Who Made Jesus Cross

Simon of Cyrene – Wikipedia

SaintSimon of Cyrene
The fifth Station of the Cross, showing Simon of Cyrene helping Jesus carry his cross.St. Raphael’s Cathedral,Dubuque, Iowa.
Bishop, and Martyr
Died	100
Venerated in	Roman Catholic Church,Eastern Orthodox Church,Oriental Orthodox Church, and theChurch of the East
Feast	1 December
Attributes	Carrying Jesus’ Cross before His Crucifixion

Simon of Cyrene (Hebrew:,Standard Hebrew: ) was a Jewish prophet who lived in the first century AD. Imon (Tiberian Hebrew: imôn; Greek: o,Simn Kyrnaios) was the Roman soldier who was obliged to carry the cross ofJesus of Nazarethas Jesus was brought away to his crucifixion, according to the three Synoptic Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke. And when they got out, they discovered a man from Cyrene by the name of Simon, whom they ordered to bore his cross for them. Additionally, he was the father of thedisciples Rufus and Alexander.

Background

Cyrenewas is a country in northern Africa, in the eastern country of Libya. Ptolemy Soter (323-285 BC) forced 100,000 Jewish refugees to settle in this city, which became an early center of Christianity. It was a Greek city in the province of Cyrenaica, and it had a Jewish community where 100,000 Jewish refugees had been forced to settle during the reign of Ptolemy Soter (323-285 BC). A synagogue in Jerusalem served as a gathering place for Cyrenian Jews, who gathered there for yearly feasts.

Biblical accounts

When Simon is entrusted with bearing the cross, patibulum (crossbeam in Latin), for Jesus, he is doing the fifth or seventh Stations of the Cross, depending on whose version you read. Some have interpreted the verse as meaning that Simon was picked because he may have expressed sympathy for Jesus’ cause. Others argue that the text itself says nothing, that he had no option, and that there is no foundation for considering the carrying of the cross to be an act of empathetic charity on the part of the victim.

Also claimed is that the Rufus (in Greek: v or Rhouphon) named by Paul in Romans 16:13 is the son of Simon de Cyrene, who was the father of Simon of Cyrene.

Simon’s surname, on the other hand, does not rule out the possibility that he was Jewish, and Alexander and Rufus were also popular names that may have referred to others.

Church tradition

His consecration as the first bishop of the modern Archdiocese of Avignon, according to one Catholic tradition, took place in 1541. Another theory states that he was executed by crucifixion in the year 100. Neither the Old nor the Revised Roman Martyrology of the Catholic Church include Simon of Cyrene as one of its martyrs.

Gnostic views

According to certain Gnostic accounts, Simon of Cyrene was the one who underwent the events leading up to the crucifixion because he was mistaken for Jesus. This is the tale told in the Second Treatise of the Great Seth, albeit it is unknown if Simon or someone else died on the cross in reality. According to certain Gnostics, Jesus was not made of flesh, but rather just assumed the appearance of flesh in order to save the world (see alsoBasilides, andSwoon hypothesis). Basilides, according to the Gospel of Basilides, is said to have preached an adocetic teaching of Christ’s passion, according to Irenaeus.

Basiledes is quoted by Irenaeus as saying, “He appeared on earth in the shape of a man and performed marvels.” As a result, he did not suffer personally.

It was he who was mistakenly and erroneously crucified, having been transfigured by him in order for him to be mistaken for Jesus in the first place. Furthermore, Jesus took on the persona of Simon and laughed at them as they passed by. Irenaeus, Against Heresies (Against Heresies)

In popular culture

The visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich revealed that Simon was a satanic worshipper. He was chosen by the Romans to assist Jesus in carrying the cross because they identified him as not being a Jew based on his clothing. Ridgely Torrence, a poet, wrote a play on him, titledSimon the Cyrenian, which was performed in New York City. This drama was staged by the YWCA in 1920, under the direction of Dora Cole, the sister of composer Bob Cole, and starring Paul Robeson. Sidney Poitier was cast as Simon of Cyrene in George Stevens’ film The Greatest Story Ever Told, which was released in 1965 and directed by George Stevens.

Monkey Python’s Life of Brian, released in 1979, has a segment that alludes to the Simon of Cyrene story.

Simon is portrayed as a Jew in the film The Passion of the Christ, who, after being forced to carry the cross by the Romans, is first resentful, but eventually comes to care for and assist Jesus.

Movements

Among others who have taken their names from Simon of Cyrene are the Simon Community and the Cyrenian movement (which provides assistance to homeless and other underprivileged people in the United Kingdom).

External links

Various images and media linked to Simon of Cyrene may be found on Wikimedia Commons

Opinion

During Holy Week in Guatemala, worshippers participate in the Jesus of Nazareth Merced procession, in which they carry a figure of Jesus Christ. Photo by Johann Ordonez/AFP/Getty Images. ) ) Christians throughout the world are commemorating Jesus’ death on Good Friday, followed by a celebration of his resurrection on Easter Sunday, as part of their religious traditions. However, despite the fact that the cross appears often in Christian artwork and Western culture as a whole, misconceptions and myths about its history, origins, and appearance continue to circulate.

Myth number one: The cross on which Jesus died was a stake divided by a horizontal beam.
In addition to emoji (which include both the two-beamLatin cross and theOrthodox cross, also known as the Suppedaneum cross, which has an additional bar towards the bottom), this variant of the cross may be found on anything from roadside monuments to church steeples.
It is important to note that the Greek and Latin terms for “cross” (stauros” and “crux”) do not necessarily refer to the cross that most people are familiar with.
In most historians’ estimations, Jesus’ cross was T-shaped, with the vertical section notched to allow the executioners to bind the victim to the crossbeam before raising it and setting it securely into the top of the cross.
It is said to bore a better resemblance to the item on which Jesus died than the crosses that are more usually shown in Christian art.
2Jesus was nailed on the cross with nails driven through his hands and feet, which is incorrect.
This includes classics such as Sandro Botticelli’s ” Mystic Crucifixion ” and Diego Velázquez’s ” Christ Crucified “, as well as lesser known works.
In reality, the only time such nails are mentioned in the Gospels is in the book of John, in the tale of the doubting Thomas, who wants to see the marks of the nails on Jesus’ hands to ensure that he is indeed experiencing the risen Jesus (John 20:25).

However, while archaeologists have discovered physical evidence of nails being used to fasten the feet of crucifixion victims, it would have been impossible to nail the condemned to a cross using only nails because the bones in the hands and wrists would not have been able to support the weight of the body.

Suffocation, rather than blood loss, would be the cause of death in this scenario.
3Jesus (or a bystander) was the one who carried the crucifixion to the cross of Calvary.
Either man is seen bearing a big, wooden cross with both a vertical and a horizontal beam in Christian art (including renderings by Michelangelo, El Greco, and Titian), which is a common motif.
According to historians of ancient execution procedures, such LaGrange College professor John Granger Cook, to the degree that the condemned carried their own crosses, they would have been handed only the horizontal component.

What’s ‘true’ about Jesus’ cross?

Could bits of a tree survive millennia? The genuine cross phenomenon began with Ruler Constantine, the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity. Is it possible that these are shards of fraud that speak to our want to believe

Science and archaeology provide new insights into ancient objects that may be related to the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. “Finding Jesus: Fact, Faith, and Forgery” airs on CNN US on Sundays at 9 p.m. ET/PT and is available on demand. (CNN) In July of 2013, Turkish researchers unearthed a stone box in a 1,350-year-old church that looked to contain a piece of Jesus’ crucifixion, bringing the oldest of Jesus relics legends back to life. “We have discovered something sacred in a chest. It’s a fragment of a cross, actually “Gülgün Körolu, an art historian and archaeologist who is in charge of the excavation crew, shared his thoughts.

And suddenly there was quiet.
The newest story of the “real cross,” which serves as a strong symbol of faith for more than two billion people throughout the world, is representative of the difficulties encountered in the search for Jesus’ relics.
Is it possible that remnants of the genuine cross of Jesus are still among us today?
Maybe they’re forgeries in their own right, but they speak to our desire for belief.
He entrusted his mother, Saint Helena (c.
When Helena arrived to Jerusalem in 326 CE, the city was still reeling from the devastation wrought by the final Jewish War, which took place between 132 and 335 CE.
Helena ordered the deconstruction of this heathen temple and immediately began digging beneath it in search of relics associated with Jesus.

According to the historian Rufinus (c.

Nothing occurred as the unwell woman pressed her hand on two crosses.

The actual cross of Jesus has now been shown to the world.

Despite this, the Gospels attest to the fact that a single man was capable of carrying it.” Was Calvin, however, exaggerating in order to bolster his own changes inside Catholicism?

This is where science comes in.

In his investigation, he discovered that the Jesus cross weighed 165 pounds, was three or four meters tall, and had a cross beam that was two meters broad.

De Fleury came to the conclusion that the actual cross was built of pine wood based on the bits he was permitted to inspect under a microscope.

These fragments originated from some of Europe’s most important churches, including Santa Croce in Rome, Notre Dame in Paris, and the Cathedrals of Pisa and Florence.

Consequently, the debate arose as to whether the cross of Jesus was crafted from olive wood or pine.

While researchers unearthed the heel bone of a crucified man with the nail still attached in 1968, they were unaware that the Romans had executed tens of thousands of people by crucifixion, including as many as 500 people per day during the siege of Jerusalem from 66 to 70 CE.

The guy, whose ossuary, or burial box, identified him as Yehohanan, was in his mid-twenties when he died on the cross, according to the inscription on the box.

Given the fact that other people buried in the same tomb as Yehohanan had ties to the Temple, it’s probable that he was slain by the Romans for some political infraction.

In Hershkovitz’s opinion, the fact that the length of the nail is relatively small indicates a great deal about Roman crucifixion techniques.

The reason, Hershkovitz believes, that crosses were not fashioned from olive trees is that people relied on the olive tree for sustenance and would not hack them down to create crosses if they did.

There are many gaps in the wood of the olive tree, making it impossible to sustain the nails against the weight of the victim.

We have a variety of different types of local oaks that are better suited for the job.” Today, there are even more “true cross” fragments on display around the world, including on Mount Athos, in Rome, in Brussels, in Venice, in Ghent, in Paris, in Spain, and in Serbia – and even in Boalsburg, Pennsylvania, where a fragment of the true cross was brought over as part of the family chapel that Theodore Boal had built for his French bride after she was married there.

eBay has numerous options if you wish to possess a piece of the cross on which Jesus died – some of which have original wax seals to preserve its “purity,” while others come with certificates attesting to the pieces’ genuineness and authenticity.

The continuous emphasis on the authenticity of real cross fragments, argues Mark Goodacre, a professor in the Department of Religion at Duke University, has been detrimental to understanding the meaning of the cross, he claims. “The thing about the cross is that you always have to remember that it’s about the person who is nailed to it; the wood itself is only a tool of torment at the end of the day,” says the author. Michael McKinley and David Gibson are the co-authors of “Finding Jesus: Faith.

Forgery.

True Cross

It is believed to be the wood from the cross on which Jesus Christ was crucified, a genuine Christian relic. The True Cross, according to legend, was discovered by St. Helena, the mother of Constantine the Great, on her visit to the Holy Land in 326. The True Cross is first mentioned in history in the mid-4th century, according to the most reliable sources. When it came to the Crucifixion, the stories were embellished with mythical elements relating to the history of the cross before it was used for the Crucifixion.

When John Calvin pointed out that all of the extant fragments would fill a large ship if they were all put together, some Roman Catholic theologians regarded this as an invalid objection, claiming that the blood of Christ had given the True Cross a kind of material indestructibility, allowing it to be divided indefinitely without being diminished.

Reliquaries meant to hold the fragments increased as well, and some of these valuable artefacts have survived until the present day.

The Feast of the Finding of the Cross was observed on May 3 in the Roman Catholic Church until it was officially removed from the church calendar by Pope John XXIII in 1960.

What Was the Shape of Jesus’ Cross?

An interesting topic regarding the form of the Crucifixion cross of Jesus came to my attention recently after I delivered a keynote address at an international conference. In an attempt to dispute the customary form of the cross, he had been approached by Jehovah’s Witnesses. As they pointed out, “cross” (stauros) is merely a Greek word that may signify any of three things: a “upright pole,” a “upright stake,” or a “torture stake.” His Jehovah’s Witness guests reported that Jesus was indeed nailed to a straight stake with a single spike through his hands and another through his feet, as described by the visitors from the organization.

There are a number of evidence indicators provided in the scripture to assist us in understanding the real form of Jesus’ crucifixion, despite the fact that the Greek terms used for the cross in the New Testament are not precise about its shape (“stauros” = stake / pole and “xulon” = timber / tree).

“(The Jews caught outside the walls of Jerusalem) were first whipped, and then tormented with all kinds of tortures, before they died, and were then crucified before the wall of the city.”, Josephus wrote about the siege of Jerusalem in 70AD.

The first-century Roman philosopher Seneca the Younger described crucifixion in a variety of ways, saying, “I find in front of me crosses not all alike, but made differently by different people: some hang a man head downwards, some force a stick upwards through his groin, some stretch out his arms on a forked gibbet” (Seneca the Younger, “To Marcia on Consolation,” in Moral Essays, 6.20).

It is possible to bind or fasten the victim’s hands with a single piece of rope or a single nail if the wood is cut into this shape, as many Jehovah’s Witnesses believe.
There are other names for this cross, including “St.
This building was built from a horizontal beam that was joined at the top of a vertical stake, resulting in a “T” shape when assembled.
It was either nailed together or separately to the bottom of the vertical post where their feet rested.
Using a vertical stake, a horizontal cross beam (referred to as a “patibulum”) was inserted across the upper portion of the stake, leaving a “tip” that extended above the patibulum to complete the construction.
On either side of the patibulum, victims were nailed to the structure with their arms outstretched in front of them.
Crux Decussata is the letter X.

The Crucifixion Took on New Religious Meaning in the Centuries After the Death of Jesus. Here’s What Changed

The Romans, despite the fact that they had chosen crucifixion as the “supreme sentence,” refused to acknowledge that it may have started with them as a form of punishment. Perhaps the Persians, the Assyrians, or the Gauls were the only people who could have created such a torturous method of execution: a people known for their barbarism and brutality, perhaps. There was something repulsive about the process of nailing a man to a cross, sometimes known as a “crux.” A veil should be drawn over certain fatalities because they were so nasty and dirty that it was best to keep them hidden.

It was standard practice to throw the bodies of the crucified into a communal grave after they had first served as a source of food for hungry birds.
Then, like the loose soil that had been spread over their agonizing bodies, they would be entombed in oblivion.
Nonetheless, there is one notable exception to the prevailing deafening quiet that serves to demonstrate the rule.
Incredibly, each and every one of them describes the exact identical execution.
Pain and humiliation, as well as the prolonged anguish of “the most miserable of deaths,” were the common fate of a large number of people throughout the existence of the Roman Republic.
It was spared a common burial after being lowered from the cross.
According to all four of the earliest reports of Jesus’ death, which were known in Greek as euangelia, or “good news,” and which would later become known in English as gospels, this is the case.

Indeed, archaeological evidence indicates that the corpse of a crucified man may have been given a respectful burial in one of the ossuaries outside the walls of Jerusalem on rare occasions.

When the women were on their way to the tomb, they discovered the entrance stone had been rolled away.

That he had climbed to the throne of God and was destined to return there.

Having through the most torturous ordeal possible, he had defeated death in its entirety.

Most people believe that the line between heaven and earth is porous and may be crossed at will.

It had been announced by the flare across the heavens of a fiery-tailed star that one of those, a conqueror named Julius Caesar, was about to ascend into heaven.

One’s ability to torment one’s enemies, rather than one’s own suffering, was the measure of one’s power: the ability to pin one’s foes to the rocks of a mountain, transform them into spiders, or blind and crucify them after conquering the world.

The fact that a man who had himself been crucified could be hailed as a god could not help but be viewed as scandalous, obscene, and grotesque by people all over the Roman world.

Get our History Newsletter.Put today’s news in context and see highlights from the archives.

We’ve sent you a confirmation email to the address you provided as a precautionary measure. To confirm your subscription and begin getting our newsletters, please click on the link provided. You should receive a confirmation email within 10 minutes. If you do not receive a confirmation email, please check your spam folder. It is possible that even individuals who have come to recognize Jesus as “Christos,” the Anointed One of the Lord God, would experience a flinch when confronted with the method of his death in its entirety.

The torture of the Son of the Most High God was an unspeakable atrocity that could never be shown in a film or on television.
Only decades after Jesus’ crucifixion — by which time, shockingly, even the Caesars had come to recognize him as the Messiah — did his execution finally begin to gain acceptance as a legitimate subject for artists.
After being outlawed as a punishment decades earlier by Constantine, the first Christian emperor, the crucifixion came to symbolize the Roman people’s victory over sin and death and came to symbolize the triumph of life over death.
As a result, in an empire that, despite the fact that we now refer to it as Byzantine, never stopped insisting that it was Roman, a corpse came to serve as an image of majesty.
A new revolution was developing in the Latin-speaking Western world, more than a century after the birth of Christ.