Who Invented Jesus

Ancient Confession Found: ‘We Invented Jesus Christ’

Is it possible that Jesus Christ was fully made up of other myths for the sake of an old Roman marketing campaign? may be the only fictitious character in literature whose complete life narrative can be traced to other sources. London, United Kingdom (PRWEB UK) October 8, 2013 In London on the 19th of October 2013, American Biblical scholar Joseph Atwill will make his first public appearance in front of the British public to discuss a controversial new discovery: ancient confessions recently discovered prove, according to Atwill, that the New Testament was written by first-century Roman aristocrats, who fabricated the entire story of Jesus Christ from the beginning.

A one-day symposium titled “Covert Messiah” will be held at Conway Hall in Holborn, and his lecture will be part of that event (full details can be found at).

“The artist admits that he presents his work with some ambivalence: “I don’t want to deliberately damage Christians,” he says, “but this is vital for our culture.” Citizens who are aware of their history need to know the truth about it so that they may comprehend how and why regimes fabricate fake histories and construct false gods.

For him, the first century was marked by a persistent source of violent revolt, owing to the expectations of Jewish groups in Palestine at the time, who were looking forward to the coming of the predicted warrior Messiah.

They reasoned that the only way to halt the expansion of ardent Jewish missionary activities was to establish a rival religious system in the community.

To the contrary, this Messiah advised Jews to “give onto Caesar” and pay their taxes to the Roman government, rather than inciting them to fight.

According to Atwill, “the simple answer is no,” and he believes that “he may be the only fictitious character in literature whose complete life narrative can be traced back to other sources.” Once all of those sources have been exposed, there is nothing else to be found.” In the course of studying Josephus’ “Wars of the Jews” in conjunction with the New Testament, Atwill made the most exciting discovery of his life.

• His discovery came about when “I began to observe a succession of similarities between the two books,” as he describes it.
• That the sequence of events and places of Jesus’ ministry are more or less identical to the sequence of events and sites of Titus Flavius’ military campaign, as reported by Josephus, appears to have escaped the attention of many researchers.
• The biography of Jesus is essentially based on past legends, particularly the history of a Roman Caesar, and is created from top to bottom from there.
• “How could this go unnoticed in one of the most scrutinized novels of all time?” The writers did not want the typical believer to be aware of what they were doing, but they did want the observant reader to be aware of what they were up to.
• “Perhaps not,” admits Atwill, “but my work has given permission to those who are ready to leave the religious community to make a complete and total separation from it.” Now that we have the facts, we can establish where the tale of Jesus comes from in its entirety.
• It is being used today, particularly in the United States, to mobilize support for military intervention in the Middle East.” Atwill invites doubters to confront him in Conway Hall, where, following the lectures, there is expected to be a heated Q & A session with the speakers.
• Atwill on the panel.

More information may be found on the website. The following is a description of Joseph Atwill: In addition to the best-selling novel “Caesar’s Messiah,” author Joseph Atwill is working on a sequel to that novel, titled “The Single Strand.” Distribute this story via social media or email:

Story of Jesus Christ was ‘fabricated to pacify the poor’, claims controversial Biblical scholar

Is it possible that Jesus Christ was fully made up of other myths for the sake of an old Roman publicity campaign? Probably not. It’s possible that she’s the only fictitious character in literature whose complete life narrative can be traced back to other sources. Eighth of October, 2013 (PRWEB UK) In London on the 19th of October 2013, American Biblical scholar Joseph Atwill will make his first public appearance in front of the British public to discuss a controversial new discovery: ancient confessions recently discovered prove, according to Atwill, that the New Testament was written by first-century Roman aristocrats and that they fabricated the entire story of Jesus Christ.

A one-day symposium titled “Covert Messiah” will be held at Conway Hall in Holborn, and his lecture will be part of it (full details can be found at).

“It is with some ambivalence that he presents his work, he admits, “since I do not want to directly damage Christians.” “However, this is vital for our culture.” The truth about our past is essential for informed individuals in order to understand how and why regimes fabricate fake histories and false gods.

For him, the first century was marked by a persistent source of violent revolt, owing to the expectations of Jewish groups in Palestine at the time, who were looking forward to the coming of the prophesized warrior Messiah.

They reasoned that the only way to halt the expansion of ardent Jewish missionary activities was to establish a rival religious system in the community.

Instead of inciting violence, this Messiah asked Jews to “give onto Caesar” and pay their taxes to the Roman government.

According to him, “I began to see a series of analogies between the two books.” “The fact that what Josephus wrote about in the First Jewish-Roman conflict appears to be a fulfillment of the prophecies of Jesus has been recognized by Christian historians for ages, I was seeing hundreds more of them.

1. As you can see, this is a pattern that was purposefully created.
2. The comparisons are philosophical or lyrical in nature, therefore they are not always instantly visible.
3. A well-educated member of the ruling elite in ancient Rome would very certainly have recognized the literary game being performed in his or her presence.” Mr.
4. “Perhaps not,” admits Atwill, “but my work has given permission to those who are ready to leave the religious community to make a complete and final separation from it.” In this case, we now have the evidence to prove that the tale of Jesus originated somewhere else.

The practice continues today, with a particular emphasis on the United States, in order to generate support for military intervention in the Middle East.” Ahead of the talks at Conway Hall, Atwill invites doubters to confront him in person, where there will likely be a vigorous question and answer session.

Atwill for the discussion.

In addition to the best-selling novel “Caesar’s Messiah,” author Joseph Atwill is working on a sequel to that novel, entitled “The Single Strand.” Post or email the following link to spread the word about this story.

Bible bombshell: Jesus Christ invented by Romans as ‘psychological warfare’

Sign up HERE to get science discoveries in health, business, and other areas that are important to you. Invalid email address We use the information you submit about yourself to serve you with material in ways that you have consented to and to enhance our knowledge of you. This may contain advertisements from us as well as advertisements from third parties depending on our understanding. You have the option to unsubscribe at any time. For further information, please see the following link: A guy named Joseph Atwill, author of the book titled “Caesar’s Messiah,” claims to have discovered old Roman confessions in which it is said that the rulers invented a “messiah” to appease Jews in Palestine.

“Jewish factions in Palestine at the time, who were waiting for a promised warrior Messiah, were a persistent source of violent revolt during the first century,” Mr Atwill explained.

Their hypothesis was that the only way to prevent the development of fervent Jewish missionary activities was to establish a rival religious system.” It was at this point that the story of the ‘peaceful’ Messiah was conceived.

Atwill explains that the sequence of events and places of Jesus’ ministry are “more or less the same as the sequence of events and sites of Titus Flavius’ military campaign as reported by Josephus,” which “seems to have evaded many academics.” That this is an intentional pattern has been established is unmistakable.

No, the Romans Did Not Invent Jesus

Sign up HERE to get science advances in health, business, and other areas that are relevant to your life and career. The email address is incorrect. Signing up allows us to deliver material in ways that you have indicated an interest in, as well as better understand you. According to our understanding, this may involve advertisements from us and third parties. Unsubscribe from the mailing list at any time. Details may be found here. ‘Caesar’s Messiah’ author Joseph Atwill claims to have discovered old Roman confessions that suggest that officials produced a’messiah’ to quiet Jews in Palestine.

1. Jesus was not based on a genuine individual, according to the author from the United States, but the Romans were inspired by actual figures associated with the First Jewish-Roman War.
2. They used psychological warfare to quell the insurrection after they had exhausted all other options for putting down the revolt.
3. Instead of inciting violence, this Messiah exhorted Jews to “deliver onto Caesar” and pay their taxes to the Roman government.” The biography of Jesus is essentially based on past legends, particularly the history of a Roman Caesar, and is constructed from top to bottom on these myths.
4. Atwill noticed that Jesus is “the only fictitious character in literature whose complete life narrative can be linked to other sources,” he says he realized he had uncovered something significant.
5. In order to wage ‘psychological warfare’ against the Jews, the Romans fabricated Jesus Christ.
6. “What appears to have eluded many scholars is the fact that the sequence of events and locations of Jesus’ ministry are more or less the same as the sequence of events and locations of Titus Flavius’ military campaign as described by Josephus,” says Mr Atwill.

” That this is an intentional pattern has been established is unmistakable. “The biography of Jesus is essentially constructed from top to bottom on preceding legends, but particularly on the biography of a Roman Caesar.”

The Theory

Sign up HERE to get science advances in health, business, and other areas that are relevant to you. Email address is not valid. We use the information you supply about yourself to serve you with material in ways that you have agreed to and to enhance our knowledge of you. This may contain advertisements from us as well as advertisements from other parties, depending on our interpretation. You have the option to cancel your subscription at any time. More information may be found here. Joseph Atwill, author of ‘Caesar’s Messiah,’ claims to have discovered old Roman confessions that suggest that officials invented a’messiah’ in order to appease Jews in the Holy Land.

Mr Atwill stated that “Jewish groups in Palestine at the time, who were waiting for a promised warrior Messiah, were a persistent source of violent revolt during the first century.” When the Romans had exhausted all other options for putting down the uprising, they turned to psychological warfare.

Instead of encouraging Jews to wage battle, this Messiah advised them to “give unto Caesar” and pay their taxes to the Roman government.” “The biography of Jesus is essentially based on preceding legends, particularly the narrative of a Roman Caesar, from beginning to end.” When Mr.

The following is a biblical bombshell: The Romans devised Jesus Christ for the purpose of waging ‘psychological warfare.’ (Photo courtesy of GETTY) He discovered the links between the New Testament and Josephus’ ‘War of the Jews,’ which is the only surviving narrative of first-century Judea.

“The biography of Jesus is essentially constructed from top to bottom on past legends, but particularly on the history of a Roman Caesar,” says the author.

The Evidence

What evidence does Atwill have to support his theory? To be sure, he also authored two additional writings that have been identified as Josephus’s works, in contrast to the New Testament, and which have been regarded by modern historians as being Josephus’s works. The Antiquities of the Jews, a history of the Jewish people, and The Jewish War, a chronicle of the Jewish people’s resistance against Rome are among the titles of these works. “I began to discover a series of parallels between the two passages,” says Atwill.

This is unequivocal proof of a pattern that was purposefully created.” What was it about modern scholars that allowed them to miss this?

The writers did not want the typical believer to be aware of what they were doing, but they did want the observant reader to be aware of what they were up to.

In the ruling elite, an educated Roman would have recognized the literary game being played. the Roman Caesars left us a type of puzzle literature that was supposed to be solved by future generations, and the solution to that puzzle is “We invented Jesus Christ, and we’re proud of it.”

The Problems

So many issues with Atwill’s idea that I don’t even know where to begin pointing them all out. In the first place, the supposed comparisons are far from being parallel. In the case of Jesus calling the disciples to be “fishers of men,” Atwill claims that this is a hidden code referring to an incident from the Jewish War that is being referenced. It is a scenario in which the Emperor Titus’ army execute Jews who had evaded them in the Sea of Galilee by chopping off their hands or heads and blasting them with darts.

• Atwill’s book is filled of these “parallels,” which are only meaningful if you already believe Atwill’s reasoning, making them insufficient proof for his theory of relativity.
• In reality, there would have been no Christians at all prior to the destruction of the Temple in A.D.
• Our knowledge of the historical record shows that this is not accurate because the Roman historian Tacitus reports in hisAnnals (Book 15, 44) that Emperor Nero blames the Great Fire of Rome, which occurred three years before the Jewish rebellion, on a group known as Christians.
• Wouldn’t the first Jews to join the Christian church have seen that something wasn’t quite right about this movement that appeared out of nowhere overnight?

Even More Problems

Aside from that, practically all academics, including non-Christian scholars, believe that the New Testament manuscripts show a diversified literary style that cannot be traced back to a single author or group of authors. This is plainly obvious from a cursory reading of the four Gospels or through a comparison of the Gospels and Paul’s writings, among other sources. Assuming, as is very certain, that these papers were created by a single individual in order to appease the Judean Jews (which has absolutely little possibility of being real), that individual did an incredibly poor job of concocting an artificial messiah for the Jewish elite to accept.

Now that Jesus’ crucifixion had actually occurred, Paul, the true author of First Corinthians, only had to accept that reality and communicate it to the congregation.

Moreover, why manufacture several additional contradicting apocryphal Gospels, such as the Gospel of Thomas, that compete with your fictitious faith, which you hope will not be recognized as canonical by the Church in the future?

Finally, how would the Romans gather a sufficient number of Jews who were prepared to commit apostasy, blasphemy, and die as martyrs for the Empire in order to proclaim this new “gospel” to a world that was still in the dark ages of literacy?

The Critics

Despite the fact that I could go on and on with more objections, I believe the most compelling evidence that Atwill’s theory is not worth the digital pixels with which it is projected is that even authors who subscribe to the fringe belief that Jesus never existed, a group known as mythicists, reject Atwill’s theory. In his article, “There is no scientific evidence that the canonical gospels were written by any Flavians, whether Josephus or otherwise,” D. M. Murdock (a.k.a. Acharya S.), who believes that Jesus was simply a rip-off of the Egyptian God Horus, writes, “There is no scientific evidence that the canonical gospels were written by any Flavians, whether Josephus or otherwise.” As Robert Price, one of the few scholars in the world who holds a doctorate in New Testament studies and who denies that Jesus ever existed, puts it, “One hates to be so harsh in the analysis of the work of an innovative thinker who gives us the gift of a fresh reading of familiar texts, but it is difficult to be euphemistic in the present case.” “The reading that has been provided here is completely absurd.” Lastly, Richard Carrier writes, “I gave him a fair shot.” Carrier, who is preparing to publish an academic defense of the allegation that Jesus did not exist in all likelihood in 2014, writes, “I gave him a fair opportunity.” Despite this, Atwill never provides any convincing examples, seldom understands what he is talking about, gets a lot of things wrong, makes stuff up, never acknowledges he was wrong, and is generally a frustratingly delusional zealot, in my view.

In addition, to my knowledge, he does not hold any relevant academic degrees.

He, on the other hand, professes to be an expert.

When your point of view is rejected even by those on the edge, where can your argument proceed from there?

Creating Christ: How Roman Emperors Invented Christianity: Valliant, James S, Fahy, Warren: 9781949914627: Amazon.com: Books

“I have rarely come across a book that is as creative, fascinating, accessible, and well-informed as this one on themes that are obviously important to the world and that I myself have spent a significant portion of my scholarly career to researching. They have provided a shocking new perspective of Christianity in this book, based on a contentious view of its Roman origins that is highly understandable to the layperson and has a very significant impact. The authors give fresh and thorough archeological and iconographic evidence while also drawing on the broadest and most cutting-edge work of other recent academics, including myself, to support their arguments.

This paper’s arguments are a great synthesis of pertinent evidence that is both insightful and thorough in its analysis.

Robert Eisenman, author of James the Brother of Jesus and The New Testament Code A fascinating and compelling investigative history of ideas that takes a risky approach to a topic that prior study has failed to properly and honestly address: how (and why!) the Flavian dynasty woven Christianity into the very fabric of Western society.

The clearly developed style and neatly ordered portions of this work provide it an accessible quality.

Was Jesus a Roman Hoax to Trick the Jews?

Joe Atwill has ruffled the feathers of many Christians and historians, which is reasonable given that he is making allegations that call into question the very foundation of the former’s beliefs and the widely recognized realities of the latter’s discipline. In his book, Joe claims to have unearthed evidence that Jesus of Nazareth, the historical figure we read about in history books and the New Testament, was only a fiction of first-century Romans who wrote his gospels as a means of quelling the messianic zeal of the Jews in the first century.

• Personally, I don’t care whether or not Jesus was a man with super abilities, or even whether he was a dude at all.
• I hold organized religion responsible for the majority of the horrible things that humans do to one another, and the only times I attend church are on Christmas and Mother’s Day, solely out of respect for my mother.
• Despite the fact that I am a proud heathen, I believe that Joe’s statements about a Roman deception being at the heart of Christianity are as ludicrous as the accusations that the United States government deliberately flew aircraft into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
• Joe has been stirring up interest on the internet for years with his wacky results and shrewd press releases, and he recently arranged a large, one-day symposium in London to announce his latest research findings and those of others.
• Here is what he had to say about it.
• Joe Atwill (interviewer): I’m a scholar who works on my own.
• OK.

When I was younger, I attended a Jesuit military academy where we studied the gospels.

What about Jesus piqued your interest?

The Jewish point of view at the time was that it desired the Romans to leave in order to establish a religious state.

It is necessary to read a man named Flavius Josephus in order to have an informed viewpoint on the gospels.

If you study his book, you will observe that there are parallels between the events of World War II and the events of Jesus’ mission, which both occur in the same chronological order.

However, please provide me with some instances.

Keep up with me “Afterwards, he sends them out into the Sea of Galilee, where they destroy the Jewish fishing vessels.

So, what does this kind of material mean to you personally?

The political outlook that Jesus possessed was one that the Romans hoped the Jews would adopt.

The Romans and the Jews were always at odds about who had the right to be called God.

As a result, they devised a persona named Jesus Christ who would represent all they desired in a messiah for the Jews.

Are there any specific references to this Roman storyline in some ancient literature that I can find?

The Old Testament events that take place in the life of the Jesus character in the gospels are all referenced by the Jesus character in the gospels.

This is the story of Jesus, according to the Bible.

This is all described in the Old Testament, in Genesis.

When you see the pattern, you will realize that everything is a fabrication.

I get what you’re trying to communicate.

You’re claiming that Jesus was concocted by the Romans as part of a conspiracy.

Is there a text that explicitly supports this claim?

It appears in Josephus’ ” Cannibal Mary,” which is a well-known chapter.

It is necessary to conduct some research in order to comprehend it.

That said, I can promise you that it would take a significant amount of time.

According to the New Testament, Jesus is the Passover lamb on the human level.

It’s an unambiguous depiction of the creation and goal of Christianity, which was a curse imposed on the Jews by the Romans in retaliation for their continual resistance.

How did the Romans go about indoctrinating the Jews into this fictitious religion, you might wonder.

The Jewish thinkers and the Roman caesars would have been the writers of this work.

All of the disciples’ tales are made up, and all of their names are made up as well.

But how come Christians now are worshipping a Jew rather than Titus Flavius, if that was the purpose all along.

Forcaesar also had the title of Pope.

The most crucial thing to remember is that you must have some form of explanation about who theson of Manis is at all times.

So the only possibility for this reappearance after the battle is Julius Caesar, because there would have been some documentation of it.

Titus was referred to as the “son of God” at the time of his birth.

They wanted the Jews to believe that the son of man guy that Jesus was predicting was actually a caesar, rather than the other way around.

You’re implying that Jesus, a man about whom the majority of scholars agree walked the Earth, never existed at all?

Suppose a guy had a duck living next door to him named Donald and he went on to create the character Donald Duck out of that experience.

That is, not when he claims that the duck is speaking.

Nevertheless, the actual historicity of the Christ, whoever he may have been, was anything but a passive cosmopolitan figure.

The guy we read about, on the other hand, is a prefigurement—a fictional character created by the author.

When you think about it, why do you think this kind of perspective on the gospels hasn’t been expressed more frequently over the years?

It is well established by scholars that the parallels I mentioned occured in the same sequence; it is only recently that they have been brought to their attention.

The most important thing to remember is that everything must be done in chronological order.

You don’t need to be a Bible scholar to figure this out; all you need is a little common sense to get by.

Thanks.

Cooper has conducted a series of interviews that are less confusing: Boots with a lot of height Don’t get into rap videos unless you know who these guys are.

The RZA and Adrian Younge are Supreme Mutant Beings, according to the RZA. What the Underachievers Have to Say About Stopping and Starting Frisk and Kimani Gray have a son named Frisk. Imagevia

ORIGINAL REPORTING ON EVERYTHING THAT MATTERS IN YOUR INBOX.

To receive electronic communications from Vice Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, ads, and sponsored content, you must agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy prior to signing up.

Jesus: A failed rebel, a myth or a Roman invention?

When our society, which has been controlled for almost four centuries by the Hispanic paradigm of late-medieval Catholicism, forces us to spend several days contemplating the Christian Messiah, I dare to question if Christ really existed in the first place. Indeed, a mountain of scholarly study has been produced in the last few decades in an attempt to address this issue, with the majority of the results being negative, at least in the sense Christianity believes he is. To begin to break free from a mindset that has been formed since infancy, one must acknowledge that science has emerged as the most powerful weapon available to us in this contemporary age for understanding reality, distinguishing between what is untrue and mythological and what is accurate and realistic (or historical).

1. Three different Jesus stories from today Archaeology, philology, psychology, literary and textual criticism, and sociology are just a few of the fields that have used science to better comprehend not just matter but also human civilization as a whole.
2. For the study of the major character of Christianity, Jesus Christ, whose death we are meant to be celebrating today, the social sciences have been applied.
3. Scholars The subject of whether Jesus Christ was a half-god, half-human being has been raised by scholars since the 18th century, when academic freedom was first granted after centuries of ecclesiastical rule.
4. The findings of these investigations will cause consternation among the Christian faithful.

However, he was only one of hundreds of similar Jewish apocalyptic preachers who proliferated throughout the Middle East following the traumatic destruction of the Jews’ Temple in Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 CE, according to another estimate (for Common Era, the non-Christian-centric equivalent of AD).

The author of the book Did Jesus Exist?, a leading authority on the bible, asserted that Jesus was one of many “repent-the-end-is-near” millenarians who lived during a time when Jews believed that because they were God’s Chosen People, God would overthrow their Roman conquerors, led by a Messiah, or Prophet-King.

When Jesus claimed the “Kingdom of God is near,” Ehrman pointed out that he was not talking to an afterlife-Heaven, where virtuous people are expected to go after death-but rather to the kingdom of God on earth.

In fact, Jesus made specific predictions about when this cosmic calamity will occur: before his followers “experience death” (Mark 9:1), or in Mark 13:30, before “this generation” (the current generation) goes away.

When the Romans were defeated by God’s cosmic powers, Jesus predicted that they would be overthrown: “The sun will go dark, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will be falling.” “And they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds in great majesty and glory,” says the Bible.

The Romans controlled via intimidation, and they even slaughtered the people they had conquered when they became bored with their task.

As Ehrman put it, “Before anybody knew it, the eschatological preacher was on the cross, and dead within six hours,” he was dead within six hours of being crucified.

Rather, it is a creation of the proselytizer Greek-Jewish Paul, in much the same way that the ancient Egyptians created the god-man Osiris and the Greeks created the demi-god Hercules.

In the words of these “mythicists,” Jesus Christ is a legendary figure who was created in the first and second centuries to serve as the central figure of a new religion, just as Greek gods, Santa Claus, Robin Hood, and King Arthur were not real historical figures, but amalgams of individuals who had been mythicized over the centuries.

• The concept of a deity who is about to die and then resurrects was frequent in ancient religions: Osiris, Attis, Heracles, and Baal were all examples.
• Furthermore, as the mythicists point out, there are no non-Christian narratives that recount the existence of a “Jesus” who was crucified and died on the cross.
• Romans In recent years, this concept has been pushed to what may be its most severe version: The Romans created Jesus as a method of pacifying the Jews, who were among the most recalcitrant peoples they subjugated during their conquest of the Middle East.
• This theory is advanced in the best-selling book Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus, written by Joseph Atwill, a noted biblical scholar who has published several books on the subject.
• In the film, the Jews are represented as a mob demanding the killing of one of their own, Jesus, whilst their despised ruler, the Romans, i.e., Pontius Pilate, is depicted as a decent man under pressure to comply with the mob’s demand?

It was something I heard when I was younger: “The Jews are wicked; they killed Jesus.” The Romans, if they did fabricate the Jesus story, definitely presented themselves as just, even respecting the Jews to such an extent that Pilate caved in to the Jewish priests and mob’s demand for Jesus’ death.

• The apparent explanation is that it was welcomed — and, according to Atwill, even founded — as one of the primary official religions of the Roman Empire, which at the time was the most powerful empire on the face of the earth.
• All that has followed is history, as the successors of the Roman Empire, the medieval kingdoms of Europe, and then the modern superpowers that included the United States have all made Christianity their official state religion.
• That is also one of the reasons why Islam, the second main religion in the world, has grown in popularity.
• Hinduism and Buddhism, despite the fact that they were considerably older than these two relatively recent religions, did not expand to the same extent as Islam and Christianity.
• It is no coincidence that the major character of Christianity is more frequently referred to as Christ the King, and that the central figure of Islam is referred to as Allah the Most Powerful, titles that were never used to the Buddha, Confucius, or Lord Krishna.

Email: Rigoberto Tiglao may be found on Facebook and Twitter as @bobitiglao. His website is at www.rigobertotiglao.com.

Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy To Invent Jesus

Christianity – Its origins and history as a religion For my novel Caesar’s Messiah, I secured the publishing rights and printed 1,000 copies of a second edition, which is now available. This version includes two new findings that were not included in the original. The first is the claim made by the Flavians that they were the ones who created Christianity. According to the second demonstration, the Gospel of Luke has a sequence that corresponds to a part of Josephus almost line for line. This discovery is referred known as the Flavian Signature in Luke, and I believe it puts an end to the debate about who authored the Gospels and when they were written.

1. Joseph Atwill is a well-known author and poet.
2. These include Francesco Carotta’s Jesus Was Caesar: On the Julian Origins of Christianity, an Investigative Report and Gary Courtney’s Et tu, Judas?, both of which are available on Amazon.
3. and Caesar’s Messiah, both of which claim that the tale of Jesus is based on the account of Julius Caesar, there is Joseph Atwill’s Caesar’s Messiah, which makes the point that the story of Jesus is the story of Titus Caesar’s Messiah is unquestionably the greatest of the bunch.
4. Caesar’s Messiah is a diligent reader of the scriptures who brings a fresh viewpoint and numerous novel discoveries to the table.
5. Atwill’s central argument is essentially a conglomeration of numerous different concepts.
6. The Gospels, according to this interpretation, are witty satires written by the Flavian Emperors and their allies.
7. Secondly, Josephus and the New Testament, he says, are basically two sides of the same coin, with one authored in close connection to the other.
8. In other words, the characters and events that can be considered parallel occur in the same order as the events that can be considered parallel.

Despite the fact that the satirical version of Josephus’s account is the same as Josephus’ version, the people in the New Testament are given other names, as is typically the case with satire.” (p65) The relevance of name swapping among these writings is shown in this paragraph, which in addition to the concept of satire and the tight link between the New Testament and Josephus, also underlines another significant issue of Atwill’s: the centrality of satire among these texts.

To explain how to interpret Josephus’ famous statement about Jesus’ death and resurrection in his book, Atwill quotes Josephus himself and writes: “To answer the problem, the reader must simply do what Decius Mundus instructs in the following chapter and ‘value not this matter of names.'” (p217) The novelty of this work’s reading of Josephus in light of the New Testament is what distinguishes it from other similar works.

When it comes to this, Atwill’s work mirrors the work of Cliff Carrington and other exegetes who have come to the conclusion that there is something profoundly suspicious about how the two bodies of work are connected.

Because of this, an excellent alternative title for this work may possibly have been When it comes to the New Testament and Josephus, there’s something unusual about them.

As a matter of fact, the four Gospels as well as the War of the Jews were written as one cohesive piece of literature in which the characters and storylines interacted.

Taking the New Testament at its most comical level reveals, for example, that the Apostles Simon and John were harsh parodies of Simon and John, the leaders of the Jewish uprising, who were killed by the Romans.” (p36) To finish this chapter, Atwill examines Mark 1 and 5 in relation to Titus’ first fight on the banks of the Sea of Galilee, drawing connections between the two passages.

Readers who have read Josephus several times may be taken aback by Atwill’s allegation that she represents a satire of Christianity.

It is noted by Atwill that the words in her lips were placed there by Josephus, and that when read in the context of his satire on Christianity, they take on a new and foreboding significance: “As for the fight with the Romans, if they manage to save our lives, we will be forced to become slaves.

1. Are these seditious rogues, on the other hand, more heinous than both of their predecessors?
2. Is it reasonable to suppose that the roasting and eating of one’s own kid will be a “byword throughout the world” and a source of rage for the “seditious varlets,” the Jewish insurgents?
3. Atwill is not the first scholar to have noticed this connection between the ‘Cannibal Mary passage’ in Josephus and the symbolic Passover Lamb of the Gospels, as Honora H.
4. Over the course of the following several chapters, Atwill seeks to resolve the mystery of who Jesus actually was, as well as the mystery of the Empty Tomb.
5. As a result, he interprets the Empty Tomb story as four different versions of the same story, each in portions, that are scattered across the gospels: “The results of my investigation proved that these four versions were intended to be read together as a single narrative.
6. The other consists of the visits to the tomb described in the other three Gospels.
7. It is because of this comedy of mistakes that the people who arrive to the empty tomb are led to think that their Messiah has risen from the dead.” (p129) The writers of the New Testament, as well as the method by which the story was produced, are discussed in the following chapters.

It is possibly Atwill’s assessment of this and the sections around it as intricate satire that provides the most groundbreaking insight in the entire poem.

This aspect of the work is not only made understandable by his reading; it is also backed by strong linguistic and thematic ties that will be tough to reject.

Atwill also makes an intriguing case in Chapter 13 that Josephus had changed the dates of significant events in his writings in order to make them match to the predictions in Daniel, as if providing an original and compelling look at the TF were not enough.

Other authors have also observed the connection of dates and names, most recently in Jay Raskin’s article on the Maccabees and early Christianity in the Journal of Higher Criticism, which was published in January of this year.

Without appearing triumphant, Atwill is typically able to maintain a firm posture that allows him to explain why no one else has found all of the connections he has (despite the fact that a surprising number of researchers have come onto bits of the jigsaw).

The book has a few unpleasant passages, such as a statistical analysis of the similarities on page 224 that reads like something out of Erich Von Daniken’s book, and the incorrect identification of a remark on page 296 as being from Jesus rather than from John the Baptist.

I have my doubts about whether the central thesis of Caesar’s Messiah will find many supporters, and this reader was not persuaded at the end of the book.

Both lay readers and scholars will find something in Caesar’s Messiah to challenge them, to entertain them, or simply to get the old gray matter back to work. It is well worth the price of admission to see this book.

Biblical Scholar Allegedly Discovers Proof That Roman Aristocrats Invented Jesus

Christendom – its beginnings and development as a religion I have obtained the rights to my novel Caesar’s Messiah from the publisher, and I have produced 1,000 copies of the second edition of the novel. One discovery in this edition was not included in the original. A good example is the Flavians’ admission that they were the ones who created Christianity. According to the second example, the Gospel of Luke has a sequence that corresponds to a piece of Josephus almost line by line. This discovery is referred known as the Flavian Signature in Luke, and I believe it puts an end to the debate about who wrote the Gospels and how they came to be composed.

• Atwill, Joseph Recently, three books have been published contending that the tale of Jesus is actually a story about a Roman Emperor, rather than the story of Jesus himself.
• And then there are books like Then Fall Jesus!
• In contrast to Carotta’s work, which mostly ignores contemporary New Testament study, Atwill is aware of it, even though he does not situate his narrative within scholarly frameworks.
• Because of this, readers who disagree with his major argument will still benefit from his work, which is both educational and challenging.
• The first is that the stories of Jesus given in the New Testament are actually stories of Titus’ march through Galilee and the destruction of Jerusalem, including the Temple, which he claims to be true.
• Consequently, they appear to be religious stories on the surface, but the underlying theme is actually a giant in-joke to the audience.

For example, when Atwill writes about the sequence with the demoniac in Gadara/Gergasa, he says: “For the simple reason that the demonic of Gadara and the battle at Gadara in the New Testament can be read as satires on Josephus’ “tyrant” John and the battle at Gadara, the two stories follow the same plot outline.

In the vicinity of Gadara, this all takes place.

During his discussion of the famous passage regarding Jesus in Josephus, Atwill states, quoting Josephus himself, “To answer the conundrum, the reader should simply do what Decius Mundus instructs in the following chapter and ‘value not this business of names.'” (p217) Because of the uniqueness of its interpretation of Josephus in relation to the New Testament, this study is extremely valuable in its own right.

When it comes to this, Atwill’s work mirrors the work of Cliff Carrington and other exegetes who have come to the conclusion that there is something profoundly suspicious about how the two bodies of work are linked.

It is possible that a better title for this work would have been: The New Testament and Josephus have a certain funkiness about them.

“After reading the Gospels in combination with War of the Jews, it was intended that they would be recognized as parody.

Many of Jesus’ sayings take on a comedic meaning as a result of their interaction, and they also produce a series of riddles, the answers to which disclose the true identities of the people from the New Testament It becomes clear, for example, when one considers the New Testament on a comedic level, that the Apostles Simon and John were merciless lampoons of Simon and John, the Jewish revolt’s leaders.” (p36) To finish this chapter, Atwill examines Mark 1 and 5 in relation to Titus’ first fight on the banks of the Sea of Galilee and draws connections between the two passages.

The odd narrative of Cannibal Mary is discussed in detail in Chapter 3 by Atwill.

It is difficult to understand a lady named Mary who murders and eats her son in the style of a Passover sacrifice as anything other than a parody of the story of Jesus as given in the Gospels, which is what the play is.

It is also possible that we shall be destroyed by this starvation, even before servitude descends upon us.

Commit yourself; be my food, and be a fury to these seditious varlets, and be a by-word to the world, which is all that is now needed to complete the disasters that befall us Jews, and then some.” On page 46, it is said that Whiston translated the passage.

As Atwill points out, if this scenario were to appear in a contemporary piece of writing, it would be immediately recognized as a parody of Christianity by all readers on the first reading.

Chapman noted in her SBL seminar paper ‘A Myth for the World’, Early Christian Reception of Infanticide and Cannibalism in Josephus’ Bellum Judaicum’, that there are parallels between the ‘Cannibal Mary passage’ in Josephus and the symbolic Passover Lamb of the Gospels (2000).

His idea is that the Gospels were fundamentally written simultaneously and, as a result, must be understood as a single unit of literature.

It is necessary to separate this integrated tale into two parts.

The other is made up of the trips to the tomb that are recounted in the other three Gospels of the Bible.

The visitors to the empty tomb are led to assume that their Messiah has risen from the dead as a result of this comedy of errors.” (p129) The writers of the New Testament and the method by which the story was built are discussed in the following chapters.

As a nuanced satire, this section, along with the rest of the book, represents one of Atwill’s most groundbreaking insights in the work.

This aspect of the work is not only made understandable by his reading; it is also backed by strong linguistic and thematic connections that will be tough to reject.

Atwill also makes an intriguing case in Chapter 13 that Josephus had changed the dates of major events in his writings in order to make them coincide with the predictions in Daniel, as if providing an original and compelling look at the TF were not enough.

Several other authors have also drawn attention to the resemblance of dates and names, most recently in Jay Raskin’s article on the Maccabees and early Christianity, published in the Journal of Higher Criticism, which was published in 2011.

Without appearing triumphant, Atwill is typically able to maintain a firm posture that allows him to explain why no one else has found all of the connections he has (despite the fact that a surprising number of researchers have come onto bits of the jigsaw).

The book has a few unpleasant passages, such as a statistical study of the similarities on page 224 that reads like something out of Erich Von Daniken’s book, and the incorrect identification of a remark on page 296 as coming from Jesus rather than from John the Baptist.

In the end, I doubt that many people will be convinced by the core argument of Caesar’s Messiah, and I was not convinced myself.

Both plain readers and scholars will find something in Caesar’s Messiah to challenge them, to entertain them, or just to bring the old gray matter back to work. It is well worth the price of entry to see it.