Why Was Jesus Not Himself A Christian?

Was Jesus a Christian?

Answer to the question It may seem weird to say, but Jesus was not a Christian, despite popular belief.
A Christian is defined as someone who has placed their trust in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior (Romans 10:9–10).
Jesus is the cornerstone of the Christian religion, yet according to the dictionary meaning of the term, He cannot be considered a Christian in and of himself.

Christ’s status as the Son of God (John 19:7), His faultless life (Hebrews 4:15), and His substitutionary death and resurrection for the forgiveness of sins serve as the foundation of Christian belief and practice (2 Corinthians 5:21).
Jesus did not come into the world in order to establish a new religious system.
There are more faiths than there are people on the planet.
The purpose of his coming was to finish God’s plan of redemption for sinful people (Galatians 4:4).

He came to us in order to fight our adversary, Satan (Genesis 3:15; John 12:31).He came to seek for and save those who had gone astray (Luke 19:10).He came to fulfill the law’s righteous requirements, and he did it with honor (Matthew 5:17).The purpose of his visit was to create a new covenant between God and humans (Mark 14:24).Christ ″came into the world to rescue us from all wrongdoing and to purify for himself a people who are his very own, ready to do what is right″ (Titus 2:14).As the consequence of Christ’s accomplished work of redemption, Christianity exists, and He is now establishing His church (Matthew 16:18).

In this respect, Christianity is not a religion: religion is man’s endeavor to reach out to God, but Christianity teaches that God has reached down to man.
It was during His time on earth that Jesus, the Second Person of the Trinity, took on human form and was physically God reaching out to us (John 1:14; 3:16–18).
Jesus was not a Christian; He was a rabbi who practiced Judaism.
Jesus observed the Jewish law that God had given to Moses (Matthew 5:17–18), which was given to him by God.
He followed the law to the letter in order to present Himself as a sinless sacrifice acceptable under the law (Leviticus 9:3; 1 Peter 1:18–19; Hebrews 9:13–14; Hebrews 9:13–14).

In the Bible, Christianity represents the fullness of God’s purpose, the completion of what God began when He set aside the Hebrew people for Himself (Deuteronomy 7:6–8).
God had promised His people for millennia that He would send His Messiah to save them and establish an eternal dominion over them.
The arrival of Jesus brought that promise to fruition, as well.

Another reason why Jesus cannot be referred to be a Christian is that the name ″Christian″ was not developed until after His resurrection and ascension into the presence of the Father.Believers in the Syrian city of Antioch were the first to be referred to as Christians (Acts 11:22).The phrase literally translates as ″tiny Christs.″ It was first used in a disparaging manner, but Christians started to regard it as a badge of pride as time went on.Christians today should listen to the voice of their Master and still consider themselves ″little Christs″ in the sense that they resemble the Lord Jesus in their actions and attitudes.Although Jesus cannot be classified as a Christian in the traditional sense, He is the Christ from whom Christians derive their name.Return to the previous page: Questions regarding Jesus Christ Was Jesus a Christian, or was he not?

Should we call ourselves a Christian?

What and when was the first time the term ″Christian″ was used?
According to the world’s perspective, the name ″Christian″ was used to identify a follower of Christ who lived in accordance with the world’s values.
The pagans of Antioch were the first to refer to the apostles as ″Christians″ (Acts 11:26; 26:28), and they did so in a derogatory manner since the apostles did not adhere to the commercial world of the pagans.

″Christian″ is an adjective, not a noun, in the dictionary.
The content is not included inside the term ″Christian,″ rather, the substance is contained within the heart of the individual it is seeking to describe, and which the pagan user is unable to perceive.
Christ never referred to himself as a Christian, and Christ never referred to his disciples as Christians.
The apostles never referred to one another as ″Christians.″ Christ never used an adjective to describe himself or to characterize anybody else.

So, how do we go about establishing our identities?″Brethren,″ ″disciples,″ ″apostles,″ ″servants,″ ″believers,″ ″followers,″ ″the loyal,″ ″the elect,″ ″the called,″ and ″saints″ were some of the terms used by the disciples to refer to one another.Additionally, we might refer to ourselves as ″bondservants″ of Jesus Christ.Kingdom Kingdom of God belongs to those who serve Christ as his servants.As a result, if you do not belong to a certain kingdom, that kingdom labels or names you as a member of another kingdom.In North America, those from the continent (kingdom) of South America are referred to as South Americans; those from Asia are referred to as Asians; those from Africa are referred to as Africans; and those from Europe are referred to as Europeans.

South Americans, on the other hand, do not refer to themselves as South Americans, and Asians do not refer to themselves as Asians.
Africans do not refer to themselves as such, and Europeans do not refer to themselves as such either.
Can you tell me if North Americans refer to themselves as such?
Do you say anything like, ″When I first met you, I was…″ when you introduce yourself to someone?
″Hello, there!

I’m a native-born North American!″ No, you don’t, since those who belong to the same kingdom don’t identify themselves or each other.
If you are a constituent of a Kingdom, you do not name another constituent of the same Kingdom anything; instead, you refer to them by the relationship that exists between the two of you (brother, sister, mother, father, workman, labourer, minister, bishop, deacon, etc).
And who is the one who initiates the relationship?

The Author of the Law (Isaiah 33:22, James 4:12).The name ″Christian″ was forced on Christ’s servants by Christ’s opponents who lived outside the Kingdom of God in order to distinguish them from those who lived within the Kingdom of God.Servants of Christ should refrain from referring to themselves as Christians since doing so implies that we are not from the Kingdom of God.The same way that someone living in Asia would not refer to themselves as Asians, individuals who are followers of Christ should not refer to themselves as Christians, because doing so would create the appearance to others that you are from a different kingdom.″Because they are of the world, they speak the language of the world,″ says 1 John 4:5.In accordance with Scripture, individuals who are of the world talk of the world and use the words of the world, respectively.

By speaking in the language of the world, or by speaking in the language of another kingdom, you are identifying yourself as a member of that kingdom.
And, because the term ″Christian″ is a phrase of the world, it may be appropriate to characterize us in terms of God’s language rather than our own.
Referees (short for references) ″A Christian is someone who adheres to the faith of Christ.
Most likely, the term Christian, like the names Nazarene and Galilean, was given to the followers of our Lord as a mark of disdain or ridicule, as was the case with the other names.

What supports this viewpoint is the fact that the inhabitants of Antioch in Syria, where they were originally dubbed Christians, as recorded in Acts 11:26, were noted by Zosimus, Procopius, and Zonaras to having been notable for their scurrilous jesting.Many people believe that this name was given by the disciples themselves, while others believe that it was imposed on them by divine authority; in either of these cases, we should have encountered it in the subsequent history of the Acts and in the Apostolic Epistles, all of which were written some years later; but it is found only in two more places in the New Testament, Acts 26:28, where a Jew is the speaker, and 1 Peter 4:16, where reference appears to be made to the nascent church.The phrase employed in Acts 11:26 merely means to be called or named, and when Doddridge and a few others interpret it to suggest a divine appointment, they ignore the usus loquendi, which provides no basis for that interpretation.

When Tacitus speaks of the Christians persecuted by Nero, the phrase vulgus Christianos appellabat, meaning the vulgar name them Christians, are particularly striking.
According to Epiphanius, they were known as Jesseans, either after Jesse, the father of David, or, more likely, from the name of Jesus, whose disciples they were at the time.
After being named Christians in the first century AD (42 or 43), they took pride in the title, which they considered to be a symbol of their devotion to Christ.
The term was eventually adopted by the majority of Christians.″ Watson’s Bible Dictionary, published in 1832, has a page number of 233.
″Cristianos, Christian: a term that is officially formed not in the Greek but in the Roman fashion, expressing attachment to or supporters to Christ and derived from the Greek word christos.

It only occurs when they are referred to by others as Christians, not when they are referred to as Christians themselves.Tacitus (A.D.96) writes in his Annals (15, 44) that the common people refer to them as Christians.Christus, the inventor or originator of this designation, had been executed by Pontius Pilate, the procurator of the Roman Empire, during the reign of Tiberius.″ Page 152 of Ethelbert William Bullinger’s A Critical Lexicon and Concordance of the English and Greek New Testament (1908), which is a critical dictionary and concordance of the English and Greek New Testament.″This term (Christian) appears just three times in the New Testament, and it is never used by Christians to refer to themselves; rather, it is used to refer to individuals who are not members of the church.

The early Christians addressed themselves as brethren, disciples, believers, and saints, to mention a few generic designations.
The heathens are thought to have given birth to the word Christian, according to popular belief.″ Note 3 on page 567 of Thomas W.
Doane’s Bible Myths, published in 1882.
″The term (Christian) given to followers of Jesus by the Greeks or the Romans, most likely as a mark of contempt for them.
It was initially used in Antioch, where it originated.″ Easton’s Bible Dictionary is a reference work on the Bible.
″Egypt, which you told me to see, my lovely Servianus, has shown to be completely fickle and inconsistent, with every breath of renown being constantly blown away by the wind.

The devotees of Serapis (in this place) are referred to as Christians, and those who are devoted to the deity Serapis (as I have discovered) are referred to as Bishops of Christ.″ The letter from the Emperor Adrian to Servianus, written in the year 134.You may learn more about this from Zodhiates Term Studies, where he explains that when they were named Christians in Antioch, they were given a ″divine warning″ via the word crematezo.In other words, be cautioned and stay away from this word and its usage.That’s exactly what the apostles did as well.You will never find any of these New Testament authors employing the term ″christian″ to describe themselves or their beliefs.

What do you think about 1 Peter 4:16?1 Peter 4:16 (New International Version) But if any man suffers as a Christian, he should not be ashamed, but rather should use his suffering to praise God in the process.First and foremost, keep in mind that this is the one and only instance in which this word is used by a man of God anywhere in the whole Bible.Two points to note: in the verse, Peter did not refer to the followers of Christ as ″Christians.″ Read it through a second time, very carefully.

He stated that they were to conduct themselves ″in the manner of a Christian.″ This is critically crucial.The term as refers to anything that is ″like or similar to,″ but it does not imply that one is that thing.As an illustration:

When it says in Genesis 49:9, ″.he couched as a lion,″ it does not necessarily follow that Judah was a lion when he couched! Similarly, when it says in Exodus 15:5, ″.they sank into the bottom as a stone,″ it does not always follow that they were a stone when they sank. Because of this, 1 Peter 4:16, ″Yet if any man suffer as a Christian,″ does not imply that a person is Christian when they are experiencing suffering.

When someone is referred to as ″as″ anything else, it does not imply that the person is that things.
It signifies that we are related to that name in some manner, but that we are not the same as that name in the literal sense.
As you can see, it was the heathens who first referred to the disciples of Christ as ″Christians″ (Acts 11:26; 26:28).

It is in the context of suffering that Peter refers to the label ″Christian,″ and it is in relation to the name that has been imposed upon them by their enemies, since our adversaries wish for us to suffer as a result of their actions.
What about the verse Isaiah 62:2?
″And thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the LORD will name,″ says Isaiah 62:2, referring to the coming of the Messiah.
The term ″Christian″ does not appear to fulfill the requirements of this passage.

If you read this passage in context, as well as the following two verses, you will be able to discern what this ″new name″ that God will give them.″Thou shalt no longer be named Forsaken, nor shall thy country any longer be called Desolate, but thou shalt be called Hephzibah,″ according to Isaiah 62:4.Hephzibah is a Hebrew word that means ″delight.″ This is the ″new name″ that the Bible speaks about in verse 2.This is the context in which it is being discussed.It is not a reference to the name ″Christian″ in any way.In the Bible, a person’s ″character″ is represented by their given name.

Was Jesus a Jew?

Discovering the identity of the Jewish Jesus BAS Staff November 02, 2021 163 Comments 185266 views Biblical Archaeology Society Was Jesus a Jew or a non-Jew?
Some individuals believe that Jesus was a Christian, while others do not.
Aryan Christianity has been asserted to be his religion by some.

Researchers have been returning to old historical sites in recent decades, and they have discovered that Jesus was a Jewish man.
The Bible Review article ″What Price the Uniqueness of Jesus?″ by Anthony J.
Saldarini warns against forcing Jesus out of his Jewish culture.
″What Price the Uniqueness of Jesus?″ Was Jesus a Jew or a non-Jew?

An artist known as the Master of Perea painted this Last Supper in the late 15th century, which included lamb, unleavened bread, and wine—all aspects of the Seder meal, which was celebrated on the first night of the Jewish Passover celebration.The picture is from the late 15th century.When it comes to identifying the Jewish Jesus, one of the questions that scholars have posed is whether or not the Last Supper was a Passover Seder.Photograph courtesy of Christie’s Images/Superstock.The Gospels were not written by Jesus himself.They are first-century narratives from the late first century that we are constantly analyzing.

Traditions have attempted to separate Jesus from the cultural context of his day, whether it is his Jewish roots or the wider Greco-Roman culture, in order to stress the uniqueness of Jesus.
As Saldarini describes below, German theologians in the nineteenth century highlighted the importance of this difference.
Was Jesus a Jew or a non-Jew?
Was Christianity an offshoot of the Jewish religion?
Several nineteenth-century theologians have argued that the tensions in the early church between Peter, who was declaring his Jewishness, and Paul, who was a missionary to Gentiles, were more complicated than previously recognized.

Albrecht Ritschl perceived a Jesus who was hostile to the Scribes and Pharisees, as well as to Judaism itself, according to Ritschl.
Jesus taught something that was so revolutionary that it completely overturned and exceeded his Jewish identity.
Christianity itself had to be cleansed of all traces of Jewish influence.

What Price the Uniqueness of Jesus?

To wrench Jesus out of his Jewish world destroys Jesus and destroys Christianity

Bible Review, June 1999

by Anthony J. Saldarini

I grew up at St.
Kevin’s Parish in the Dorchester district of Boston in the 1940s and 1950s, and I knew that Jesus was clearly a Christian during that period.
Even more bizarrely, during the Nazi era in Germany, Jesus was identified as an Aryan Christian.

How did a Galilean Jew in the first century become a Christian, and, according to some, an Aryan Christian at that?
Before we laugh at this ridiculousness, we should realize that we do not have a single word written by Jesus, nor do we have a single contemporary report of his acts.
Instead, we have four late-first-century views of Jesus in the form of the Gospels, which we may read online.
Each calls for, and has got, ongoing reinterpretative treatment.

Despite the high danger of misinterpretation associated with Jesus’ teachings, every age is compelled to attempt to make sense of the Gospels.Even while we must always interpret what we read, not all interpretations are created equal, according to the statements of some postmodern theorists.A Christian Jesus is a provincial, self-serving fiction, but an Aryan Jesus is a wicked mythological figure.But why have Christians clung so tenaciously to the notion that Jesus was a Christian while refusing to acknowledge the plain fact that Jesus was a Jew?The answer is the prevalent problem of individuality.

Become a Member ofBiblical Archaeology Society Now and Get More Than Half Off the Regular Price of the All-AccessPass!

Explore the world’s most intriguing Biblical scholarship

With an All-Access pass, you may access more than 9,000 articles from the Biblical Archaeology Society’s extensive collection, as well as much more.
All religious traditions strive to promote themselves as something unique, superior, or main, as something that cannot be replaced or replaced with anything else.
For Christians, this implies that either Jesus as a person or his teachings and acts must stand out from the context of his historical time period in some way.

For hundreds of years, the theological premise that Jesus is divine was sufficient justification.
When it comes to our empirical world of science and history, many Christian academics adopt a different approach, attempting to distinguish Jesus from the Judaism of his day as well as from the Greco-Roman culture in which the tale is set.
In the same way that so many other things do, present historical and theological controversies have their origins in the thriving research of nineteenth-century Germany.
Ferdinand Baur (1792–1860) and Albrecht Ritschl (1822–1889) are two names that may not immediately spring to mind, but a quick overview of their lives and work may serve to clarify Christian prejudices both then and now.

Baur successfully argued that early Christianity had its origins in Judaism and, less convincingly, that the entire history of early Christianity was characterized by a struggle between a Jewish wing (led by Peter) and a gentile wing (led by Paul) until a synthesis was achieved.Baur’s work is available online at www.baur.org.Later study has proved that Paul was far more Jewish than Baur believed, and that the struggles among the early disciples of Jesus were far more complex than Baur had imagined at the time.However, his central claim, that Christianity is based on a Jewish matrix, has stood the test of time.Amy-Jill Levine’s book, ″Uncovering the Jewish Context of the New Testament,″ explains what Jews (and Christians) should know about Christian scripture and Jesus the Jew, as well as what Christians should know about Jews.Many German Lutheran scholars of the nineteenth century were troubled by the idea of a Jesus who taught in the manner of a Jew and of an early Christian community that resembled a Jewish sect.

They preferred to imagine a Jesus who taught a new and unique doctrine that overthrew the established tradition.
Albrecht Ritschl ″fixed″ the situation by launching an attack on the Jews in response to Baur’s remarks.
Jesus, in his opinion, did not reform or alter Judaism; rather, he denounced it.
According to Ritschl, Jesus the Jew surpassed Judaism by purging Christianity of its Jewish features and therefore transcending Judaism.
Many German academics, notably Adolf Harnack and Rudolf Bultmann, followed Ritschl’s lead in one way or another from the middle of the nineteenth century to the end of World War II.

Despite the fact that none of them were Nazis, reading them after the Holocaust leaves us with an uneasy feeling.
Ritschl preserved the uniqueness of Jesus and extricated him from his Jewish context by replacing the Jewish Jesus with a Romantic Jesus who had a supernatural, ineffable relationship with God, a relationship that superseded all historical influences, and by doing so, protected the uniqueness of Jesus and extricated him from his Jewish setting.
When isolated from historical fact, deep personal interactions soon degrade into personal projections that are disconnected from community and culture.

This is the substance of contemporary religion and spirituality.As a result, we must confront the fundamental question: Does Jesus the Jew—in his capacity as a Jew—have any influence on Christian theology or on Jewish-Christian relations?Is it possible that Jesus’ existence as a Jew was purely coincidental?After all, he had to have been born somewhere, whether it was in Peru or Ethiopia, Mongolia, or elsewhere.Is Jesus’ Jewishness supplanted by his function as Christ, the Messiah (the ″Anointed One″), who has been sent by God to rescue all peoples on the face of the earth?It is impossible to understand Jesus without first understanding his Jewish environment.

It is also impossible to understand Christianity without first understanding Jesus.
Even Jesus’ most well-known role as Christ is based on a Jewish tradition.
Christianity denies its roots in Israel, its history, and the God who has loved and protected Israel and the church if it abandons the concrete facts of Jesus’ life and of Israel’s history in favor of a mythical, universal, spiritual Jesus and a distant kingdom of God.
After they have abandoned their attempts to interpret the true Jesus sent by God, they have begun to reconstruct him in their own image and likeness.

The hazards are self-evident.Christian violence in Israel’s people will pave the way for equal violence against Israel, the place and people of Jesus, if Christians forcefully remove Jesus from his natural, ethnic, and historical place within Israel’s people.This is a historical lesson that continues to plague us all as the twentieth century draws to a close.

The article ″What Price the Uniqueness of Jesus?″ by Anthony J.
Saldarini first published in the June 1999 issue of Bible Review.
The piece was originally published in Bible History Daily in September 2011 and has since been republished several times.

Jesus Wasn’t A Christian

Have you ever wondered who was responsible for the founding of Christianity?
According to the dictionary, it was Jesus Christ.
Isn’t Christ synonymous with Christianity?

A few more comments on that, as well as why it is important that we do it right…
For starters, Jesus’ last name is not ″Christ.″ It is ″Jesus.″ He was known as Jesus of Nazareth, or just Jesus, since he was the son of Joseph and Mary.
His title may have been ″the Christ″ or ″the anointed one,″ but he did not go by that moniker in his personal life.
His name was/is Jesus, and he was/is a prophet.

(Either Joshua or Yeshua.) By faith and culture, he was a Jew.However, he was unquestionably not a ″Christian.″ There were no such things as ″Christians″ back then.Moreover, he wasn’t the first to arrive, as he was not there to establish a new faith.He came in the form of truth and grace.He came to reveal the Father to us.He came to explain how to get there.

He had come to offer life to those who were dead.
But Jesus most certainly did not come to establish a new religion – as if the world needed yet another religion!
So what is the significance of this?
Is it only a question of semantics?
It doesn’t seem to make any difference.

Please allow me to give three reasons why it makes a significant difference if Jesus was not a Christian and was not the founder of Christianity:

It frees us from the obligation of defending all of the 2000 years of wrongdoing committed in the name of Christian faith. We can just express our regret and move ahead. We don’t have to claim ownership of it
instead, it frees us from having to choose sides in the present ″cultural wars.″ We have the option of stepping away from the ″Christians vs″ conflict. There isn’t a single point of contention. Rather than feeling the pressure to convert people to Christianity – which is time-consuming and doesn’t appear to be very effective – we can simply figure out what Jesus did in similar circumstances and what we believe he would want us to do today
we don’t have to feel the pressure to do good in the world. We may just love them in the name of Jesus and hope that GOD would use them to bring them back to himself.

This has a significant impact on everything. The way we conduct our lives. The manner in which we communicate with others and the manner in which we engage with the world’s systems. Consider the implications of this. Take a few steps back. Thoughts? Carl’s Thoughts, All Articles, and Carl’s Thoughts

Jesus Was Not A Christian

Everything changes as a result of this. What we do on a daily basis How we communicate with people and how we engage with the world’s processes are both influenced by our cultural backgrounds. Put it this way: Take a few steps back. – Thoughts? All Articles, Carl’s Thoughts, and Other Articles

Scott’s Christian life was changed

Scott Volk has been a follower of Jesus Christ for 44 years, despite being a practicing Jew.
Volk, on the other hand, just got concerned for Israel ten years ago, following a personal meeting with the Almighty.
A plane ride back from the Holy Land gave Volk a sensation that God was sitting next to him, pointing His finger at him and saying, ″You’re a Jew, and I’ve called you to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.″ That one moment had a profound impact on me.

Volk thinks that by authoring ″Jesus Was Not a Christian,″ he would be able to persuade Christians to look deeper into the history of their faith and the reason of their salvation.

FREE DAILYDEVOTIONAL

God and the GOD TV crew invite you to begin your day together.
Get a daily devotional and inspiring video delivered directly to your email in 2-3 minutes.
GET THIS SPECIAL OFFER ″In order to have an accurate knowledge of God’s plan for Israel as well as His purpose for the Church, we must first rediscover the basis and root of our faith.″ The book Jesus Was Not a Christian was created to aid in the restoration of that most crucial of foundations.

If we do not comprehend this vital point, we will not only be unable to effectively carry out Jesus’ mission on earth, but we will also be unable to carry out our obligation as Christians to drive Israel to jealousy.″ Scott Volk is credited with inventing the phrase

About Scott Volk

Scott Volk is a Messianic Jew who came to faith in Christ in 1975.
He is married with two children.
After completing his undergraduate studies at CFNI in Dallas and his graduate studies at North Central University in Minneapolis, Scott served in a variety of pastoral roles in Arizona, Florida, and North Carolina.

After more than two decades in pastoral ministry, Scott created Together For Israel, a non-profit organization whose mission is to work with the church in the redemption of the nation of Israel (Rom 11:26).
In addition to being married for 30 years, Scott and his wife Beth also have a passion to see Jews and Gentiles united as ″one new man″ in the Messiah.
They have five children and live in the city of Charlotte, North Carolina, with their families.
Sources for the images: Together for Israel |

Scott Volk is an American politician who was born in a small town in the state of Washington.God and the GOD TV crew invite you to begin your day together.Get a daily devotional and inspiring video delivered directly to your email in 2-3 minutes.Become a member today.You Might Be Interested in the Following:

Did Jesus Really Call Himself God? Why Does it Matter?

Is it true that Jesus referred to himself as God?
Is it really that important?
These aren’t brand-new inquiries.

This practice dates back to before Jesus was even born, and it continues today.
You may learn more about s by reading this article.
The Bible, on the other hand, affirms the existence of the Trinity.
Yes, the word ″trinity″ does not exist in the Bible, but this is because the phrase was coined to convey the reality of God as Father, God as Son, and God as Holy Spirit in three distinct persons.

This is something that we would be delighted to assist you with here at SteepleLess Church.We have a pastor that would be delighted to assist you one-on-one through phone, zoom, text, or in person if you are within driving distance.I’ve read the Bible six times and am currently starting on my seventh, and I hold a 94-hour master’s degree in divinity from a reputable institution.I would be delighted to assist you in any way I can; please contact me via email.

Did Jesus Claim to be God?

While John chapter 1 of the Bible is difficult to understand because it contains a large number of distinct theological terms, it clearly portrays Jesus as being God.
It has been recorded that the persons who translated the New World Bible, which was the only official edition available to these people, did not have a working knowledge of the original languages of the Bible, Greek or Hebrew.
These are established in a court of law as a result of a lawsuit filed against the individuals who translated this particular edition.

Atheists, Christians, Jews, and others are unanimous in their belief that this is not a translation of the Bible and is replete with inaccuracies.
The folks that worked on this version did not even go to college; one of them did for two years before dropping out of school.
Having said that, there is no shame in not going to college, but if you want to translate a 2000-page book from an old language, having only a high school degree would be insufficient.
Now that we’ve returned to the subject, Jesus was crucified for blasphemy.

The crucifixion of Jesus occurred because He declared Himself to be equal to God.This is reported in a variety of sources, including pagan, Jewish, and Christian.Furthermore, Jesus is depicted as God in a slew of other biblical passages.I was just compiling the two most prevalent and compelling evidences in the Bible that Jesus is the Son of God.

Why Does it Matter if Jesus is God?

It is significant because if you do not believe in God and accept his free offer of salvation, you will not be able to enter the kingdom of heaven.
More information on going to paradise may be found here.
A person who believes in Jesus as the Son of God will be saved, according to the teachings of the Bible.

Please see this link for further information about the person and work of Jesus.
While demons are said to believe in the Bible, the Bible also teaches that they are not saved.
Clearly, this belief is more than just an intellectual conviction; it is a conviction that implies that the individual places their confidence in God.
It is only when you place your confidence in God and accept His offer of salvation that you will be granted eternal life with Him.

You will not be saved until you place your faith in Jesus as the Son of God, as taught in the Bible.It is possible to think that Jesus was a decent guy, a good prophet, and even to obey his commandments, but you will not enter the kingdom of heaven if you do not accept that He is God.Knowing that Jesus is God is critical to one’s ability to be saved.

How Does a Person Accept Jesus as God?

Being a Christian, you may believe, is simple, and that once you embrace Jesus as your Savior, everything in your life would be simple and pleasant.
This is completely false and cannot be further from the truth.
According to the Bible, if you believe in God, you will be despised and persecuted by your fellow man.

This is due to the fact that it is disrespectful to this world to believe that there is a heaven and a hell and that not everyone is fundamentally a nice person on some level.
All you have to do is put your faith in God to save you from your sins and you will be saved.
You will be saved if you place your faith in Jesus as God and recognize that God exists in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
All of the activities you take following this redemption are wonderful, but they will not be enough to rescue you.

There are no deeds you can take, no matter how magnificent they are, that can save you from your sin.Only Jesus’ death on the cross can rescue you from your sins.No other sacrifice can do so.You will be saved if you accept God’s gift of salvation at no cost to you.Continue reading for additional answers to your queries, such as ″Did Jesus actually claim to be God?″ ″Does it truly make a difference?″

How Does the Church Help us in this Process?

The importance of good actions in the life of a Christian cannot be overstated.
As previously said, these will not bring salvation, but they will assist in bringing God’s splendor to light.
When you love God and love others, you will be a blessing to everyone in your immediate vicinity.

The deeds that are completed will demonstrate our gratitude to God for everything that He has done for us.
After you have been rescued, it is impossible not to engage in good deeds and to love others around you.
This is due to the fact that the Holy Spirit has now taken up residence inside you and is encouraging you to behave in love.
In order to be saved, one must first believe that one has been saved.

If one continues to lie, cheat, steal, curse, or otherwise sin without remorse, one has either not been saved or is ignoring the Holy Spirit who is inside one.According to the Bible, if we are saved, we must ″take up our cross everyday.″ This implies that we shall live a life of self-sacrifice for the sake of others.We are to humble ourselves and put the needs of others above our own needs.One of the most important duties of the Church is to assist you in your endeavor.The Church of God was established to inspire individuals to live lives that are worthy of God.We would be delighted to assist you with anything relating to Christianity here at SteepleLess Church; simply shoot us an email or fill out the contact form.

What Should My First steps be in Christianity?

Baptism should be the first action you take after receiving Christ as your Savior.
Baptism is nearly entirely described as something that takes place immediately after salvation in the Bible.
After that, the finest thing to do would be to inform your family and friends about what you’ve accomplished in your life thus far.

Christians are called to spread the gospel of God’s love in order for everyone to be rescued.
Living in a community of believers will assist you in strengthening your faith and living the life that God has called you to live for Him.
Joining a church would be a fantastic idea because it is the primary means through which Christians can encourage and support one another.
It is impossible to grow in your Christian faith if you are not a part of a church community of Christians.

It is the responsibility of Christians to engage in activities such as Bible study, prayer, and service to others.These will take up a significant portion of your time because we all require assistance in order to serve others.To get in touch with us, please click here.Please watch the short movie below if you would want to embrace the free gift of salvation that God provides through Jesus Christ.To learn more, please visit this page.If you truly meant what you said in your prayer, the next step is to link you with other Christ-followers in your area so that you might grow, learn, and become stronger in your Christian faith.

Click on the CONNECT NOW button to the right to connect with a community of Christians who can assist you in establishing that connection with God that you’ve only recently started.
God loves you — and I mean it in the most personal way!
And since He does, you have a promising future ahead of you!
You may rely on Him to assist you in locating it.

Connect with Other Believers

Take the next step and get to know those who are searching for true answers in the same way that you are. You will discover incredible support and community, as well as solutions to issues that you may not have ever considered asking!

John Kimmel, Jr.

John Kimmel Jr.
is the Associate Pastor of Steepleless Church, which is a homegroup movement church.
He has been in ministry for almost 20 years.

He holds a BA in history from Texas A&M University and an MA in divinity from Southwest Baptist Theological Seminary.
His wife, Alyssa, and their son, who was born in February of 2021, are his primary residences.
He may be reached at [email protected], or through his website.

Why do christians worship jesus and not god himself?

Hello, Mirra, and welcome back.
Yes, I spent the most of my last email describing why we adore Jesus – because he is the Son of the Living God.
That being said, you are correct in that the following question is, ″Why, then, is he dubbed the Son of God?″ Part of the solution is difficult, and it necessitates the exercise of trust.

You’re a person of faith, therefore I’m confident that you recognize that there are things in God’s universe that are beyond our comprehension.
However, the other part of the solution is rather straightforward, so I’ll start with that.
The Trinity has been brought up by several people, and they are completely correct.
The Trinity (which literally translates as ‘threefoldness’!) is a philosophical concept that defines God’s character and deeds in three distinct ways.

Comparable to the 99 names of Allah, although clearly there are substantial differences, this is similar in some respects to the 99 names of Allah.As a result, the Trinity is God.One God, manifested in three different ways, yet with the same personality and character in each.These are the three types of forms: God – the Father (Creator, Most High, Sustainer, Protector – I’ve looked at the names of Allah and found that they match well with our concept of God as Father).God – the Son (I’ve looked at the names of Allah and found that they fit well with our knowledge of God as Son).God’s Son is referred to as (Creator too, but also Teacher, Saviour, Redeemer, Lord and Judge).

According to the Bible, the gap between mankind and God was too large for God to have the kind of connection of love and forgiveness that he desired with them.
As a result, in his incredible kindness, Jesus came to dwell among us as a human being.
His death on the cross reconciled us with God by putting God in human form and face to face with us, thereby bridging the gap between our human failings and God’s perfection.
Even though this is diametrically opposed to Muslim doctrine, it is the Christian’s greatest power, because it is only through God the Son’s sacrifice that we have been adopted as God’s children.
The Holy Spirit represents God (again the Creator, but basically the spirit of God as he works in the world and in people, as a Witness, as Strength, as the Challenger and Comforter of his people).

God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit (‘Ghost’ is simply an old-fashioned name for Spirit, of course) make up the Holy Trinity.
There is some mystery about it, but there is also some that is pretty understandable.
To provide an example, when my sons were tiny, they referred to me just as ‘Mummy.’ They would have struggled to comprehend that to many more youngsters, I was not referred to as ″Mummy,″ but rather as ″Teacher.″ They were also only vaguely aware that I might also be referred to as their father’s ″wife″ in addition to their mother.

It may seem clear to you and me that our life roles (Mummy, Teacher, Wife) are always changing, but to a tiny kid, it is rather confusing and even frightening.We are childlike in our comprehension of God (Father/Son/Spirit), thus it is not a cause for concern if we don’t comprehend everything about him completely right away.While Legion is delighted to agree with your perplexity regarding Christian beliefs, I assume you’ve seen from his earlier articles that he’d like you to doubt your own religion as well, which is why I’m bringing this up.You and I are both essentially speaking from a place of faith, and he, I assume, feels that believing in things that cannot be proven is foolish and so should be avoided.Is that a fair explanation of your perspective, Legion?Do you have any questions?

Why Didn’t Jesus Ever Say, ″I Am God″?

Believing that Jesus is God is a significant undertaking.
We as Christians place our hope in Jesus for the forgiveness of our sins, and this is at the heart of our faith!
If Jesus is not God, then there is no hope for sinners since no mere human being could fully fulfill God’s rule and endure God’s endless wrath against sin on their behalf.

Christian education and comfort have been supplied by the Heidelberg Catechism for hundreds of years.
It addresses the need for a mediator and deliverer who is not only a man but God himself in the form of God the Son.
Specifically, this is required ″in order that he may, by the strength of his Godhead, endure in his human form the weight of God’s anger; and that he may gain for us, and restore to us, righteousness and life″ (Hebrews 2:14).
(Heidelberg Catechism Q&A 17).

If it’s so vital, why didn’t Jesus just declare, ″I am God?″ If it’s so crucial, why didn’t Jesus just say, ″I am God?″ Despite the fact that we cannot provide a definitive response to this issue, I do not believe that we are required to do so.Here are three passages from the Gospel of John in which Jesus explicitly declares himself to be God: 1.Jesus asserts that he is the Son of Man.In the third chapter of John, Nicodemus, a religious authority of the Jews, approaches Jesus and inquires about his teaching.According to Jesus, ″No one has risen into heaven save he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man″ (No one has ascended into heaven but the Son of Man).(See also John 3:13) Nicodemus is right to question him about heavenly matters since he himself has descended from heaven, and he is correct in this.

The term Jesus chooses for himself, ″Son of Man,″ is important in and of itself.
According to the Old Testament, this Son of Man is a celestial figure who reigns eternally over a kingdom that will never be destroyed by any means (Dan.
7:14).
Throughout the Gospels, there is a strong emphasis on the incarnation–God becoming human.
Important to notice is that, immediately after claiming for himself the title Son of Man, and therefore claiming for himself heavenly origins and the arrival of an everlasting kingdom, Jesus turns and speaks of his impending crucifixion, which would provide life to those who believe (John 3:14–15).

It is because Jesus is God manifested that his death may bring about the restoration of life for those who place their faith in him.
2.
Jesus asserts that he is one with God the Father.

Jesus was traveling through the temple one winter day when he was mobbed by Jews who asked him to spell it out for them: ″How long will you keep us waiting?″If you are the Christ, please tell us in no uncertain terms.″ (See also John 10:24.) They were curious as to whether he was, in fact, the long-awaited Messiah, whom the Old Testament had said would be God’s Son (Isa.7:14, Isa.9:6, Mic.5:2).Jesus informs them that he has informed them–through the deeds he has accomplished.

(John 10:1—18) Jesus is the Good Shepherd, who gives his life for the sake of his flock.
His opponents don’t trust him since they aren’t sheep in his flock.
His sheep, on the other hand, are given eternal life by him because they hear his voice and follow him (John 10:25—29).
It is then explicitly stated by him: ″I and the Father are one.″ For the Jews pressing in around Jesus, this claim must have been clear enough for them to pick up stones and stone him to death for blasphemy: ″It is not for a good work that we are going to stone you, but for blasphemy, because you, being a man, have taken upon yourself the nature of God″ (John 10:31—33).

3.Jesus asserts that he is the I AM.The Pharisees were not Jesus’ first encounter, and this was not the first time that he was targeted for murder because he claimed to be God himself.

In John 8, Jesus is accused of performing miracles with the assistance of demonic powers.
He assures those who follow and obey him that they will live.
His opponents are enraged by his actions.
Due to the fact that Abraham died, they view this to be an arrogant claim to be superior than the Jewish patriarch Abraham.
″Your father Abraham was overjoyed that he would live to see my day,″ Jesus explains.

He was relieved when he noticed it″ (John 8:56).The Jews claim that this is absurd because Jesus has not yet reached the age of fifty!They were shocked when Jesus told them that he was ″the one who existed before Abraham was″ (really, genuinely).(See also John 8:58.) I AM who I say I am.When the Lord God of Israel revealed himself to Moses at the burning bush, he used the name ″Lord God of Israel″ to identify himself.

Jesus was claiming this name as his own.
″God also said to Moses, ‘Say this to the people of Israel: ″The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’″ The one who said to Moses, ″I AM,″ revealed himself to Moses in yet another way: ″God also said to Moses, ‘Say this to the people of Israel: ″The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God This will be my name for all time, and as a result, I will be remembered across all generations″ (Exod.
3:15).
This is the person who claimed to be Jesus.
As far as the Jews were concerned, it was enough: ″So they gathered stones to throw at him, but Jesus concealed himself and fled out of the temple″ (John 8:59).
Despite the fact that Jesus never states ″I am God″ in such a formal fashion, he obviously identifies himself as God in a variety of remarkable ways.

In ways that are life-giving.Only God himself was capable of accomplishing what was necessary to reconcile us to himself and ″return to us righteousness and life.″ There are several passages in Scripture that we might refer to in order to examine Christ’s divinity.The future Messiah would be divine, according to prophecy in the Old Testament (Isa.7:14, Isa.9:6, Mic.

5:2).The writers of the New Testament assert that Jesus is the Son of God (Rom.9:5, Titus 2:13, Heb.1:8).

Christ is endowed with divine characteristics (John 5:22, Acts 17:31, Heb.1:3, Col.1:17).The Bible instructs us to regard Christ as God and to worship him as such (John 5:23, 1 Cor.1:2, Phil.2:9-11).

The New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm.
B.
Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995), 150-52, contains a more in-depth study of why Jesus chooses this term for himself.
Jesus’ claim to be the Good Shepherd in John 10:1—18 brings the promise of Ezekiel 34 to fruition, as God himself will govern as a good shepherd over his own people in his own time.

By claiming to be the good shepherd, Jesus claimed to be the celestial monarch who had been prophesied.
Heidelberg Question and Answers from the Catechism 17

Was Jesus a prophet?

During Jesus’ time on earth, many individuals referred to Him as a prophet, including the woman caught in adultery (John 4:19) and others (Matthew 21:11; Luke 7:16).
At the very least, Jesus made a comparison between Himself and a prophet: ″When they questioned Jesus about it, he said, ″A prophet does not go unnoticed unless he is in his hometown or among his relatives or in his own family.″ And he was unable to perform any amazing works there, with the exception of healing a few ill individuals who he placed his hands on.
And he was taken aback by their disbelief…″ (Matthew 6:4–6).

There were prophets who spoke for God in the Bible who did so when they were commanded by God, including Samuel (1 Samuel 8:7), Jeremiah (Jeremiah 1:4), Ezekiel (3:16), and others.
They acted as God’s representatives.
Jesus also stated that His message had come from God (John 7:16; 8:28; 17:8).
Prophets, too, are able to predict the future because of the might of God.

As a result, Jesus told His disciples that He would be murdered on the third day and then rise from the dead the next day (Matthew 16:21).This prophecy came to pass in the end.We see this happen in Acts 2 because He promised to send the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:8).Jesus also made prophesies concerning the demolition of the temple in Jerusalem, His return, and other events that would take place during the end of the age (Matthew 24).Miracles were also accomplished by prophets.Moses performed several miracles, the most notable of which was parting the Red Sea (Exodus 14:21–22).

The story of Elijah summoning fire from heaven is told in detail in 1 Kings 18:26–38.
Not to mention the fact that Jesus did marvel after marvel.
Take a look at the Gospels.
Here are a couple such examples: Matthew 8:14–17; Mark 1:40–45; Luke 8:42–48; and John 6:16–21 are examples of passages from the Bible.
In today’s world, many people consider Jesus to be a prophet, and He did indeed fulfill the duty of a prophet.

Many people, including Muslims, believe that Jesus was a wonderful prophet but not God or the sole Savior, which is regrettable because many people see Him in that light alone.
Jesus is much more than a prophet in many ways.
He is God (John 10:30; Philippians 2:5–11; Colossians 1:15–20).

He is the creator of the universe.He is the promised Messiah (Jesus fulfilled scores of Old Testament prophesies about the Messiah).He serves as the atonement for our sins (Hebrews 2:17).Jesus is a prophet, and he came to fulfill the prophesy of Deuteronomy 18:18 (the Book of Mormon) (see Acts 3:22; 7:37).He is, nevertheless, much more than a prophet.He is the Word of God (John 1:1), and he is the only one who can redeem us (John 3:16).

(John 14:6; Acts 4:12).
Truths that are related: What is the identity of Jesus Christ?
Is Jesus Christ the Son of God?
Is Jesus the Christ, or is he a false prophet?

What is the relevance of Jesus’ humanity in relation to his divinity?What exactly was Jesus’ mission?Return to the page: The Truth About Jesus Christ.

Jesus Many Faces – He Was Born, Lived And Died As A Jew

Jesus’ identity is inextricably linked to his Jewishness, which cannot be understood in isolation.
Harold W.
Attridge is the Lillian Claus Professor of New Testament at the University of Southern California.

Yale Divinity School is located in New Haven, Connecticut.
What was the most significant religious impact in your life?
There is no question that Jesus was influenced by the traditions of Israel, and that he was exposed to their influence.
However, it is unknown in what form such tales were transmitted to him in Galilee at the beginning of the first century.

He would almost surely have been aware of the Temple in Jerusalem, and, according to legend, he would almost certainly have traveled up to Jerusalem for the main pilgrimage festivals.He would have been familiar with the Temple’s rites and the significance of its atoning sacrifices.I believe he would have celebrated Passover with his family, and he would have been aware of the aspirations for divine rescue that are inherent in the celebration.He was most likely aware of the emerging Pharisaic movement, which promoted a notion of purity that was available to all Jews, not only those who were performing at the Temple worship, and which was gaining popularity.He would very definitely have been familiar with Jewish scripture.And we can see in several of his parables how he uses images from the Bible to make a point.

For example, the big Cedar of Lebanon from Ezekial is likely to have a part in his portrayal of the mustard seed, which grows into a tree, and there is likely to be an element of parody in his account of the mustard seed.
Consequently, his connection with the biblical legacy is complicated, but it is undoubtedly significant in his development.
Shaye I.D.
Cohen is the Samuel Ungerleider Professor of Judaic Studies at Brown University as well as a Professor of Religious Studies.
Is Jesus a Jew, and if so, how would his upbringing in Galilee as a young man have been impacted by his religious beliefs and practices?

Was Jesus a Jew or a non-Jew?
Of course, Jesus was born into a Jewish family.
He was born in Galilee, a Jewish region of the globe, to a Jewish mother and a Jewish father.

All of his friends, companions, coworkers, and disciples were Jews, and he had no problem with it.He was a regular attendee of Jewish community worship services, which we refer to as synagogues.He preached from Jewish scripture, as well as from the Bible.On Jewish holidays, he observed the customs.A trip to the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem, where he was under the control of priests, was the next stop on his journey.He lived, was born, lived, died, and taught as a Jew throughout his life.

Any casual reader of the gospel text will immediately recognize this.
That he was a Jew is not so remarkable as the fact that the gospels make no pretense that he was anything other than a Jew.
The gospel writers had no idea that Jesus was anything other than a Jew when they wrote their accounts.
The gospels don’t even give the impression that he came to create a new religion, which is a concept that is entirely alien to the rest of the gospel text and completely alien to Paul himself.

That is an idea that occurs to me much later in the game.Consequently, to claim that he was a Jew is to state an obvious fact, to state a notion that is so evident on the surface that one wonders if it really has to be said at all.Of course, it is necessary to say this because we all know what occurs later in the tale, when it is revealed that Christianity has evolved into something different than Judaism, and as a result, Jesus is no longer regarded as a Jew, but rather as the creator of Christianity, rather than a Jew.

However, he was, of course, a Jew.
Paula Fredriksen (Paula Fredriksen): Boston University’s William Goodwin Aurelio Professor of the Appreciation of Scripture is an expert in biblical interpretation.
Was Jesus of Nazareth a Jew?
Why is it so essential to us, and why do you think it would have influenced his perspective of things?
When I read the accounts about Jesus in the New Testament, I am struck by how fully he is assimilated into the culture of the first century.

Religious observance and piety in the Jewish tradition.We have a tendency to become sidetracked by the principal plot thread of the gospels, since we are waiting for the tale to progress up to and including the crucifixion and resurrection.Jesus is, however, always shown as entering the synagogue on the Sabbath throughout that account, as well as the stories provided by the evangelists to fill in the gaps between Galilee and Jerusalem, as well as other stories.According to the synoptic gospels, he travels to Jerusalem for the pilgrimage holidays, notably for Passover (in John), but also for any number of other pilgrimage festivals (in the other gospels).At Passover, Jerusalem is not the kind of location you’d want to be unless you’re very dedicated to participating in a great deal of ritual activity with a great deal of historical relevance.

What we’ve learnt from the gospel accounts isn’t that Jesus was not a Jew in the traditional sense.
Quite the contrary, in fact.
As a result, he is thoroughly immersed in the Judaism of his day.
From the gospels, we learn that he is not a member of any of the groups whose distinguishing qualities Josephus provided us with information on.
He is not a Sadducee in any way.
He is not a follower of the Pharisees.