Why did Jesus tell the recently healed blind man not to return to the village in Mark 8:26?
Mark 8:26 (NIV) NKJV (New King James Version) – 26 Then He sent him away to his house, telling him not to go into the town or tell anybody in the town what had happened. ClarifyShareReport Asked on August 13, 2017 by an anonymous user The responses from the community are arranged according to how many people voted for them. The greater the number of votes, the higher the position of an answer on the list. A number of individuals had brought this man to Jesus for healing, but the narrative implies that Jesus made an effort to remove him to a different site outside the village where those individuals would not be in attendance.
He had previously demonstrated this same mindset (again, in my opinion) when He had refused Satan’s temptation to throw Himself off the pinnacle of the Temple (although Mark does not specifically mention that particular temptation in his gospel), which would have not only put God to the test, but would also have sought to gain attention or fame through a public spectacle, rather than by addressing people’s needs for physical and (more importantly) spiritual healing.
0 replies on August 14, 2017 Vote for it, share it, and report it.
On the contrary, according to Mark 8:26, Jesus sent the man who had been healed of his physical (and spiritual) blindness to his house, rather than sending him through (or taking a path through) the community of Bethsaida.
Is that a lengthy distance to travel?
While reading the Gospel of Matthew, we will learn that the people in the villages of Bethsaida, Chorazin, and Capernaum did not believe Jesus or repent from their wicked ways (or lifestyle), despite the fact that Jesus had preached repentance from their sins and performed numerous miracles to demonstrate His glory, authority, and sovereign power over the universe.
- 21 Sorrow befalls you, Chorazin!
- The marvels that were accomplished in you would have been repented of long ago by the people of Tyre and Sidon if they had been performed there.
- 23 And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted to the heights of the skies as well?
- It is possible that, if the miracles that were accomplished in you had been performed in Sodom, they would have survived to this very day.
- Strangely, seeing extraordinary miracles did not always result in people repenting and following Jesus’ teachings, as some might expect.
- He was looking for involvement from the audience rather than applause.
- Refer to Matthew 13:11-17 for further information.
– The Marshal 0 replies on September 08, 2018 Vote for it, share it, and report it.
Jesus ordered him back home and warned him not to enter Bethsaida, thus the man was not from Bethsaida.
Why would he travel to unbelieving Bethsaida, where Jesus had been rejected, now that he had been healed?
Following that, He cured a blind man and walked on the water in the vicinity.
‘Had the miracles I performed in you been performed in evil Tyre and Sidon, their people would have repented of their misdeeds long ago, dressing themselves in burlap and slapping ashed on their heads to demonstrate their sorrow’ (Matthew 11:21, NLT).
Charles Caldwell Ryrie, my professor at Dallas Theological Seminary, stated, “As with everything in the Christian life, our job is to obey what the Lord teaches, not to second-guess His reasons for giving us His commands.” replies received on August 22nd, 20210 Vote for it, share it, and report it.
Working as a Project Manager in the Gulf, specifically in the State of Kuwait As the prophet Isaiah 42:1-4 predicted in the scriptures that the Lord Jesus would bring justice to the Gentiles, it is likely that the blind man was a victim of his generation’s wicked lifestyle, for which his healing had to be done twice before he was completely delivered.
Sending him home was a definite indicator that he had returned to repentance, but remaining in the midst of ungodly people was a sure evidence that he had fallen back into sin. 0 responses received on November 5, 2017 Vote for it, share it, and report it.
Add your Answer
All responses are REVIEWED and MODERATED before being posted. Please make certain that your response adheres to all of our criteria. What makes a good response, exactly? A well-written response offers new insight and perspective on the subject matter. Here are some rules to follow in order to ensure that everyone has a meaningful learning experience.
- Keep your commitments to the eBibleStatement of Faith
- Your response should be comprehensive and self-contained
- Support your points with evidence and scriptural references if at all feasible. Look for an answer to the question “why”
- Make use of the appropriate tone and attitude of compassion and understanding
- More information may be found in The Complete Guide to eBible.
Why did Jesus tell the recently healed blind man not to return to the village in Mark 8:26?
Mark 8:26 (NIV) NKJV (New King James Version) – 26 Then He sent him away to his house, telling him not to go into the town or tell anybody in the town what had happened. Request for clarificationShareReportAsked on August 13th, 2017Anonymous For the purpose of further debate and general criticism on the subject. Comments are shown in reverse chronological order.
Mark 8:26 is more spiritual in nature than it is physical in nature. The blind guy, on the other hand, had spiritual healing that revealed itself physically. Jesus told the guy not to return to the village, but rather to go to his family’s house instead of the village. When it comes to spirituality, it is implied that the inhabitants of Bethsaida were practicing demonic spirituality at the time. Because of his infirmity, the man, in my judgment, traveled to Bethsaida and joined himself with the perverted people who lived there.
Jesus, as a Prophet, felt it in his soul and understood the ramifications of the man he had just healed returning to an idolatry-filled society.
Kelvin Olukayode is a Nigerian actor.
LoginorSign Upto add your comment.
And they made their way to Bethsaida. And other people brought him a blind guy who pleaded with him to touch him, and he agreed. When they reached the edge of town, he grabbed the blind man’s hand in his own, leading him out of the hamlet. After spitting in his eyes and laying his hands on him, he questioned him, “Do you see anything?” And he raised his eyes to the sky and declared, “I see humans, yet they appear to be trees strolling.” His sight was restored and he was able to see everything well when Jesus placed His hands on him once again in the process of healing his eyes.
- Some of His miraculous deeds are reported for us numerous times in the gospels, each time from a different point of view, allowing us to see them from diverse perspectives.
- The gospel of Mark has a description of one of these one-of-a-kind miracles in great detail.
- We shall go into this miracle in further depth by looking at each verse in Mark that contains this tale.
- The remnants of this settlement, which is no longer inhabited, have been unearthed by archaeologists, who have confirmed that it existed during the time of Christ.
- Despite the fact that they may not have realized or believed that Jesus was the Messiah, they would have heard about His incredible miracles and wished to witness them for themselves.
- It’s possible that the villagers were bringing the blind guy to Jesus because he was a member of their community and they were concerned about his well-being.
- Whatever their motivation, they were certain that Jesus would be able to accomplish a wonderful thing for this guy.
This may have been due to his inability to see, or it could have been due to his lack of trust in Jesus’ ability to really do anything for him in the first place.
Before we proceed, we must recognize the spiritual lesson included within the first verse of this chapter.
There will be times in our lives when we will be spiritually suffering or in need of healing, just as the blind man experienced these situations.
Even while our faith is not always powerful enough to bring us to Christ on our own, we might find ourselves at the feet of Christ, ready to receive His healing touch, with the help of other Christians’ encouragement and faithful pursuit.
Verse 23 is a proverbial slap in the face of adversity.
He questioned the guy, “Do you see anything?” after spitting in his eyes and putting His hands on him.
Jesus did not choose to perform the cure in front of everyone in the crowd, but instead chose to take the man alone with Him outside of the crowded village.
A simple word from him, right there in the midst of the thronging mob, may have brought the guy back to health.
The fact that Jesus was divine in his essence suggests that he was already aware of the man’s lack of trust.
No one is mentioned as following Jesus or as being nearby, but it is crucial to highlight that Jesus sought out this guy with the aim of spending quality time with.
The world in which we live is a whirlwind of activity and distraction.
In this account, we see that Jesus gently guided this guy to a place he would not have gone on his own initiative.
We can’t fight it or make excuses for it.
The second portion of this verse is brief, but it is a significant element of the story; Jesus spat directly into the man’s eyes, which was a first for Jesus.
As an apparently required part of Jesus’ premeditated strategy, (1) transporting them outside of the hamlet, (2) spitting in his eyes, and (3) touching Him were all performed.
The majority of observers think that the warmth of Jesus’ saliva would have relieved the man’s discomfort.
Given his ability to discern this distinction, we may fairly presume that he had previously seen something and was not born blind.
It’s possible that Christ’s saliva was merely another gesture of charity on his part.
The guy had a previous severe ailment, and while we cannot verify this from the text, it would seem reasonable that Jesus’ compassion would have compelled Him to care for the man’s suffering before curing him.
He is frequently faithful to ease the throbbing pangs of our souls as He brings us to a place of restoration and completion.
Towards the conclusion of verse 23, we witness the miracle taking place.
In every other instance of Christ’s miraculous power, we see that His efforts result in the miracle being completed on the first attempt of Christ.
Let us take a closer look at verse 24 to see how it relates to this.
‘I see people strolling about; they seem like trees,’ I think.” All of Jesus’ activities, particularly those surrounding the reports of His miracles, were deliberate and had a specific purpose.
Jesus never makes a blundered step.
Rather, it was necessary for Jesus to perform this miracle in two stages: first, partially with the first touch, and then totally with the second.
The development was necessary in order to increase the faith of the person who was being cured.
Not only was the man carried away to be alone with Christ, but it is possible that his wounds were calmed as well, and the miracle was completed in two phases as a result.
The Lord Jesus Christ was more than a miracle worker; He was also a Savior and Lord, who was healing his sight while also spiritually touching his heart.
According to verse 25, “Jesus placed his hands on the man’s eyes once again.” When his eyes were opened, his vision was restored, and he was able to see perfectly again, he said, The ultimate saving touch of our Savior is portrayed within the words of this passage.
The blind man, who was most likely already giddy from the fact that he could at least see something after the initial touch, may have concluded that the miracle had come to an end.
All of Jesus’ miracles were performed without regard to a system or approach.
It was His intention to see the man’s faith increase in this particular scenario.
He had his sight returned, and he was able to “see everything well,” according to the text.
“Jesus sent him home, telling him, ‘Do not go into the village,'” says verse 26.
It’s possible that this was due to the large number of people who had gathered outside the building, eager to witness what would happen.
Jesus wished to prevent the crowds from mistaking Him for a mere miracle worker and not the true Messiah, as they had previously done.
He also desired to instruct and train others in order to finally guide them in the direction of God.
He would almost certainly have told his family and maybe others at some point in time during his life.
Nonetheless, at the time of the encounter, Jesus was only requesting obedience by directing the man not to return to his village.
Finally, there is a great deal that we can take away from this divine incident.
The aim of the Lord is for us to be taken to areas of isolation with Him that we may otherwise shun.
Sometimes it is only in the wonderful communion with our Savior that we are able to truly experience His healing touch.
Our faith will not be stretched any farther than it is capable of withstanding, but He will tend to our wounds as He reveals more of Himself to us.
We are given a wonderful description of how Jesus opens the eyes of our hearts so that we may see Him more clearly via the healing of the blind man at Bethsaida, and we can learn a lot from it.
Don’t Go Back Into The Village
22When they arrived at Bethsaida, several people brought a blind man to Jesus and begged him to touch him and heal him. Jesus agreed, and the man was healed. Taking the blind man’s arm in his own, Jesus escorted him outside of the hamlet. “Can you see anything now?” he said after spitting in the man’s eyes and placing his hands on his shoulders. 24The man took a few steps back and peered around. “Yes,” he said, “I can see people, but they aren’t very clearly visible to me.” “They appear to be wandering about like trees.” 25At that point, Jesus placed his hands on the man’s eyes once again, and the man’s eyes were immediately opened.
26 “Don’t go back into the village on your way home,” Jesus instructed him as he was sent away.
According to what I believe to be Charles Spurgeon’s words, “A preacher who insists that everything he teaches is unique is not worth listening to.” This is not the outline for my sermon. It was given to me by an evangelist based in Birmingham, Alabama. He kept it in a Revival service for safekeeping. The statement had an impact on me and I was intrigued by it. I brought it back home with me and slept on it that night. I had it on my mind when I woke up at 4:00 a.m., so I decided to jot down the bits that I remembered and to offer a few extra thoughts that had occurred to me while he was speaking.
The message is based around three words: the first is.
We’ll start with verse 22. When they got at Bethsaida, several people brought a blind man to Jesus and begged him to touch him and heal him. Jesus agreed, and the blind man was healed. This is not the main point of the message, but it is brought up in passing to illustrate a point. The reason I say this is because I mistrust the intentions of those who brought the blind man to Jesus in the first place. I believe they were looking for signs or expecting miracles. Because the miracle of the loaves occurred relatively close to Bethsaida, it’s possible that these people were there when Jesus fed the 5,000 just a few weeks earlier.
Despite the fact that I have serious doubts about their motivations, I see certain aspects of them that are beneficial to the church, such as.
- They did, in fact, assist the blind guy out of compassion. Regardless of whether or not their intentions were pure, they were successful in connecting him with the appropriate individual. The majority of us have the ability to feel empathy for others who are less fortunate than ourselves. if we were aware that there was a starving person in our immediate neighborhood, we would not rest until we had given them a portion of our meal Americans are, on the whole, caring individuals. We are especially responsive in times of sorrow. The events of September 11, 2001, are still fresh in our minds. Americans gave 1.4 billion dollars to the victims of the September 11th attacks out of their own free will. Even when we have compassion, is it enough? We’ll come back to this topic later on. Evangelism – They were the ones who led the man to Jesus. Wow! By bringing the blind man to Jesus, they are fulfilling the role of an evangelist. If only our people, the members of our churches, could become as enthusiastic about leading people to Christ as we are. In my opinion, there is absolutely nothing wrong with bringing someone to Jesus
- Intercession – they pleaded with Jesus to heal the blind guy In the realm of ministry, there is no greater task than the work of intercession. They went to Jesus on the man’s behalf in order to meet his needs.
This is when things really start to get interesting. As far as I am aware, this is the only miracle that Jesus performed that required two steps. To begin, Jesus takes the blind man by the hand and brings him out of the town. Then he spits in the man’s face and walks away. Wow, such a creative method to perform a miracle! When Jesus saw the guy, he spit in his face. Then Jesus inquires, “Can you perceive anything at this point?” “I see people, but I can’t make out what they’re saying,” the man stated after taking a glance around.
- He was most likely suffering from a degenerative eye illness that had progressed over time and made him completely blind.
- The message is as follows: some individuals just want Jesus to perform a small amount of work for them; they are not interested in the entire package.
- They are aware that only Jesus can bring them to heaven, but the fact is that they do not desire abundant life; rather, they desire only eternal life in the presence of God.
- They want a little bit of Jesus, but not the whole thing.
- He may have been overjoyed at the prospect of being able to see a bit further.
- The question is as follows: Want what you desire or do you want what Jesus wants you to have is the question you must answer.
They had come to Jesus in search of a miracle, and they had received one, but they departed too quickly.
Jesus desires for you to have everlasting life, but He also desires for you to live the Abundant Life that He has for you.
However, I do not believe that Jesus’ objective in performing this miracle was to make it stand out from the crowd.
He grabs the man by the hand and brings him out of the hamlet with him.
We do know that it was not a remote location because the first thing the guy saw was other people, but Jesus did bring him out of the settlement, so there must have been a purpose for this decision.
When He stood before Herod, He was deafeningly still and refused to say anything.
Jesus was neither a magician nor a performance in the traditional sense.
Clearly, this group had witnessed Him do miracles and knew that He was capable of performing them; nonetheless, they had missed the point.
Folks, the MIRACLE-MONGERS may be found everywhere you look.
My friends have driven hundreds of miles to view the face of Mary carved in rock or wood, but they would travel across town to share Jesus with a lost soul.
Some churches base their programming around the sensational: they run promotion after promotion after promotion to draw people in.
Vance Havner used to tell a story about a church that he said had “gone Hollywood,” by which he meant that they were involved in the entertainment industry.
One of the three big temptations is the allure of the exceptional or the extraordinary.
Havner narrated the story of the church where there was a talking horse.
He stomped on the commandments ten times, according to the number of commandments.
Jesus did come to amuse his followers.
Keep an eye out for the Village.
Then Jesus started to criticize the places where he had performed so many miracles since the people in those towns had not repented of their sins and handed their lives over to God.
Because, if the miracles I performed in you had been performed in filthy Tyre and Sidon, their people would have repented of their crimes long ago, covering themselves in burlap and sprinkling ashes on their hair to demonstrate their sorrow for their transgressions.
Given that Jesus established Capernaum as His headquarters and that Bethsadia was a short distance away, it is understandable that He spent more time in Korazin and Bethsaida than in the other towns in the region.
Take note of what Jesus advises to the cured man on his way home: “Don’t walk back into the village on the way back.” Wow, what a powerful word of encouragement.
Was it because the hamlet had a culture of skepticism and doubt?
We all need affirmation, but no one needs it more than a new believer who is just beginning their journey.
There’s definitely a lot more to it than just our desire for confirmation.
Immediately after Jesus rescues us, He provides us with direction and instruction.
Someone once remarked, “When Jesus is all you have, you will realize that He is all you need.” I believe that is true.
We will never be able to get the support of the villagers in our endeavor.
Some people assume that their partner will be able to meet all of their requirements, but this is also not true.
The guy was not prohibited from traveling into the village indefinitely, but he did not need to take that road on his way back home, according to my understanding.
Eventually, he will be able to address the disbelief of the people in the same way that Jesus was able to do.
One person, no matter how powerful, will not be able to influence a large group of people unless they are very strong in their beliefs and leadership abilities.
When Jesus stated, “Don’t go back to the village,” I believe He was giving us some excellent counsel.
We are in desperate need of forgiveness. Character is required. We require a cause for living and a reason for dying, and only Jesus, not the village, can provide us with these things. Don’t go to the village until absolutely necessary.
The Blind Man at Bethsaida
Following Jesus’ feeding of four thousand Gentiles and His scolding of the disciples for their inability to accept (Mark 8:1–21), our Lord proceeded to the town of Bethsaida to continue his ministry. There’s a blind man in there. However, as we will see, the healing process itself was somewhat odd. First and foremost, note that Jesus did not heal the man in the village proper, but rather outside the town (vv. 22–23), where he was blind. It’s possible that such a move was prompted by Christ’s wrath on the community for its disbelief.
- 11:21; Luke 10:13), his healing of the man outside the town confirms His unwillingness to continue performing miracles in front of those who refuse to accept His teachings about His person and work.
- We have already remarked that the use of spittle may be connected to Jesus’ intention to instill trust in the man that his sight would be restored, because it was a popular idea at the time that healers could bring about healing by such methods.
- “He cured individuals in a number of ways to demonstrate that [Christ] had complete freedom in regard to his manner of proceeding, and was not confined to a definite rule, so that he would not resort to a variety of tactics in exercising his power,” the Bible says.
- The healing reported in Mark 8:22–26 is notable for the fact that it is the only healing described in the Gospels that takes place in stages.
- The fact that they were still unable to comprehend who Jesus was after His miracles (see vv.
- In fact, their continuing presence with Him demonstrates that they had begun to see dimly, allowing them to see Christ’s actual identity for what it truly was.
- In order for them to see Jesus as the prophesied Savior of the world, He would have to do more than just open their eyes and hearts.
It is reassuring to know that Jesus may act in a manner that appears slower in some circumstances than in others, like in the case of the blind man in Bethsaida.
It instructs us that we should not give up on those who appear to be the most hardened to the gospel of Jesus Christ. God has the ability to alter their hearts, therefore we should continue to pray for them and proclaim the gospel to them whenever the chance presents itself.
For Further Study
New International Version (New International Version) “Don’t even go into the village,” Jesus instructed him as he returned home. New Living Translation (New Living Translation) “Don’t go back into the village on your way home,” Jesus instructed him as he was sent away. Version standardized in English He sent him back to his house with the instruction, “Do not enter the community.” Berean Study Bible (also known as the Berean Study Bible) ‘Do not go back into the village,’ Jesus instructed him as he was sent home.
- New The King James Version (KJV) is a translation of the King James Bible.
- The New American Standard Bible is a translation of the New Testament into English.
- Afterwards, he sent him home, telling him, “Don’t even think of going into the village.” Holman The Christian Standard Bible is a translation of the Bible in the Christian tradition.
- Afterward, he sent him away to his house, telling him that he should not even enter the hamlet.
- Version in the Present Tense of the English Language “You may return home at this time, but do not walk into the village,” Jesus instructed him.
- Standard Version in its literal sense and He sent him away to his house, telling him, “You are not permitted to enter the village, nor may you inform anybody in the community.” The New American Bible is a translation of the New Testament into English.
- “Do not even go into the village,” Jesus instructed him as he returned home.
His words to him were, “Do not enter the village,” and he was sent away to his residence.
Young’s Literal Translation of the Text as well as to his residence, telling him that he was not permitted to walk into the village or notify anybody in the community of what had happened.
Context The Man Who Was Blind at Bethsaida.
26 “Do not return to the village,” Jesus told him as he sent him home.
On the way, He asked His followers, “Who do people think I am?” He wanted to know.
Then He spat in the man’s eyes and placed His hands on his shoulders to comfort him.
8:25 (Matthew 8:25) A second time, Jesus placed His hands on the man’s eyes, and when he opened them he found that his sight had been restored, and that he could see perfectly again.
And he sent him away to his house, telling him not to go into town or tell anybody in town what had happened.
In Mark 5:43, the Bible says They were given strict instructions not to tell anyone; and he ordered that something be served to her to eat as soon as they arrived.
(26) Neither of them venture into town.
We can extend the application of Mark 8:24 to the task of spiritual illumination by following the line of thought established in the Note on Mark 8:24.
In verse 26, the author says: According to the most reliable translation, this passage reads as follows: Afterward, he sent him away to his house, telling him that he should not even enter the hamlet.
His natural desire would have been to display himself at Bethsaida, where he was sure to be well-known, and to sing the praises of his great Benefactor in front of the crowd.
He longed to be alone and unobserved.
His miracles were performed for the purpose of his doctrine, rather than for the sake of his doctrine being performed.
“My doctrine will evaporate as quickly as dew.” “He will not struggle or cry, and no one will be able to hear his voice as he walks the streets.” Commentaries that run in parallel.
SingularStrong’s 649 is as follows: From the Greek words apo and stello, which means to put aside, i.e.
him αὐτὸν(auton) A possessive pronoun that is used in an accusative masculine manner.
The reflexive pronoun self, which is used in the third person as well as the other persons, is derived from the particle au.
said,λέγων(legōn) Strong’s 3004: Verb – Present Participle Active – Nominative Masculine SingularStrong’s 3004: Verb – Present Participle Active – Nominative Masculine SingularStrong’s 3004: (a) I say, speak; I mean, mention, tell; (b) I call, name, especially in passing; (c) I tell, command; (d) I call, name, especially in passing.
Aorist Subjunctive Active – 2nd Person Verb – Aorist Aorist Subjunctive Active – 2nd Person SingularStrong’s 1525: to enter, enter into, come into, come into To enter is derived from the Greek words eis and erchomai.
theτὴν(tēn) 3588:The, the definitive article in Strong’s 3588:The, Accusative Feminine Singular.
κώμην(kōmēn) Accusative Feminine SingularStrong’s 2968: a village or small town in the countryside.
Jump to previousAddedEnterHomeHouseJesusMayestVillageVillageVillageVillage Addition of HomeHouseJesusMayestVillage to the list of places to visit Links Mark 8:26 NIVMark 8:26 NLTMark 8:26 ESVMark 8:26 NIVMark 8:26 NLTMark 8:26 ESVMark 8:26 NIVMark 8:26 NLTMark 8:26 ESV Mark 8:26 New American Standard Bible Mark 8:26 King James Version Mark 8:26 (NIV) BibleApps.com Biblia del Evangelio 8:26 Paralela Chinese Version of Mark 8:26 French translation of Mark 8:26 Gospel of Mark 8:26 in the Catholic Bible Gospels of the New Testament: Mark 8:26 (NIV) He escorted him away to his residence (Mar Mk Mr)
Team 5, Question 3
It is true that there are numerous healing events presented in the Bible where Jesus and His fellow disciples heal the ills—but the two healing stories from Mark 8:22-26 and 10:46-52 that we will be examining have significant remarks to make because the concept of “blindness” is involved in both cases. According to Mark 8:22-26, the events that occurred when Jesus cured a blind man in Bethsaida; according to Mark 10:46-52, the events that occurred when Jesus healed a blind beggar in Bartimaeus.
Throughout history, the notion of blindness has been one of the many important concepts that have assisted us in gaining a greater understanding of the activity of faith.
It turns out that the people who believed they were seeing are actually blind, and that the others who realized they weren’t seeing are truly seeing.
Keep in mind that while Mark 8:22-26 described how Jesus physically laid his hands on the blind man’s eyes and also asked him a question before restoring the sight of the blindman in the village of Bethsaida, the beggar from Bartimaeus simply said, “Go your way; your faith has made you well,” and the beggar’s sight was restored.
- The technique by which Jesus heals, on the other hand, is distinct.
- Prior to describing the healing event that took place in Bethsaida, it is important to understand how Mark portrayed Jesus.
- Throughout the healing process of the blind man from Bethsaida, this concept of Jesus as a human being filled with faith is reflected.
- As a result of Jesus placing His hands on the blind man and asking him the question, the blind man was able to see for the first time.
- All that the blind man did was just accept Jesus’ cure and provide a response to his query.
- Not surprisingly, those who see this occurrence may later assert that Jesus is “more than a person,” that Jesus is “better” than the rest of society.
- Nonetheless, believing in God should be viewed in its fullest possible context.
Not only should Jesus’ abilities be at the forefront of our thoughts, but so should the power that comes through faith.
However, people must recognize that Jesus is also the “last” and the servant of everyone, and that the healing capacity that Jesus has attained does not come from him, but rather is given to him by trust in the Father.
We already recognize the human aspect of Jesus, who is a man who believes in God and is able to teach and heal.
However, the essential tenets of religion, as well as the genuine identity of Jesus Christ, have not been fully articulated.
It was explained in verses 1-8:21 that Jesus was a divine man; nevertheless, what about the Holy Father, who supports and/or is Jesus Christ’s divine identity?
(9:37) What is happening here is the perfect answer to the question regarding the relationship between God and Jesus Christ—He who sent the divine man is God, and He is the divine man Jesus Christ—and it is a beautiful thing to see.
Mark then moved on to introduce another key identity from the Trinity throughout verses 8:27-10:45, namely, the name and content of “Holy Father.” The second healing episode, like the first, acts as a bookend for Mark’s presentation of the Trinity’s notion of the Holy Father, which takes place later in the chapter.
In Mark 10:46-52, Jesus is no longer the one who “does” the healing; instead, it is the disciples who do it.
Just as Christ said, “your faith has made you well,” it is not what Jesus physically did that healed the blind men from both events; rather, it is the faith that Jesus carried that enabled them to regain their sight.
DIFFICULT PASSAGES: Mark 8:22-26 – Why Did He Do It Like That?
When they arrived at Bethsaida, several of the crowds brought a blind man to Jesus and requested him to touch him. He grabbed the blind man’s hand in his and led him out of the hamlet. “Do you see anything?” Jesus inquired after spitting in the man’s eyes and placing his hands on him. “I see people; they seem like trees going around,” he added as he raised his eyes to the sky. Jesus placed his hands on the man’s eyes for a second time. Finally, he was able to see well since his eyes were opened and his sight had been restored.
- – Mark 8:22-26 (NASB) Only Mark has a record of this miracle, and he is the only one who knows about it.
- The narrative is straightforwardly recounted, but it is not as straightforwardly comprehended.
- Some of the Twelve lived in this fishing town, which was also their home.
- He was on his way to Caesarea Philippi with the Twelve, where he would continue to educate them about topics that he had no intention of sharing with the rest of the crowds in Jerusalem.
- Possibly motivated by a desire to get away from the crowds, Jesus personally grasped the man’s arm and guided him out of the hamlet.
- Then He inquired, “Do you see anything?” he said.
- The guy said, “I see people; they appear to be strolling about like trees.” In other words, he was able to see, but only partially.
Then his eyes were opened, and his vision was restored, and he was able to see everything well again.
This is the only miracle in which the healing took place in stages, and it is also the only miracle in which the person who had been healed was questioned if he had been healed.
Chrysostom, the preacher known as “the golden tongue,” served as a presbyter and bishop in Antioch around the late fourth century.
He has left a large number of writings.
He did not come to Jesus seeking healing; rather, others brought him to Jesus.
According to R.
Foster (Studies in the Life of Christ, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, Reprinted 1971, p.
The question Jesus posed appears to imply that the procedure was part of a premeditated strategy on His part.
It is the belief of McGarvey that the miracle did not take place in stages, but rather consisted of two simultaneous miracles, each of which accomplished exactly what Jesus intended; and that Jesus utilized this alternative way to demonstrate that He could cure in part and by progressive increments.
It was during one of my sessions at the Sunset School of Preaching in the mid-1960s that I inquired as to why it was done this way, and Johnny Ramsey responded by suggesting that it was possibly done to demonstrate that He was in total charge of the process.
However, I had the impression that there had to be more to it than that.
When I looked at this episode in the perspective of the rest of the Bible, I began to see more clearly why Jesus acted in this manner.
Jesus declined to offer another sign to people who did not believe in the signs He had already given (Mark 8:11-12).
Isaiah 6:9-10 is a chapter that speaks of eyes that do not see, ears that do not hear, and hearts that are hardened.
Following this, the disciples did begin to comprehend – to a certain extent.
After Jesus healed him, Peter confessed him as the Christ of God – and then proceeded to reprimand him when He stated He would be killed in Jerusalem (Mar 8:27-32).
With the following statement from William Barclay (The Gospel of Mark, in The Daily Study Bible Series, Vol.
194-195), we can get close to this: “Usually Jesus’ miracles happened swiftly and totally.” The sight of the blind guy gradually returned as a result of this miracle.
No one can comprehend all of God’s truth at the same time.
This is one of the hazards of some types of evangelism.
This is one of the hazards associated with church membership.
Their revelation is the discovery of Christ’s endless riches, and no matter how long a man lives (a hundred, a thousand, or a million years), he would still have to continue growing in grace, learning ever more about the unfathomable wonder and beauty of Jesus Christ.
IMPORTANT LESSONS FOR US This “parable in action” teaches us some essential lessons that we should take into consideration.
- We should never believe that just because we can perceive some truth, that we are in possession of all truth. Our humility requires us to acknowledge that “now we perceive only a poor reflection as if we were looking in a mirror” (1 Corinthians 13:12). There will come a moment when we will recognize Jesus for who He truly is, and then we shall become like Him (1 John 3:1-3). Meanwhile, let us be modest enough to accept that there are things we do not yet see and comprehend
- We should be cognizant of the fact that seeing a bit does not imply that we understand all. In Mark 8:27-29, Peter confessed Jesus as the Messiah, and the rest of the Bible confirms this. When Jesus began to speak about traveling to Jerusalem and dying before being resurrected from the dead in verses 31-32, however, Peter pulled Him aside and began to scold Him. However, he did not comprehend what it meant when Jesus declared himself to be the Messiah and the Christ. It is necessary to be patient with individuals who do not grasp what we believe we understand about Scripture or Jesus if we – and even apostles – do not entirely comprehend the significance of what we see in the Scriptures or in Jesus. Sincere followers of Jesus who are striving to be as near to Him as possible can occasionally have differing perspectives on certain issues and concepts. We must be patient with one another, always striving to have a better knowledge of ourselves and wanting to learn from people who are in opposition to our beliefs. If we only love people who love us, what do we do that makes us stand out from the crowd? How can we ever be able to fix our mistakes if we are only willing to learn from people who are in agreement with us? Furthermore, if we are unable to truly listen to them, how can we expect them to listen to us?
Taken to heart, there would be lot less turmoil inside the church and far less prejudice towards those who wish to follow Jesus if we all applied these three truths. It also means that other Jesus-followers would have significantly less reasons to harbor negative feelings against us, wherever “we” may be at any given time. This entry was posted in Blessings and tagged understanding the Bible| Tagged:Blind Man, Context, Healing Blind Man, Peter