What Is Jesus Real Name

This Is What Jesus’ Friends And Family Actually Called Him — And No, It Wasn’t Jesus

Even among people of different religious beliefs, the name “Jesus” is almost universally recognized. It may come as a surprise, however, that the name “Jesus,” which millions of Christians all over the world are urged not to use in vain, was not in fact the name of the historical figure. Despite the fact that the assertion appears to be controversial, the truth is that it is more of a translation issue.

What Was Jesus’ Real Name?

Commons image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons “Isous” is the Greek transcription of Jesus’ given name, whereas “Yeshua” is the late Biblical Hebrew form of Jesus’ given name. Of course, neither English nor Spanish existed in their present forms during the time when the genuine Jesus was living, nor was the New Testament written at the time that the original Jesus was alive. Jesus and his followers were all Jewish, and as a result, they all received Hebrew given names – despite the fact that they would have spoken Aramaic.

As a result, the majority of academics think that the Christian Messiah’s given name was really “Yeshua,” which was a very popular Jewish given name during Jesus’ lifetime.

This raises the question of how the name “Jesus” got to be unique in the first place, given that there were apparently so many individuals called “Yeshua” moving around at the time.

How “Yeshua” Became Lost In Translation

Commons image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons Because of this, the King James Bible was written in the “I” spelling rather than the “J” spelling. Given the fact that not every language has the same sounds, people have traditionally adopted their names in order to be able to pronounce them in a number of different languages. Even in modern languages, there are discrepancies in how Jesus is pronounced from one dialect to another. In English, the name is pronounced with a hard “J,” yet in Spanish, the name is pronounced with what would be a “H” in English, despite the fact that the spelling is the same.

The New Testament was initially written in Greek, which not only has a completely different alphabet than Hebrew, but also does not include the “sh” sound present in the Hebrew word “Yeshua,” which means “Yeshua.” After deciding to use the Greek “s” sound instead of the “sh” sound in the name Yeshua, the New Testament authors added a final “s” to the end of the name to make it more masculine in the original language.

When the Bible was translated into Latin from the original Greek, the term “Iesus” was used by the translators to refer to the person who had given the name.

For decades, this inscription has been a typical feature of portrayals of the crucifixion in Western Christianity as “INRI,” an acronym for the LatinIesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum, or “Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews,” which translates as “Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews.” Because Latin being the main language of the Catholic Church, the Latinized form of the name “Yeshua” was used to refer to Christ across the rest of Europe and beyond.

Even the King James Bible, which was first published in 1611, utilized the “Iesus” spelling.

How “Yeshua” Eventually Became “Jesus”

It’s difficult to identify precisely where the “Jesus” spelling originated, while some historians believe that a variant of the name that originated in Switzerland is the most likely candidate. It is more common for the “J” in Swiss to be pronounced like an English “Y” or the Latin “Ie” as in “Iesus.” In 1553, when the Catholic Queen “Bloody” Mary ascended to the English throne, thousands of English Protestant intellectuals fled, with a large number eventually settling in Geneva. It was at Geneva that a group of some of the best English minds of the day collaborated to create the Geneva Bible, which was the first to utilize the Swiss spelling of the name “Jesus.” Commons image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons A significant contribution to the popularization of the “Jesus” spelling was made by the Geneva Bible.

Eventually, it was transported to the New World on the Mayflower, which arrived in 1620.

As a result, the name used by English speakers today is an English adaption of a German translation of a Latin transliteration of a Greek transliteration of an initially Hebrew name, which was then adopted by the English language.

Then read about Jesus’ tomb being opened after it had been sealed.

Should You Really Be Calling Jesus by the Name Yeshua?

Is Yeshua the correct spelling of Jesus’ given name? It is believed by followers of Messianic Judaism, Jews who embrace Jesus Christ as the Messiah, and they are not alone in their belief. In fact, some Christians believe that individuals who refer to Christ by his Hebrew name, Yeshua, rather than by his English name, Jesus, are worshipping the incorrect savior. These Christians believe that naming the Messiah by his given name, Jesus, is equivalent to calling the Messiah by the name of the Greek deity Zeus.

What Is Jesus’ Real Name?

Indeed, the Hebrew word for Jesus is Yeshua (Jesus). It is an acronym that stands for “Yahwehis Salvation.” Yeshua is spelled “Joshua” in the English language. However, when the name Yeshua is translated from Hebrew into Greek, which is the language in which the New Testament was written, the name becomesIsous. “Jesus” is the English spelling of the name Isous. The names Joshua and Jesus are the same, which suggests they are related. One name has been translated from Hebrew into English, and the other has been translated from Greek into English, respectively.

Consider the following scenario: Languages use various words to describe the same item in different ways.

Furthermore, we can refer to Jesus by several names without altering his character in any way.

In English, he is referred to as Jesus, with a “J” that sounds like the letter “gee.” Portuguese speakers refer to him as Jesus, but with a “J” that sounds like “geh,” and Spanish speakers refer to him as Jesus, but with a “J” that sounds like “hey,” respectively.

Which of these pronunciations do you think is the most accurate? Of course, they are all speaking in their own tongue.

The Connection Between Jesus and Zeus

The names Jesus and Zeus have absolutely nothing to do with each other. This hypothesis is based on fabrications and has made its way across the internet, where it has been joined by a slew of other false and misleading material.

More Than One Jesus in the Bible

Jesus Christ, in reality, was not the only Jesus mentioned in the Bible; there were other others. Jesus Barabbas is one of several people with the same name that are mentioned in the Bible. He is commonly referred to as just Barabbas, because he was the prisonerPilate was freed from instead of Jesus Christ: “Which one do you want me to release to you: Jesus Barabbas, or Jesus who is considered the Messiah?” Pilate inquired of the multitude after it had assembled. (Matthew 27:17, New International Version) In the genealogy of Jesus, an ancestor of Christ is referred to as Jesus (Joshua) in Luke 3:29, according to the Bible.

and Jesus, whose surname is Justus.

(Colossians 4:11, English Standard Version)

Are You Worshiping the Wrong Savior?

The Bible does not give preference to one language (or translation) over another in terms of significance. We are not required to invoke the Lord’s name entirely in Hebrew, as we are in other languages. Furthermore, it makes no difference how we say his name. And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved, according to the text of Acts 2:21. (ESV). God is aware of those who invoke his name, regardless of whether they do it in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or Hebrew.

Matt Slickat, Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry, summarizes the situation as follows: “Some believe that if we do not pronounce Jesus’ name correctly, we are in sin and serving a false deity; however, this claim cannot be supported by Scripture.

Receiving the Messiah, God manifested in human, through faith is what distinguishes us as Christians.” So go ahead and call out in the name of Jesus with confidence.

Yeshua or Joshua? Jesus may actually go by a different name

Getty Although some people feel that Christmas is represented by a jovial man in a red and white suit, others believe that Christmas has more religious roots. A common misconception about Christmas is that it is about celebrating Jesus Christ, who many Christians believe to be his real name. A result of the countless translations that the Bible has undergone, “Jesus” has become the popular name for the Son of God in the modern day. His given name in Hebrew is Yeshua, which is a shortened form of the word yehshu’a.

  • Michael L.
  • When the name Yeshua is translated into the Greek language, from which the New Testament is derived, it becomes Isous, which is spelled “Jesus” in the English language.
  • According to the Bible, anybody who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.
  • – Romans 10:13 (NASB) The majority of the time, the discrepancy in names is due to translation.
  • Regardless matter whether he is referred to as Jesus or Yeshua, the tale of his birth is the same.

Despite the fact that December 25th is not the real day of Jesus’ birth, it has been designated as a day for Christians to convert nonbelievers, according to William Walsh’s 1970 book, The Story of Santa Claus.

Jesus (name) – Wikipedia

Jesus

Pronunciation
Gender Male
Origin
Word/name Hebrew
Other names
Related names Joshua,Yeshua,Isa

Isous(o; Iesus in Classical Latin) is an ancient Greek version of the Hebrew and Aramaic names Yeshua and Y’shua (Hebrew: ). It is used as a given name for boys and men. Because its origins lay in the name Yeshua/Y’shua, it is etymologically connected to another biblical name, Joshua, because both names derive from the same root. “Jesus” is not commonly used as a given name in the English-speaking world, but its equivalents, like as the SpanishJesus, have had long-standing popularity among persons from other language backgrounds.

Etymology

There have been a number of different hypotheses as to the actual etymological meaning of the nameYhôua(Joshua,Hebrew:), includingYahweh /Yehowah saves, (is) salvation, (is) a saving-cry, (is) a cry-for-help, (is) my aid, andYahweh /Yehowah saves, (is) salvation, (is) a As may be seen in the Hebrew text of Ezra 2:2, 2:6, 2:36, 2:40, 3:2, 3:8, 3:9, 3:10, 3:18, 4:3, and 8:33, as well as in the Biblical Aramaicat text of Ezra 5:2, Ezra 3:19, 7:7, 7:11, 7:39, 7:43, 8:7, 8:17, 9:4, 9:5, 11:26, 12 These Bible passages are about 10 different people (in Nehemiah 8:17, the name refers toJoshuason ofNun).

  1. This historical transition may have occurred as a result of a phonological shift in which gutturalphonemes, such as, were diminished.
  2. However, this has changed recently (-yah).
  3. During the Second Temple era, the name Yeshua/Y’shua was widely used by Jews, and numerous Jewish religious luminaries, including Joshua in the Hebrew Bible and Jesus in the New Testament, were known by this name.
  4. In contrast, both the Western Syriac Christian tradition and the Eastern Syriac Christian tradition employ the Aramaic names (in Hebrew script: )Yeshu and Yisho, respectively, which include the ayin.
  5. Earlier, in the 3rd century BCE, theSeptuaginthad already transliterated the Hebrew name (Yeshua) into Koine Greek as nearly as possible, resulting in the name (Isous).

When speaking Hebrew or Aramaic during this period, the diphthongalvowel of the Masoretic name Yehoshua or Yeshua would not have been present in the pronunciation of the word, and some scholars believe some dialects dropped the pharyngealsound of the final letter ayin, which had no equivalent in ancient Greek in any case.

  • According to thePanarionofEpiphanius of Salamis, the nameIsous is derived from Hebrew/Aramaic and means “healer or physician, and savior,” and that the early Christians were known as Jessaeans before they were known as Christians.
  • From Greek, (Isous) made its way into Latin, at the very least by the time of theVetus Latina.
  • The word (Isous) was transliterated into the Latin word IESVS, where it remained for centuries.
  • Minuscule(lower case) letters were formed about the year 800, and a little time later, theUwas invented to separate the vowelsound from the consonantalsound, and theJwas invented to distinguish the consonant from the vowelsound.
  • The name Jesus comes from the Middle English word Iesu, which means “Jesus” (attested from the 12th century).
  • Because of this, early 17th century works such asthe first edition of theKing James Version of the Bible(1611) continued to print the name with an I, as did the Frenchman Pierre Ramus in the 16th century.

The English language borrows the Latin names “Jesus” (from the nominative form) and “Jesu” (from the genitive form) (from the vocative and oblique forms). “Jesus” is the most often used version, with “Jesu” appearing in a few older, more ancient manuscripts as well.

Declension

The name is declined in an irregular manner in both Latin and Greek:

See also:  Why Did The Romans Kill Jesus
Latin Greek
nominative Jēsūs Iēsūs(Iēsus) Ἰησοῦς
accusative Jēsūm Iēsūm(Iēsum) Ἰησοῦν
dative Jēsū Iēsū Ἰησοῦ
genitive
vocative
ablative

Biblical references

Jesus (Yeshua) appears to have been in common usage in the Land of Israel around the time of Jesus’ birth, according to archaeological evidence. As an added bonus, Philo’s reference to Joshua (o), which means redemption () of the Lord inMutatione Nominumitem 121 suggests that the etymology of Joshua was known outside of Israel. Jesus Barabbas, Jesus ben Ananias, and Jesus ben Sirach are some of the other characters with the name Jesus. In the New Testament, an angel advises Mary to name her child Jesus inLuke 1:31, and an angel tells Joseph to name the kid Jesus in Matthew 1:21, both of which occur during Joseph’s first dream.

“You shall call his name Jesus, for he will rescue his people from their sins,” the angel says.

At the same time, it accomplishes the dual objectives of recognizing Jesus as the savior and emphasizing that the name was not chosen at random but rather in response to a divine order.

Other usage

During the 1380s, John Wycliffe used the spellingIhesusand also used the spellingIhesu(the letter ‘J’ was then awash glyphvariant of ‘I’, and was not considered to be a separate letter until the 1629 Cambridge 1st RevisionKing James Biblewhere the name “Jesus” first appeared) in oblique cases and also in the accusative, and sometimes, seemingly without reason, even for the nominative. Unlike Tyndale, who used Iesuin oblique cases and in the vocative on occasion in the 16th century, the 1611King James Version uses Iesus throughout, independent of syntax and case.

Jesu (pronounced JEE -zoo; derived from the Latin Iesu) is a pronoun that is sometimes used to refer to Jesus in English.

Other languages

The nameJesus is used in numerous languages, including East Scandinavian, German, and several others. Other examples of language use are as follows:

Language Name/variant
Afrikaans Jesus
Albanian Jezui
Arabic ʿIsàعيسى(Islamic or classical arabic) /Yasūʿيسوع(Christian or latter Arabic)
Amharic ኢየሱስ(iyesus)
Aragonese Chesús
Aramaic / Syriac ܝܫܘܥ(Isho)
Arberesh Isuthi
Armenian Հիսուս (Eastern Armenian) Յիսուս (Western Armenian)(Hisus)
Azerbaijani İsa
Belarusian Ісус(Isus) (Orthodox) /Езус(Yezus) (Catholic)
Bengali যীশু(Jeeshu/Zeeshu) (Christian)’ঈসা(‘Eesa) (General)
Breton Jezuz
Bulgarian Исус (Isus)
Catalan Jesús
Chinese simplified Chinese:耶稣;traditional Chinese:耶穌;pinyin:Yēsū
Coptic Ⲓⲏⲥⲟⲩⲥ(Isos)
Cornish Yesu
Croatian Isus
Czech Ježíš
Dutch Jezus
Estonian Jeesus
Filipino Jesús(Christian and secular) /HesúsorHesukristo(religious)
Fijian Jisu
Finnish Jeesus
French Jésus
Galician Xesús
Garo Jisu
Georgian იესო(Ieso)
German Jesus
Ewe Yesu
Greek Ιησούς(Iisúsmodern Greek pronunciation)
Haitian Creole Jezi
Hausa Yesu
Hawaiian Iesū
Hebrew Yeshua /Y’shuaיֵשׁוּעַ
Hindustani ईसा / عيسى (īsā)
Hmong Daw Yexus
Hungarian Jézus
Icelandic Jesús
Igbo Jisos
Indonesia Yesus (Christian) / Isa (Islamic)
Irish Íosa
Italian Gesù
Japanese イエス (Iesu)/イエズス (Iezusu)(Catholic)/ゼス(zesu) ゼズス(zezusu)(Kirishitan)イイスス(Iisusu)(Eastern Orthodox)
Jinghpaw Yesu
Kannada ಯೇಸು (Yesu)
Kazakh Иса (Isa)
Khasi Jisu
Khmer យេស៑ូ (Yesu), យេស៑ូវ (Yesuw)
Kikuyu Jeso
Kisii Yeso
Korean 예수 (Yesu)
Kurdish Îsa
Latvian Jēzus
Ligurian Gesû
Limburgish Zjezus
Lithuanian Jėzus
Lombard Gesü
Luganda Yesu
Māori Ihu
मराठी-Marathi येशू – Yeshu
Malagasy Jeso, Jesoa, Jesosy
Malayalam ഈശോ (Īsho), യേശു (Yēshu), കർത്താവ് (Kartāvŭ) (Karthavu is the literal translation of ‘Lord’)
Mirandese Jasus
Maltese Ġesù
Mongolian Есүс
Neapolitan Giesù
Norman Jésus
Occitan Jèsus
Piedmontese Gesù
Polish Jezus
Portuguese Jesus
Romanian Iisus (Eastern Orthodox) / Isus (other denominations)
Russian Иисус (Iisus)
Sardinian Gesùs
Serbian Isus / Исус
Sicilian Gesù
Sinhala ජේසුස් වහන්සේ – Jesus Wahanse (Catholic Church), යේසුස් වහන්සේ – Yesus Wahanse (Protestantism)
Shona Jesu
Slovak Ježiš
Slovenian Jezus
Somali Ciise
Spanish Jesús
Swahili Yesu
Tajik Исо (Iso)
Tamil Yesu (இயேசு)
Telugu యేసు – ఏసు -Yesu
Thai เยซู – “Yesu”
Turkish İsa
Turkmen Isa
Ukrainian Ісус (Isus)
Urdu عیسیٰ
Uzbek Iso
Venetian Jesu
Vietnamese Giêsu, Dêsu
Welsh Iesu
Xhosa Yesu
Yoruba Jesu
Zulu uJesu

See also

  • Name of Jesus
  • Isa (name)
  • Joshua (disambiguation)
  • Holy Name of Jesus

References

  1. AbLiddell and Scott are two of the most well-known names in the world of sports. An Aramaic–English Lexicon, p. 824
  2. AbcCatholic Encyclopedia: The Origin of the Name Jesus Christ
  3. Robinson 2005
  4. Stegemann 2006
  5. “”, Ernest Klein,A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language(New York: Macmillan Publishing Company 1987)
  6. Talshir, M. H. Segal,A Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew(Tel Aviv: 1936), p. 146
  7. Brown, Driver, Briggs, Ges The Talmud and other Jewish sources, where Jesus is referred to as Yeshu and other Jews with the same name are referred to by the fuller names Yeshua and Yehoshua, “Joshua,” suggest that this is the case
  8. Jennings and Brown Driver Briggs Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon
  9. Hendrickson Publishers 1996
  10. “Strong’s Hebrew: 3467. yasha – to deliver”.biblehub.com
  11. “Strong’s Hebrew: 3467. yasha – to deliver”.biblehub.com Brown Driver BriggsHebrew and English Lexicon
  12. Hendrickson Publishers 1996ISBN1-56563-206-0
  13. Brown Driver BriggsHebrew and English Lexicon
  14. “1. The Proto-Semitic root *y’ appears to have preceded Hebrew, as evidenced by the fact that it is found in proper names in NWSem and most of the ESA languages. According to the Ug evidence, the second consonant is pronounced as (Sawyer 1975:78). This new evidence calls into question several previous interpretations based on Arb (see B.1). A.3, A.4, B.3), the collocation of y’ phrases with deities’ names (as with y
  15. See A.1, 3, 5, 7-10
  16. Also Syntagmatics A.1), historical evidence (see A.5, 7-10
  17. Also Syntagmatics A.1), and phonetic equivalence are the key points presented by Sawyer (1975). (B.1). It had been previously endorsed by KB (412, together with wasia), Huffmon (1965: 215), and Stolz (1971: 786, citing Sawyer 1965:475-76, 485)
  18. And at the conference where Sawyer first presented his article, T.L. Fenton and H.W.F Saggs had stated their great agreement with it (Sawyer 1975: 83-84). The most notable example of this viewpoint is that it was adopted in the newest Hebrew lexicon in order to accommodate philological facts (Ges18: 510).” (AitkenDavies, 2016)
  19. Philo Judaeus, “De ebrietate” in Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunted (Philo Judaeus, “De ebrietate” in Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunted (Philo Judaeus, “De ebrietate” in Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunted (Philo Jud P. Wendland, Berlin: Reimer, 1897 (repr. De Gruyter, 1962), vol. 2:170-214, Section 96, Line 2
  20. Williams, Frank
  21. Translator. P. Wendland, Berlin: Reimer, 1897 (repr. De Gruyter, 1962), vol. 2:170-214, Section 96, Line 2. “Introduction”. Book I of Epiphanius of Salamis’ Panarion (Panarion of Salamis) (Sects 1-46). 1987. (E.J. Brill Publishing, Leiden) This image depicts a page from the very first edition of the King James Version of the Bible, which contains the Gospel of Luke. ISBN90-04-07926-2 From. Matthew, who was able to get a hold of the information on March 28, 2006
  22. By Douglas Hare 2009ISBN0-664-23433-Xpage 11
  23. Matthew 1-7by William David Davies, Dale C. Allison 2004ISBN0-567-08355-1page 209
  24. Bible explorer’s guideby John Phillips 2002ISBN0-8254-3483-1page 147
  25. The Westminster theological wordbook of the Bible2003 by Donald E. GowanISBN0-664-22394-Xpage 453
  26. Who Te Aka Mori Dictionary is a free online resource for Mori language learning. Retrieved on June 10th, 2021

Bibliography

  • Graham DaviesJames K. AitkenJames K. Aitken (2016). “Another ‘Deliverance’ Word from the SAHD” “Lexeme: (from the SAHD ‘Deliverance’ Words” (PDF). Robinson, Neal’s Semantics of Ancient Hebrew Database is 15 pages long and has 15 entries (2005). “Jesus”. Jane Dammen is a character in McAuliffe (ed.). The Qur’an is an encyclopedia of knowledge. Brill, doi: 10.1163/1875-3922 q3 EQCOM 00099
  • Stegemann, Ekkehard (Basle)
  • Stegemann, Ekkehard (Basle) (2006). “Jesus”. Hubert Cancik and Helmuth Schneider published a book titled (eds.). Brill’s New Pauly (doi: 10.1163/1574-9347 bnp e522560)
  • Brill’s New Pauly (doi: 10.1163/1574-9347 bnp e522560)
  • Bri

Was Jesus’ name really Jesus?

To be sure, all current scholars of antiquity believe that Jesus lived historically (or, at the very least, the overwhelming majority of them): He was a Galilean Jew who was baptized by John the Baptist before launching his own ministry immediately afterward. They also believe that he preached orally, was referred to as “rabbi,” and left no written records of his own, in a manner similar to that of Socrates. The majority of these experts likewise believe that Jesus was apprehended, tried, and killed by Roman officials.

  1. But was Jesus actually his given name?
  2. More information may be found at: Is it possible that Jesus and Joseph were true carpenters?
  3. It is the first chapter of Matthew that opens with a genealogy of Jesus that traces his lineage all the way from Abraham through David to Joseph, establishing Jesus as a descendant of the House of David from the beginning.
  4. Matthew’s Gospel has only one instance in which Jesus is referred to as “the carpenter’s son,” and that is on the cross (Cf.
  5. Contrary to this, his narrative makes it quite plain that Mary was engaged to Joseph when he discovered her “with child of the Holy Ghost.” During a dream sequence, an angel appeared to Joseph, indicating that the child was of heavenly origin.
  6. The passage itself reads as follows (see Matthew 1, 222-23): More information may be found at: What is the significance of Moses, Elijah, and Jesus being present during the Transfiguration?
  7. Since the angel also instructs Mary in the Gospel of Luke to name the infant Jesus (cf.

Her guardian angel assured her, “Don’t be scared, Mary.” You have gained favor with the Almighty.

So, did the angels misinterpret the prophecy in the first place?

Calling (e.g., “They shall call his name Emmanuel”) and naming (e.g., “You shall give him the name Jesus”) are two very different things.

More information may be found at: What is the significance of Moses, Elijah, and Jesus being present during the Transfiguration?

At first glance, the name, on the other hand, appears to have no Messianic connotations.

The long and somewhat convoluted version is that while the kingdom of Judah was at war with two neighboring countries, Isaiah abducted king Ahaz’s son, Shear-Jashub, and promised him that his enemies would not prevail against him.

The prophet Isaiah also mentions another kid, his own, who is named “Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz,” which is a symbolic name that translates as “hurry to the prizes.” These writings then describe a third kid, this one called Immanuel, who is mentioned as follows: Afterward, he added, “Hear ye now, O house of David; is it such a little thing for you to weary men, but are you willing to weary my God as well?” So the Lord himself will provide you with a sign; see, a virgin will become pregnant and give birth to a son, whom she will name Immanuel (God with us).

The butter and honey will be given to him so that he may learn to reject the bad and choose the right.

Matthew’s Gospel, on the other hand, interprets Isaiah’s words in a different way, seeing it as prophesying the arrival of the Messiah, the Incarnation of God, which literally translates as “God is with us.”

So, why the name Jesus, then?

To be sure, all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically (or, at the very least, the overwhelming majority of them): He was a Galilean Jew who was baptized by John the Baptist before immediately beginning his own ministry. They also agree that he preached orally, was referred to as “rabbi,” and did not leave any written records of his own, in a manner similar to that of Socrates. Moreover, the majority of these scholars agree that Jesus was detained by Roman authorities, tried, and executed by them.

  1. What if Jesus wasn’t his given name?
  2. For more information, please see this link: Were Jesus and Joseph in fact carpenters in their own right?
  3. When Matthew opens his Gospel, we are given an account of Jesus’ genealogy, which traces his lineage all the way from Abraham to David and on to Joseph, thus portraying him as a descendant of King David.
  4. Matthew’s Gospel contains only one instance in which Jesus is referred to as “the carpenter’s son,” and that is in verse 57.
  5. Matthew 13, 55).
  6. A dream in which an angel revealed the divine origin of the child saved Joseph’s life just as he was about to call off their engagement.
  7. When the angel tells Joseph to name the child “Jesus,” why does he do so when the prophecy clearly states that “they shall call his name Emmanuel”?

Luke 1, 30-31), there appears to be some general angelic confusion at work here.

The favor of God has been bestowed upon your person.

Did the angels misinterpret the prophecy in some way?

Calling (e.g., “They shall call his name Emmanuel”) and naming (e.g., “You shall give him the name Jesus”) are two distinct concepts.

For more information, please see this link: What is the significance of Moses, Elijah, and Jesus being present at the Transfiguration together?

Despite this, at first glance the name has absolutely no Messianic connotations.

The long and sometimes confusing version is that when the kingdom of Judah was at war with two neighboring kingdoms, Isaiah took king Ahaz’s son, Shear-Jashub, and promised him that his enemies would not succeed in their attempts to destroy the kingdom.

See also:  Who Created Jesus

Other children are mentioned, including one that is Isaiah’s own, who is given the symbolic name of “Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz.” This is also a name that means “hurry to the spoils.” These texts then mention a third child, this one named Immanuel, who is mentioned in the Bible.

So the Lord himself will provide you with a sign; behold, a virgin will become pregnant and give birth to a son, whom she will name Immanuel.

This text, on the other hand, is understood differently in the Gospel of Matthew, who interprets Isaiah’s prophecy as predicting the coming of the Messiah and the Incarnation of God, which literally translates as “God is with us.”

What Was Jesus’ Real Name?

Yoeml/Shutterstock In the history of mankind, one of the most important characters is Jesus Christ, or, to be more precise, Jesus of Nazareth. After 2,000 years, the holy figure who serves as a focal point for 2.3 billion adherents of the faith that bears his name (according to the Pew Research Center) has been commemorated through many media such as art, music, literature, and other forms of expression. However, over the most of those 2,000 years, almost everyone who has stated his name has pronounced it incorrectly at some point.

His name was an old Aramaic name, and it is possible that he spoke ancient Aramaic (a cousin of Hebrew, according to History) in his everyday life.

And to make matters even more complicated, the name we know him by was not transliterated immediately from his old language into whichever current language the speaker is speaking; rather, there was an intervening language that further complicated the situation.

As a result, it differs in both appearance and pronunciation from the name given to him by his mother.

Jesus’ real name was something akin to Yeshua

Photograph by Repina Valeriya/Shutterstock The prophet of the first century was most likely known by the name “Yeshua,” which was a short form of the Hebrew name “Yehshu’a.” “God is salvation,” according to Learn Religions, is the meaning of the phrase. And if the name Joshua appears to be familiar, it is because another Biblical character with the same name existed in the Old Testament: Joshua. The New Testament, on the other hand, was written in ancient Greek, which translated Jesus’ name as “Isous,” which eventually became known as “Jesus” in English.

According to PBS, “this is due to the fact that the original authors of the New Testament were attempting to convert the sound of the Hebrew name into Greek letters, but because they did not have the letters or spelling to represent the’sh’ sound in their language, they substituted a ‘S’ sound in the middle, which led them to the name Ious.” PBS reports that later translations of the Bible removed the “I” at the beginning of the name and replaced it with a “J,” and his name finally became known as “Jesus” in the modern day.

However, there is no definitive explanation for why the substitutions occurred, other than to state that it had a lot to do with transliteration, which is the process of transferring sounds and letters from one alphabet to another — sort of like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

Jesus didn’t have a last name

Modern Christians consider a man named Jesus to be the son of God, and the name “Jesus” has become associated with the idea that this guy was the son of God. According to Slate, Jesus is a well-known name that requires no introduction to most people living in the world thousands of years after the historical figure died, regardless of their religious beliefs or lack thereof. However, in Yeshua’s era, his name was fairly common, indicating that he was a well-known figure. According to Slate, in Jesus’ day, persons with the same name were recognized by the fact that their father was different from their mother.

Instead, he would have been referred to as “the son of” Joseph or “Yeshua Bar Yehosef,” which means “the son of Joseph.” Yet another method in which they would have recognized one Yeshua from another was by adding their hometown to the end of their names, as in Yeshua Nasraya, which translates to Jesus of Nazareth in contemporary English.

He should be known to by his given name, according to Learn Religions, and some Christians are quite passionate about this belief.

Is Yeshua Hamashiach the Proper Hebrew Name for Jesus Christ?

God is referred to by many other titles in the Bible, including Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6), Elohim (Genesis 1:1), and El Roi (Genesis 16:13), to mention a few. What about the person of Jesus Christ? Every language has a distinct name for him, and every language has a different pronunciation for him. Nevertheless, does he have a single authentic and appropriate name? YeshuaHamashiach is an acronym that stands for Jesus the Messiah. Yeshu’a would have been the initial Hebraic name for Jesus, according to tradition.

He just goes by the name Yeshua Hamashiach, or does he go by several names?

Although those who lived during Jesus’ time may have pronounced his name like “Yeshua,” this article will argue that we do not forsake our prayers or petitions to the Lord by saying “Jesus” or “Hisus K’ristos” or “Isus Krist” or any other pronunciation in any other language when we pray or petition the Lord.

Where Did The Controversy of Yeshua vs. Jesus Start?

“Can you tell me what Athens has to do with Jerusalem?” It would be an understatement to suggest that the Bible and Ancient Greek culture did not get along well with one another. There was a raw point in the hearts of many in Jesus’ day and beyond when it came to Hellenization, ranging from the Maccabean insurrection against Antiochus Epiphanes IV to the Sadducees assimilating one too many Hellenistic customs. The name Jesus was changed from Yeshua Hamashiach to IZEUS, which means “son of Zeus,” after the Greek term for “son of Zeus.” It goes without saying that if we understood Jesus’ name to signify “Son of Zeus,” we would be straying far from propertheology.

  • The notion that Jesus’ name was derived from anything associated with the Greek pantheon would’ve been offensive to both Jews and Christians at the time of his birth.
  • As a result, because the New Testament was written in Greek, not all names will translate using the same letters across alphabets of different languages.
  • My given name is Esperanza, which means “hopefulness” (translation).
  • Whatever the circumstances, if people referred to Jesus as “Yeshua” back in his day, shouldn’t we refer to him in the same way today?

Wouldn’t it be strange if our own names were pronounced in various ways in different parts of the world? Is it true that we lose power in Jesus’ name if we use the name “Jesus” instead of the name Yeshua?

Why Can We Say “Jesus” Instead of “Yeshua”?

Several factors contribute to our ability to pronounce Jesus’ given name as “Jesus.” We can pray to God using any transliteration of his name, including “Yeshua,” “Jesus,” or any other name we want to call him. However, it is important to remember that many Messianic Jews and other Christian groups will only use the name “Yeshua” to emphasize the fact that Jesus was a Jew, and because the name “Christ” or “Jesus” has had some negative connotations associated with it due to church misuse and abuse of that name.

By transliterating Jesus’ name, we have the power to communicate with people using a pronunciation that they are familiar with and can speak for themselves (Mark 16:15).

The Russian alphabet has several characters that I am unable to pronounce since I have not taught my vocal chords to operate in that manner.

We are reminded of Jesus’ witness to the Jewish people while on earth, as well as his Jewish background, and we are reminded of how the New Testament completes the set-up of the Old Testament when we hear the name Yeshua, which means “Jesus.”

Why Does This Matter?

There is only one authentic name for Jesus, yet every name for Jesus has enormous power, regardless of how it is spelled. The name Yeshua Hamashiach may be respected by those who choose to speak it, and we can find ways to incorporate that name into our prayers and our own lives. iStock/Getty Images Plus/Javier Art Photography iStock/Getty Images Plus/Javier Art Photography She is a multi-published author and a graduate of the professional writing program at Taylor University, where she studied creative writing.

As a writer and editor, she has worked for a number of different publishing firms as well as periodicals, newspapers, and literary agencies, and she has worked with writers such as Jerry B.

Her modern-day Daniel trilogy, published by IlluminateYA, is now available.

Her inspirational adult novel Picture Imperfect, which will be released in November of 2021, will also be released.

Yahushua is the True Name of the Messiah

Note that Joshua is spelled as Yoshua or Yahushua in Hebrew since there is no “J” sound in the language. In the English language, the letter J with its “J” sound did not appear until around 500 years ago. It is also possible that the letter “J” was not included in the original 1611 King James translation. (proof) The objective of this research is to establish that the Messiah’s given name was never “Jesus,” and that the name “Jesus” is actually a human creation. When we look at the King James Version of the Scriptures (KJV), we see an unusual difficulty with the translation: Acts 7:44 (KJV)Our forefathers built the tabernacle of testimony in the desert, as he had ordered, speaking to Moses and commanding him to build it in the manner that he had seen.

Isn’t this passage referring to Joshua, son of Nun rather than the Savior?

Another example (from the King James Version) is as follows: A second limit is set by God, who says in David, “Today, after such a long time,” as in “Today, if ye will hear his voice,” and “Do not harden your hearts,” as in “Today, if ye will hear his voice.” 8 As for Jesus, if he had offered them rest, he would not have mentioned another day later on in his discourse.

  1. All other translations use the word “Joshua” in this place.
  2. In the Greek/Latin distortion of the Messiah’s original Hebrew name, we get the solution to our question.
  3. This was the Messiah’s given name in the beginning.
  4. However, this term was derived from3091in the Hebrew language, which is.
  5. which is accurately called “Yahushua,” as stated above.

It is very clear that the current form “Jesus” bears no resemblance to the ancient name, which the disciples were praying in, baptizing in, and teaching in, and for which they were suffering so much criticism. This is a proven truth. Investigate the matter further and decide for yourself.

Secular References

“Jesus Christ—.,” according to the Encyclopedia Americana. The name Joshua was prevalent at the time of Jesus of Nazareth, despite the fact that Matthew (1:21) reads the name initially Joshua as ‘Yahweh is Salvation,’ and considers it particularly suited for Jesus of Nazareth.” (Volume 16, page 41) Encyclopedia Britannica is a reputable source of information (15th ed.) “Jesus Christ—.,” says the author. A similar statement may be made about the name Jesus. It is the typical Greek version of the popular Hebrew name Joshua that appears in the Septuagint;.” (Volume 10, page 149)

Religious Scholars

Barnes’ observations: (Note on Matt. 1:21) He goes by the name of Jesus, which is the same as Saviour. It is derived from the word “save,” which means “to save one’s life.” Joshua is the same name in Hebrew as in English. “It is used in two places in the New Testament where it refers to Joshua, the Jewish leader who led the Jews into Canaan, and the name Joshua should have been maintained in our translation.” Marvin R. Vincent’s book, Word Studies in the New Testament, is available online. “Jesus.

Its complete and original form is Jehoshua, which is shortened to Joshua or Jeshua through contraction.” Jackson and Lake’s The Acts of the Apostles (The Acts of the Apostles) “Jesus— This is the standard Greek translation of the Hebrew Joshua.” “Jesus— This is the regular Greek translation of the Hebrew Joshua.” Smith’s Bible Dictionary (Smith’s Bible Dictionary): “Jesus Christ —- The name Jesus, which literally means Savior, was a common given name in ancient Israel, deriving from the Hebrew Jehoshua.” James Hastings’ A Dictionary of the Bible is a valuable resource.

  1. Jesus is a Greek version of the names Joshua or Jeshua.
  2. The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Religion contains the following entries: Jesus (The Name) — Matthew’s gospel describes it as a sign of His mission: ‘For He will deliver His people from their sins,’ says the gospel writer.
  3. 374 in Vol.
  4. It is possible to use a play on words (Yeshua, Jesus; yoshia, shall rescue) when speaking Hebrew, but not when speaking Aramaic.

The name Joshua is derived from the Hebrew phrase “Yahweh is salvation.” The Commentary of Matthew Henry (on Matthew 1:21) “Jesus is the same name as Joshua; the only difference is that the termination has been altered for the sake of conformity with the Greek.”

Conclusion

As a result, it may be deduced that “Jesus” was not the Messiah’s given name when He was on the earth. Exactly this is the goal of this research. For further detail on why we should use the Messiah’s given name, please see this page.

See also:  What A Friend We Have In Jesus Hymn

Should Christians Say Yeshua Instead of Jesus? — The Cross Church

Kent Langham contributed to this article. “Yeshua” and “Jesus” are two different names for the same person. Is one more accurate or better than the other in terms of accuracy? Is it necessary for us to speak the name of the Son of God in the Hebrew language? Should Christians refer to Jesus as “Yeshua” rather than “Jesus”?

The Jewish Roots of Christianity

An increasing number of people are becoming interested in the Jewish “origins” of Christianity. A movement of Gentiles has risen up in recent years claiming to rediscover the “Hebrew Roots” of Christianity. They contend that Christianity as it is practiced today is heavily influenced by and even perverted by pagan Greek and Roman culture, which they claim has been perverted by Christianity as it is currently practiced. While we will not be able to dissect many of these assertions in their individual contexts in this space, what I have found intriguing (and rather disturbing) is the increased evangelical emphasis on “Hebrew origins.” Specifically, I’m referring to organizations of gentile believers who support the fundamental ideas of Christianity, congregate in churches, but who also highlight certain dates from the Hebrew calendar, observe Jewish holidays, and refer to Jesus Christ asYeshua, the Messiah.

Specifically, it is this final point that I wish to address in this piece.

YeshuaThe Hebrew Roots Movement

In light of the growing influence of the Hebrew Roots Movement (which, despite its name, does not have a formal doctrinal statement or set of unifying principles to distinguish who is in or who is out), as well as the growing interest in Jewish culture and tradition among evangelicals (which is particularly prevalent in charismatic churches), many Christians today are grappling with the following question: If the incarnate Son of God was Jewish, and his name was Yeshua, and he was recognized and called by the name Yeshua, then why wouldn’t we refer to him as Yeshua in all of our communications?

A number of people have gone so far as to assert that in order to be saved, we must call upon the name of Yeshua HaMashiach, and that to do so in any other way is to call upon a false deity (though this extreme seems to be rare amongst the most influential proponents of these ideas on a broader scale).

Yeshua vs Jesus: The Main Question

Here is the fundamental problem at stake, which I believe most people are overlooking, and the question that must be answered is: Who has the ability to make these decisions on our behalf? To put it another way, how can we determine what we should refer to as the Son of God? What is our standard of excellence? I believe that if we can answer this fundamental issue, we will almost surely be able to address the question at hand.

The Answer

I believe that the Bible is the solution to all of the concerns raised above, as well as to all other questions about life and godliness: The Bible. We may find the solution in the Protestant Bible, which has sixty-six books and contains the answers to all of our questions about salvation and worshiping God (1 Peter 1:3;2 Tim. 3:16). If we are expected to call God by a certain name, you better believe that the Bible has revealed that to us, since the Bible has shown clearly and plainly the method of salvation as well the means of honoring God in our life, so you better believe that the Bible has revealed that to us.

If you are not fluent in Hebrew, then while it may not be wicked to use his Jewish name (although it very well may be depending on the motivation), there is simply no legitimately reasonable reason for you to do so if you are not fluent in Hebrew.

The Name That Is Above Every Other Name

Please keep in mind that the solution to this issue does not rest in man’s opinion, tradition, or skepticism, but rather in the Word of God himself. So let us turn to the Bible for guidance. Philippians 2:6-11 contains what many orthodox New Testament scholars refer to as the “Carmen Christi,” or “the hymn to Christ as to God,” which is a hymn to Christ as well as to God. This “hymn” or poem had previously been in circulation among the churches in Paul’s day, and many of these academics think that Paul used it to show humility to his audience (the church at Philippi), however some scholars believe Paul personally penned it.

  1. 11).
  2. If Paul wrote this letter in 62 AD, then the song would very definitely have been in circulation among the churches for several years prior to that date in order for Paul to use it as an example in his letter.
  3. Well, I believe that this verse of Scripture provides an unequivocal response to our issue and leaves no space for debate.
  4. Think about it and share it with one another because you have the same mentality as Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God as something to be grasped, but humbled himself by taking on the form of a servant and being born in the image of mankind.
  5. As a result, God has elevated him and given him the name that is above all names, so that at the mention of Jesus’ name, every knee should bend, in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
  6. This last statement in Isaiah 45:23 is translated as “every tongue shall confess to God” in the Septuagint (Greek translation of the Old Testament), which Paul and the early churches would have been reading in the first century.
  7. According to Paul, this passage of Scripture from the book of Isaiah, in which Yahweh speaks and declares that to him every knee will bend and every tongue will swear homage, is best understood in the context of the Lord Jesus.

If Yahweh proclaims that you will bow the knee to him, then for Paul and the early church, this means that you will bow the knee to Jesus as well.

NamesThe Name

What does any of this have to do with names, you might wonder. In any case, the Septuagint, which is what would have been in use by the early New Testament church, translates God’s personal name, YHWH, as Kyrios, or ‘Lord,’ just as our English versions of the Old Testament interpret God’s personal name, YHWH, as LORD (in small caps). As a result, when Paul writes in Philippians 2:11 that “every tongue shall confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,” he is equating Jesus Christ with Yahweh, who is the creator of the universe.

There is no indication that the New Testament was originally written in Hebrew, which is important to remember.) That is pure conspiracy theory, and it has absolutely no historical foundation.) As a result, the statement “every tongue must acknowledge that Isous Christos Kyrios” is the one that Paul really wrote while writing to the church in Philippi (Jesus Christ is Lord).

Paul, Christ’s apostle and the author of two-thirds of our New Testament, does not use the term Yeshua HaMashiachisYHWH, but he transliterates the word from Hebrew into Greek instead of saying it.

Evidently, for Paul, simply uttering the Son of God’s name in its Greek form was sufficient for associating him with the God of Israel and addressing him as “Lord” was sufficient.

No Other Name Under Heaven

There are many who object to the Son being addressed by any name other than his Hebrew name, citing Acts 4:12, which states, “And there is salvation in no one other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” This line of reasoning, on the other hand, is utterly erroneous. I’d want to know once again in what language Luke originally wrote this passage from Peter’s announcement. In fact, he composed it in Koine Greek rather than Hebrew! Then, in verse 10, Peter declares, “let it be known to you and all the people of Israel that this man is standing before you well by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth(Ious Christos Nazraios), whom you crucified and whom God resurrected from the dead, by him this man is standing before you well.” Another time, for emphasis, I’ll state it one more: Luke recounts Peter’s testimony in Greek, not in Hebrew.

  • So, if one truly wanted to be consistent in arguing that we must speak the name correctly in order to be saved, one would have to call on Yeshua’s name in Greek, wouldn’t they?
  • Alternatively, one may claim that Luke initially penned this piece in Hebrew and that it was reproduced in Greek and passed off as the original by some diabolical scheme.
  • To become entangled in all of this, I believe, is to completely miss the purpose of the book.
  • Resisting the temptation to believe in the person and work of Jesus Christ as he is revealed in the Scriptures means rejecting the one means of redemption available; there is no other way to be saved.
  • Do you perceive the majesty of the Son of God in His glory?
  • Whatever language you speak, then call on him and be saved.

“For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, pouring his treasures on all who call on him,” says the Bible. Because “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved,” according to the Bible (Romans 10:12-13).

Going Forward

Allow me to summarize my line of thinking in one statement in the hopes of making things more clear: Because the Apostles were not concerned with using the name “Yeshua” instead of “Jesus” (or whatever name a particular language uses as its transliteration), and because the Apostles were Jesus’ hand-selected “sent ones” to preach the gospel, establish churches, write Scripture, and establish the doctrine of the church until Jesus returns, we should regard them as our final authority on all matters concerning the church until Jesus returns.

To put it bluntly, I rely on the Apostolic testimony as revealed in Scripture as the foundation for my decision to refer to the Eternal Word as “Jesus Christ.” Please understand that I do not believe there is any need to be interested in “rediscovering” the Hebrew Roots of Christianity because the Apostles did not appear to be concerned in spreading their Hebrew roots and culture throughout the world.

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus,” says the Apostle Paul to them (Galatians 3:28).

As the Apostle Paul writes, “For while I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all, in order that I may gain more of them.” They were not interested in promoting Jewish tradition or culture; rather, they were interested in rescuing souls.

I pretended to be a person under the law (despite the fact that I was not myself under the law) in order to win over people who were under the law.

So that I might win over the weak, I made myself weak in order to win over the weak.

I do everything for the sake of the gospel, so that I may participate in its blessings with them as well.

I am also concerned that the views I have attempted to dispel in this post are not for the purpose of the gospel, but are rather “foolish debates, dissensions, and quarrels over the law,” and “are useless and worthless” in the eyes of the Lord (Titus 3:9).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.