whom Did Jesus Appear after His Death?

They were the primary reason the disciples believed in the resurrection of Jesus because they witnessed Him alive after He had been declared dead. Jesus appeared to His disciples in a living state on a number of occasions throughout His ministry. It is as a result of this that we see them testifying time and time again to the fact that they were eyewitnesses to His resurrection. Because the disciples had direct knowledge of the resurrection, they provide a significant argument in favor of the resurrection of Christ.

The Testimony of Jesus Regarding His Resurrection Jesus’ own personal witness of His resurrection from the dead is the first piece of evidence.

And I am in possession of the keys of death and Hades (Revelation 1:18).

Take a look at my fingers and toes.

• You can feel my flesh and bones, and you will realize that a ghost does not have flesh and bones, as you can see I do (Luke 24:39).
• The following were the people who made an appearance.
• Mary Magdalene was the first person to see Jesus after he ascended into heaven.
• ‘Woman, what is the cause of your tears?’ Jesus inquired.
• She turned to face him and said, ‘Rabboni!’ (which translates as ‘Teacher’) (John 20:14-16).
• Mary the Mother of James, Salome, and Joanna are three of the most important women in the Bible.
• This occurred following the apparition of Jesus to Mary Magdalene.

And lo and behold, Jesus came up to them and welcomed them.

Once again, we are treated to an unexpected appearance.

Peter When Paul mentions witnesses, Peter is the first to come to mind, and he is also the first of the apostles to view the resurrected Christ.

The gospels are utterly deafeningly quiet about the specifics of this gathering.

On the Road to Emmaus, There Were Two Disciples Later on Easter Sunday, Jesus appeared to two disciples on the road to Emmaus, according to the Gospel of Luke.

And they were having a conversation with one another about all that had happened.

However, they were unable to recognize him because of their eyesight (Luke 24:13-16).

It was in reality because they had lost faith in Him that they were departing from Jerusalem.

This is the final of Jesus’ five appearances on Easter Sunday, and it is the most dramatic.

It is reported in both Luke’s and John’s gospels, providing us with two completely separate versions of what occurred in that day.

Following his statement, he demonstrated his hands and his side to the group of onlookers.

However, Thomas, one of the twelve disciples, known as Didymus, was not there when Jesus appeared (John 20:19, 20, 24).

It was eight days later when He reappeared, this time with Thomas in attendance.

Jesus entered through the closed doors and stood in the center of the crowd, saying, “Peace to you!” “Reach your finger here and look at my hands,” he instructed Thomas.

‘Do not be unbelievers, but rather believers.” After that, Thomas responded by exclaiming to him, ‘My Lord and My God!

Another appearance took place on the Sea of Galilee, where Jesus appeared to seven disciples.

Simon Peter, Thomas named Didymus, Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, as well as two other disciples, were all present at the same time (John 21:1, 2).

Additionally, the story of Jesus coming before His eleven disciples in Galilee is told in the Bible.

And when they saw him, they worshipped him; nevertheless, some were hesitant to do so (Matthew 28:16, 17).

On another instance, Jesus appeared to over 500 individuals at the same time on a single date.

James In addition, the Bible claims that Jesus appeared to His half-brother James.

The specifics of this apparition have not been documented.

And as he went, he drew close to Damascus, at which point a halo of light flashed around him from above.

In response, the Lord responded, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting” (Acts 9:3-5).

They were successful in convincing His disciples that He had resurrected from the grave.

Furthermore, Jesus demonstrated to them that he was alive after his suffering via several persuasive demonstrations, coming to them over a period of forty days and spoke of matters pertaining to the kingdom of God (Acts 1:3) SummaryAccording to the Bible, Jesus made a number of public appearances following His death.

In the Bible, it is expressly stated that on Easter Sunday, Jesus appeared to Mary Magdalene, the ladies who came to Jesus’ tomb (Mary the Mother of James, Salome, and Joanna), Peter, and two disciples who were traveling on the Emmaus road.

Later, he appeared in front of them with Thomas in attendance.

During another appearance, he was in front of more than five hundred individuals at the same time.

The character James makes an appearance as well. At long last, Jesus appeared to Saul of Tarsus, the man who would go on to become known as the Apostle Paul. Any of these appearances convinced His disciples that He had risen from the grave beyond all reasonable doubts.

Who saw the risen Jesus first? Mary Magdalene? Peter? Cleopas? Who?

Who was the first person to see Jesus? (MATT28:9) The Virgin Mary is the only one to whom Jesus makes his first appearance (MARK16:9). Jesus makes his first appearance solely to Mary Magdalene (LUKE24:15-18) To Cleopas and another person, Jesus makes his first public appearance (JOHN20:14) One and only Mary Magdalene is there when Jesus makes his first appearance (1Cor15:5). Jesus makes his first appearance to Cephas (PETER). Who was the first person to see Jesus? Mary Magdalene, I believe, was the first person to view the resurrected Jesus after he rose from the dead.

• This viewpoint is supported by the Bible’s passage John 20:14.
• On the basis of what I perceive to be a “compressed” or “telescoped” account presented in Matthew 28:9, I also assume that the other Mary was the second person to witness the rising Jesus.
• Mark makes no mention of the other Mary or anybody else in the story.
• There is nothing solid about Mark 16:9, save that it claims that Mary Magdalene was the first to be crucified.
• After learning that Jesus was not in the tomb, the disciples were surprised when Jesus appeared to “them” in Matthew 28:9, according to the Bible.
• Consequently, it is probable that Mary Magdalene was the first to see Jesus, and that the other Mary saw him shortly after her encounter.
• Alternatively, it’s possible that Mark 16:9 intentionally chose to focus primarily on Mary Magdalene, and that the other Mary was also in attendance.

According to Luke 24:15-18, the “women” went to the tomb and discovered that Jesus had not been found there.

He does, however, claim that Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and a lady named Joanna went to the other disciples to inform them that Jesus had risen from the dead.

Or did Joanna come upon Mary Magdalene and the other Mary as they were making their way out from the tomb to inform the others that Jesus had risen from the dead?

Luke does not mention whether or not any of the ladies had seen Jesus on their way back to the tomb.

They were the first to view the rising Jesus, although Luke does not explicitly state that they were.

According to John 20:14, Mary Magdalene encountered the rising Jesus.

Regarding the story given in 1 Corinthians 15:4, there is no indication of who was the first person to see Jesus, as there was in the previous verse.

What it does state, though, is as follows: First, Jesus was crucified, then he was risen, then Jesus appeared to Peter, and then Jesus appeared to the other Apostles.

There is nothing more or less to say.

However, there is no demonstrable inconsistency in terms of who was the first to see the resurrected Jesus.

Next:Did Jesus give the incorrect name to the right man? Isn’t it possible that he was referring to Ahimelech when he stated Abiathar? Go to the following page:List of questions and answers

Who saw Jesus first after His resurrection?

Mary Magdalene was the first person to see Jesus following His resurrection, precisely as the scriptures state (Mark 16:9). Matthew 28:9, Mark 16:9, Luke 24:15-18, John 20:14, and 1 Corinthians 15:3-5 are all references to Jesus.

1. “And lo, Jesus came up to them and greeted them,” Matthew 28:9 says of the three ladies. “And they came up to Him, seized hold of His feet, and prostrated themselves before Him.” The appearance to Mary Magdalene is recorded in Mark 16:9: “Now after He had risen early on the first day of the week, He appeared to Mary Magdalene, from whom He had driven out seven devils.” Jesus’ Disciples (Luke 24:15-18)
2. During their conversation and deliberation, Jesus Himself contacted them and joined them on their journey.” 16 However, they were unable to recognize Him because their eyes were blocked. He asked them, “What are these phrases that you are exchanging with one another while you are walking?” They replied, “I don’t know.” And they remained still, their faces dejected. 18 When He asked whether he was the only one visiting Jerusalem, one of them, called Cleopas, responded affirmatively, saying, “Are You the only one visiting Jerusalem who is oblivious of the events that have taken place here in recent days?” The Bible says of Mary in John 20:14, “When she had spoken this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, and she did not realize that it was Jesus.” For example, 1 Corinthians 15:3-5 states, “For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5and that He appeared first to Cephas, then to the twelve.”

There is absolutely no conflict here. The solution is straightforward. Mary Magdalene was the first person to see Jesus following His resurrection, precisely as the scriptures state (Mark 16:9). After then, the others were able to see Him. The context of the other verses does not provide any difficulties at any point. Please go to theResurrection Chronologypage to discover how the verses are connected to one another.

Who Were the Six Women Who Saw the Risen Christ?

It’s unlikely that you’d chose women as the first public witnesses in a fabricated narrative if you wanted it to be taken seriously. Jewish women may testify in matters of personal, familial, and private law, but they would not be able to serve in this capacity as public witnesses or public spokespeople. Even the testimony of many women, according to the Jewish historian Josephus, was unacceptable “because of the frivolity and boldness of their sex.” “Hysterical female. misled by. sorcery,” Celsus, the second-century opponent of Christianity, criticized the notion of Mary Magdalene as a claimed resurrection witness, referring to her as a “hysterical female.

• sorcery.” The fact that the Gospels mention women discovering the empty tomb serves as a strong indication that they were written historically.
• At times, it might be difficult to recall or even sift through the names of all of these ladies who have passed away.
• For example, this demonstrates the prevalence of particular names in first-century Galilee.
• By Andreas J.
• Stewart, The Most Important Week of the Most Important Person Who Ever Lived is a book about the most important week of the most important person who ever lived (Wheaton: Crossway, 2014) .

1. Joanna (wife of Chuza)

• The first woman to discover the empty tomb (Luke 24:10)
• Her husband was Chuza, the household manager or steward of King Herod Antipas (Luke 8:3)
• She was a follower of Jesus and, along with Susanna and many others, contributed financially to Jesus’ ministry (Luke 8:3)
• She was one of the first women to discover the empty tomb (Luke 24:10)

2. Mary Magdalene

• She was a Galilean, most likely from the town of Magdala (on the west bank of the Sea of Galilee)
• Jesus rescued her from seven devils (Luke 8:2
• Mark 16:9)
• And she was baptized in the name of Jesus (Luke 8:2
• Mark 16:9). Among her many accomplishments were: becoming a follower of Jesus (Matt. 27:57)
• Witnessing the crucifixion and burial (Matt. 27:61
• 28:1
• Mark 15:40, 47
• John 19:25)
• Being one of the women who went to the tomb on Sunday (Mark 16:1
• John 20:1)
• Being the first person to see Jesus alive (Mark 16:9)
• Informing the other disciples of Jesus’ resurrection (Luke 24:10

3. Mary (mother of Jesus, widow of Joseph of Nazareth)

• Jesus liberated her from seven devils (Luke 8:2
• Mark 16:9)
• She was a Galilean, perhaps from Magdala (on the west bank of the Sea of Galilee)
• She was a Galilean, possibly from the town of Magdala (on the west bank of the Sea of Galilee)
• She was a Galilean, probably from the town of Magdala Among her many accomplishments were: becoming a follower of Jesus (Matt. 27:57)
• Witnessing the crucifixion and burial (Matt. 27:61
• 28:1
• Mark 15:40, 47
• John 19:25)
• Being one of the women who went to the tomb on Sunday (Mark 16:1
• John 20:1)
• Being the first person to see Jesus alive (Mark 16:9)
• Informing the other disciples of Jesus’ resurrection (Luke 24:10,

4. Mary (mother of James and Joses/Joseph)

• She was a witness to Jesus’ crucifixion, burial, and resurrection appearances
• Her sons were named James the Younger (hence her husband must have been named James) and Joses/Joseph (Matt. 27:61
• 27:56
• Mark 15:40, 47)
• She was a witness to Jesus’ crucifixion, burial, and resurrection appearances

5. Mary (wife of Clopas)

• She was a Galilean who witnessed Jesus’ crucifixion
• In John 19:25, it appears most likely that grammar indicates “his mother’s sister” = “Mary the wife of Clopas,” rather than two separate women being referenced (“his mother’s sister” + “Mary the wife of Clopas”)
• She was a Galilean who witnessed Jesus’ crucifixion
• She was a Galile As reported by the historian Eusebius, Hegesippus’ spouse Clopas was the brother of Joseph of Nazareth, according to the historian Hegesippus (Hist. Eccl.3.11
• 3.32.6
• 4.22.4). It is possible that Jesus was Mary and Clopas’ nephew
• Their son Simeon (Jesus’ cousin) rose to become the leader of the Jerusalem church, taking over from James the brother of Jesus.

6. Salome (mother of James and John)

• She was one of Jesus’ disciples in Galilee
• She was there at the crucifixion and went to the tomb on Sunday (Mark 15:40
• 16:1)
• She was a disciple of Jesus in Galilee. Zebedee’s sons (i.e., James and John) are most likely descended from her.

The Sequence of Christ’s Post-Resurrection Appearances

Some individuals believe that the Gospel descriptions of Jesus’ post-Resurrection appearances are inconsistent in terms of the places, witnesses, and time of his appearances. We are admonished by Scripture to constantly be prepared with responses (1 Peter 3:15) for the hope that we have in ourselves. Because these solutions, as well as our everlasting hope, are predicated on the reality of Christ’s Resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:17), we must sort through some of the “many infallible proofs” (Acts 1:3) that the Bible provides.

As the yearly celebration of our Lord’s Resurrection approaches, we give here a defense of some of history’s most significant events, as well as a proposed timeline of those events.

Contradictory or Complementary Accounts?

So, where precisely did Jesus show up, and to whom did he appear? On the basis of the word “to the mountain,” some have questioned the internal coherence of the Bible’s text. Once they had reached Galilee, they went to the mountain that Jesus had designated as a meeting place. When they saw Him, they worshipped Him, but others were skeptics about His identity. Is it possible that Jesus appeared to the eleven disciples on a hillside in Galilee or in Jerusalem behind closed doors? (Matthew 28:16–17, emphasis added) Is this story in Matthew in conflict with those in Mark, Luke, and John, or is it in agreement with them?

(Matthew 16:14) As a result, they woke up at the crack of dawn and returned to Jerusalem, where they saw the eleven and others who were with them gathered together, proclaiming, “The Lord has certainly risen, and has appeared to Simon!” On the breaking of bread, they shared their stories of what had transpired on the trip, as well as how He had been known to them during the journey.

1. “Peace be with you,” Jesus said to them that same evening, which was the first day of the week, when the doors to where the disciples were gathered were closed out of fear of the Jews.
2. When the disciples finally saw the Lord, they were overjoyed.
3. Beginning on Resurrection Sunday, He “showed himself alive.
4. The apostles stood by and watched as he descended from Mount Olivet, which is near Jerusalem (Acts 1:9–12).
5. In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul includes a summary statement that includes information on these appearances as well as others that were not reported in the Gospels or Acts.
6. After then, He was seen by over five hundred brethren all at once, the vast majority of whom are still alive today, though some have passed away.

Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 15:3–7, We know that those appearances included a meeting with Cephas (Peter), a later appearance to “the twelve,” and a subsequent appearance to almost five hundred individuals at once, the vast majority of whom were still living eyewitnesses at the time Paul composed his letter.

Eleven or Twelve?

Some may argue that Paul was incorrect in referring to “the twelve” since that Judas is no longer alive. Although Matthias had taken over as betrayer at the time Paul wrote this letter (Acts 1:20–26), Paul was still writing it. It is noteworthy that the eleven unanimously decided that the successor would have to be a man who had been with them from the time of the Lord’s baptism until the day He ascended. 1 In fact, one of the primary goals of this appointment was to ensure that the new apostle would serve as a testimony to the Resurrection of Christ.

This scenario serves as a reminder that Jesus had a large number of followers in addition to the twelve apostles.

The Women

Prior to attempting to reconcile the four different Gospel versions of the women’s acts, it is necessary to consider their early appearances on Resurrection Sunday. The gospels of Matthew 28, Mark 16, Luke 24, and John 20 all begin with the arrival of the ladies (including Mary Magdalene) at the tomb of Jesus. 2 They discover it to be empty, with the stone removed. After the initial visit to the tomb, we advise that Mary Magdalene be secluded from the other ladies for a while. The implication is that she raced out to locate Peter and the “other disciple” (John).

• 3 Mary Magdalene informed them that the body of the Lord had gone stolen, according to John 20:1–2.
• She witnessed the angels in the tomb, inquired about Jesus’s whereabouts, and then had her own discussion with Jesus.
• A new verse, found in Mark 16:9–11, states that Mary Magdalene was the first person to whom Jesus appeared, and that the disciples did not accept her tale.
• As Luke recounted, they were startled when they learned there were two angels present.
• The angel instructs the women to go inform the disciples and Peter that Jesus has risen from the dead and would meet them in Galilee, alluding to Peter’s isolation from the rest of the group following his denial and implying that he was not with the rest of the group.
• It’s possible that they narrowly missed Peter and John, who were on their way to the tomb at the time.
• Following His appearance to Mary Magdalene, Jesus went to the ladies who were on their way to the city, reinforcing the message that they should go tell His brethren that He would be in Galilee when they saw Him for themselves.

They were overjoyed to convey the message after meeting with Him. The fact that “the eleven and all the others” eventually learned of Christ’s Resurrection through all of the women, including Mary Magdalene, is summarized in Luke 24:9–11. No one, however, took them seriously.

The Empty Tomb and Beyond

Another significant incident occurred on that Sunday morning, according to Matthew 28:11–15. The leading priests were informed of what had occurred by the guards. The leading priests concocted and circulated the story that the disciples had taken the body while the guards were sleeping, with the assistance of bribes in the appropriate places. The fact that the tomb was indeed empty was verified for all time by this act of defiance. On that particular Sunday, none of the events mentioned in the subsequent verses of Matthew 28 took place.

• As a result, this event occurred after some of the events reported in the other Gospels.
• A brief account of the first is found inLuke 24:13–35 and a longer one in Mark 16:12–13.
• In the course of their journey, they had a chance encounter with Jesus, who gave them an eye-opening Bible lecture in which He revealed how the Old Testament Scriptures had been fulfilled via His suffering, death, and resurrection.
• When they arrived, they discovered that the Lord had also had a personal encounter with Simon Peter before to their arrival.
• To long last, we get at the passages in question.
• “The eleven gathered together” and “those who were with them,” according to Luke 24:33, were the recipients of the Emmaus road pair’s story.
• Perhaps Thomas had gone out for some reason or was simply not there at the moment, and the name “the eleven” was used to refer to the group of disciples following Judas’ death as a generic description of the company of disciples.
• Unlike Mark and Luke, Matthew did not record any of Christ’s visits to “the eleven” on that day while remaining in the city, although Mark and Luke did.
• During these two visits in Jerusalem, He reassured His supporters that He was, in fact, still alive.

Galilee

In Matthew 28:16–17 and John 21, however, the Galilean sightings are detailed, although they are not documented in Mark or Luke. According to Matthew 28:16, the eleven disciples traveled to Galilee, where they presumably waited for Jesus to arrive as He had promised in the word provided by the women. According to John 21, Peter and six other people made the decision to go fishing together. Jesus directed them to throw their nets on the other side of the boat from where they were now fishing. When the disciples arrived on the shore, they saw Jesus preparing breakfast for them.

1. This was “the third time Jesus presented Himself to His disciples after He was risen from the grave,” according to John, indicating that it was the third time He appeared to them as a group after He was raised from the dead (John 21:14).
2. Following Jesus’ seashore apparition, he appeared on the scheduled mountain in Galilee (Matthew 28:16–17), which took place a short time later.
3. We are taken to Galilee, where we will see Jesus in his promised appearance, after the parenthetical remarks concerning the tale the Jewish officials created to explain away the missing corpse in the preceding verses.
4. By this time, knowledge of Christ’s predicted arrival would have spread throughout His large number of disciples, giving them ample time to prepare for it.

When the disciples saw Jesus there, they worshipped Him, though some of them were still skeptical. The eleven had already met Jesus more than once, and some had even had a meal with Him, therefore the phrase “some doubted” is most likely referring to those who had not before seen Him.

Last Appearances

After appearing on the mountain, we learn from 1 Corinthians 15:7 that Jesus met with His half-brother James, who was there. While we cannot be certain of the location of this encounter, it seems likely that it took place in Galilee, given that this is where Jesus and James grew up and where James appears in the Gospel accounts (Matthew 12:46–50; cf. Matthew 13:55). Wherever this occurred, it appears to have served as a trigger for James, who had before identified himself as a skeptic (John 7:5), to come to believe that his half-brother was and continues to be the Son of God.

As stated in Acts 1 (cf.

He delivered them their final instructions before ascending to the throne of God in victory.

Conclusion

Assuming the infallibility of Scripture and, as a result, the veracity of the eyewitness stories, here is one conceivable post-Resurrection/pre-Ascension chronology that may account for all that has been revealed to us in God’s Holy Scripture. 4 As the suggested timeline above demonstrates, there are no inconsistencies in the narratives of Jesus’ post-Resurrection appearances after his death and resurrection. A good reporter piecing together a story from reliable eyewitnesses is what we must do when studying God’s Word.

As a whole, these tales convey the most essential truth in all of human history: that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, died for our sins and rose again, defeating sin and death for the sake of our redemption and the glory of the Father.

After His Resurrection, Jesus Appeared First to His Mother Mary, Say the Saints

“The fulfilment of Mary’s mission at the Annunciation in Nazareth,” declared Pope St. John Paul II, “was the culmination of her mission at the Annunciation in Nazareth.” After Jesus’ Resurrection, there is no record of his appearing to his mother Mary, according to the Gospels. Do we ever wonder if he did happen to see her or not?

After all, she was his mother, the first person to view him when he was born at the Nativity scene. As a result of the Annunciation and the Incarnation, she was the first Christian from the beginning of time. Wouldn’t he want to visit his mother first, before anything else?

Pope St. John Paul II

“There are several sightings of the rising Christ recorded in the Gospels; nevertheless, there is no reference of a meeting between Jesus and his Mother. As St. John Paul II, the great Marian saint, explained in a public audience on May 21, 1997, “this silence must not be taken as evidence that Christ did not come to Mary after the Resurrection, but rather it calls us to inquire into the reasons why the Evangelists made such a choice.” A year before, he reminded the audience that Mary observed the full paschal mystery and “remains alone to keep alive the flame of faith, prepared to receive the joyous and startling revelation of Christ’s Resurrection.” It is possible that the evangelists did not record Mary’s meeting with her raised Son Jesus because such a witness would have been judged too biased by those who opposed the Lord’s Resurrection, and hence not worthy of believed, according to Pope John Paul II in 1997.

1. Another argument was provided by the great saint as well.
2. Paul emphasizes that Jesus appeared “to more than 500 brethren all at the same time” in one appearance (1 Corinthians 15:6).
3. Obviously, the Evangelists did not record every appearance that Jesus made.
4. His rhetorical inquiry was if Mary’s decision not to accompany the ladies who were heading to the tomb at dawn may “suggest that she had already encountered Jesus” (John 20:21).

Of course, Our Lady has shown to be the most dependable of them all.” According to Pope John Paul II, there is yet another reason for believing that Jesus appeared to his mother first: “The singular and exceptional character of the Blessed Virgin’s presence at Calvary, as well as her perfect union with him in his suffering on the Cross, seem to postulate a very particular sharing on her part in the mystery of the Resurrection.” In this sense, her appearance would be part of “completing in this way her involvement in all the important moments of the paschal mystery,” which would be the goal.

The Church believes that Mary, as the image and model of the Church who waits for Christ’s return and meets him in the group of disciples during his Easter appearances, “had a personal contact with her risen Son” so that she, too, could “delight in the fullness of paschal joy,” according to the Vatican.

St. Vincent Ferrer

Many theologians have concluded that Jesus appeared first to Mary, his mother, following his Resurrection, according to Dominican St. Vincent Ferrer, who delivered a stirring Easter sermon this year. “The Blessed Virgin Mary was the subject of his first apparition, despite the fact that this is not mentioned in the gospel of Matthew.” He himself provided three compelling arguments for why we should think that Jesus appeared to his mother initially. “First and foremost, by divine command, because she suffered beyond all others during the Passion of her son,” stated St.

1. Christ was born to his mother in a particular way, so that she would not have to go through the anguish of childbirth.
2. In light of Scripture’s command to ‘Honor your father, and forget not the groaning (birth pains) of your mother,’ (Sirach 7:29), Christ exemplified the commandment of respecting parents in the most perfect way possible.
3. “If someone were actually overseas, and his mother had assumed that he had died, and he still healthily returned and would first see other acquaintances, and only then come to his mother, this would not be a decent son, nor would he appear to have honored his mother,” he explained.
4. St.
5. According to him, the scripture reveals that the Apostles abandoned faith at the Crucifixion: “On that Holy Saturday, only the Virgin Mary invariably believed.” As a result, every Saturday morning in the Church of God, the office of the day is dedicated to her memory and reverence.
6. Then he cited Jesus from John 14:21, who said, “And he who loves me will be loved by my Father; and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him” (and he was right).

Vincent stated that “from these three grounds it is apparent that he appeared to the Virgin Mother first,” despite the fact that “the holy Evangelists are strictly mute about it.” As an example of God’s favor, he painted a picture of how this may have happened, so that “the devoted soul might piously reflect, in order to sense the beauty of this vision in their hearts.” It is possible that she did not know the hour of Christ’s Resurrection because it is not written that Christ revealed the hour of his Resurrection,” he speculated.

“The Virgin Mary was absolutely certain that her son would rise on the third day, as predicted by him, but it is possible that she was unaware of his Resurrection hour,” he added.

Vincent, Jesus “greeted his mother by saying, ‘Peace be with you.'” He also mentions another detail: It was at this point that the Virgin went on her knees and loved him while crying out in delight.

She kissed his hands and feet and exclaimed: ‘O precious wounds, which have caused me such sorrow on Good Friday.’ Jesus replied to his mother as he kissed her: “Rejoice in the fact that the future is filled with nothing but joy and celebration.”

St. Bridget of Sweden

St. Bridget of Sweden, who was well-known for her visions during her lifetime, wrote the following in her Revelations: “When the third day arrived, it caused consternation and fear among the Disciples. The ladies who were going to anoint Jesus’ body at the tomb looked for him but were unable to locate him. The Apostles were huddled together in their anxiety, protecting the entrances to the church. Even if we are not told in the Gospels, it is certain that Mary spoke of her Son’s resurrection, that he had been genuinely raised from the dead, that he was alive again in all of his humanity, no longer subject to death, and ascended to an everlasting glory.

However, we may think that Mary, Jesus’ mother, was the first to learn of his resurrection and that she was the first to witness him.

St. Ignatius of Loyola

It was the same belief held by St. Ignatius of Loyola. “First, he appeared to the Virgin Mary,” he wrote in his Spiritual Exercises, at the beginning of the meditations on the Resurrection of Christ our Lord. Even though it is not stated in Scripture, this fact is included in the statement that He appeared to a large number of other people since Scripture assumes that we have comprehension, as it is written: ‘Are you also without understanding?’

Servant of God John Hardon

In the twentieth century, Servant of God John Hardon, who, at the request of Pope St. Paul VI, published The Catholic Catechism (1975), had the same beliefs as he does now. “It is not only a religious belief that the Risen Savior appeared to His Mother Mary for the first time on Easter Sunday. More than six Doctors of the Church, including Sts. Ambrose, Anselm, and Albert the Great, have said that Our Lady was the first witness to the Resurrection. Father Hardon listed various reasons for this, the most important of which, according to the Church’s spiritual leaders, is that the Resurrection is the fulfillment of the Annunciation of the Good News.

She was rewarded for her faith at the Resurrection when she had the opportunity to see and talk with her glorified Son,” Father Hardon recounted.

She symbolized the human race that had already been redeemed at the Resurrection.” This link is still active.

She embraced Him in her arms at the Resurrection, after having received the Motherhood of the Church from Him on the Cross.” Moreover, Mary “accepted her vocation to suffer with her Son in His mission of saving the world from sin when she heard the Annunciation.” “On Easter Sunday, she participated in the pleasure of His magnificent Resurrection with Him,” says the author.

“At the Annunciation, Mary was transformed into the connection between Christ’s humanity and our own,” Father Hardon remarked.

By working with Him as the mediatrix of the gifts He started to distribute to a human family restored to gracious fellowship with God at the Resurrection, Mary completed this bond.

The Mother of Sorrows became the Cause of Our Joy twice: once because the joy she experienced upon being reunited with her Risen Son is a promise of the joy we should experience on earth in knowing that we have carried out God’s will, and again because the joy she experienced upon being reunited with her Risen Son is a promise of the joy we should experience on earth in knowing that we have carried out God’s will.” The joy she experienced on Easter Sunday serves as a prologue to the complete joy we will experience upon seeing Christ, in spirit when He welcomes us into eternity, and in body and soul following the final resurrection on The Last Day,” she explains.

Father Hardon reminded us that “our religion is the foundation of everything.” As long as we have faith in the Lord’s promise to fulfill it, we shall be blessed, just as Mary was.

The following is what Pope St.

The Case for Christ: What’s the evidence for the resurrection?

Strobel, a writer for the Chicago Tribune and a Yale Law School graduate, wrote “The Case for Christ: A Journalist’s Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus” in 1998, which was released in English and Spanish. Strobel had previously been an atheist, but after his wife’s conversion to evangelical Christianity, he felt obligated to challenge some of the central Christian claims about Jesus. While the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection was the most important of these assertions, additional claims included the belief in Jesus as the actual Son of God and the veracity of the New Testament literature, among others.

It went on to become one of the most widely read and widely distributed works of Christian apologetic (that is, a defense of the rationality and correctness of Christianity) in history.

The film makes an attempt to present a persuasive argument for the historical accuracy of Jesus’ resurrection.

Are all of Strobel’s arguments relevant?

According to the film’s producers, the evidence supporting the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection is the film’s core subject. Several of its arguments, on the other hand, are not immediately applicable to this situation. According to Strobel, the fact that there are over 5,000 Greek copies of the New Testament in existence, which is significantly more than any other ancient literature, is a significant point in his argument. He does this in order to show that we may be reasonably certain that the original forms of the New Testament books have been faithfully conveyed.

There are fewer than ten papyrus texts from the second century that have survived, and many of them are extremely fragmented.

If these second-century copies are true, all we have left are first-century documents claiming that Jesus was risen from the grave, which isn’t very encouraging.

What do the New Testament writings prove?

One of the most important arguments in the film is drawn from the New Testament book known as First Corinthians, which was written by the Apostle Paul to a group of Christians in Corinth in order to resolve conflicts that had developed in their society. Paul is believed to have written this letter in the year 52, around 20 years after the death of Jesus. In 1 Corinthians 15:3-8, Paul provides a list of the persons who have seen the resurrected Jesus in their lives. The New Testament is a book of scripture that was written in the first century AD.

Many academics think that Paul is referring from a far older Christian faith, which may have formed only a few years after Jesus’ death and was adopted by the church.

Indeed, many New Testament scholars would agree that some of Jesus’ disciples believed they had seen him alive only a few weeks or months after his death, and that this belief was supported by other witnesses.

It is not uncommon for people to experience visions of their deceased relatives: Thirteen percent of those polled in a research of over 20,000 people claimed to have seen the dead.

To put it another way, sightings of the rising Jesus are not nearly as uncommon as Strobel would have us believe they are.

A miracle or not?

But what about the 500 persons who witnessed Jesus’ resurrection at the same time? First and foremost, biblical scholars are baffled as to what incident Paul is alluding to in this passage. The “day of Pentecost” (Acts 2:1) is said to be a reference to the Holy Spirit bestowing miraculous abilities on members of the Christian community in Jerusalem, allowing them to communicate in languages that were previously unknown to them. However, according to one major researcher, this incident was added to the list of resurrection appearances by Paul, and the origins of the event remain unclear.

1. Second, even if Paul is reporting truthfully, his claims are no more credible than those of vast numbers of individuals who claim to have witnessed an apparition of the Virgin Mary or a UFO.
2. The fact that Jesus’ tomb was empty on Easter morning, according to Strobel, is the greatest explanation for this event.
3. There is substantial evidence to suggest that the Romans did not generally remove victims from crosses after they had died in battle.
4. But even if we believe that the tomb was indeed empty that morning, what evidence do we have that it was a miracle rather than the corpse of Christ being moved for unknown reasons?

Who are the experts?

Aside from all of the obvious flaws in Strobel’s presentation, I feel that Strobel has made no genuine effort to include a diverse range of academic viewpoints in his presentation. As part of the film, Strobel travels around the country, interviewing professors and other professionals about the historical significance of Jesus’ resurrection. In his book, Strobel describes the experts he interviewed as “renowned scholars and authority who have impeccable academic credentials.” The movie does not explain how Strobel selected the experts he interviewed.

“We affirm that the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, though written by men, was supernaturally inspired by God so that all of its words are written true revelation of God; it is therefore inerrant in the originals and authoritative in all matters,” states the faculty application for Liberty University, for example.

Many of the other experts he interviews for his book have connections that are comparable to his own.

(I believe there are around 10,000 professional biblical scholars in the world at this time.) His arguments for the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection were compelling, according to an email response I received in response to my query regarding whether most professional biblical academics would find his arguments persuasive.

Furthermore, Dr.

At the end of the day, though, each individual must come to his or her own conclusion on the Christ case. The way someone interprets the evidence is influenced by a variety of factors, including, for example, whether or not the person has an anti-supernatural prejudice.”

No compelling evidence

The Easter Cross is a symbol of hope and resurrection. Artist Sharon’s Art4TheGlryOfGod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. According to Strobel, if he had polled experts at public institutions, private colleges and universities (many of which have religious affiliations), or denominational seminaries, the results of his poll would have been very different. Many Christian apologists, like Lee Strobel, assert that the primary reason secular scholars do not acknowledge the historicity of the resurrection is because they have a “anti-supernatural prejudice,” which is consistent with what Strobel says in the statement above.

Although some Christians believe in miracles, I believe that apologists such as Gary Habermas are equally as anti-supernaturalist when it comes to miraculous claims involving later Catholic saints or miracles from non-Christian religious traditions that occur after the beginning of Christian history.

While such astonishing claims abound in the world today, I believe that “The Case for Christ” has failed to give persuasive proof that Jesus’ resurrection was historically accurate.