What Day Was Jesus Crucified Lds?

What day of the week was Jesus crucified?

Friday is traditionally considered to be the day on which Jesus was crucified.While some current academics believe that He was crucified on Wednesday or Thursday, others believe that He was crucified earlier.The theories’ supporting arguments are discussed in further detail below.

The Gospels claim that Jesus died on the day before the Sabbath, which lends support to the notion of a Friday crucifixion.″And when evening had come, because it was the day of Preparation, that is, the day before the Sabbath, Joseph of Arimathea, a respected member of the council, who was also himself seeking the kingdom of God, took courage and went to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus,″ Mark 15:42-43 says.″Because it was the day of Preparation, that is, the day before the Sabbath, Joseph of Arimathea, a respected member of the The Sabbath has traditionally been observed on Saturday, the concluding day of the week.As a result, it appears that Mark is explicitly referring to Christ’s death on Friday.

It is taught in the Bible that Jesus resurrected from his tomb on the third day (1 Corinthians 15:4), and that this third day was Sunday, the first day of the week, according to the Bible.
In Jewish timekeeping, a portion of a day was treated as if it were a whole day.
His funeral would take place on Friday, Saturday (the Sabbath), and Sunday, a total of three days.
In Matthew 16:21 and Luke 9:22, we learn that Jesus foretold His own death and resurrection on the third day.
Some believe that a Friday death and a Sunday resurrection do not conform to the teachings of Matthew 12:40.
It is in this passage that Jesus declares, ″For just as Jonah was swallowed up by a colossal fish for three days and nights, so will the Son of Man be swallowed up by the earth for three days and nights.″ Because Jesus was not in the grave for ″three nights,″ some believe that either Jesus’ prediction was incorrect or that the crucifixion took place sooner than Friday as stated in the Bible.

The most common day suggested by such proponents is Thursday, however some also advocate for Wednesday.The scripture stating that Jesus would be in the grave for three days and three nights does not necessarily imply that He would be in the dead for exactly 72 hours as stated in the Bible.For example, it’s possible that Jesus would stay in the tomb for around three days.Jesus’ connection to Jonah’s story was intended to convey the idea that Jesus, like Jonah, would appear to have passed away from this world.He would, however, return to finish God’s will, just as Jonah did.

In addition, some who argue for a Thursday or Wednesday date believe that there were too many events that occurred between the crucifixion and the resurrection for the time period to be accurate.However, this argument provides no convincing evidence, as one would expect the Gospel authors to provide greater information about the concluding parts of Christ’s life than they do at other points in the narrative.The incidents might have taken place between Friday and Sunday, according to a thorough investigation of the evidence.Some have argued for a Wednesday date for the crucifixion, claiming that there were two ″Sabbaths″ or holy days during Passover week, one on Wednesday and one on Friday.After the first one, which happened on the evening of the crucifixion (Mark 15:42; Luke 23:52-54), the ladies went out and bought spices (Mark 15:42; Luke 23:52-54).(after the Sabbath, Mark 16:1).

According to this interpretation, the Passover was the first Sabbath, and the normal Sabbath (Saturday) followed only a few days later.
There is no question that Jesus’ resurrection took place on the first day of the week, as recorded in the Bible (Sunday).
And, based on the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, it appears that He was crucified on Friday, rather than the previous day.
Truths that are related: What is the source of Christ’s zeal?
What are the meanings of Christ’s last seven statements, and what are they about?
Is it any wonder that blood and water gushed out of Jesus’ side when he was pierced?

What happened to Jesus during the three days that elapsed between His death and resurrection?What are some of the reasons why I should believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ?Return to the page: The Truth About Jesus Christ.

What was the real date of Jesus’ birth?

Since the early twentieth century, many Mormons have believed that they had discovered the precise date of the first Christmas celebration.An apostle of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints named James E.Talmage declared in a book titled ″Jesus the Christ″ (1915) that ″We believe that Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem of Judea on April 6, B.C.

1,″ and that ″Jesus Christ was crucified in Bethlehem of Judea.″ Elder Talmage did not come up with this date on the spur of the moment.His inspiration for the phrase came from Section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants, which is a series of revelations received primarily through the Mormon founding prophet, Joseph Smith Jr.As a result of his book, many Mormons, from church officials to members of the congregation, now acknowledge April 6 as the true date of Jesus’ birth.Although Elder Talmage’s reading of Doctrine and Covenants 20 was widely accepted, not every member of the LDS Church did.

Jeffrey R.
Chadwick, an associate professor of church history and doctrine at Brigham Young University, published an article in the latest issue of BYU Studies on ″Dating the Birth of Jesus Christ″ in which he challenges the popular but not universal Mormon dating of Jesus’ birth to April 6, which is contested by many Christians.
And he’s in good company to boot.
President J.
Reuben Clark Jr., a counselor in the First Presidency of the LDS Church, wrote in 1954 that Christ was born in December of 5 B.C.
or early 4 B.C., according to the LDS Church.

Elder Bruce R.McConkie, who was also an apostle at the time, preferred the date of December 5, B.C., as well as several dates in 4 B.C.The date of April 6 is derived from the day on which the LDS Church was first formed in 1830, which is April 6.″The rise of The Church of Christ in these last days, being one thousand eight hundred and thirty years since the coming of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in the flesh, it (the church) being regularly organized and established in accordance with the laws of our country, by the will and commandments of God, in the fourth month, and on the sixth day of the month which is called April,″ says the first verse of D&C 20.Some people, including Elder Talmage, have read this verse as if it is the Lord speaking and revealing precisely that Christ was born on April 6, 1830, and that the revelation was given on that day.

Steven C.Harper, an assistant professor of church history at Brigham Young University and a volume editor of the Joseph Smith Papers, said in a phone interview that this is a common interpretation of the verse.The discovery of a previously unknown D&C 20 manuscript, however, revealed that the verse was actually an introductory head note written by early church historian and scribe John Whitmer — something Whitmer did for many of the revelations, according to Harper — rather than a verse in the book of Mormon.″As a result, they are distinct from the scriptures that Joseph generates by revelation.″ Another interesting point to note about the paper, which was disclosed as part of the Joseph Smith Papers, is that the revelation was delivered on April 10 – not April 6.Accordingly, despite the fact that it refers to the organization of the church just a few days earlier, the revelation — which, according to Harper, has nothing to do with the birth date of Christ — and its introductory verses ″shouldn’t be read as if it is a revelation of the birth date of Jesus Christ,″ he added.″It is a revelation of the birth date of Jesus Christ.″ This is all I’m going to say about it: ″The interpretation that has been the most accepted throughout time is very much up to criticism.″ And this wasn’t the first time that John Whitmer used a phrase like this to refer to a particular day in history.

″It is now June the twelfth, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-one years after the arrival of our Lord and Savior in the flesh,″ he wrote at another point in his writing career.
This style of terminology, in other words, was simply a sophisticated 19th-century means of expressing the date.
If one adopts the interpretation of the verse in D&C 20 given by Chadwick, Harper, Elder McConkie, and President Clark, when did Jesus Christ come into the world?
When it comes to the date of Jesus’ birth, Chadwick’s article goes into great length about the different indicators that the Bible and the Book of Mormon provide.
The death of King Herod the Great appears to be the single most important piece of evidence.
According to the Bible, Jesus was born before Herod’s death.

According to Chadwick, Herod’s death was recorded as occurring around the end of March or the beginning of April in 4 B.C.In addition to the reference of a lunar eclipse occurring before Herod’s death, the date on which his son was ousted by Caesar Augustus both validate this date.Both of those predetermined occurrences came together to confirm Herod’s demise in a seamless manner.It goes without saying that if Herod was killed in 4 B.C., a Christ birthdate in 1 B.C.seems implausible.

So, since Jesus had to be born before April 4, B.C., is it possible to reduce the time frame even further?For pages and pages, Chadwick’s work in BYU Studies uses set dates to estimate other dates, and it is a fascinating read.As an example, he examined the time of Jesus’ death in detail, comparing it to the length of Jesus’ life as recorded in the Book of Mormon, and factoring in events such as Jesus’ circumcision, which took place eight days after his birth, Mary’s 40-day ritual purification, the visit of wise men from the east, and a two-week journey to Egypt into the equation.As a result of all of these occurrences, ″at the very least, Jesus would have had to be born eight weeks before Herod’s death, which occurred at the beginning of April (4 B.C.).″ Chadwick then considers the Annunciation to Mary, in which she is informed that she will bear a son called Jesus.Luke 1:26 places this incident within the sixth month, which corresponded to the period between mid-to-late February and mid-to-late March at the time.What month was it in 5 B.C.?

Add nine months to the end.The evidence from the New Testament, the Book of Mormon, and Josephus’ history, together with input from archaeological and astronomical studies, all lead to a day in December of 5 B.C.(late in the Jewish month of Kislev) as the date of Jesus’ birth, according to Chadwick.

As a result, it is possible that the true date of Christmas was on December 25, as previously believed.
As Chadwick stated, ″it is just as likely that Jesus was born on the calendar day we call Dec.
25 as it is that he was born on any other date in the few weeks preceding or after that date.″ In those December weeks that we now call to as the Christmas season, ″his birth took place.″ [email protected] is the e-mail address.

The Real Day of Jesus’ Death

An LDS archaeologist has arrived to a different conclusion about the day of Jesus’ death than what has generally been thought to be true.The reason behind this is as follows.If you’re looking for a different perspective of view, check out ″The Restoration of Priesthood Keys on Easter 1836, Parts One and Two.″ Now that Easter season has here, we may once again reflect on Jesus Christ’s sacrifice on the cross, his crucifixion, and his resurrection.

The New Testament is clear in saying that Jesus rose from the dead on the first day of the week, which we refer to as Sunday.Yet it may come as a surprise to many people to find that Friday is not considered to be the day of the crucifixion, as is often believed.As opposed to this, the evidence from both the New Testament and the Book of Mormon indicates that Jesus was crucified on Thursday, the fifth day of the week.A slew of these signs were investigated in a recently published scholarly piece I wrote, which appeared in the most current issue of BYU Studies Quarterly and was written by myself (December 2015).

On the fifth day of the week, which we refer to as Thursday, it is revealed in that article that Jesus was crucified and killed.
During the year AD 30, something like this happened (rather than AD 33, as some LDS sources often maintain).
Also of note is that the calendar date for that Thursday was April 6, according to the Julian calendar, which was in use at the time in Rome.
A link to the whole 57-page essay will be provided below for anyone who are interested in reading it in its entirety.
For the time being, I’ll just go over a couple of the most important aspects.
Throughout all four of the New Testament gospels, there is only one direct account of the length of time that elapsed between Jesus’ death and resurrection: the account in John.

There are at least a dozen passages that indicate his body being in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea for three days, and it is possible that there are more.Although there are twelve prophesies in all, eleven of them were made before the events of Jesus’ death took occurred.Furthermore, the language used in them may appear unclear, since some passages state that Jesus would rise from the tomb on ″the third day″ (for example, Matthew 16:21), while others state that he would rise ″after three days″ (for example, Luke 24:44).(example Mark 8:31).According to Luke 24:20-21, the sole after-the-fact record of how much time passed between the crucifixion and the resurrection is contained in the story of the two disciples chatting with the risen Lord on the road from Jerusalem to Emmaus, which takes place on the way to Emmaus.

Cleopas stated to the stranger traveling with them (whom they were unaware was the Savior) that Jesus had been delivered by the chief priests and had been crucified during that discussion, which took place in the late afternoon of the Sunday after Jesus had risen from the dead.Afterwards, Cleopas stated that ″this is the third day since these things were completed.″ Sunday was the third day after Jesus was crucified, which implies Saturday had been the second day since the execution, and Friday had been the first day since the incident — plainly suggesting that it occurred on Thursday!Luke 24 has a single, precise report that provides no room for question concerning the time of the occurrences.And, because it makes use of the phrase ″the third day,″ it is highly likely that the several predictive statements in the four gospels that make use of the phrase ″the third day″ are to be interpreted in the same way – that Jesus rose on the third day since (that is, the third day after) his execution.Matthew 12:39-40 contains a very unique prediction made by Jesus, which is found in his famous ″sign of the prophet Jonas.″ Foretelling his death and resurrection, Jesus declared: ″as the Son of man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth,″ which means ″in the center of the earth.″ Significant about this passage is that not only are three days, but also three nights, are indicated, during which time he would remain in the tomb.The classic Friday-for-the-crucifixion paradigm only permits for Jesus to have been in the tomb on Friday night and Saturday night, according to the biblical narrative.

However, realizing that the crucifixion took place on Thursday means that Jesus did indeed spend three nights in the tomb — Thursday night, Friday night, and Saturday night – before being raised from the dead early on Sunday morning.
Golgatha The question has long been raised as to how Jesus could have been executed on a Thursday given the four gospels all claim that the day after his death was a Sabbath.
Assuming the Jewish Sabbath is observed every Saturday, would this not imply that Jesus died on the day before?
The answer to this question is unequivocally No.
Even while conventional Christianity, which has marked Friday as the day of Jesus’ death for 1800 years, plainly accepted such logic, those who did so neglected to consider the fact that Jesus died on the eve of Passover, which is a Festival Sabbath, and that Passover is a holiday.
Passover is observed on the seventh day of the week, regardless of the day of the week it occurs.

In Jewish tradition, there were two sorts of Sabbaths: the normal Saturday Sabbath and the Festival Sabbath, which may be observed on any day of the week save Saturday.Yom Tov, which translates as ″Good Day,″ is the name given to the Festival Sabbath in Hebrew, where it is celebrated every year.According to my BYU Studies Quarterly article, the Gospel of John identified the Festival Sabbath that followed Jesus’ crucifixion as ″an high day″ – the Greek term megalo h hmera, literally meaning ″a great day,″ appears to have been John’s way of expressing the Hebrew term Yom Tov in the Greek text of his gospel account.John 19:31 states: ″for that sabbath was a high day.″ A further demonstration is provided in the BYU Studies Quarterly article, which demonstrates that the Yom Tov ″high day″ of Passover happened on a Friday in the year AD 30.The day of Jesus’ crucifixion had to have been a Thursday, the day before that Festival Sabbath, in order for it to have occurred.

In order to avoid going into too much detail on the historical and astronomical calculations that allow us to establish the day and date of Passover in different years during Jesus’ lifetime, readers are encouraged to go to the page linked above for more information.The essay is titled ″Dating the Death of Jesus Christ″ (BYU Studies Quarterly 54:4, 2015) and may be found online at http://www.byustudiesquarterly.org/.That it must be the year of Jesus’ death (rather than the year AD 33) is further explained by the known lifetime of Jesus, which according to the Book of Mormon was 33 years, and the earliest conceivable time of his birth (the winter of 5/4 BC), as well as other evidence.The following link will take readers to a prior study titled ″Dating the Birth of Jesus Christ″ (BYU Studies 49:4, 2010), which has further information on this topic.Finally, the Book of Mormon contains important information that points to Thursday as the day of the crucifixion, as previously stated.It is reported in the book of Third Nephi that a huge storm erupted in ancient America at the same time that Jesus died in Jerusalem (see 3 Nephi 8:5, compare Helaman 14:21).

Following the storm, which lasted three hours, there was total darkness over the entire area for three days, which served as a symbol of Jesus’ death and coincided with the time when his corpse was placed in the tomb in Jerusalem, according to tradition (see 3 Nephi 8:19-20 & 10:9, compare 1 Nephi 19:10 and Helaman 14:20).Since the earth rotates, there is a significant time difference between Jerusalem and the Americas – specifically, there is an eight-hour time difference between Jerusalem and the American Central Time Zone, with any point in time on the American continent being eight hours earlier than any point on the Jewish calendar in Jerusalem.In light of the fact that Jesus died at ″the ninth hour,″ about 3:00 PM Jerusalem time, the hour of his death would have been around 7:00 AM Central Time in America.

(See Matthew 27:46.) It would be three hours later when the three-hour storm in America would have subsided and the deep darkness would have set in.
If Jesus’ crucifixion is to be imitated on a Friday at 3:00 PM Jerusalem time, then the onset of darkness in America must occur at 7:00 AM on Friday morning.
This would allow for complete darkness in America on Friday, as well as on Saturday, and Sunday.

As for the possibility of three days of darkness before Jesus’ resurrection, this was ruled out by the fact that he rose from the dead and left his tomb early on Sunday morning in Jerusalem, which was long before midnight on Saturday night in America.Under a Friday crucifixion scenario, there would have been no darkness on Sunday in the United States of America.And the darkness on Friday and Saturday is just two days, not three, as some people believe.The crucifixion took place on a Thursday at 3:00 PM in Jerusalem, which means that darkness began in America at 7:00 AM Central Time on Thursday and would have remained throughout the day on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday — three full days before Jesus’ resurrection on Sunday.As a result, the statistics from the Book of Mormon, which mentions three days of darkness, plainly imply that the day of the crucifixion must have fallen on a Thursday.After been developed by well-intentioned but underinformed persons who were not linked to the New Testament church and who were unfamiliar with the Jewish calendar and festivals, the legend of Jesus’ execution on a Friday first emerges in gentile Christian sources in the second century AD.

Jesus Christ’s atoning sacrifice for us all was accomplished on Thursday, according to both the New Testament and the Book of Mormon, Another Testament of Jesus Christ.Jeffrey R.Chadwick is a professor of archaeology and Near Eastern studies at Brigham Young University, as well as a religious education professor of church history and Jewish studies.He is also the director of the Jerusalem Center.He may be reached at the following address:

Amid Russian invasion, LDS Church issues generic denunciation of ‘armed conflict’

— The Royal National Society (RNS) When Russia invaded Ukraine the day before, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints responded with such a tepid statement that it wasn’t quite apparent if the remark was meant to address Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or not.We are grieved and very concerned about the violent violence that is now occurring in our region.Every impacted area, as well as the rest of the world, is represented by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church).

Our thoughts and feelings have been drawn to them, as well as to all of our brothers and sisters.We have not stopped praying for peace.We are aware that Jesus Christ is the only way to find true and lasting peace.Even in the midst of horrible battles, Jesus has the ability to soothe and console our spirits.

He instilled in us a love for God and for our neighbors.
We hope that this violent struggle will be brought to a swift conclusion, that the conflicts will be resolved amicably, and that peace will reign both between nations and inside our own hearts.
We implore international leaders to work towards such resolutions and peace on the planet.
The date of the statement, as well as the fact that the LDS Church ″had members in each of the impacted areas,″ strongly imply that it was intended to denounce (softly, feebly, and unsteadily) what Russia has done and is doing in the Ukraine.
However, because the countries in question are not identified, we are left to make educated guesses.
Members of the Church’s Europe Area Presidency were also asked to fast for peace on Sunday, which is the Church’s customary monthly day of fasting, in a message published earlier today.

It did not, however, mention any specific individuals.The countries of Russia and Ukraine are not listed.It is not the time to be like Switzerland, who chose to remain silent in the face of an unjustified attack.( Even Switzerland, it appears, shares this sentiment, as the country stated earlier today that it was abandoning its traditional neutrality and adopting economic penalties in response to ″Russia’s unprecedented military strike on a sovereign European state.″ I support the practice of praying for peace and the establishment of churches that include such prayers as a regular and pointed element of our worship services.In the course of one day and one week, we Mormons could do more with this.

It’s not that I disagree with anything in the official ″statement on armed conflict″ issued by the Catholic Church.I mean, what exactly is there to disagree with?It’s more that the broad, all-encompassing character of the legislation eliminates any meaningful influence it may have had.According to historian Ardis Parshall, who expressed herself on Twitter, it was ″vague and devoid of emotion.″ Ardis Parshall, a historian, sent out a tweet on February 25, 2022.So, why is it being used so broadly?It’s a fascinating subject, especially in light of the Church’s strong anti-Soviet sentiments during the second half of the twentieth century.

The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, has done more than any previous leader to bring the country back to the era of tyranny.
In 2020, for example, he was successful in getting legislation passed that will allow him to continue in power until 2036, thereby nullifying the two-term restriction that has been in place since the country’s shaky democracy was founded in the country’s 1993 constitution.
As a result of his efforts, freedom has been curtailed and authoritarianism has been promoted.
Despite this, the Church has said very little in terms of condemnation of him or of his activities to far.
This, I believe, is due to the Church’s own self-interest on this matter.
In 2018, President Russell M.

Nelson announced the construction of the first Latter-day Saint temple in Russia in over a century.The fact that the site of the temple has not been publicized shows that it is still a highly sensitive subject of discussion in the current negotiations.No matter what Putin has done in Ukraine or at home, it is probable that LDS leaders do not intend to enflame the situation with him.It is a precarious scenario for the Russian Orthodox Church, which is characterized by escalating conflict.During Putin’s rule, LDS missionaries in Russia have been prohibited from engaging in religious proselytizing; they must instead be referred to as ″volunteers″ rather than ″missionaries,″ and their work is restricted to service activities.

Even with that caveat in mind, two Mormon missionaries-turned-volunteers were apprehended in 2019* and imprisoned for three weeks in an immigration detention center on suspicion of allegedly teaching English without a valid teaching certificate.As a cautionary story, Latter-day Saint leaders need go no farther than what has been occurring with the Jehovah’s Witnesses, to whom they are sometimes linked, to see what has been happening.Russia outlawed Jehovah’s Witnesses in 2017, and Putin’s dictatorship has spent the previous three years repressing them, raiding their homes and inflicting severe prison sentences on many of its members.Because Jehovah’s Witnesses refuse to salute national flags or serve in the military, their history has been marked by numerous disputes with totalitarian regimes, most notably during the Nazi regime in Germany.But here’s what I can’t seem to get my mind off of.Mormons, much to our eternal regret, had a more cordial connection with the Nazis in the 1930s, prior to the outbreak of World War II.

As the book ″Moroni and the Swastika″ demonstrates, the Church was extremely worried at the time about avoiding being expelled from Germany at a time when its missionary activities were gathering momentum, therefore church members did everything they could to accept Hitler’s policies as much as they could.Examples include Mormons using their genealogy skills to assist Germans in proving their Aryan lineage and even encouraging Mormon missionaries to educate German young men how to play basketball in preparation for the 1936 Berlin Olympics, which were held in the city.Hitler was aiming for a ″Nordic victory″ at the Games, according to the Deseret News, and the missionaries might assist him in that endeavor.

On January 25, 1936, the Church section of the LDS periodical Deseret News was published.
I think it would be wonderful if Mormons could take anything from from their own history.
As long as our missionaries were permitted to continue preaching, our short-sightedness in 1930s Germany allowed us to turn a blind eye to grave horrors taking place in our country.

Our priorities were incorrect at the time, and I am concerned that we may be repeating the same error now.Despite the fact that I understand why the Church today might be hesitant to speak out against Putin — doing so would mean saying goodbye to a new temple in the short term and potentially placing Russian church members in a precarious position in relation to the state — it is a moral disappointment when the best we can come up with is the equivalent of ″thoughts and prayers.″ * It has been corrected that the Mormon missionaries were jailed in Russia in 2017.An previous version of this article said that they were detained in Russia in 2017.That occurred in the year 2019.Content that is related to this: Putin is wanting more than just Ukraine’s territory; he is after the country’s religious essence as well.Mormon Nazis: A new book reveals that the LDS Church supported the Third Reich.

Overview

Who is Jesus Christ?

Jesus Christ is the Savior of the world, as well as the Son of the Most High God (the Father).He is the Redeemer of our souls.Each of these names allude to the reality that Jesus Christ is the sole means by which we might be reconciled to our heavenly Father and live with him forever.

Scriptures

Scripture References

Isaiah 49:26
John 1:14, 18
1 Timothy 2:5
1 Nephi 21:26
1 Nephi 22:12
2 Nephi 25:12
Alma 5:48
Doctrine and Covenants 45:3
Doctrine and Covenants 66:1
Doctrine and Covenants 93:11
1 Nephi 21:26
1 Nephi 22:12
2 Nephi 25:12
Alma 5:48
Doctrine and Covenants 66:1
Doc

Scripture Study Resources

Topical Guide, ″Jesus Christ″
Bible Dictionary, ″Christ,″ ″Christ, Names of,″ ″Jehovah,″ ″Jesus″
Topical Guide, ″Jesus Christ″
Topical Guide, ″Jesus Christ″
Topical Guide, ″Jesus Christ″
Topical Guide, ″Jesus Christ″
Topical Guide, ″Jesus Christ″
Topical Guide, ″Jesus Christ″
Topical Guide, ″Jesus Christ″
The Triple Combination ″Jesus Christ″ is included as an index.
″Jesus Christ″ is a Bible study guide that includes the entire Bible.

Messages from Church Leaders

Bringing the Divine Presence of Jesus Christ into Our Lives
Jesus the Christ: Our Master and President of the Universe ‘If Ye Had Known Me,’ Russell M. Nelson’s poem. David A. Bednar, an ordained minister
President Ezra Taft Benson’s Five Marks of the Divinity of Jesus Christ
Christ: The Light That Shines in the Darkness President Ezra Taft Benson’s Christ: The Light That Shines in the Darkness Sharon Eubank is known as ″The Master Healer.″ Carole M. Stephens
Carole M. Stephens

Additional Messages

Videos

Tabernacle Choir Videos

″Come, follow me,″ says the narrator. ″Come unto me, says the Lord.″ ″Dear to the Shepherd’s Heart,″ as the song goes. ″Lord, I Would Be Willing to Follow Thee″ ″Master, the Tempest is raging!″ says the narrator.

Learning Resources

General Resources

″The Living Christ: The Testimony of the Apostles″ is a book on the resurrection of Jesus Christ. ChurchofJesusChrist.org ″Jesus Christ, the Son of God,″ says the Bible. JesusChrist.ChurchofJesusChrist.org

Church Magazines

″When Jesus Was a Child,″ by Kim Webb Reid, is available online.Whether you’re a friend or a Liahona, The month of February 2017 Kelly Hunsaker’s article, ″Min-Jun Measures Up,″ appeared in the New York Times.In January 2017, a friend or Liahona wrote to me.

Jacob F.Frandsen’s poem, ″Taking His Name Upon Me,″ is available online.Whether you’re an Ensign or a Liahona, The month of August 2011 ″He Carried My Sorrows,″ a poem by Jane Bleak.Whether you’re an Ensign or a Liahona, The month of June 2011 ″Sailing True in the Marshall Islands,″ by Joshua J.

Perkey, is available online.
April 2011: Ensign or Liahona, depending on who you ask.
″Jesus as a Child,″ by Diane L.
Mangum, published in ″Jesus as a Child.″ Liahona, New Year’s Day, 2011.
″Jesus Christ Is the Only Begotten Son of God,″ says the Bible’s first verse.
Ensign or Liahona, December of the previous year ″The Ability to Transform,″ June 2010: Ensign or Liahona, depending on who you ask.

″’I Am the Way,’″ writes David A.Edwards.March 2008: Ensign or Liahona, depending on your preference

Study Manuals

We are devoted to Jesus Christ, who has been chosen as our leader and Savior. ″The Life of Christ″ is the third chapter in Gospel Principles. In the New Testament for Individuals and Families, Chapter 11 of the Gospel of John
January 14–20: Luke 2
Matthew 2 Come, Follow Me—For Individuals and Families: New Testament 2019
″The Plan of Salvation″ is a biblical term that refers to God’s plan of salvation. Preach My Gospel: A Guide to Missionary Service, lesson 2
Preach My Gospel: A Guide to Missionary Service, lesson 1
Preach My Gospel: A Guide to Missionary Service, lesson 2
Preach My Gospel: A Guide to Missionary Service, lesson 1
Preach My Gospel: A Guide to Missionary Service, lesson 2

In the News

″Jesus Christ,″ according to the Newsroom. ″Christianity: Following Jesus in Word and Deed,″ according to the author. Newsroom

Teachings of Presidents of the Church

″Jesus Christ, the Divine Redeemer of the World″ (Jesus Christ, the Divine Redeemer of the World) ‘Accepting the Atonement of Jesus Christ’ is found in Joseph Smith’s Teachings of the Prophets, chapter 3
″Accepting the Atonement of Jesus Christ.″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Brigham Young, chapter 5
″Jesus Christ’s Infinite Atonement″ (The Infinite Atonement of Jesus Christ). Teachings of Church Presidents: John Taylor, Chapter 5
″The Atonement of Jesus Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: John Taylor, Chapter 5
″The Atonement of Jesus Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Wilford Woodruff, chapter 7
″Reflections on the Mission of Jesus Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Joseph Fielding Smith, chapter 7
″Reflections on the Mission of Jesus Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Lorenzo Snow, chapter 24
″I Know That My Redeemer Lives″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Lorenzo Snow, chapter 24
″I Know That My Redeemer Lives″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Lorenzo Snow, chapter 24
″I Know That My Redeemer Lives″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Joseph F. Smith, chapter 1
″Jesus Christ Redeems All Mankind from Temporal Death″ (Jesus Christ Redeems All Mankind from Temporal Death). President Joseph F. Smith, Teachings of the Prophets of the Church, chapter 10
″Jesus Christ Redeems the Repentant from Spiritual Death″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Joseph F. Smith, chapter 11
″The Father and the Son″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Joseph F. Smith, chapter 11
″The Father and the Son″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Joseph F. Smith, chapter 40
″Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God″
″Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Heber J. Grant, chapter 24
″Our Testimony of Jesus Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Heber J. Grant, chapter 24
″Our Testimony of Jesus Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: George Albert Smith, chapter 3
″Jesus Christ: ‘The Way, the Truth, and the Life’″
″Jesus Christ: ‘The Way, the Truth, and the Life’″ Teachings of Church Presidents: David O. McKay, chapter 1
″Our Savior, Jesus Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: David O. McKay, chapter 1
″Our Savior, Jesus Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Joseph Fielding Smith, chapter 2
″The Lamb Slain from the Foundation of the World″ (The Lamb Slain from the Foundation of the World). In the Teachings of the Presidents of the Church: Harold B. Lee, chapter 3, he writes, ″Jesus Christ: My Savior, My Lord.″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Spencer W. Kimball, chapter 3
″Jesus Christ, Our Savior and Redeemer″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Spencer W. Kimball, chapter 3
″Jesus Christ, Our Savior and Redeemer″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Ezra Taft Benson, chapter 6
″Jesus Christ—Our Only Hope and Joy″
″Jesus Christ—Our Only Way to Hope and Joy″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Howard W. Hunter, chapter 1
″We Look to Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Gordon B. Hinckley, chapter 8
″We Look to Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Howard W. Hunter, chapter 1
″We Look to Christ″ Teachings of Church Presidents: Howard W. Hunter, chapter 1
″We Look to Christ″

Stories

What Would Your Life Be Like if You Didn’t Have the Book of Mormon to Read? ″You Are in My Hands,″ says President Russell M. Nelson. Dieter F. Uchtdorf, President of the United Nations
Elder Richard J. Maynes discusses the joy of living a Christ-centered life.

Teaching Resources

Teaching Outlines

Come, Follow Me—for Primary: New Testament 2019—Luke 2
Matthew 2 Come, Follow Me—for Secondary: New Testament 2019
Hebrews 1–6 will be studied from November 4–10. ‘Come, follow me,’ says the Lord—for Primary: New Testament in 2019.
The ninth to fifteenth of December: Revelation 1–11 ‘Come, follow me,’ says the Lord—for Primary: New Testament in 2019.
December 16–22: Christmas Come, Follow Me—For Primary: New Testament 2019
December 16–22: Christmas Come, Follow Me—For Secondary: New Testament 2019
″The Book of Mormon Is Another Testament of Jesus Christ,″ according to the Jesus Christ and the Everlasting Gospel Teacher Manual. ″Salvation Comes Through Jesus Christ,″ according to the Teachings and Doctrine in the Book of Mormon Teacher Manual, lesson 1. Teachings and Doctrine of the Book of Mormon Teacher Manual, lesson 8
″The Coming of Jesus Christ″ Teachings and Doctrine of the Book of Mormon Teacher Manual, lesson 21
″Come unto Christ″ Teachings and Doctrine of the Book of Mormon Teacher Manual, lesson 28
″Come unto Christ″ Teachings and Doctrine of the Book of Mormon Teacher Manual, lesson 29
″Come unto Christ″

Stories and Activities for Teaching Children

″Jesus Christ,″ Teaching Aids for Preschool and Elementary School Students

Media

Music

In addition to the hymn ″Redeemer of Israel,″ Hymns no. 6 includes the hymns ″All Creatures of Our God and King,″ Hymns no. 62, ″Nearer, Dear Savior, to Thee,″ Hymns no. 99, ″Rock of Ages,″ Hymns no. 111, ″Abide with Me
‘Tis Eventide,″ Hymns no. 165, ″I Stand All Amazed,″ and ″He Sen ″Tell Me the Stories of Jesus,″ Children’s Songbook, number 34
″Tell Me the Stories of Jesus,″ Children’s Songbook, number 57

The Day Christ Died – Was it on a Thursday or Friday?

Following the teachings of Jesus, Christian tradition places his final lunch with his followers on Thursday evening and his crucifixion on Friday, which we name ″Good Friday.″ We now know that there is a one-day holiday.Wednesday night was Jesus’ final dinner, and he was crucified on Thursday, the 14th of the Hebrew month Nisan, the following day.The actual Passover dinner was served on Thursday night, at sundown, to mark the beginning of the 15th of Nisan.

That Passover supper was never consumed by Jesus.He had passed away around 3 p.m.on Thursday afternoon, according to his family.We need to get the chronology right that weekend because understanding the early tradition that Jesus was in the tomb for ″three days and three nights″ helps us comprehend the timing of the ″Last Supper″ and the Passover as well as how the Sabbaths and festival days coincided that year.

This alternate chronology allows all of our parts from our different sources, including the Synoptic Gospels, the Gospel of John, and the Gospel of Peter, to fit together seamlessly and accurately.
A great deal of uncertainty emerged since all four gospels claim that there was a mad dash to remove Jesus’ body down from the cross and buried before sunset because the ″Sabbath″ was approaching.
Everyone concluded that the allusion to ″the Sabbath″ had to be referring to Saturday, which meant that the crucifixion had to have taken place on a Friday.
However, as Jews are well aware, the day of Passover itself is also a ″Sabbath,″ or day of rest, regardless of which day of the week it occurs on.
In the year 30 AD, Friday, the 15th of the Jewish month of Nisan, was also a Sabbath, resulting in two Sabbaths occurring back to back – Friday and Saturday – for the first time in recorded history.
When Matthew writes that the ladies who came to Jesus’ tomb came early on Sunday morning ″after the Sabbaths,″ it appears that he is aware of this (Matthew 28:1).

As is typically the case, the gospel of John retains a more exact chronology of what transpired during the time period under consideration.It is specifically stated in John’s gospel that the Wednesday night ″last supper″ occurred ″before the holiday of Passover.″ Additionally, he points out that when Jesus’ accusers handed him to be executed on Thursday morning, they would not enter Pilate’s courtyard because they would be contaminated, and therefore would not be able to partake in the Passover meal that evening as a result (John 18:28).John is well aware that the Jews would be gathering for their customary Seder supper on Thursday night.When one reads the gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke, one gets the idea that the ″final supper″ was the Passover dinner of the disciples.Some have even suggested that Jesus may have eaten the Passover feast a day early, knowing full well that he would die the next day.

Others disagree.However, the truth remains that Jesus did not partake in the Passover supper in 30 CE.Jesus was no longer alive when the Passover dinner began at dusk on Thursday.He had been hurriedly interred in a tomb until after the celebration, when formal and complete Jewish funeral procedures could be carried out in accordance with tradition.There are various signs that this was the case outside of John’s gospel that point to this being the case.As an example, in Luke, Jesus tells his disciples at the final meal: ″I sincerely want to share this Passover with you before I suffered, but I will not share it until the fulfillment of this Passover in the kingdom of God″ (Luke 22:14).

A subsequent copyist of the text altered the word ″again″ to make it read ″I won’t eat it again,″ since the story had formed that Jesus did commemorate Passover that night and changed the celebration of the holiday to the Christian Eucharist, often known as the Mass.
Furthermore, all of our sources state that Jesus shared ″a loaf of bread″ with his followers, using the Greek term (artos) that refers to an ordinary loaf, not the unleavened flat bread or matzos that Jews eat during their Passover feasts.
In addition, when Paul alludes to the ″last supper,″ he does not say ″on the night of Passover,″ but rather ″on the night Jesus was betrayed,″ and he also references the ″loaf of bread″ in a crucial way (1 Corinthians 11:23).
If this meal had been the Passover supper, Paul would have wanted to say something like that, but he doesn’t want to.
For further information on the historical context of this debate, read ″The Last Supper and the Passover.″ According to the Talmud, ″Yeshua the Nazarene was hung on Erev Pesach,″ which literally means ″on the eve of Passover,″ which means ″on the eve of the festival of Passover″ (b.
Sanhedrin 67a and 43a)

On what day of the week was Jesus crucified?

Although the Bible does not specify the day of the week on which Jesus was crucified, the two most frequently accepted theories are that it occurred either on Wednesday or on Friday of that week.It has been suggested that He was crucified on a Thursday, which some believe is a reasonable compromise.″For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a great fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the center of the earth,″ Jesus declared in reference to Himself (Matthew 12:40).

Consequently, we DO KNOW that there were three days between Jesus’ crucifixion and His resurrection, but the exact days that this time period encompassed are still up for question.

What’s three days?

Also controversial is the definition of ″three days″ in the important texts that speak of Christ’s resurrection, which is disputed by certain scholars.When it came to counting days, the Jewish thinking at the time was that even half days were still considered as one day.For those passages, some versions include the phrase ″on the third day,″ but not all of them.

Not to mention the fact that not everyone believes that the phrase ″on the third day″ is an accurate translation of those texts.In fact, Mark 8:31 states that Jesus will be raised ″after″ three days, not ″before.″ In numerous ways, depending on which side of the argument is being advanced, the concept of ″three days″ can be expanded.

The Argument for Friday

Those who argue for the crucifixion taking place on a Friday do so in the context of the Jewish thinking of the historical period we discussed before, which renders the notion of ″day″ somewhat ambiguous.To put it another way, it might be considered three days if Jesus was buried for a portion of Friday, all of Saturday, and then a portion of Sunday.Mark 15:42, which states that Jesus was killed ″the day before the Sabbath,″ is one text that supports a Friday crucifixion.

If this was referring to the weekly Sabbath (which is kept on Saturdays), then the crucifixion would have occurred on Friday.Matthew 16:21 and Luke 9:22 are two further passages from the Bible that may allude to a Friday crucifixion.″On the third day,″ according to both scriptures, Jesus would be raised from the dead.That implies He would have been risen on the third day of the week, rather than having been buried for a full three days and nights.

The Argument for Thursday

When arguing for the Thursday Crucifixion, proponents employ an enlarged understanding of the phrase ″three days.″ As an illustration: Consider the following scenario: you visit your friend after school on Monday, but he is missing from school every day until you see him in the morning on Thursday.″I haven’t seen you in three days!″ you could exclaim, despite the fact that it has only been 60 hours in reality (2.5 days).If Jesus was crucified on Thursday evening, this would explain how they were able to claim that it took three days to execute him.

Also, proponents of a Thursday crucifixion argue that there are simply too many events that occur between Jesus’ burial and His resurrection for them all to have occurred between Friday and Sunday—basically one 24-hour period plus two partial days—for it all to have occurred between Friday and Sunday.Some have estimated that up to 20 events take place within the timeframe, with one of those days being the Sabbath (Saturday), during which Jews were ordered to take time off from their work.Having an extra day or two would alleviate the difficulty with the timing.

The Argument for Wednesday

According to the reasoning presented on Wednesday, Jews kept TWO Sabbaths that week due to Passover (Mark 15:42; Luke 23:52-54).The Old Testament has evidence that the high holy days of Passover were referred to as ″Sabbath″ days, despite the fact that they did not occur on the seventh day of the week.(See Leviticus 16:29-31, Leviticus 23:24-32, and Leviticus 39.) The first Sabbath would have occurred on the evening of Jesus’ crucifixion, according to tradition.

The second Sabbath would have been the usual weekly Sabbath, as was the case previously.When the Sabbath had passed, Mark 16:1 tells us that the ladies went out to buy spices, and Luke 23:56 continues the account by adding that once they had prepared the spices, they rested ″on the Sabbath.″ How could they buy spices after the Sabbath and then prepare them before the Sabbath, given the time constraints?If there were two Sabbaths, they would be able to do so.They would not have made purchases on the Sabbath since doing so would have been a violation of God’s mandate to observe the Sabbath.

With this interpretation of two Sabbaths and a Wednesday crucifixion, we are able to resolve the problem of the biblical story of the women and the spices while maintaining a literal interpretation of Matthew 12:40.
As a result, the chronology might look somewhat like this: During the day on Wednesday, Jesus was crucified and buried around dusk.
The holiday of Passover was observed from sunset Wednesday to sunset Thursday (the first Sabbath).
The spices were obtained and cooked by the women after the sun set on Thursday.
In Israel, Jews keep their weekly Sabbath from sunset on Friday to sunset on Saturday; hence, this was the second Sunday in a seven-day period, and so the ladies would have rested.
Jesus arose from the dead somewhere between sunset on Saturday and daybreak on Sunday, and he walked out of the tomb alive.

Even though the Bible does not specify the precise hour He rose from the dead, we may be certain that it was before Sunday morning since the women returned at that time.As a result, on Sunday morning, soon after daybreak (Mark 16:2) and before the sun had completely risen (John 20:1), the women arrived to anoint Jesus’ body but discovered that the tomb had been opened and that Jesus had vanished.One of the problems with the Wednesday crucifixion argument is found in the book of Luke, chapter 24.The disciples who accompany Jesus on the road to Emmaus are reported to be doing so on ″the same day″ as His resurrection, according to the Scriptures (Luke 24:13).While telling Him about Jesus’ crucifixion (Luke 24:21), they don’t recognize Him and say, referring to the fact that ″this is the third day since these things occurred.″ If we count the days from Wednesday to Sunday, we have four days in all.

Possibly, they were keeping track of the days since His burial, which would have been from Thursday to Sunday, or three full days.

Still confused?

I understand that it’s all a little complicated since we don’t have a specific Scripture reference that tells us what day of the week it is at this point.Scholars attempted to piece together all of the evidence, but came up with a variety of conflicting interpretations.The fact that Jesus was killed on a specific day of the week doesn’t really important when we look at the broader picture, though.

It is likely that God would have communicated that knowledge quite readily through His Word if it had been vital for us to know (1 Corinthians 14:33).Because the Bible specifically states when He was raised from the dead, we can be confident that this was a crucial detail to know.At the end of the day, what counts is whether or not we think Jesus is who He claims to be, that the events that transpired during this time period actually occurred, and what those events mean to us as Christians.It is only if we believe that Jesus died in our place, taking on the penalty that we should have received as a result of our sin, and that He is our Savior that we will be granted eternal life (John 3:16, 36)!

It makes no difference whether Jesus was killed on a Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday.
No matter what day it was, we may be certain that it DID happen, and that we have been blessed with the greatest gift that anybody could ever receive: salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.

TL;DR

Although the Bible does not specify the day of the week on which Jesus was crucified, the most frequently accepted theories are that it occurred on a Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday of that week.We know that there were three days between Jesus’ crucifixion and His resurrection (Matthew 12:40), but the exact day on which the crucifixion took place is still up for discussion.And it’s completely inconsequential.

What counts in the end is whether or not we b