How Did Jesus Mother Died

Tomb of the Virgin Mary – Wikipedia

Church of the Sepulchre of Saint Mary, also known as the Tomb of the Virgin Mary, is a Christian tomb in the Kidron Valley, at the foot of the Mount of Olives, in Jerusalem, considered by Eastern Christians to be the burial place of Mary, Jesus’ mother. The tomb was built in the twelfth century. There is an agreement between religious congregations that has been in effect for 250 years that relates to the site.

History

Eastern Christianity’s Sacred Tradition teaches that the Virgin Mary died a natural death (theDormition of the Theotokos, or falling asleep), just like any other human being; that her soul was received by Christ upon death; and that her body was resurrected on the third day after her repose, at which time she was taken up, soul and body, intoheaven in anticipation of the general resurrection (theraphael).

According to one tradition, her grave was discovered to be empty on the third day.

In a speech delivered on June 25, 1997, Pope John Paul II stated that Mary had died naturally before being taken up into Heaven.

In response, Juvenal stated that on the third day following Mary’s burial, her tomb was discovered to be empty, with just her shroud remaining in the church of Gethsemane as a reminder of what had happened.

According to various traditions, it was theCincture of the Virgin Mary that was left behind in the tomb, or that she dropped herself during the Assumption of the Virgin Mary.

Archaeology

An archaeologist working for the Franciscan friars excavated the site in 1972. He discovered evidence of an ancient cemetery dating back to the 1st century; however, his findings have not yet been subjected to peer review by the wider archaeological community, and the validity of his dating has not been fully assessed. Following Bagatti’s interpretation of the remains, it appears that the cemetery’s original structure, which had three rooms (the real tomb being the inner chamber of the whole complex), was assessed in line with the conventions of the time period in question.

  1. On top of the grave, an edifice was constructed.
  2. Throughout the decades that followed, the church was demolished and rebuilt several times, but the crypt was preserved because it is believed to be the burial location of Prophet Isa’s mother, who is buried there (Jesus).
  3. Mary in the Valley of Jehoshaphat.
  4. The monastic structure was comprised of early Gothic columns, red-on-green paintings, and three towers that served as fortification.
  5. Despite the fact that this church was demolished by Saladin in 1187, the crypt was still preserved; all that remained were the south door and stairway, with the masonry from the upper church being used to construct the walls of Jerusalem.
  6. On Palm Sunday in 1757, the Greek Orthodox clergy seized control of a number of Holy Land sites, including this one, and evicted the Franciscans.

Throughout the centuries, the tomb has been held in trust by the Greek Orthodox Church of Jerusalem and the Armenian Apostolic Church of Jerusalem, while the grotto of Gethsemane has remained in the hands of the Franciscans.

The church

The rock-cut was created by The Tomb of Mary and its entrance, which is decorated with icons on its front side; the eastern apse of the crypt. There is now a glass encasement over the stone bench where the Virgin’s corpse was laid down. The cruciform chapel that protects the tomb has been dug in a rock-cut cave that was reached by a large descending stairway that dates back to the 12th century. It is preceded by a walled courtyard to the south. The chapel of Mary’s parents, Joachim and Anne, is located on the right side of the stairway (facing east).

  1. There is a chapel dedicated to Saint Joseph, Mary’s husband, which was originally constructed as a mausoleum for two additional female relations of Baldwin II, and is located on the left (towards the west).
  2. The eastapse is also home to the altars of the Greeks and Armenians.
  3. At the moment, the Muslims no longer have ownership rights to this property.
  4. Both the Armenian Patriarchate and the Armenian Apostolic Church of Jerusalem, as well as the Greek Orthodox Church of Jerusalem, are in control of the sanctuary.

Authenticity

According to a narrative that dates back to the 4th century AD and was first reported by Epiphanius of Salamis, Mary may have spent the last years of her life in the city of Ephesus, Turkey. This belief was inferred by the Ephesians from John’s presence in the city, as well as Jesus’ orders to John to look for Mary after his death. Epiphanius, on the other hand, pointed out that, while the Bible describes John departing for Asia, it makes no reference of Mary accompanying him on his journey. In accordance with the Eastern Orthodox Churchtradition, Virgin Mary lived in the vicinity of Ephesus, atSelçuk, where there is a place currently known astheHouse of the Virgin Maryand venerated by Catholics and Muslims, but argues that she only stayed there for a few years, despite accounts of her spending nine years there from the time of her birth until her death.

The Book of John on the Dormition of Mary, which was written in either the first, third, fourth, or seventh centuries, places her burial at Gethsemene, as does the Treatise on the Death of the Blessed Virgin Mary, which was published in the fourth century.

In later centuries, SaintsEpiphanius of Salamis, Gregory of Tours, Isidore of Seville, Modesto, Sophronius of Jerusalem, German of Constantinople, Andrew of Crete, and John of Damascusall speak of the tomb being in Jerusalem, and bear witness to the fact that this tradition was accepted by all the churches of the East and West.

Other claims

TurkmenKeraitesbelieve, in accordance with a Nestoriantradition, that another tomb of the Virgin Mary might be found inMary, Turkmenistan, a town that was formerly known as Mari. Other stories state that Jesus, after escaping the crucifixion, traveled to India with the Virgin Mary, where they lived until the end of their lives, according to the Bible. There is a belief within the Ahmadiyya movement that Mary was buried in the Pakistani town of Murree, and that her grave is currently housed at the shrine Mai Mari da Ashtan.

Another legend among the Christians of Nineveh in northern Iraq holds that the tomb of Mary is located in Erbil, with the location of the tomb being linked to the direction of tilt of the formerGreat Mosque of al-Nuriminaret inMosul, according to the tradition.

  • Following a Nestoriantradition, TurkmenKeraites believe that another tomb of the Virgin Mary might be found inMary, Turkmenistan, which was once known as Mari. According to some accounts, after escaping the crucifixion, Jesus and the Virgin Mary journeyed to India, where they stayed until the end of their lives. In accordance with the Ahmadiyya movement, Mary was buried at the Pakistani town of Murree, and her grave is currently housed in the shrine Mai Mari da Ashtan. The legitimacy of these assertions has not yet been confirmed academically, and there has been no scholastic or academic inquiry into them, nor has the Holy See or anybody else given their canonical confirmation. Among Christians in Nineveh, northern Iraq, there is another story that the tomb of Mary is located near Erbil, and that this site is associated with a tilt in the old Great Mosque of al-Nuriminaret in Mosul.

See also

  • The Abbey of Saint Mary in the Valley of Jehosaphat is located in the valley of Jehosaphat. The Feast of the Dormition of the Theotokos (according to Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, and Eastern Catholic traditions)
  • The Assumption of Mary (which is the same event as the Assumption of Mary, but is seen differently by Roman Catholic theology)
  • The Assumption of Mary (which is the same event as the Assumption of Mary, but is viewed differently by Roman Catholic theology)
  • House of the Virgin Mary, a Catholic shrine atop the Turkish mountain of Koressos

References

  1. What Should a Mother Do?’ at AmericanCatholic.org
  2. United Nations Conciliation Commission’ at United Nations (1949). Working Paper on the Holy Places prepared by the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine
  3. Cust, 1929, The Status Quo in the Holy Places prepared by the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine On Wednesday, June 25, 1997, Pope John Paul II addressed a general audience
  4. Catholic Encyclopedia, The Tomb of the Blessed Virgin Mary
  5. Catholic Encyclopedia, The Holy Family
  6. Belt of the Holy Theotokos, by Father Demetrios Serfes, published on March 1, 1999, and archived from the original on January 31, 2010, retrieved on January 16, 2010
  7. Alviero Niccacci, “Archaeology, New Testament, and Early Christianity”Archived2012-10-23 at theWayback Machine, Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, Faculty of Biblical Sciences and Archaeology of the Pontifical University Antonianumin Rome
  8. Alviero Niccacci, “Archaeology, New Testament, and Early Christianity”Archived2012-10-23 at theWayback Machine, Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, Faculty of Biblical Sciences and Archaeology of the Work is still being done on the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (A Work in Progress)
  9. The Tomb of Mary
  10. Observe the rock-cut architecture
  11. The author Murphy-O’Connor (2008) writes on page 149 that In Helmut Koester’s Ephesos, Metropolis of Asia (2004), p.327, Vasiliki Limberis writes, “In two MMS. the author is said to be James the Lord’s brother
  12. In one, John Archbishop of Thessalonica, who lived in the seventh century.”
  13. AbHerbermann writes, “In two MMS. the author is said to be James the Lord’s brother
  14. In one, John Archbishop of The On September 27, 2006, the original version of this article was archived. Retrieved2014-08-01. The following is a CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link): Geary, 1878, page 88

Bibliography

  • Adomnán(1895). A pilgrimage to the Holy Land on Arculfus’s behalf (about the year A.D. 670). The Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society (aboutArculf, p.17)
  • Antoninus of Piacenza (aboutArculf, p.17)
  • And Antoninus of Piacenza (aboutArculf, p.17) (1890). The Holy Places visited by Antoninus Martyr about the year 570 A.D are listed below. Clermont-Ganneau, C.S., Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society, London, Palestine (1899). J. McFarlane’s translation of Archaeological Researches in Palestine, 1873-1874, from the French is available online. Vol. 1, London: Palestine Exploration Fund (pp. 20-21)
  • Cust, L.G.A. Vol. 1, London: Palestine Exploration Fund (pp. 20-21)
  • (1929). The current state of affairs in the Holy Places. High Commissioner of the Government of Palestine
  • Suzanne Olsson, H.M.S.O. for the High Commissioner of the Government of Palestine In Kashmir, Jesus was crucified. The Tomb of the Unknown (2019) | The claimed last burial location of Mary in Mari Ashtan, Pakistan, including images and further reference links
  • Fabri, F. (1896). Felix Fabri (approximately 1480–1483 A.D.) vol. I, part II, a collection of poems. Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society (pp.464-469)
  • Geary and Grattan (pp.464-469)
  • And others (1878). From Bombay to the Bosphorus, a voyage across Asiatic Turkey is recounted in this book. Sampson Low, Marston, SearleRivington, and C.G. Herbermann published Vol. 2 in London (1901). The Catholic Encyclopedia is a resource for learning about the Catholic faith. Encyclopedia Press
  • G. Le Strange, G. Le Strange, G. (1890). Palestine Under the Control of the Moslems: From A.D. 650 to 1500, a description of Syria and the Holy Land is given. Committee of the Palestine Exploration Fund, London, OCLC1004386 (pp.210,219)
  • Maundrell, H., Committee of the Palestine Exploration Fund, London, OCLC1004386 (pp.210,219)
  • Maundrell, H., Committee of the Palestine Exploration Fund, London, OCLC1004386 ( (1703). A journey from Aleppo to Jerusalem during the Easter season in the year 1697. The Theatre Press in Oxford printed this edition. The Moudjir ed-dyn (p.102) is a fictional character created by the author (1876). Sauvaire is a French word that means “saved” (ed.). Histoire de Jérusalem et d’Hébron depuis Abraham jusqu’à la fin du XVe siècle de J.-C. : fragments de la Chronique de Moudjir-ed-dyn. (pp.27,33,193)
  • Murphy-O’Connor, J. Histoire de Jérusalem et d’Hébron depuis Abraham jusqu’à la fin du XVe siècle de J.- (2008). The Holy Land: An Oxford Archaeological Guide from the Earliest Times to the Year 1700 is a book on archaeology in the Holy Land. Oxford Archaeological Guides are published by Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press, p. 149, ISBN 978-0-19-923666-4. Oxford University Press. 2016-09-16
  • Retrieved 16 September 2016
  • J. Phokas, Phokas & Associates, Inc. (1889). Journey to the Holy Land on the Pilgrimage of Johannes Phocas. The Palestine Pilgrims’ Text Society (pp.20-21)
  • Pringle, Denys (pp.20-21)
  • Pringle, Denys (2007). The Churches of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: The city of Jerusalem, Vol. III, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-39038-5 (pp.287-306)
  • Roberts, A. The Churches of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: The city of Jerusalem, Vol. III, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-39038-5 (pp.287-306)
  • Roberts, A. The Churches of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem (1886). The Twelve Patriarchs, Excerpts and Epistles, The Clementina, Apocrypha, Decretals, Memoirs of Edessa and Syriac documents, and Remains of the First Ages: Volume 8 of The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Fathers’ Writings Down to A.D. 325: The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Fathers’ Writings Down to A. Publishers: C. Scribner’s Sons
  • Vogüé, de
  • M. Vogüé (1860). Les églises de la Terre Sainte. (pp.305-313)
  • Warren, C.
  • Conder, C.R. Les églises de la Terre Sainte (1884). The Survey of Western Palestine: Jerusalem, London: Committee of the Palestine Exploration Fund, (pp.40, 402)
  • The Survey of Western Palestine: Jerusalem, London: Committee of the Palestine Exploration Fund, (pp.40, 402)
See also:  Who Was Emperor During Jesus

External links

  • The Virgin Mary’s Tomb is located in Athens. Sacred Destinations gives a description of the interior and history of the site
  • Jerusalem provides a description of the inside and history of the site. Mary’s Tombat
  • Assumptions About Mary (comments on the historicity of the location) at Catholic Answers
  • O Svetoj zemlji, Jerusalimu I Sinajuat
  • O Svetoj zemlji, Je

The Virgin Mary’s Tomb is located in Athens, Greece. Holy Places gives an overview of the inside and history of the site; Jerusalem provides a description of the exterior and history of the place. Mary’s Tombat; Assumptions About Mary (comments on the historical accuracy of the site) at Catholic Answers; O Svetoj zemlji, Jerusalimu I Sinajuat; O Svetoj zemlji, Jerusalimu I Sinajuat; O Svetoj zemlji, Jerusalimu I Sinajuat; O Svetoj zemlji, Je

When did Mary die? How did Mary die?

QuestionAnswer The last time Mary, the mother of Jesus, is mentioned in the Bible is when the Holy Spirit descended upon her (along with many others) on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1–4). Following that, we don’t get to hear anything further about Mary in the Bible. The Bible says that Mary most likely spent her final years at John’s house (John 19:27), where she died. We don’t know exactly where John used to reside. He could have had a residence in either Jerusalem or Ephesus. Several scholars have proposed that, because it seems likely that John managed many of the churches in Asia Minor, Mary followed him to Ephesus, where she became a member of the Ephesian church, which Timothy served as pastor (1 Timothy 1:3).

  • The year AD 43 and AD 48 are mentioned in two different traditions, but we have no method of authenticating either date.
  • According to one tradition, Mary never lived in Ephesus, but rather in a modest stone home constructed over a spring on a hill on the road outside of Jerusalem, where she spent her days.
  • According to folklore, Mary built monument stones marking the different stations of the cross beside her home to commemorate her life.
  • She died there and was buried with the Holy Grail, which she had brought with her from France.
  • Catherine Emmerich, a Catholic mystic who lived in the early 1800s, claimed to have had a vision in which she saw Mary’s dying minutes.

Catherine’s vision depicts the apostles’ presence at Mary’s deathbed, Peter’s administration of the Mass and extreme unction to Mary, Mary’s death (which occurred at the same hour as Jesus’ death), her spirit’s ascension into heaven (accompanied by many souls released from purgatory), her burial, and her body’s assumption the next night.

At the end of the day, we have to face the truth that we do not know anything about Mary’s latter life or her death.

Mary’s tale is subservient to the story of Christ, despite the fact that it is more than incidental to it. Questions about Biblical Characters Return to: Questions about Biblical Characters When did Mary pass away? What caused Mary’s death?

Did the Virgin Mary die?

“data-medium-file=” ssl=1″ data-large-file=” ssl=1″>Catholic Faith Network” data-large-file=” ssl=1″ data-medium-file=” ssl=1″ data-large-file=” ssl=1″ picture courtesy of the Catholic Faith Network

Questions of Faith

Mary, the mother of Jesus, is believed to have been taken into heaven at the conclusion of her life, both physically and spiritually, according to Catholic belief. She was lifted up by God to partake in his heavenly splendor, having been preserved completely free of all traces of original sin. This concept was dogmatically declared by Pope Pius XII in 1950, yet there is still some debate as to whether she died before or after her ascension of the papacy. Specifically, the apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus said that Mary was “assumed body and soul into the grandeur of heaven once the end of her earthly existence was completed.” Notably, there is no mention of her death, therefore it is still up in the air whether or not she was aware of her own mortality.

It appears plausible to assume that Mary died in order to better correspond to her son’s wishes.

Belief

While we don’t know how she died because the New Testament doesn’t mention anything about it, the Pope says that the notion that she died out of love for her son is the most appropriate explanation for her death. It is customary in the Eastern Orthodox Church to refer to Mary’s “dormition” or “sleep,” which signifies that she died in the fullness of grace and without pain before being taken up to heaven. There are numerous apocryphal accounts of her death, such as the collection of stories known as Transitus Mariae (200AD), which claims that Mary died in Jerusalem surrounded by the apostles, and that, depending on which version you read, her body was buried and then vanished, or that it simply vanished.

No, the Mother is not more important than the Son, who died for us.” As theologians and historians continue to argue what exactly happened at the end of Mary’s physical existence, it may be wiser to err on the side of humility and acknowledge that we just don’t know what happened.

Her reputation among the martyrs and her holy body, through which light dawned on the globe among blessings, indicate that she was either executed or put to death – as the scripture states, ‘And a sword shall pierce through her soul.’ Alternatively, she may still be alive since God is capable of doing anything he desires.

“No one knows what will happen to her.” (Epiphanius of Salamis lived between 310 and 403 AD.)

What Happened To Mary, The Mother Of Jesus, After The Crucifixion?

Is there any information on what happened to Mary Christ’s mother following the crucifixion of Jesus Christ?

Mary at the Cross

As recorded by Matthew, Mary was physically present at the death of her Son, Jesus. “There were also many women there, looking on from a distance, who had followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering to him, among whom were Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Joseph and the mother of the sons of Zebedee,” Matthew writes (Matt 27:55-56). Can we possibly comprehend Mary’s agony as she stood by and watched Jesus suffer for six hours on the cross? Only God and her could have known how she must have felt at the time.

John takes care of Mary

As recorded by Matthew, Mary was physically present at the death of her Son, Jesus. “There were also many women there, looking on from a distance, who had followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering to him, among whom were Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Joseph and the mother of the sons of Zebedee,” the gospel writer says of the scene (Matt 27:55-56). What kind of agony might Mary have been going through as she stood by and observed Jesus’ terrible six-hour death on the cross? Only God and her could have known how she must have felt.

After the Cross

“There were also several women there, watching from a distance, who had accompanied Jesus from Galilee, ministering to him, among them were Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, as well as the mother of the sons of Zebedee,” Matthew writes (Matt 27:55-56). Can we possibly fathom Mary’s agony as she stood by and watched Jesus suffer for six hours on the cross? Only God and her knew what that must have felt like. What did she make of the three hours of darkness that blanketed Jerusalem while Jesus hung in agony on the cross, and how did she react to it?

Conclusion

Everything that occurred to Mary is little in comparison to what will happen to you if you do not place your faith in Christ. If a person has been born again, he or she will one day enter the kingdom and will be able to ask Mary to intercede on their behalf. While we wait for that day to arrive, we can only concentrate on what we do know, which is the reality that Jesus came to die for sinners, which includes each and every one of us. Fortunately, the ground beneath the foot of the cross is level.

Then you’ll be able to understand what happens to you once you die.

Here’s something more for you to check out: 5 Biblical Wives Who Were Exceptional Mothers a source of information Scripture quotes are taken from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version ® (ESV ®), which was published by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers, in 2001 and is protected by copyright.

Permission has been granted to use. All intellectual property rights are retained. Bible Study,Mary,Mary mother of Jesus,What happened to Mary the mother of Jesus,What happened to Mary the mother of Jesus

Did Virgin Mary Die Before Assumption?

Although the idea of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary into Heaven at the conclusion of her earthly life is not difficult to understand, one question is a frequent subject of controversy: Did Marydie do anything before she was accepted into Heaven, body and soul?

The Traditional Answer

However, one point of contention about Mary’s ascension to the heavenly realm at the conclusion of her earthly existence is that she was not a virgin at the time of her ascension. Did Marydie do anything before she was taken up into Heaven, body and soul?

The “Falling Asleep” of the Holy Mother of God

In that text, written in the voice of Saint John the Evangelist (to whom Christ had assigned the care of His mother while on the Cross), the Archangel Gabriel appears to Mary while she prays at the Holy Sepulchre, and she receives instructions from him (the tomb in which Christ had been laid onGood Friday, and from which He rose onEaster Sunday). The Archangel Gabriel informed the Blessed Virgin that her earthly existence had come to an end, and she made the decision to return to Bethlehem to be with her Savior.

Together, they transported her bed (again, with the assistance of the Holy Spirit) to her house in Jerusalem, where Christ appeared to her the following Sunday and instructed her not to be afraid.

She sprang up and kissed each of the apostles on the cheek with her own hand, and they all gave praise to God; then the Lord reached out His undefiled hands and accepted her pure and faultless soul.

The apostles carried Mary’s body on a couch to the Garden of Gethsemane, where they laid her remains in a new tomb, which they named after her: In the midst of this, an intoxicating fragrance of sweet savour poured forth from the sacred sepulchre of our Lady, the mother of God; and for three days, the voices of unseen angels could be heard praising Christ our God, who had been born of our Lady.

See also:  How To Argue Like Jesus?

It is believed that Mary died before her body was taken up into Heaven, according to “The Falling Asleep of the Holy Mother of God,” which is the earliest existing written record chronicling the end of her life.

The Same Tradition, East and West

According to that text, which was written in the voice of Saint John the Evangelist (to whom Christ had committed care of his mother during His death on the Cross), an angel appeared to Mary while she prayed at the Holy Sepulchre (the tomb in which Christ had been laid onGood Friday, and from which He rose onEaster Sunday). Her earthly existence had come to an end, and the Blessed Virgin made the decision to return to Bethlehem and meet her death, as Gabriel had informed her of this. Every one of the apostles was taken to Bethlehem by the Holy Spirit after being snatched up in clouds and transported to be with Mary during her final days on the earth.

With a song in his heart, Peter looked up to see Mary, who had a face that shined brighter than the sun.

Her lovely feet were wrapped in cloths for the consecration; and her precious and holy body was placed on a couch and borne by Peter, John, Paul, and Thomas, who had all run to assist her.

So that when the third day finished, no one could hear anything anymore, and everyone knew that her pristine and precious corpse had been transferred to heaven from that point forward.

The “Falling Asleep of the Holy Mother of God” is the earliest existing written record documenting the end of Mary’s life, and as we can see from the text, it implies that Mary died before her body was taken up into Heaven by the angel Gabriel.

Pius Xii on the Death and Assumption of Mary

That letter, written in the voice of Saint John the Evangelist (to whom Christ had assigned the care of His mother during His death on the Cross), relates how the Archangel Gabriel appeared to Mary as she prayed at the Holy Sepulchre, and how she responded (the tomb in which Christ had been laid onGood Friday, and from which He rose onEaster Sunday). The Archangel Gabriel informed the Blessed Virgin that her earthly existence was come to an end, and she made the decision to return to Bethlehem to be with her death.

With the assistance of the Holy Spirit, they transported her bed to her house in Jerusalem, where Christ appeared to her on the next Sunday and encouraged her not to be afraid.

Her exquisite feet were wrapped in cloths for the consecration; and her delicate and holy corpse was placed on a couch and carried by Peter, John, Paul, and Thomas.

Afterward, when the third day came to a close, the voices could no longer be heard, and everyone realized that her pristine and precious corpse had been taken to heaven.

Mary’s Death Is Not a Matter of Faith

The doctrine, as articulated by Pope Pius XII, does not definitively answer whether the Virgin Mary died on the cross. That the Immaculate Mother of God, the eternally Virgin Mary, had fulfilled the course of her earthly existence and had been assumed body and soul into heavenly glory is what Catholics must believe is what they must believe. The phrase “having fulfilled the course of her earthly existence” is unclear; it leaves up the possibility that Mary did not die prior to her Assumption of the Virgin Mary.

Where Is Mary Buried?

We are not going to make you wait for an answer to come in. Mary, the Mother of God, is not commemorated in any way. Instead, the following is what transpired. In the course of her earthly existence, the Immaculate Mother of God, the eternally Virgin Mary, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory, as stated in the Bible. When Pope Pius XII issued the encyclicalMunificentissimus Deus in 1950, he formally declared the Assumption of Mary to be a doctrine of the Catholic Church, which was officially recognized as such the following year.

In order for Catholics to comprehend the reasons behind the dogmas, not just on the level of apologetics, but also on a very personal level, it is essential that they do so.

There are significant ramifications to the Assumption of Mary since it demonstrates not just Mary’s character but also God’s character. “The Assumption of the Virgin” by Titian is a masterpiece.

Scriptural Objection

A recurrent charge leveled against the Catholic Church is that different popes “create” new dogmas. The allegation of “invention” is frequently leveled because there is no explicit Scriptural event to support it. The fact that Mary’s Assumption is not clearly described as a historical occurrence in the Gospel of Matthew is correct. For many individuals, this is the end of the story. In the Protestant tradition, many people are cautious, if not contemptuous, of any theological position that is not explicitly stated in Scripture, according to the belief (” sola Scriptura “), which holds that there can be no theological certainty apart from the written Gospel.

  • As Bishop Fulton Sheen reminds us, “The Church had already spread over the entire Roman Empire before a single book of the New Testament had been composed.” There were already a large number of martyrs in the Church long before the Gospels or the Epistles were written.
  • —Fulton Sheen, The World’s First Love But, if Mary had been taken up into Heaven, it is very certain that the event would have been recorded in Scripture, isn’t it?
  • Sacred Scripture does not operate in this manner, which can be frustrating.
  • Many of the deeds of the Apostles—including those of Mary, Queen of the Apostles—have gone undocumented for a variety of reasons.
  • In Christ’s private existence, he remained exactly that: private.
  • Are we, on the other hand, willing to assert that nothing significant occurred over these three decades?
  • Even in the context of His public existence, not everything that Jesus did was recorded in the Scriptures.
  • (Even the longest Gospel may be read in approximately an hour and fifteen minutes.) In no way does Scripture claim to offer an entire account of every aspect of Christ’s life; rather, it does not make the claim that it does so.
  • Is it reasonable to expect all of Jesus’ actions to be recorded in Scripture if many of his actions are not recorded in Scripture?
  • For the sake of Sheen’s argument, many early Christians acted on the basis of direct talks and interactions with Christ, and/or people who genuinely interacted with Christ.

This leads to a number of extremely fascinating questions when it comes to the Assumption of Mary, which we will explore further below.

Historical Invention?

In the Catholic Church, it is a popular accusation that various popes “create” new dogmas. The allegation of “invention” is frequently leveled against Christians since there is no clear Scriptural occurrence to support the charge of “innovation.” The fact that Mary’s Assumption is not clearly recorded as a historical occurrence in the Gospel of Matthew is unquestionable. The case is effectively closed for many individuals. Numerous adherents of the Protestant tradition are wary of any theological doctrine that is not explicitly stated in Scripture—adopting the position (” sola Scriptura “), according to which no theological certainty exists beyond the written Gospel (see also: sola Scriptura ).

  1. As Bishop Fulton Sheen reminds us, “The Church had already spread over the entire Roman Empire before a single book of the New Testament had been written.” The Church had already suffered a great number of martyrs before the writing of the Gospels or the Epistles.
  2. —Fulton Sheen, The World’s First Love, p.
  3. Assuming, however, that Mary was indeed taken up into Heaven, it is reasonable to believe that the event would have been recorded in the Bible.
  4. Sacred Scripture does not operate in this manner, which can be irritating.
  5. It’s possible that a significant portion of what the Apostles did, especially Mary, Queen of the Apostles, went unrecorded for a variety of reasons.
  6. Aside from the accounts of Jesus’ childhood and the event in the Temple when he was twelve years old, the Bible is deafeningly silent on the last thirty years of Jesus’ life.
  7. However, there is virtually little written about Jesus’ thirty-year journey on this planet, which is a mystery to most people.

Is it the kind of Christian who would make such an absurd claim?

They are remarkably concise, especially when one considers that they mostly cover a very considerable period of three years.

In no way does Scripture pretend to offer an entire account of every aspect of Christ’s life; rather, it does not assert that it does so in any way.

If many of Jesus’ actions are not recorded in Scripture, can we assume that all of Mary’s actions will be recorded in Scripture?

Many early Christians took action based on direct talks and interactions with Christ, and/or individuals who truly interacted with Christ, as Sheen points out.

Consequently, the views, deeds, and worship practices of the early Christians are inextricably linked to the beliefs, acts, and worship practices of the modern Christian church. Consequently, when it comes to the Assumption of Mary, we are presented with a slew of extremely fascinating questions.

Theological Questions, or Lack of Questions

A widespread charge leveled against the Catholic Church is that different popes “create” dogma. The allegation of “invention” is frequently leveled against Christians since there is no actual Scriptural event to support it. It is true that Mary’s Assumption is not clearly recorded as a historical occurrence in the Gospel of Matthew. For many individuals, that is the end of the story. Many adherents of the Protestant tradition are skeptical, if not contemptuous, of any theological conviction that is not explicitly stated in Scripture—adopting the sola Scriptura viewpoint, which holds that there can be no theological certainty apart from the written Gospel.

  • As Bishop Fulton Sheen reminds us, “The Church was established across the entire Roman Empire before a single book of the New Testament was written.” There were already a great number of martyrs in the Church long before the Gospels or the Epistles were written.
  • —Fulton Sheen, The World’s First Love However, if Mary had been taken up into Heaven, it is almost certain that the event would have been recorded in Scripture, isn’t it?
  • It may be discouraging, but Sacred Scripture does not operate in this manner.
  • Many of the deeds of the Apostles—including the actions of Mary, Queen of the Apostles—have gone unnoticed for a variety of reasons, including lack of documentation.
  • Christ’s private life was exactly that: private.
  • Are we, on the other hand, willing to declare that nothing significant occurred over these three decades?
  • Even in the context of His public existence, not everything that Jesus did was recorded in the Bible.
  • (It takes roughly an hour to read the longest Gospel.) Scripture does not profess to present an entire account of every aspect of Christ’s life, nor does it assert that it does so.
  • Is it reasonable to expect all of Jesus’ actions to be recorded in Scripture?
  • To Sheen’s point, many early Christians acted on the basis of direct discussions and interactions with Christ, and/or people who genuinely talked with Christ.

Consequently, the views, actions, and worship practices of the early Christians are inextricably linked to the beliefs, activities, and worship practices of Christians today. When it comes to the Assumption of Mary, this leads to a number of extremely fascinating questions.

Habeas Corpus

It is a widespread charge leveled against the Catholic Church that various popes “create” dogma. The accusation of “invention” is sometimes predicated on the absence of a specific Scriptural incident. It is true that Mary’s Assumption as a historical event is not clearly described in the Gospel as a historical occurrence. Many people consider this to be the end of the matter. Many adherents of the Protestant tradition are skeptical, if not contemptuous, of any theological conviction that is not explicitly stated in Scripture—adopting the sola Scriptura perspective, which holds that there can be no theological certainty apart from the written Gospel.

  • As Bishop Fulton Sheen reminds us, “The Church had already spread over the entire Roman Empire before a single book of the New Testament was written.” The Church had already suffered a great number of martyrs before the writing of the Gospels or the Epistles.
  • —Fulton Sheen, The World’s First Love However, if Mary had been taken up into Heaven, it is very certain that the event would have been recorded in the Bible, isn’t it?
  • It may be annoying, but Sacred Scripture does not operate in this manner.
  • Many of the deeds of the Apostles—including the actions of Mary, Queen of the Apostles—have gone undocumented for a variety of reasons.
  • Christ’s personal existence was exactly that: personal.
  • Are we prepared to conclude, on the other hand, that nothing significant occurred over these three decades?
  • Even in terms of His public existence, not everything that Jesus did was recorded in the Bible.
  • (The longest Gospel may be read in roughly one hour.) Scripture does not claim to be a complete record of every aspect of Christ’s life, nor does it assert that it is.
  • More to the point, the early Christians were not intellectually bound simply to Scripture—especially, certainly, those who lived and died before to the compilation of the Bible.

Consequently, the views, deeds, and religious practices of the early Christians are inextricably linked to the beliefs, activities, and religious practices of Christians today. And this brings us to a number of extremely fascinating questions when it comes to the Assumption of Mary.

Conclusion

In the Catholic community, the Assumption of Mary is a source of tremendous happiness. Bishop Fulton Sheen writes in his book, The World’s First Love, that the world is in the throes of despair, but that the Church has an answer. “The Mystical Body of Christ urges the hopeless to reflect on the two most terrible wounds the planet has ever received: the empty tomb of Christ and the empty tomb of Mary,” he says in his book. It is our Catholic faith that the image of the empty tomb should inspire hope and excitement in our hearts and minds.

  • Images: Death and Assumption of the Virgin by Fernando Yáez de la Almedina (public domain), through Wikimedia Commons; Death and Assumption of the Virgin by Fernando Yáez de la Almedina (public domain), via Wikimedia Commons Additionally, check out 5 Historical Proofs of Jesus’ Resurrection.
  • What happened to the early Christians after the Resurrection?
  • John Clark is a published novelist as well as a speechwriter.
  • was his debut novel.
  • He has published hundreds of articles and blogs about Catholic family life and apologetics, which have appeared in publications such as Magis Center, Seton Magazine, Catholic Digest, and Homiletic and Pastoral Review, among others.
See also:  How Much Is A Jesus Piece?

Where did Mary live after the Resurrection?

Christians believe that Jesus rose from the grave and ascended into heaven, according to the Scriptures. But what happened to his mother after that? While those sentences do not supply us with a specific address, they do present us with a number of hints. At the time of Jesus’ death, it is generally considered that his foster-father Joseph had already died, according to traditional accounts. As a result, Jesus would be the primary family member responsible for caring for his ailing mother. More information may be found at: Is it possible that Jesus and Joseph were true carpenters?

Jesus called out to his mother and the disciple whom he adored who were standing nearby, and he said to his mother, “Woman, see!

(See also John 19:26-27.) The majority of biblical experts agree that the “beloved disciple” was St. John the Evangelist, in accordance with tradition.

Jerusalem

Because it is documented in the book of Acts, it appears that John looked for her while she was in Jerusalem at the time. Once they reached Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is a short distance away from the city and only one sabbath day’s journey away, they went up to the upper room, where they were staying: Peter and John, James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, Simon the Zealot and Judas the son of James. All of these people, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, as well as his brothers and sisters, joined together in prayer.

The “Way of the Cross” was where Mary spent the remainder of her life, according to legend, walking it every day and repeating the steps taken by her son.

More information may be found at: Find out more about the grotto in Turkey where Saint Peter said Mass.

A second site in Jerusalem, known as the Church of the Dormition, is maintained by Benedictine monks and is dedicated to Mary, mother of Jesus.

Ephesus

On the other hand, there is a story that John the Evangelist was born in the city of Ephesus, which is supported by historical evidence. Numerous people think that because John resided in this location, the Virgin Mary also dwelt there with him and that her ascension to heaven occurred there as well. Some private visions of Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich in the nineteenth century, which identified Ephesus as the location of the Virgin Mary’s home, served to further cement this conclusion. More information may be found at: In the ancient city of Ephesus, there are five Christian sites worth seeing.

Make sure to go through the slideshow below to learn about some of the earliest depictions of the Virgin Mary.

Did the Virgin Mary die and, if so, where?

The year 1999 saw me traveling around Israel and the Holy Land, including a stop at the Basilica of the Dormition, where we were informed that the Virgin Mary had died. Years later, I traveled to Ephesus, where I stopped at a little house where we were informed Mary had lived and died. Saint Paul VI paid a visit to the residence in 1967, and Saint John Paul II delivered Mass there in 1979. My concern is this: Why hasn’t the church reached a judgment on the correct location of Mary’s death, given the historical significance of the issue?

  • Theological conjecture has been a source of amusement for generations, and the church has never given a conclusive response to the topic.
  • Some theologians believe that, because death is a result of sin, Mary would not have had to die if she had not committed sin.
  • The topic of where Mary spent her final years on earth has been debated for centuries, but there are two solid historical traditions to consider.
  • Other evidence, on the other hand, appears to indicate that Mary traveled to a location near Ephesus (modern-day Turkey) and remained there until she was taken up into heaven, under the protection of the apostle John.
  • The validity of each tradition has never been explicitly determined by the church.
  • The solution to your inquiry has been lost to the pages of history and is unlikely to be discovered again.
  • You can reach Father Doyle at [email protected] with any inquiries.

retains ownership of the copyright. All intellectual property rights are retained. Creating links is welcomed, but it is not permitted to republish or re distribute without the publisher’s prior written consent. This includes framing or other similar methods of distribution.

What happened to the family of Jesus after his death and resurrection?

“What happened to Jesus’ family after his death and resurrection?” you might wonder. Ensign, September 1975, pp. 36–37 Professor Gerald N. Lund of the Department of Seminaries and Institutes is a curriculum specialist. However, while the answer to this question is yes, it is crucial to remember that the authors of the New Testament did not seek to provide a complete picture of Jesus’ personal or familial life. Ultimately, they wanted to show Jesus as the Christ while also communicating the significance of that reality to the rest of humanity.

We do know that Jesus had four brothers and at least three sisters, if not more, according to tradition.

“Isn’t this the carpenter’s son?” they said, astonished, and “isn’t his mother’s name Mary?” they inquired.

Aren’t they all here with us?” Italics are mine.) (Matt.

Although there is little information available about Joseph’s subsequent life, most scholars believe that he died somewhere during the 18 years that elapsed between the family’s return to Jerusalem when Jesus was 12 (see Luke 2:41–50) and the beginning of Christ’s canonical ministry.

(See, for example, John 19:25–27.) The brothers of Jesus—or, to be more precise, the half-brothers of Jesus—are given extra attention, as a result of this.

However, it appears that they were converted shortly afterward, because Luke records that the Church gathered in “prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren” immediately after Christ’s ascension into heaven.

(See 1 Corinthians 15:7 for further information.) More is known about James than about any of the other brothers of Jesus, including Peter and John.

For example, he plays a key part in the historic Jerusalem Council, which addressed the topic of circumcision for Gentiles and was presided over by the pope.

(See Acts 15:19–20 for further information.) It’s worth noting at this point that some people mistakenly believe that the James of Acts 15 was James, the son of Zebedee, who served in the early church’s presidency with Peter and John.

(See Acts 12:1–2 for further information.) This occurred in the year A.D.44, five or six years before the Jerusalem Council was convened.

1:19) and is included among the “pillars” of the church, along with Peter and John.

In addition, the fact that during the Jerusalem Council, James announced what was to be the official policy of the church would lend further credence to that hypothesis.

The epistle of James was written by James, Jesus’ brother, and is known as the Book of James.

(See James 1:5–6 for further information.) Interestingly, James does not refer to himself in that epistle as the Lord’s brother, but rather as his servant, which is a significant distinction.

Despite the fact that he did not identify himself as an apostle, the fact that his letter would be recognized and acknowledged as authoritative implies that he, too, may have been a disciple of Jesus.

The only reference to Mary after the crucifixion is found in Acts 1:14, which refers to her meeting with the Church immediately after the ascension of her Son.

Ancient legends, which are not always trustworthy, tell us that Mary was affiliated with the church in Jerusalem for many years before accompanying John to Ephesus, where she died a few months later.

Luke is upfront about the fact that he is writing his gospel on material he has acquired from eyewitnesses to the events of Jesus’ life.

(See Acts 24:26–27 for further information.) Caesarea was just approximately 50 miles northwest of Jerusalem, making it a convenient stopover.

Some distinguishing elements of Luke’s gospel lend credence to the notion that Mary was one of Luke’s primary sources.

The visits of the angel Gabriel, as well as the subsequent visit of the wise men, are recorded in Matthew, but it is to Luke that we turn to learn of the manger and the shepherds, the packed inn, and the swaddling garments that we are directed.

It is so unlike from the rest of his work that one researcher referred to these poems as “translate Greek,” a phrase that would perfectly fit the notion that this knowledge was provided by Mary.

Nonetheless, the evidence we do have clearly implies that the Savior’s family played active and significant roles in the creation and history of the Church of Jesus Christ during its early development and history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.