Why We Baptize In Jesus Name

Why Should We Baptize In Jesus Name?

Why Should We Baptize in the Name of Jesus Christ? The subject of water baptism has long been referred to be a “major issue,” and it has undoubtedly been described as such by many church leaders throughout history and the present. To begin our investigation, let us first analyze how important it is, or whether it is necessary, to be baptized. The Importance of Baptismal Water in the Christian Faith Christian water baptism is a rite established by Jesus Christ and administered by the Church. So why did Jesus demand it in Matthew 28:19, if it isn’t vital in God’s grand scheme of things?

What was Peter thinking?

First and foremost, whatsoever Christ definitively created and ordered cannot be considered insignificant, regardless of whether we recognize or appreciate its value.

The fact that Jesus travelled several kilometers to be baptized despite the fact that He was sinless was justified by the statement, “For so it becomes us to accomplish all righteousness” (See Matthew 3:13-16.) In spite of the fact that water itself does not have any redeeming qualities, God has decided to include it in His overall plan of redemption.

• Luke 7:30 states that “the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God against themselves because they were not baptized.” Baptisms are performed in a variety of ways.
• Afterward, when he was baptized, Jesus immediately rose to his feet out of the water (Matthew 3:16).
• Therefore, we have been buried with him by baptism into death (Romans 6:4).
• “At initially, all baptisms were performed by thorough immersion,” according to the World Book Encyclopedia (vol.
• In addition, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, “In the early ages, all were baptized by immersion in streams, pools, and baptisteries” (vol.
• After the Catholic church established baby baptism, immersion proved to be inconvenient, and the technique of administration was altered to sprinkling.
• 3, pp.

Having risen from the watery grave of baptism and been given new life in the Holy Spirit, we are identified with Christ’s risen body.

The Lord did not tell them to baptize in these words as a formula, but rather to baptize in “the name.” The singular form of the term name is employed in this context, and it serves as the focal point of the baptismal command.

It is also true that no other name has been given among men by which we can be saved.

The name Jesus is the name through which the functions of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are revealed to be one and the same.

“I have come in the name of my Father,” Jesus declared, and “the Comforter, who is the Holy Ghost,.the Father will send in my name,” he added (John 5:43; 14:26).

‘For in him dwelt bodily all the whole of the Godhead,’ says the Bible (Colossians 2:9).

This operation was required in order for them to comprehend the Scriptures, and many people today require the same operation in order to comprehend the Scriptures.

The commission that Jesus then issued is described in verse 47: “And that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name throughout all nations, starting with Jerusalem.” Peter was one of those individuals to whom Jesus had spoken and whose minds had been enlightened by the revelation.

1. It was as if the hearts of those who heard the message had been wounded.
2. “Then those who willingly embraced his word were baptized, and on the same day, approximately three thousand souls were added to them” (Acts 2:41).
3. Take Peter, however, and accompany him to the residence of Cornelius some years later.
4. For the most part, the translations really state “in the name of Jesus Christ.” If Peter made a mistake on the Day of Pentecost, he had plenty of time to remedy himself before going to the house of Cornelius, according to tradition.
5. When the hearers’ hearts were pricked, they came to Peter and the rest of the apostles and shared their feelings with them (Acts 2:37).
6. Despite the fact that Matthew was present, we find no words of correction from him.
7. However, all of the apostles were aware of and carried out the Lord’s instructions.

They were baptized in the name of Jesus as well as the Samaritans, who were not Jewish.

Nevertheless, when they believed Philip’s message about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.

Acts 8:5, 12, and 16 are examples of this.

He traveled to Ephesus several years after the Day of Pentecost and saw some followers of John the Baptist who had fled to the city from Jerusalem.

he inquired of them.

When they heard this, they were moved to repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ” (Acts 19:2-5).

Paul’s baptism of Lydia and her household (Acts 16:14-15), as well as the baptism of the Philippian jailer (Acts 16:16), did not affect the formula or technique of baptism, according to our understanding.

Afterward, they told him, “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou, along with thy household, shall be saved.” “And he took them at the same hour of the night, cleaned their stripes, and was baptized immediately, he and his entire household”” (Acts 16:30-33).

Despite the fact that Paul was not there when Jesus issued his last instructions to the apostles in Matthew 28:19 and Luke 24:47, Paul was baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus anyhow.

He claimed that his gospel was not a product of human tradition, but rather a revelation from God.

For I did not acquire it from a man, nor was I taught it, but rather got it through the revelation of Jesus Christ” (Galatians 1:11-12).

God revealed the mystery of the church to this apostle, “which, in past eras, was not made known vnto the sons of mankind, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit” (Ephesians 3:5).

Whatsoever you do, in word or action, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father through him, as Paul said (Colossians 3:17).

Obviously, we cannot afford to ignore this command to the church.

Not only did the apostles teach baptism in the name of Jesus, but they also practiced it.

It is instead in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ that we find them baptizing people.

The apostle Paul declared, “However, if we or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel to you than the one we have preached unto you, let him be accursed” (Galatians 1:8).

Some believe that the words of Jesus in Matthew 28:19 are acceptable, but that the words of Peter in Acts 2:38 are not.

Peter was one of the apostles, and it was to him that the keys of the kingdom had been handed, therefore we have no right to dismiss his claims as untrue.

As cited in Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible, volume 1, page 241.

To you, which is more important: the commandment of God or the tradition of mankind? Copyright protection for the year 2002. UPI (United Pentecostal Church International) is an acronym that stands for United Pentecostal Church International.

Should we be baptized in Jesus’ name (Acts 2:38), or in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19)?

The Reasons for Baptism in the Name of Jesus Historically, the subject of water baptism has been referred to as a “great issue,” and many church leaders, both past and present, have undoubtedly stated that it is so. Consider the significance of being baptized, as well as the necessity of being baptized, in our investigation of this subject. It is extremely important to be baptized with water. Jesus Christ instituted the practice of Christian water baptism as an ordinance. In Matthew 28:19, Jesus commands us to do something that, according to the Bible, is unimportant.

• Regarding the significance of water baptism, we must keep two points in mind.
• Second, by keeping this ordinance, Christ and the apostles demonstrated the significance of it.
• The apostle Peter explained, “Baptism also saves us now, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ (not by washing away the filth of the flesh, but by giving us a good conscience toward God)” (I Peter 3:21).
• The proper mode of baptism, according to the Scriptures, is immersion in water.
• He baptized him after they both went into the water, Philip and the eunuch.” “And they both went into the water, Philip and the eunuch” (Acts 8:38).
• Not by placing the body on top of the ground and then sprinkling some soil on it, but by completely encircling the body with dirt and soil.
• 1, p.651).

2, p.263).

(See, for example, Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition, vol.

Having risen from the watery grave of baptism and been given new life in the Holy Spirit, we are identified with Christ’s resurrection.

The Lord did not command them to baptize in these words as a formula, but He did command them to baptize in “his name.” The singular form of the word name is used in this context, and it serves as the focal point of the baptismal commanding authority.

It is also true that no other name has been given among men by which we can be saved.

The name Jesus is the name by which the roles of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are revealed to be one in the same.

“I have come in the name of my Father,” Jesus declared, and “the Comforter, who is the Holy Ghost,.the Father will send in my name,” referring to the Holy Spirit (John 5:43; 14:26).

‘For in him dwelleth bodily all the fullness of the Godhead,’ says the apostle Paul (Colossians 2:9).

To understand the Scriptures, it was necessary for their understanding to be opened, and many people today require the same operation.

The commission that Jesus gave at that point is described in verse 47: “And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning with Jerusalem.” Among those who heard Jesus speak and whose mind was opened was Peter, who was one of those who had heard Jesus speak.

1. The hearts of those who heard the message were wounded, and they cried out to Peter and the other apostles, “Men and brethren, what must we do?” they felt convicted.
2. They were baptized on the same day that they joyfully embraced his word, and roughly three thousand people were joined to them that day (Acts 2:41).
3. Take Peter, however, and accompany him to the home of Cornelius some years later.
4. (The majority of versions really state, “In the name of Jesus Christ.’) It’s unlikely that Peter made a mistake on the Day of Pentecost since he had plenty of time to fix himself before going to Cornelius’ house.
5. It was at this point that the hearers expressed themselves to Peter and the other apostles, who responded in kind (Acts 2:37).
6. The fact that Matthew was present does not preclude the possibility that he offered any correction.
7. However, all of the apostles were aware of and followed out the Lord’s directives.

Also baptized in the name of Jesus were the Samaritans, who were not Jewish by religion.

Nevertheless, when they accepted Philip’s message on the truths concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.

8:5, 12, and 16 are examples of such statements.

Years after the Day of Pentecost, he traveled to Ephesus and saw several disciples of John the Baptist who had fled to that city from Jerusalem.

When Jesus asked them whether there was a Holy Ghost, they said, “We haven’t even heard if there is.” What, then, were you baptized into?

To the baptism of John, they declared.

They were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus as soon as they heard this (Acts 19:2-5).

Paul’s baptism of Lydia and her household (Acts 16:14-15), as well as the baptism of the Philippian jailer (Acts 16:17), did not affect the formula or technique of baptism, according to our understanding.

Afterward, they told him, “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou, together with thy household, shall be saved.

It is difficult to imagine a scenario in which Paul baptized these individuals using anything other than the identical manner and phrase he employed elsewhere, namely, immersion in the name of Jesus Christ.

Who knows how he came up with the idea.

The gospel that was taught by me is not a man-centered message, I confirm to you, brothers and sisters.

To represent Jesus among the Gentiles, Paul was chosen to write several epistles to the church, all of which were written under the inspiration of God.

It was Paul who claimed to be a prophet or spiritual leader: “If any one thinks himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him admit that the things that I write unto you are the commands of the Lord” (I Corinthians 14:37).

In both words and deeds, water baptism is celebrated.

In the words of the apostles and prophets, “the church is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Jesus Christ himself as the chief corner stone” (Ephesians 2:20).

Nothing indicates that they were baptized with the phrases, “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost,” as is customary.

They were carrying out the Lord’s mandate in Matthew 28:19 when they baptized in his name.

We must take note of this as a somber cautionary tale.

While Peter did not speak publicly until the Day of Pentecost, this was because of the anointing by the Holy Spirit.

In Mark 7:8, Jesus replied, “You have set aside the commandment of God, and you have adhered to the tradition of mankind.” According to history, it was not until many years after the apostles that the technique and formula of baptism in the name of Jesus Christ were modified.

In the year 2002, the copyright was registered. The United Pentecostal Church International (UPCI) is a worldwide organization of Pentecostal churches that worship God through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Subscribe to the

Get our Question of the Week emailed to your inbox every weekday morning! Got Questions Ministries is a trademark of Got Questions Ministries, Inc., registered in the state of California in the year 2002. All intellectual property rights are retained. Policy Regarding Personal Information The information on this page was last updated on January 4, 2022.

In whose name are we to be baptized—Jesus’ name (Acts 2:38), or in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19)?

Jesus instructed His followers to baptize people in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, as taught by the Bible (Matthew 28:19). However, according to Acts 2:38, the apostle Peter preached that people who believed in Jesus were to be baptized in his name. “And there is salvation in no one else,” the apostles declared, “because there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). Which of the following is correct? A person who has been baptized in the name of Jesus is someone who has placed their faith in Jesus as Savior.

The practice of the early church was to baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, in accordance with Jesus’ teachings, thereby emphasizing God’s Triune character.

In the New Testament, there are several passages that allude to something being done in the “name of Jesus” as a reference to the “authority of Jesus.” For example, Acts 3:6 depicts Peter curing in the name of Jesus, implying that Peter is acting on Jesus’ authority: “I don’t have any silver or gold, but I’m happy to give you what I do have.

Second Thessalonians 3:6 specifically warns against individuals who profess to be followers of Jesus but yet continue to live in sin “in the name of Jesus.” In this passage, the concept of Jesus’ authority is also introduced, emphasizing that Paul’s teaching comes from Christ rather than from his own perspective.

However, being baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit does not conflict with one of these conceptions.

Truths that are related: What is the meaning of Christian baptism?

There there a suitable way to get baptized, is there? Is baby baptism permissible in the Bible? Is there a scriptural precedent for baptism of children as infants? Is it necessary to be baptized in order to be saved? Return to the page: The Truth About the Church

Should We Be Baptized in Jesus’ Name Only?

It has long been a mystery as to why the book of Acts talks of baptism in the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 2:38). “Repent, and let everyone of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit,” Peter instructed them. Acts 2:38;16 New King James Version (NKJV)The Holy Bible, New King James Version 1982 by Thomas Nelson”>Acts 2:38;16 New King James Version (NKJV) Because, as of yet, He had not descended upon any of them.

The Holy Bible, New King James Version (NKJV), published in 1982 by Thomas Nelson”>Acts 8:16;5 (New King James Version).

Acts 19:5 (New King James Version (NKJV)The Holy Bible, New King James Version 1982 by Thomas Nelson”>Acts 19:5), whereas Jesus Himself instructed the disciples to “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Mark 16:15; New King James Version (NKJV)The Holy Bible, New King James Version 1982 by Thomas Nelson”>Acts 19: (Matthew 28:19).

As some may believe, they are not two distinct methods of baptism.

“In the name of”

The phrase “in the name of” is a slang word that meaning “under the authority of.” The meaning of the phrase “in the name of Jesus Christ” is the same as the meaning of the phrase “in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.” Regardless of the interpretation, it implies that when the apostles baptized someone, they were acting under the authority of God. That is exactly what the apostles were doing in the passages from the book of Acts that have been quoted above. There is no indication in those texts as to the specific language that the apostles used when they conducted the baptisms.

In today’s world, a minister of Jesus Christ is still able to baptize people under the authority of or in the name of Jesus Christ.

When they baptize, they use the New King James Version (NKJV), which was published in 1982 by Thomas Nelson”>Matthew 28:19 in the New King James Version (NKJV).

Understanding Matthew 28:19

While we’re on the subject, we should point out that Matthew’s words provide a unique perspective on the Trinity by referring to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in the same sentence. According to Matthew 28:19, the Greek word for “in” iseisand can mean “into,” which is the correct way to interpret it in this particular context. Sinners are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, which means they are cleansed of their sins. This implies that the individual has first gained an understanding of God the Father, His Son, and the Holy Spirit before reaching the point of baptismal immersion.

1. God takes up residence in the converted person through the power of the Holy Spirit, enabling him or her to continue to live in the manner that God desires.
2. God takes up residence in the converted person through the power of the Holy Spirit, enabling him or her to continue to live in the manner that God desires.
3. “However, God has revealed them to us by the power of His Spirit,” Paul says.
4. Even so, no one other than the Holy Spirit has access to the things of God.
5. the Spiritis from God, we now have the ability to comprehend and comprehend fully the things that God has freely given to us.

The natural man, on the other hand, is unable to receive the things of the Spirit of God. because they are spiritually discerned” (verses 10-14). Are you looking for the church that is behind Life, Hope, and Truth? See our “Who We Are” page for more information.

The conversion process

In Acts 2:38, Peter was responding to those who had been moved to action by his teaching and had inquired as to what they should do next. A brief overview of the conversion process was given by Peter to them: “Then Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and let everyone of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins; and you shall receive the gift of Holy Spirit.'” Furthermore, the conversion procedure remains unchanged today. Those who have come to repentance have a clear understanding of what sin is and how they have sinned, and they are making a serious effort to turn their lives around as a result of their realization.

It is only after sincere repentance that it is possible to be baptized by God’s ministers in the name of Christ.

Change the course of your life!

Cecil Maranville

A preacher of the Church of God, a Worldwide Association, Cecil Maranville is known for his zealousness and dedication. He was involved in the replies to queries that our readers sent to this website for many years and has now retired. Read on for more information.

In whose name should we be baptized?

How come they only baptized people in the name of Jesus once in the Bible book, The Acts of the Apostles, if Jesus stated that all his followers must be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit? Why did they only baptize people in the name of Jesus once in the Bible book The Acts of the Apostles?

Some relevant Bible texts

Before we proceed any further, let us confirm in the Bible in whose name Jesus instructed the disciples to baptize people, and in whose name the disciples really performed the baptizations.

• According to Jesus’ words, “Go then and make disciples of all countries, baptizing them in the name of The Father, The Son, And The Holy Spirit, teaching them to do everything that I have commanded you
• And behold, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” (20:19-20)
• (Matthew 28:19-20)
• As Peter addressed the crowd at Pentecost, “he said to them, ‘Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins
• And you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.'” “And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ,” Peter says in Cornelius’ home, according to Acts 2:38. According to Acts 10:48, Paul at Ephesus said, “When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.” (See Acts 19:5)

What does ‘in the name of’ mean?

Did the disciples fail to carry out the instructions that Jesus gave them? Let’s have a look and see. First and foremost, we must determine what the phrase “in the name of” genuinely implies. It can be translated as ‘on behalf of’, ‘by the authority of’, or ‘by the power of’. It is a term that indicates that one individual is acting on behalf of another, operating in line with his or her wishes and orders, and acting under the authority of that individual or entity. When Jesus instructed the disciples to baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, He was instructing them to do so with the authority of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in their own right.

Everything that one authorises is also what the others authorises.

What one person says to do is exactly what the other people say to do. To act in accordance with the authority (in the name of) one is to act in accordance with the authority (in the name of) all three, because they are all the same authority.

Being baptized by Jesus’ authority

As a result, the phrase “in Jesus’ name” is not a formula for what must be explicitly uttered when a person is baptized. ‘In Jesus’ name’ simply refers to the authority or power that Jesus possesses. In order to baptize in the name of Jesus, one must simply do it in submission to His power or authority. His authority is God’s authority, which is the same power as the Father’s and the Holy Spirit’s. He has the authority of God. As a result, to baptize in Jesus’ name is to baptize in accordance with His power or authority, which is the same as baptism in accordance with the name, authority, or power of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

We have been buried with Him and have risen to walk with Him in the newness of life that He has given us.

Let us hope that this is reflected in our daily lives.

Why We Must Baptize in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit

The importance of doctrine cannot be overstated. Have you recently observed a baptism in the presence of your gathering church and found yourself wondering why the pastor places such much emphasis on the baptism being conducted in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit? If so, you are not alone. Is it really that important? Is it permissible to just baptize in the name of Jesus without any other explanation?

Testimony of Being Saved by God

The scriptural formula for baptism is the Trinitarian formula, which includes the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit as the three persons of the Trinity. As the new believer is submerged beneath the surface of the water in the name of the Trinity, there is something that is plainly transmitted to all witnesses. The redemption of every sinner is completed by the participation of all three members of the Trinity. As a result, it is quite legitimate for the sinner to sing praises to the triune God while immersed in water as a public declaration of trust in the one true and living God of the universe.

In this way, the three unique co-equal and eternal persons of the Trinity are not three different deities, but rather three distinct individuals who together comprise the one true God who rescues sinners and who is co-eternal with him.

B.

1:2), the Son who died for them on the cross (John 10:11, 15), and the Spirit of God who convicted them of sin and brought them to a place of repentance and submission to God through the Scriptures (1 Pet.

1:2). It is important that new Christians do not become perplexed by the Trinitarian formula while they are standing in the water for their baptism.

Jesus Commanded the Trinitarian Formula

When it comes to faith and practice, it’s vital to develop your doctrinal beliefs as well as your stances on how to live out your religion in accordance with Jesus’ clear instructions on both. If Jesus mandates anything, there is no need to ponder over it or give it any thought. It is never acceptable to reduce the instructions of Jesus to the level of a discussion. “If you love me, you will obey my commandments,” Jesus stated emphatically (John 14:15). Jesus made a declaration just before his ascension to the right hand of the Father following his death, burial, and resurrection—a message that we as the church of Christ have learned and utilized as our marching orders.

Follow Jesus’ order to “go and make disciples of all countries” by baptizing them in his name (the Father’s name, the Son’s name, and the Holy Spirit’s name), teaching them to obey all that I have taught you.

While we do have scriptural evidence of new believers being baptized in the name of Jesus in the New Testament, it appears clear that the motivation for that particular statement was centered on the fact that Jesus had been largely rejected as the Messiah of God and that the early disciples were elevating Jesus to a position of prominence in their community.

At the end of his public career, however, we see that Jesus mandates the Trinitarian formula rather than the “Jesus only” formula.

Furthermore, throughout history, heretical organizations like as the Oneness Pentecostals, who hold aberrant and weak theological beliefs that are obviously outside the bounds of orthodoxy, have employed the “Jesus only” formula to their advantage.

The Trinitarian Formula was the Pattern of the Early Church

The early church believed in and embraced the teaching of the Trinity, and they made a point of emphasizing this truth in their baptismal practices for new converts. The Trinitarian formula was put into effect by the early church in accordance with Jesus’ mandate. Nonetheless, the Didache states that “but about baptism, baptize ye as follows: having first recited all these precepts, baptize in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit,” with running water “but concerning baptism” (Didache 7:1).

A brief summary is provided in the document’s opening sentence, which reads, “The teaching of the Lord to the Gentiles (or Nations) by the twelve apostles.” The fact that Jesus mandated and the early church followed the Trinitarian formula for baptism should be highlighted as well.

Think about it: wouldn’t it be unusual to have everything centered on Jesus, and then be baptized in his name as well as in the names of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?

The following is what James White has written: The reason why baptism in the name of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is so vital becomes clear when we realize that we are receiving our God’s blessings via this act of baptism in the name of the triune God whom we love and serve and adore, the triune God who has rescued us.

The Son—the Redeemer, who forsook the splendor of heaven in order to redeem His sheep.

Our indwelling Comforter, who brings the truths of the Christian faith to life in our hearts, is known as the Holy Spirit. What other name would we want to be known by but the triune name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?

1. New converts were baptized in a manner that indicated the early church’s belief and acceptance of the theology of the Trinity, which was a direct reference to this fact. Early Christians put the Trinitarian formula into action, just as Jesus had instructed them to do. “But about baptism, thus baptize ye: having first recited all these commandments, baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in running water,” the Didache says (Didache 7:1). The Didache was a treatise written by the apostles in the early church that detailed the teachings of Jesus. A brief summary is provided in the document’s opening line, which states that it is “The teaching of the Lord to Gentiles (or Nations) by the twelve apostles.” The fact that Jesus mandated and the early church followed the Trinitarian formula for baptism should be highlighted as well. It appears that they were teaching some theology prior to baptizing individuals as disciples of Christ. Don’t you think it would be weird to have everything centered on Jesus and then be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit would be a strange juxtaposition? It is important to follow the law. The following is written by James White: We now see why baptism in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit is so significant: it is baptism in the name of our God, the triune God whom we love, serve, and adore, the triune God who has rescued us. The father is the wellspring of all things and the most gracious of all beings. The Son—the Redeemer, who forsook the splendor of heaven in order to save His flock. Our indwelling Comforter, who brings the truths of the Christian faith to life in our hearts via the power of the Holy Spirit. What other name would we want to be known by but the triune name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

Pastor Pray’s Mill Baptist Church is a Baptist church in Pastor Pray’s Mill, North Carolina. The founder and president of G3 Ministries, Josh Buice is also the pastor of Pray’s Mill Baptist Church on the westside of Atlanta, where he grew up. He appreciates theology, preaching, and church history, and he is a strong supporter of the local church he attends. Additionally, he likes a variety of activities in the outdoors, such as long distance running and high-altitude hunting. He has been writing on Delivered by Grace while he was at seminary, and the site has grown in popularity as a result of the enormous number of people who read it.

Why Baptism in Jesus’ Name is Essential.

The Importance of Baptism in the Name of Jesus Sign in to leave comments on your favorite stories, take part in discussions in your community, and engage with your friends and other users. LOG IN WITH YOUR FACEBOOK ACCOUNT In today’s society, baptism is considered as a “outward manifestation of what has occurred on the inside,” but is this what the Bible says about the practice? Baptism in most Protestant churches is also influenced by the Catholic church, with baby baptisms and baptizing in the names of the “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost” being practiced in many denominations.

According to John 3:5, “Jesus said, “Truly, verily, I say unto thee, Unless a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.

After all, baptism is required of every Christian, and it’s essential to understand how today’s churches have twisted core doctrine to the point where they now offer a little cute prayer called the “salvation prayer,” or “the sinners prayer,” while lying to the people and telling them to “accept Jesus into their heart as their personal Lord and Savior;” this is a lie!

1. The apostles’ teachings were followed by everyone in the early church of the New Testament!
2. “Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and ye shall receive a gift of the Holy Ghost,” according to Acts 2:38.
3. Does Christ appear to be split in 1 Corinthians 1:13-17?
4. Was your baptism under the name of Paul, or were you baptized elsewhere?

Because Christ did not send me to baptize, but to proclaim the gospel: not with wisdom of speech, lest the cross of Christ be rendered ineffective.” These biblical verses not only give proof that the church of Corinth was baptized in truth, but they also provide evidence as to who was baptized on their behalf.

He was implying that because they were baptized in theNAMEof Jesus, they shouldn’t have been idolizing Paul as if they had been baptized in his name.

Rather than in the words “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,” baptism should be done in the name of the “Lord Jesus, Jesus Christ, or Jesus,” as opposed to the titles “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.” There are multiple times in the Bible when theNAMEoftheLORDwas shouted out during baptism, and this is one of the reasons why.

When Saul had an experience with Jesus in Damascus, he had no idea who it was who had appeared to him in the first place.

The following examples of baptisms in the name of Jesus are recounted in the book of Acts: Acts 2:38, Acts 2:39, Acts 2:40, Acts 2:41, Acts 2:42, Acts 2:43, Acts 2:44, Acts 2:45, Acts 2:46, Acts 2:47, Acts 2:48, Acts 2:49, Acts 2:50, Acts 2:49, Acts 2:50, Acts 2 “Then Peter addressed them, saying, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in theNAMEofJesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins, and ye will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” Acts 8:16 explains that The apostle Paul writes, “For as of yet, he had not fallen upon any of them; only they had been baptized in theNAMEof the Lord Jesus.” And he ordered them to be baptized in the name of the Lord,” according to Acts 10:48.

Then they asked for him to remain for a particular period of time.” “When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus,” according to Acts 19:5.

Make haste to be baptized, and let water wash away your sins as you call on His name.’ The motivation for performing baptisms in Jesus’ name is found in Luke 24:47.

When the apostles went forth to preach the gospel, many people were outraged by the NAMEof Jesus Christ, rather than the titles “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.” Due to how successful and strong the NAMEof Jesus is, individuals have petitioned the apostles to cease teaching it because of how effective and powerful it is!

The dispute may arise, however, as to what is meant by Matthew 28:19, which reads “Go ye then, and teach all countries, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:” Now, if I ordered someone to write me a check in theNAMEof the CEO of Amazon, they wouldn’t write “The Name of the CEO of Amazon” on the check; instead, they would put Jeff Bezos on the check since Jeff Bezos now occupies the position of CEO of the company.

Rather than disobeying Jesus by teaching baptism in Jesus’ Name on the day of Pentecost, Peter and the disciples obeyed and carried out Jesus’ command throughout their sermon.

This Content Has Been Reported This material has not been approved by Odyssey HQ and only reflects the views and opinions of the author who has not been compensated.

Subscribe to ourNewsletter

I grew up in a little church that was a member of a Pentecostal movement that was anti-Trinitarian in nature. Despite the fact that this movement has split into numerous denominations, fellowships, and churches, the majority of them are united in their belief that Christian baptism should not include the phrase “in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19) because the Trinity is a concept associated with the Anti-Christ. Some Christians believe that when Peter said, “Repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ” on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:38), he was acting on a revelation from God that Matthew 28:19 was more or less a riddle – one that can only be solved if one is given a revelation that “Jesus Christ” is the “name” of God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

• While Oneness (also known as “Jesus Only”) adherents typically claim that this is a revelation from God that has been given to them at the end of time, Modalism may be traced back to the teachings of Sabellius, who lived in the third century C.E.
• Is there anything you can do if someone in your church wants to be baptized but has been influenced by this false teaching?
• It’s even possible that they’ve come to recognize the Trinity, but still favor the Oneness baptism formula over the traditional one.
• Was Peter completely wrong?
• Let’s go through it step by step: Step one: Is there a difference between titles and names?
• Names and titles are virtually indistinguishable from one another.
• “Onoma” can refer to “reputation” in some cases, as in Revelation 3:1.

The name “The Word of God” is given to him in Revelation 19:13: He is clad in a garment stained with blood, and His name is named The Word of God.

Following that, proponents of Oneness assert that because Matthew wrote “name” rather than “names” in 28:19, he must be referring to a single noun rather than three.

As you might expect, they respond with the words “Jesus Christ.” This is hilarious because, according to their own reasoning, the name “Christ” is not a proper noun.

Nonetheless, the argument that Matthew would have used the plural “names” if he’d intended for individuals to be baptized into three names is erroneous in both Greek and English, as demonstrated above.

Yes.

hitting the skulls of Bill and Cindy and Raul,” for example, would have been incorrect unless I was making the assertion that Bill, Cindy, and Raul each have many heads.

To summarize all I’ve spoken to you thus far, be on the lookout for other gods’ names and refrain from mentioning them or allowing their names to be heard from your mouth.

See also Deuteronomy 18:20 and Joshua 23:7-8 for further information.

As a result, Oneness adherents have a skewed understanding of what it means to be baptized “in the name,” as if there were a specific magic incantation that must be performed in order for baptism to “function” and for the individual to be really rescued by God.

In the name of Jesus, I put on my clothing and go to work.

The same may be said about prayer.

You do not have to actually say, “in the name of Jesus,” in order for God to hear your request (although there is nothing wrong with saying, “in the name of Jesus,” in this case).

Paul wasn’t concerned that anybody would accuse him of actually stating, “I now baptize you in the name of Paul,” as if he were referring to himself.

In Acts 2:38, baptism “in the name of Jesus Christ” (Matthew 28:19) refers to baptism in accordance with the mandate of the risen Lord (Matthew 28:19), not to something else.

Remember the difference in point of view between Jesus’ command in Matthew 28:19 and Peter’s remarks in Acts 2:38 while comparing the two passages.

In the book of Acts, Peter informs those who have not yet been baptized that Jesus is the authority under whom they should be baptized.

More information may be found in Acts 22:16: “Now, why are you delaying?” Put on your baptismal garments and wash away your sins while calling on His name.’ The syntax of the verse indicates that the person who is being baptized is to invoke the name of Jesus.

The baptizer at my church asks, “What is your holy confession?” shortly before we baptize the new members.

“In response to your profession of faith, I baptize you in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit,” explains the baptizer.

What Methods Did the Early Church Use to Get Things Done?

Baptism is not a hokus-pokus solution to eternal salvation.

What, on the other hand, did the early Christians say when they baptized new believers?

Oneness/Jesus’ Only adherents assert that the book of Acts demonstrates their point of view. The question is, if Luke, the author of Acts, had intended to record the precise sentence that the baptizer was to pronounce, why didn’t he write it in the same way each time he did so?

• “. in the name of Jesus Christ.” says Acts 2:38.
• 8:16 “. in the name of the Lord Jesus.”
• 10:48 “. in the name of Jesus Christ.”
• 19:5 “. in the name of Jesus Christ.” The Bible says in 22:16, “. calling on His name.”

One would assume that if there were a specific formula of words that must be uttered in order for baptism to “function,” Luke would have been meticulous enough to record it exactly the same manner each and every time it was done. Every baptism was preceded by the recitation of a specific formula, liturgical term, or incantation according to Luke. He made the point that these baptisms were carried out with the authority of Christ. Every verse focuses on the individual who is being baptized rather than the one who is performing the baptism.

1. Paul visits several followers in Ephesus and says the following: “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you placed your faith in me?” Jesus inquired of them.
2. “We’re going into John’s baptism,” they remarked.
3. It is immediately apparent to Paul that something has gone wrong with their baptisms as soon as they admit their ignorance of the third Person of the Trinity.
4. that disseminated throughout the ancient churches of the Roman empire.
5. This is what it says: “.
6. But if you don’t have either, sprinkle water on your head three times in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.” The Didache, of course, is not included in the Bible.
7. Paul, Peter, James, and other apostles lived just a few years after the composition of the Didache, although John lived for several decades after the writing of the Didache.

Is God’s revelation of Oneness and Jesus a new revelation from the past?

However, the argument that Jesus Christ is the hidden answer to the puzzle, “What is the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?” did not come to any prophet of the twentieth century via revelation.

“I baptize you in the name of Jesus Christ,” stated the ancient gnostic heretic Marcion, who was the first to say it (see Cyprian, Letter 72,4).

He also did not accept the Old Testament since he regarded Jehovah to be a false god, and he did not embrace the New Testament either.

Not much fresh can be discovered beneath the sun.

The Oneness/Jesus-Only interpretation of baptism does not have a solid foundation on which to build.

By following this formula, one rejects the authority of Jesus himself — and by doing so, one rejects Peter’s Spirit-inspired instruction to be baptized “in the name (and under the authority) of Jesus Christ.” Tagged as:Acts 2:38, baptism, Jesus Name, Jesus Only, Matthew 28:19, oneness, trinity, Trinity

Why do people get baptized in the name of Jesus only?

ThyWordIsTruth.com is a Christian website dedicated to the proclamation and defense of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the world.

Why do people get baptized in the name of Jesus only?

If Jesus commanded in Matthew 28:19 to go into all the world and make disciples, and baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, then this is exactly what he meant! If this is the case, why do some individuals just be baptized in the name of Jesus, and then say that being baptized in the name of the trinity is untrue and that one is not saved. This is a Pentecostal movement, as the name implies.

The Answer:

Please refer to this particular lecture on baptism in addition to the solution provided below. This question refers to a concept known as “Jesus Only,” which is regularly practiced. Those who preach it are referred to as “Oneness” individuals in the Pentecostal Church, and they are a subset of that denomination. The term “Jesus Only” refers to their belief that baptism should and may only be done scripturally “in the name of Jesus alone,” which is what they teach. This doctrine is supported by the fact that, despite the instruction to baptize contained in Matthew’s account of the Great Commission, the book of Acts does not record any instances of it being delivered in this manner.

1. Baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus, according to Acts 8:16.
2. Baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus, according to Acts 19:5.
3. Closer analysis of this perspective, on the other hand, uncovers its flaws Initially and foremost, if the formula first established in Acts 2 38 is binding, then the three who came after them made a mistake by not adhering to the formula as mandated by law.
4. This alone demonstrates that there was no specific plan in mind for the arrangement of the words.
5. The Bible says in Acts 2:38, “kai baptistheto.epi to onomati Jesou Christou.” Baptismenoi.eis to onoma tou Kuriou Jesou, according to Acts 8:16 At the end of Acts 10:48, the phrase “baptisthenai en to onomati tou Kuriou” appears.
6. Third, take notice of the lack of consistency in the name: Jesus Christ is mentioned in Acts 2:38.
7. Acts 10:48 – Praise be to the Lord.

The following examples illustrate how prepositions are used to indicate a connection between a person’s given name and a baptismal act: Epistle to the Onomati (Acts 2:38) (literally, upon the name).

(into the name).

Onoma (eis to onoma) in Acts 19:5.

In light of the differences in the terminology employed in connection to the link between the name(s) of Jesus and the baptismal actions, it is clear that there is no consistency in the usage of the words, and that a conclusion that binds one of them is erroneous.

Amen.” 19 1 Go therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and in the name of the Holy Ghost.

“Until the end of the world,” according to this edict, which was founded on “every authority in existence.” A baptism performed in any other manner is not authorized by the Lord.

Their stance is that individuals baptized on the Day of Pentecost and later in the book of Acts were really baptized, and that the Apostles on the Day of Pentecost, as well as others who afterwards baptized, were in the position of disobeying and so violating the plain commands of God.

It follows that baptism in Jesus’ name entails baptism in the manner that Jesus himself permitted.

Those who baptize in any other manner do not do so, regardless of what they claim.

“The name” is used frequently in Scripture to refer to the total of the divine characteristics of the Person identified, as well as everything else that is included in the Being whose name is specified.

It is said by Thayer that “the name is employed for all that a word covers.to do anything in the name of another, that is, by one’s command and authority, acting on his behalf, and supporting his cause” is “a use mainly Hebraistic usage of the name.” In this way, acting under the authority of Christ and drawing on our connection with him as our Redeemer and Lord, we are baptized into a state of union and communion with God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit, who are all present at our baptism.

• “The name is not only a designation, in the sense that it would give the baptismal ritual only the force of a charm,” Vincent explains.
• It is the same as if he were present.
• By professing his or her acceptance and appropriateness of god in all that he or she is as well as everything that he or she does for man, one is baptized into the name of the Trinity.
• 1, p.
• If you read the Bible, you’ll know that when Paul arrived at Ephesus (Acts 19:1ff), he discovered a group of disciples who had been baptized by Apollos when that preacher made the error of proclaiming the baptism of John after it had ceased to be valid.
• “Unto (ASV, “into”) what, therefore, were you baptized?” Paul inquired immediately afterward.
• It is obvious that their baptism must have been flawed if they had not heard of the Holy Spirit, for the baptism of the Great Commission is “into” the name of the Holy Spirit, and hence must have been imperfect.

The phrase “baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” is taken from this mandate. Matthew 28:18-20 is a passage of scripture.

God’s Plan of Salvation

If you have not heard the gospel, you must hear it and then understand and recognize that you are lost without Jesus Christ, regardless of who you are or where you come from. We are told in the Bible that “all have sinned, and all have fallen short of the glory of God.” (See also Romans 3:23.) It is necessary for you to recognize that you are lost and that the only way to be saved is through obedience to the gospel of Jesus Christ before you will be saved. (2 Thessalonians 1:8; 2 Thessalonians 1:9) “I am the way, the truth, and the life,” Jesus declared.

(See also John 14:6) It says in the Bible, “There is salvation in no other: for there is no other name under heaven given among men, by which we must be saved.” (Read Acts 4:12) If you want to please God, you must believe in him and have faith in him because “it is impossible to please him unless one has faith in him.” “He who comes to God must believe that he is and that he is a rewarder of those who diligently seek him.” (See also Hebrews 11:6) But neither belief alone nor faith alone is sufficient to save.

(See also James 2:19, James 2:24, and Matthew 7:21.) You must confess your sins and repent of them.

The so-called “Sinner’s Prayer” that you hear so much about today from denominational preachers does not appear anywhere in the Bible.

By contrast, there are numerous examples showing that prayer alone does not save.

(Acts 22:16).

(Acts 10:2, 6, 33, 48).

You must obey the gospel.

1:8) You must confess that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

Because Jesus is already Lord of your life whether or not you have obeyed his gospel.

(Acts 2:36) Also, no one in the Bible was ever told to just “accept Jesus as your personal savior.” We must confess that Jesus is the Son of God, but, as with faith and repentance, confession alone does not save.

(Acts 2:38) It is at this point (and not before) that your sins are forgiven.

(Acts 8:35-36; Romans 6:3-4; 1 Peter 3:21) Anyone who responds to the question in Acts 2:37 with an answer that contradicts Acts 2:38 is NOT proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ!

(Acts 2:47; Philippians 4:3) To continue in God’s grace, you must continue to serve God faithfully until death.

Unless they remain faithful, those who are in God’s grace will fall from grace, and those whose names are in the Book of Life will have their names blotted out of that book. (Revelation 2:10; Revelation 3:5; Galatians 5:4)