Why Did Jesus Only Take Peter James And John

Why did Jesus choose Peter, James, and John to be His inner circle?

QuestionAnswer In Luke 6:12–16, Jesus announced that He had chosen His twelve disciples. Simon Peter, Andrew, James, John, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James son of Alphaeus, Simon the Zealot, Judas son of James, and Judas Iscariot were among those who belonged to this group of men. Three disciples (Peter, James, and John) appear to have been the closest to Jesus and to have served as a “inner circle” to Christ out of the original twelve. Luke 5:4–11 describes Peter, James, and John as being among the first of Jesus’ followers who had been with Him for the longest period of time.

As eyewitnesses to Jesus’ transfiguration (Mark 9:2–3), Jairus’ daughter’s resurrection from the dead (Luke 8:49–56), and Jesus’ prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane (Matthew 26:36–38), these three men were there with Him at significant moments in His ministry.

They were some of His closest associates.

When Jesus claimed to be the Messiah and Son of God, Peter, known as “the rock,” was the first of his disciples to profess trust in him as the Messiah and Son of God (Matthew 16:16).

The Day of Pentecost was significant in that Peter openly preached to the audience, and the Holy Spirit moved in the hearts of the listeners, leading to the conversion of over three thousand individuals to Jesus on that particular day (Acts 2:41).
They both stated their readiness to be murdered as a result of their trust in Jesus (Matthew 20:22), and they both suffered as a result of their faith in Jesus.
(Revelation 1:9).
The same mandate, to proclaim the gospel and make disciples of all countries, was assigned to Christ’s eleven surviving apostles upon his ascension (Matthew 28:18–20).
The three men were well-prepared for their future duty since they had witnessed countless wonderful incidents throughout Jesus’ ministry as eyewitnesses.
Rather than attempting to broaden the scope of His mission, Jesus “concentrated on actual depth and long-term influence” (“The Leadership Strategy of Jesus,” michaelhyatt.com/the-leadership-strategy-of-jesus, accessed 5/27/20), according to Michael Hyatt.

These three fisherman were transformed into “fishers of men” in the truest sense (Matthew 4:19). Questions about Luke (return to top of page) What was it about Peter, James, and John that drew them into His inner circle?

Subscribe to the

Get our Question of the Week emailed to your inbox every weekday morning! Got Questions Ministries is a trademark of Got Questions Ministries, Inc., registered in the state of California in the year 2002. All intellectual property rights are retained. Policy Regarding Personal Information The information on this page was last updated on January 4, 2022.

Why did Jesus only take Peter, James, and John with Him into the Garden of Gethsemane in Mark 14:33?

14:33 (Matthew 14:33) NKJV – verse 33 And He brought Peter, James, and John with Him, and He became worried and exceedingly distressed as a result of what had happened. ClarifyShareReport The question was posed on March 18, 2016. Deangelo Willis is a professional basketball player. The responses from the community are arranged according to how many people voted for them. The greater the number of votes, the higher the position of an answer on the list. These three apostles were reportedly very close to Jesus, according to tradition.

They are also As far as I’m aware, the Bible doesn’t go into detail about why those three individuals were picked in this particular manner by Jesus.

It was because of this that Jesus pronounced Peter blessed, because Jesus stated that this knowledge had not been revealed to Peter through human means, but rather by God the Father, and that it was upon this “rock” (for which reason Jesus bestowed on Simon the name Peter, which comes from the Greek word for rock (petros)) that Jesus said He would build His church.

Despite the fact that he denied Jesus three times (as Jesus had said he would do, and not just once, but three times), Peter emerged as the most prominent and vociferous of the apostles in evangelizing the people (Acts 2) following Jesus’ ascension (see Matthew 16:16).

Because they were both apparently of a brash and impetuous nature, Jesus gave them the nickname “Sons of Thunder” (or “Boanerges” in Greek), as evidenced by the time they asked Jesus if He wanted them to call down fire from heaven to destroy a Samaritan town that had refused to accept Him because He was traveling to Jerusalem (Luke 9:51-56).

But they both undoubtedly loved Jesus, to such an extent that James would be the first apostle to be martyred for his faith (Acts 12:2), and that John was the one to whom Jesus (as He was dying on the cross) entrusted the care of His own mother, and who was preserved alive (as the only apostle who was not martyred) to witness a vision of the events of the end times, as foretold in the book of Revelation).

This selection of these three individuals, I believe, was based on Jesus’ knowledge of their faith and love, as well as His foreknowledge of the events that would unfold in which they would be involved and their roles in the early church, that led Him to choose them to witness the significant events that only they were present.

Vote for it, share it, and report it.
Jesus chose Peter, James, and John, the same men who had accompanied him to the house of Jairus (Mark 5:37) and to the Mount of Transfiguration (Matthew 17:5), as Mr.
These three events correspond to Philippians 3:10: “That I may come to know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings,” says the apostle Paul.
It had already been 3 years after his three disciples had been with him when Jairus and his wife were suffering terribly as a result of the death of their daughter.

Isn’t it natural for you and me to desire someone by our sides, especially someone who has observed enormous sorrow, to assist us carry the burden while we are going through difficult times? 0 replies on September 28th, 2019 Vote for it, share it, and report it.

Add your Answer

All responses are REVIEWED and MODERATED before being posted. Please make certain that your response adheres to all of our criteria. What makes a good response, exactly? A well-written response offers new insight and perspective on the subject matter. Here are some rules to follow in order to ensure that everyone has a meaningful learning experience.

Keep your commitments to the eBibleStatement of Faith
Your response should be comprehensive and self-contained
Support your points with evidence and scriptural references if at all feasible. Look for an answer to the question “why”
Make use of the appropriate tone and attitude of compassion and understanding
More information may be found in The Complete Guide to eBible.

The Three Disciples — Crossroads Church

You’re probably thinking that the title of this blog article contains a significant typographical error. It doesn’t work like that. In fact, we often refer to the disciples as a group of twelve men with whom Jesus spent the most of his time and who he directly taught to eventually lead His ministry. Without a doubt, Jesus had a total of twelve disciples in whom He carefully devoted his time and resources. He did, however, have three disciples who he elevated to a higher level than the other twelve disciples.

Here are a number of things to think about when it comes to Jesus and His three disciples.

Jesus took the three to places He didn’t take the twelve!

A cursory examination of the Gospels indicates that there were several places where Jesus just brought Peter, James, and John with him. He didn’t bring the twelve with him everywhere he traveled. When Jesus traveled to the Mount of Transfiguration, He only had three disciples with him. The disciples James and John were there when Jesus cured Peter’s mother-in-law and were welcomed into Peter’s home. When Jesus went to the Synagogue to cure the daughter of the ruler, He only took three disciples with Him: Peter, James, and John.

We will never know how or why Jesus chose to take these three people to areas where he did not take the other nine disciples.

Only the three are named in Acts!

If you read the Book of Acts, you will see that the only disciples listed are Peter, James, and John, who were not among the original twelve. Following Jesus’ departure, it appears that they assumed leadership responsibilities that the other nine did not take. At the Feast of Pentecost, Peter gives a sermon. The lame beggar is healed by Peter and John while they are on their way to the temple. The Jewish council summons Peter and John to appear before them. When Peter and John were anointed with the Holy Spirit, they were dispatched to the Samaritans.

There are no mentions of the other disciples in the Book of Acts, leading us to think that the fact that Jesus spent more time with them was preparing them to take on greater responsibilities than the others.

Who are the people in your life into whom you are putting your heart and soul at a higher level than anybody else?

Who are the folks you are placing in ministry positions that no one else is filling, and to whom are you delegating additional authority and responsibility? Who are the people in your close circle?

Jesus, James, John, and Peter

Have you ever observed that our relationships with our friends vary in terms of intimacy? Some are as close as sisters, while others are lovely people who, for whatever reason, aren’t included in our inner circle of friends. Do we try to elevate all of our friendships to the level of “bestie” status? What if not all friendships were meant to last forever, or if not all friendships had the same level of closeness? In today’s reading, we’ll look at the reality that different types of friendships have different levels of closeness.

Jesus lectured the crowds, dispatched seventy on a mission (Luke 10), and, of course, recruited twelve disciples—yet only three were chosen to be part of his inner circle of disciples.
As we read in today’s chapters, we discover that Jesus took frequent retreats with Peter, James, and John in order to pray.
Peter was a fisherman who gave up everything to join Jesus and his disciples.
It is unclear why Jesus picked these individuals as his closest associates, but it is clear that he does so based on their actions.
When Jesus enabled Peter, James, and John to see the resurrection of a small girl in Mark 5:37, they were taken by surprise.
Following that occurrence, Jesus took the three disciples up to a mountain where he was transformed, or metamorphosed, into a glorified condition, known as the transfiguration.
There was a growing sense of trust amongst these four gentlemen, which culminated in a stronger link and increased closeness between them.

Jesus, the Son of God, need the friendship of intimate companions.

Jesus confided in these men and allowed them access to his identity, his authority, and his suffering, knowing that they would maintain his trust.

To be a good friend, we must demonstrate that we are trustworthy.

We bring glory to God in our friendships when we are trustworthy with one another.

When it comes to friendship, our intentions should always be love and commitment.

Every connection, no matter the season or the purpose for which people have earthly friendships, is a chance to honor God and to share Jesus with them. May we strive to have all of our relationships firmly established in Him, for Him, and to Him who provides all good things in our lives.

inventory

With which Biblical buddy have you had the most resonant experience? The reasons for this are as follows: When does a person shift from being an acquaintance to becoming a friend
Do you consider the role that God plays in your friendships, if any
In most cases, “commitment” is a word that is used in the context of marriage and sometimes even parental responsibility. Have you given any thought to making a commitment to your friends? That is, what would it look like
What are some of the ways that we may consciously foster trust in our interpersonal interactions
And so forth.

Why Did Only Three Disciples See the Transfiguration of Christ?

According to the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament, only three disciples were present at the occurrence of the Transfiguration. Peter, James, and John were the most prominent personalities and participants in Jesus Christ’s most essential works: they were the apostles Peter, James, and John. Were the other disciples less deserving of attention? When it comes to the number of disciples present at the time of the Transfiguration, what does Scripture say? When Jesus has been transfigured in front of them for six days, he gathers the disciples, Peter, James, and John his brother, and takes them to a high mountain apart.

When Jesus has been with them for six days, he takes them to a high mountain by themselves, where he is transfigured in front of them (Mark 9:2).
And while he prayed, the appearance of his visage changed, and his clothing became white and gleaming (Luke 9:28-29).
One of the three apostles who saw the resurrection of Jairus’ daughter, as well as being there in the Garden of Gethsemane, was the Apostle Peter.
You are the Christ, the Son of the living God, according to the Scriptures (Matthew 16:16).
John Chrysostom (4th century).
It wasn’t just a remark without any supporting evidence; James demonstrated this with his actions.
John of Damascus (8th century) writes, “He took Peter to demonstrate that his testimony, which was true, was confirmed by the testimony of the Heavenly Father, and in order to assure him that it was his Father in heaven who had revealed it (cf.

Acts 12 Not all of Jesus’ disciples were worthy to behold the splendor of his resurrection.

“Why did the Lord Christ not take all twelve of His disciples up the mountain, but just Peter, James, and John?” says Blessed Theophylact of Ohrid (11th–12th centuries) concerning Judas.

Although some may argue that if this was the case, why did Jesus not leave Judas alone at the bottom and bring the others with him instead.

Because He did not want any of those men or us to say anything, He left Judas with the other eight disciples, instructing them to glorify the three with a vision and to make the rest blessed by their faith, as the Lord says, “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe.

Christ chose Peter because Peter cherished Christ, John because Christ cherished John, and James because he, like John, was a fanatic.

It is also important to note that, according to the Jewish tradition, Jesus Christ took at least three disciples as witnesses.

We held them in more esteem than all others because they were more responsive to the event, more reliable to grasp and maintain it, and more attentive to it; and because they could be counted on to announce and proclaim Him again when the time came.

Because not everyone was worthy (for example, Judas Iscariot), and not everyone could accommodate the event and pass it on, Jesus could not take all of the disciples with him to the Father’s house.

Notes: John Chrysostom, St.

2 John of Damascus, the Homily on the Glorious Transfiguration of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Explanation of the Gospel according to Matthew. 4 Gennadius Scholarius. Homily on the Transfiguration of the Lord. / Sermons of St. Gennadius II (George) Scholarius, Patriarch of Constantinople. St. Petersburg, 2007, p. 336. Translated by The Catalogue of Good Deeds Source:

“He who has ears to hear, let him hear!” (Matthew 11:15)

Join our newsletter to receive the most fascinating articles on spiritual topics as well as the most recent news from St. Elisabeth Convent in one convenient place.

Why did Jesus privilege Peter, James, and John at the Transfiguration?

The Feast of the Transfiguration of the Lord is celebrated on August 6th. Jesus takes Peter and James, as well as John his brother, and takes them up onto a high mountain separate from the rest of the disciples after six days: And he was transfigured in front of their eyes. (2 Corinthians 5:1-2) (Matthew 17:1-2) Neither did Christ reveal his glory to all peoples at the same time, nor did he reveal himself transfigured to the entire company of Apostles; rather, he chose only three of them – Peter, James the Greater, and John the Beloved – to be witnesses to his Transfiguration and reveal his glory to all peoples.

Indeed, what is it about these three that our Savior favors on a daily basis?
This is true on two different levels.
(See also John 1:14) According to the comments of two or three witnesses, the incident occurred.
So it happened that the multiplied loaves were not handed to the people directly by Christ but rather were distributed via the intercession of the Apostles.

What distinguished Peter, James, and John from the rest was the perfection of his love for the Savior: “Peter was greater than the rest because of the excellence of his love for the Savior:” Jesus addresses Simon Peter, saying, “Simon son of John, dost thou love me more than these?” Lord, thou are aware of my affection for thee,’ says he to the king.

Augustine in his concluding tractate on the Gospel of John.
Matthew 16:18).
Finally, John the Beloved was chosen for this role because of our Savior’s personal affection for the Evangelist, as well as because of the fact that he was a virgin.
Summa Theologica III, q.45, a.3, ad 4 (Summa Theologica III, q.45, a.3, ad 4).
Because of this, according to the commentary on Matthew 17:3, “He considered these three to be superior to the others.”.

However, He did not want them to tell anyone about what they had witnessed before His Resurrection, “lest such a wonderful thing should seem unbelievable to them; and lest, after hearing of such great glory, they should be scandalized at the Cross” that followed; or, again, “lest they should be completely hindered by the people”; and “in order that they might then be witnesses of spiritual things when they should be filled with the Holy Ghost,” as Jerome writes on Matthew 17:19.

Why Peter, James, and John?

The story of Peter, James, and John on the Mount of Transfiguration has a truth–gem hidden away in the background. The two ancient prophets who God sends to honor Jesus are Moses and Elijah, and they have the key to unlocking this treasure. First and foremost, why did Jesus choose Peter, James, and John to be part of His inner circle of ministry training and development? There are a variety of possible explanations for this: 1 As an illustration, consider good leadership training. Even though Jesus preached to large groups of people, there was a small group of around a hundred people who appeared to be intently following Him, including the magnificent ladies who assisted the ministry in practical ways.

However, even the Perfect Leader, Jesus, demonstrated to us the significance of focusing on a smaller “inner circle” in order to get the most intimate instruction possible.
2Peter, James, and John are the polar opposites of the Twelve Apostles.
James was the first to die, while John was the longest living.
I’m not sure if it has this impact on him or not, but it does!
Jesus put the same amount of Himself in both James and John.
It was a terrific investment on Jesus’ part, providing the most “bang for the money.” But what about James?
Is it possible that Jesus would have remarked, “What a waste?” No way, not at all!

James’ importance to the Kingdom of God was equal to or greater than that of John.

In this section, we’ll look at the other guys who were on the Mount: Elijah and Moses.

Moses At long last, Moses has arrived in the Promised Land!

Assuming the Mount is Tabor, rather than Hermon, which is twelve miles north of Israel and more than 9000 feet above sea level.

Finally, at the end of his earthly mission and in the midst of Israel, Moses’ fury got the better of him, and he failed by striking the rock, dishonoring God in the process.

Moses, on the other hand, received one final act of kindness from God.

Moses passed away on the mountain, and God buried him there.

As an example, consider the following exchange between two angels: “Hey Moses, my child, I’ve got something for you to do today that I know you’ll appreciate.” “Why now, Lord?” Moses asks in response.

“Because my Beloved Son, Jesus, has fulfilled the Laws I gave you on Mount Sinai,” God responds.

Everything has been rectified.

Moses was present to bear testimony to Jesus’ greatness, not to take any of that glory for himself or his followers.

All of the honor and glory are now solely reserved for Jesus.

Furthermore, Jesus fulfilled the prophecies, among which Elijah was considered to be the most important.

Horeb, after fleeing from Jezebel, and this was not his first encounter with God.

Given that Jesus fulfilled the Law and the Prophets, God’s emissaries stand at Jesus’ side as He commands, “Listen to My Beloved Son!

Revelation Moses and Elijah are also the most likely candidates to be the Two Witnesses in the Book of Revelation, who are slain by the Anti–Christ for their preaching.

Imagine Jesus having a conversation with Moses and Elijah on the Mount of Olives: “Hey, Moses and Elijah, come here for a second,” he says.

“I believe that you and I have a lot in common.” They have been observing Jesus’ ministry from afar, and they have a dubious expression on their faces when they see him doing good.

We’ve witnessed these individuals in action.

As it turns out, Peter, James, and John had a lot of characteristics with Elijah and Moses.

Peter was a loud–mouthed and enraged individual who, when he made a mistake, became unhappy and defeated.

They were the ones who put themselves forth as the candidates for the positions of right and left hand on Jesus’ throne.

Moses and Elijah had both been natural leaders who had failed in the flesh and fled the scene of the crime.

Moses, Elijah, and the apostles Peter, James, and John sprang from the same mold as Moses and Elijah.

“Hey, you old fellas,” Jesus may have said while introducing the Three Apostles to the Two Prophets, “Hey, you old dudes.” Allow me to present you to the young men who will carry on your legacy in their own way.

This is a crucial time in their lives, and I want them to shake your hand and look you in the eyes to remember it.

God will continue to humble you, break you, and form you into the supernatural leader who walks in His Spirit if you let Him to.

Moreover, as a leader, you should be on the lookout for your Peter, James, and John—those young people who possess the innate raw material that will catapult them to the front of the team.

Assist them in learning to yield to the Spirit’s leading. Allow God’s word to permeate into their hearts, saying, “This is My Beloved Son, pay attention to what He says!”

Who appeared to Peter, James, and John on the Mount of Transfiguration?

The question is, “Who appeared to Peter, James, and John on the Mountain of Transfiguration?” The Ensign, April 1983, pages 21–23 Professor Larry E. Dahl of Church history and doctrine at Brigham Young University is the author of this article. When Moses, Elijah, and John the Baptist (among others) came to Peter, James, and John on the Mount of Transfiguration, the apostles were given the “keys of the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 16:19), which they used to enter the kingdom of heaven. In addition, there is evidence to support the claim that they were bestowed with authority from on high and taught in the business of God’s kingdom.

We may learn the following from their stories in the King James Version of the Bible: First, Jesus separated Peter, James, and John and brought them “up onto a high mountain apart” about a week after Peter was told that he would be handed the keys to the kingdom of heaven (Matt.
(See Mark 9:2 for further information.) 2.
(See Matthew 17:2.) 3.
17) were seen by Peter, James, and John chatting with Christ.
A dazzling cloud “overshadowed them,” and “when they entered the cloud, they were filled with terror.” 5.
As they descended down the mountain, the Savior commanded them not to tell anyone about their encounter until until his resurrection had occurred.
It was also verified by him that John the Baptist had already arrived in his function as an Elias, and that he had been slain by the same people who would later slay the Son of Man.

17:14.

We discover that John the Baptist was also there on the Mount of Transfiguration, according to the Prophet’s inspired translation of Mark’s account.

In his remarks on this line, Robert J.

As a result, many people have questioned whether or not this text has been printed incorrectly in any way.

Similarly, the Bernhisel copy, on page 74, contains exactly the same phrasing as the present text of the printed Inspired Version, so correlating the two versions of the text.

… “There can be no doubt that theElias who appeared on the Mount of Transfiguration was none other than Elijah the prophet.

180, 367; see also Joseph Smith’s Translation of the Bible.) “It is not to be understood that John the Baptist was the Elias who appeared with Moses to confer keys and authority upon those who then held the Melchizedek Priesthood, which higher priesthood already embraced and included all of the authority and power John had held and exercised during his ministry,” explains Elder Bruce R.

Possibly, he was present as the last legal administrator under the Old Covenant in order to symbolize that the law had been fulfilled and that all old things had been done away, thus drawing a contrast between his position and the position of the apostles Peter, James, and John, who were then about to become the first legal administrators of the New Kingdom.” (1965, 1:404 in Bruce R.

The Elias who appeared on the Mount of Transfiguration was, in fact, Elijah, albeit John the Baptist was also present to see it.

the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood.” He was able to reclaim this authority because it was necessary for the effective administration of the Melchizedek Priesthood ordinances.

The Savior, Moses, and Elias appeared to them on the mountaintop and gave them the keys to the kingdom.

(See 3:387 in the History of the Church.) According to the Prophet, the disciples were also transfigured, which may be interpreted as an explanation for Luke’s remark that “they entered into the cloud.” (See also Luke 9:34.) The Father’s voice coming from the cloud, as well as Peter’s remark that Jesus “received from God the Father honour and glory when such a voice came” (2 Peter 1:17), provide proof that the Father was also there.

We have Moses’ evidence that mankind must be transfigured in order to be able to stand before God.
It is recorded in Doctrine and Covenants 7 as “translated from parchment, penned, and concealed up by himself,” as part of John’s record.
McConkie, 3 vols., Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954–56, 2:165), Elder Joseph Fielding Smith expressed his belief that Peter, James, and John “received their endowments on the mount,” and Elder Bruce R.
they received the more sure word of prophecy.” 1.
Indeed, there must have been a great deal that happened that we are not aware of.
In this passage, Jesus not only maintains but also proves that the New Testament account of his experiences on the Mount of Transfiguration is incomplete, as it reveals that the Apostles there witnessed the transfiguration of the earth that will take place in the future.

We can be frantically engaged in expanding our minds toward comprehension and our hearts toward meaningful application of what we have already received while waiting for the end of time to arrive.

The First Presidency of the Early Church: Their Lives and Epistles

John was the last surviving member of the first Church’s executive committee. Reading the conclusion of John’s Gospel, as well as its modern explanation (see D C 7), we can see that his distinctive ministry continued without interruption, despite the fact that he was known as an elderly Apostle by the end of the first century. “Which we have heard, which we have seen with our own eyes, which we have gazed at, and which our hands have handled,” he wrote as the final witness of Christ among the Old World Apostles, expressing his direct experience of Jesus in simple terms: (See 1 John 1:1.) The last decade of John’s earthly life is sketched in history, but his intermediate years are left out.

During this time, he also served on a number of Church councils, which were concerned with the expansion of the mission.
In contrast to Peter, however, there was no indication of John’s location until nearly half a century after his disappearance.
When he was younger, Irenaeus became acquainted with Polycarp, an Asia Minor bishop who lived in the region of Ephesus, in what is now southwest Turkey.
In his own words, Irenaeus recalls the events of those days: “I remember the happenings of those days.
how he described interaction with John and with those who had seen the Lord.” 13 Irenaeus said that John authored the Revelation while in exile “as the reign of Domitian was drawing to a close,” which would be about the year A.D.96.
Irenaeus describes John as being recognized until “the years of Trajan,” which corresponds to a reign that began in A.D.98.
17 As a result, a study of Irenaeus implies that the book of Revelation was written about A.D.96, the Gospel was written around A.D.98, and the letters were written around A.D.100.

Why did Jesus favor Peter, James and John more than the other disciples?

I believe Peter, James, and John witnessed more miracles than the others because they were in close proximity to the circle, rather than being excluded from it. In addition to their exposure to the transfiguration, I suppose you are referring to the fact that they witnessed Him sweat blood in the garden. (If they were able to keep their eyes open for long enough) Because Jesus described Himself as a man on the earth (as well as God), it is possible that Peter, James, and John were among those in the closest circle.

It is possible that Jesus invited this inner group to become closer to Him because He was God, and because ‘God is Love,’ Jesus may have done it based on their needs rather than His own human preferences.
The fact that James was a member of the family as well as a close friend might have been a contributing element.
In the gospel accounts, Peter is frequently shown ‘leading’ the disciples, sometimes with reckless abandon, and he subsequently emerges as a leader in the New Testament church.
Peter’s character looks to be one who would push himself forward in order to be at Jesus’ side at all times, and this appears to be true.
Paul traveled to Jerusalem in order to meet with Peter and James, who were leaders in the local church at that time.

As a follow-up to the statement that Jesus is Love and that He was living his life from that perspective, John addressed himself as “the one whom Jesus loved” and “the cherished disciple.” I would like to believe that John did this because he truly ‘understood’ the message and was fully consumed by the Love of Jesus for him and his family.

The Love of Jesus, I think, was absorbed by John on the most fundamental level and penetrated him to such an extent that John referred to himself as ‘John, the disciple whom Jesus loved.’ Isn’t it true that Jesus loved everyone of his disciples in the same way?
Because he received God’s Love and was transformed by it on a far deeper level than the others, I believe that John identified himself in this manner.
Walking in Love and walking in the Spirit are practically similar, and this would explain John’s spiritual giftings, which are also almost synonymous.
According to historical accounts, John was the only disciple who did not suffer a martyr’s death, despite the fact that they attempted to murder him by boiling him in oil.

God is our bright example of how love always triumphs.

What Was the Transfiguration of Jesus?

“After six days, Jesus took Peter, James, and John with him and brought them to the top of a mountain, where they were all by themselves. He appeared to them as though he had been transformed. His clothing become a brilliant white, whiter than any other person on the planet could bleach them. And there came in front of them Elijah and Moses, who were conversing with Jesus at the time. “Jesus,” Peter replied to him “It is beneficial for us to be here, Rabbi. Let us construct three shelters: one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah, if you don’t mind.” (He was at a loss for what to say since they were so terrified.) They were shrouded by a cloud when a voice came from the cloud: “The cloud has spoken.” “I’m introducing you to my Son, whom I adore.

Just as they were about to begin their descent from the mountain, Jesus instructed them not to tell anyone about what they had witnessed until the Son of Man had risen from the dead.” Mark 9:2-9 (KJV)

The Transfiguration of Jesus Christ

This biblical incident appears in each of the Gospel books as a pivotal occasion in Jesus’ life and as evidence of his divinity. It is described as follows: Then, after performing a series of miracles and foretelling His own death, Jesus takes just three of his followers with him to a “high mountain.” They are Peter, James, and John. This is the location where the Transfiguration occurs, during which his physical appearance is radiantly altered. Transfiguration of Jesus Christ was a tremendous proof of His divine essence and manifestation of His glory, which Jesus possessed before to entering the human form and entering the kingdom of God.

“Allow this thought to dwell within you, just as it did in Christ Jesus: Who, while He was in the form of God, did not consider it theft to be on an equal footing with God: but He made Himself of no renown, and took upon Him the form of a servant, and was fashioned in the image of men: And when He was discovered in human form, He humbled Himself and became submissive unto death, even death on the cross.

As a result, God has also exalted Him and given Him a name that is above every name, in order that at the mention of Jesus’ name everything in heaven, everything on earth, and everything beneath the earth will bow, and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father ” (Philippians 2:5-11KJV).

What was the Importance of the Transfiguration?

The following is a transcription of the video above in which the question “What was the significance of the Transfiguration?” is answered. It’s hard to comprehend what’s going on during the Transfiguration unless you take into consideration the fact that this miraculous event occurs only a few days after Jesus revealed to his followers for the first time that He was going to be crucified. Moreover, when Jesus announced to his followers in Matthew 16:21 that He was about to die, they were outraged and scandalized.

This is after those disciples had followed Jesus for months and years, had witnessed his miracles, and had performed marvels in His name.

As a result, Jesus separated three apostles, Peter, James, and John, and led them up a high mountain away from the rest of the group as a result.

He then instructs the disciples to pray, and they promptly fall asleep.

He had renounced his exterior brilliance, and for a little moment, while they looked on, they saw him transform into something greater (metamorphized is the Greek word).

The entire objective of that encounter was to strengthen the incredible faith in which those apostles were already standing.

When Jesus appeared on the Mount of Transfiguration, it was to strengthen the apostles’ already-shaking faith.

When they inquire as to why the exorcism has failed, Jesus responds that it is due to their incredible faith.

That Jesus was about to die was conveyed through the Transfiguration, and that is precisely what the event was all about.

He had been attempting to convey His approaching death to the disciples, and he now realizes how severely handicapped they have become as a result of the news.

So He is sensitive enough, a few days later, to provide that type of condescending object lesson, in which God condescends to give him that bodily splendour just for the sake of reinforcing their religious beliefs. Larry Koester provided the image for this article.