Where did Jesus die? Where was Jesus crucified? — Place of a Skull
I’m becoming increasingly perplexed by the word Zion. Whether or whether this is the mountain on where Jesus was crucified is something I’d want to know.
- Every one of the four gospels claims that Jesus was crucified on a hill named Golgotha, sometimes known as the ″Place of the Skull.″ In some ways, the location where He died resembled a skull.
- It is stated in both John 19:20 and Hebrews 13:12 that the location of His crucifixion was outside of the city; rather, it was ″near the city.″ But where did Jesus die, and who was there?
- What was the location of Jesus’ crucifixion?
Where Did Jesus Die? — Golgotha — Place of the Skull
- When it comes to the site where Christ was crucified, the New Testament has five passages that mention it.
- Among the Scripture texts are Matthew 27.33, Mark 15:21-22, Luke 23.33, John 19:17, and Hebrews 13:12.
- And when they arrived at a location known as Golgotha, which literally translates as ″Place of the Skull…
- When Simon of Cyrene (the father of Alexander and Rufus) arrived from the countryside, they pushed him into service as the bearer of His cross, according to Matthew 27:33 (NASB).
- Later, the soldiers led him to the location known as Golgotha, which means ″Place of the Skull.″ NASB) When they arrived at the location known as The Skull, they crucified Him together with the convicts, one on each side of Him, one on the right and the other on the left.
- Luke 23:33 (NASB) As a result, they grabbed Jesus and led Him out, bearing His own cross, to a site known as the Place of the Skull, which is known in Hebrew as Golgotha, where He was executed.
So Jesus likewise suffered outside the gate in order to purify the people with His own blood (John 19:17 New International Version).13:12 (Hebrews 13:12) (NASB) According to Matthew 27:33, Jesus was taken to the cross of Golgotha.According to John 19:17, Golgotha is a Hebrew term that literally translates as ″skull.″ The Greek word kranion literally translates as ″Calvary.″ It is believed by some that the Church of the Holy Sepulcher was erected on the site of Golgotha, also known as ″the Place of the Skull.″ According to Luke 23:33, ″The Skull″ was the location where Jesus was crucified.A man called Simon of Cyrene who was traveling near by from the country was confronted and compelled to carry the cross by the soldiers while Jesus was being led to the Place of the Skull (Mark 15:21-22), according to the Bible.A route between the countryside with the city of Jerusalem was constructed, as evidenced by this.
According to Hebrews 13:12, Jesus died outside of Jerusalem.What was the location of Jesus’ death?What was the location of Jesus’ crucifixion?He died outside of the city, on a hill known as The Place of a Skull, sometimes known as Golgotha, near a route heading from the countryside.
Calvary is the name of the place.
Where Christ Was Crucified — Calvary
- Gordon’s Calvary is marked by the presence of a skull lodged in the side of a hill.
- Golgotha is supposed to be the hill on where the Crucifixion occurred.
- It is referred to as Calvary by Christians.
- In Christianity, there is a hymn called ″I Believe In A Hill Called Mount Calvary″ that some Christians like to sing.
- On the summit of this hill, according to legend, Jesus was crucified, and this is where the Church of the Holy Sepulcher has been constructed.
- On a hill known as ″The Skull,″ Jesus was crucified on a ″old rough cross.″ He gave his life there for you and me.
- He died so that our sins could be forgiven, so that we could be at peace with God, and so that we could one day spend eternity with God.
- If you are looking for God, you can find Him and enjoy eternal life if you search diligently.
- You must, however, go in quest of Him.
- When you find Him, you will be blessed with a personal connection with God as well as an abundant life.
- I’m on the lookout for God.
- What is the importance of the cross that Jesus Christ carried on the crucifixion of Calvary?
- Did Jesus’ physical body and spiritual spirit perish?
- Is there any historical information available regarding the cross?
- Is it possible that Jesus was crucified in order to fulfill an ancient prophecy?
- Is there any historical information available regarding the cross?
Is it possible that God was not present for three days?- Following the Crucifixion Why did God allow His Son to suffer and die in our place?– God Is Compassionate Is it true that Jesus ascended into heaven, both physically and spiritually?Accounts of Christ’s Resurrection – The Resurrection of Christ
Where was Jesus crucified, buried and resurrected?
- The third of April, 2008, is a Thursday.
- What location did Jesus die, be buried, and rise from the dead?
- Stan Wilson contributed to this article.
- ASSIST News Service has obtained exclusive access.
- THE CITY OF JERUSALEM, ISRAEL (ANS) – As I sit down to write this on Easter Sunday afternoon, I thought it would be appropriate to wrap up the series of stories about my tour of Israel with a visit to the two locations that are most widely believed to have been the sites of Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection: the Garden Tomb and the Tomb of the Resurrection.
- The Church of the Holy Sepulchre was our first stop in Jerusalem.
The ground on which it is built
|Inside the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is a slab which is said to be where Christ’s body was laid and wrapped for burial. Tourists are seen praying at the slab and kissing it. Also inside the church is a place identified as the place of the crucifixion as well as the remains of what may have been the tomb of Christ|
- The location on which the church is built is regarded by most Christians as Golgotha, the site of Jesus’ crucifixion.
- It also contains the remnants of a tomb, which may have been where Jesus was laid to rest.
- Since the 4th century, the church has been a popular destination for pilgrims.
- Today, it serves as the headquarters of the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, who is based in the city.
- Early Christian communities in Jerusalem appear to have staged liturgical celebrations at this place for at least three centuries, beginning with Jesus’ resurrection and continuing until the Romans conquered the city in 66 AD.
- On the location of the Holy Sepulchre, which was initially a place of reverence for the Christian community in Jerusalem, Eusebius relates how the site had been covered with soil, over which a temple dedicated to Venus had been constructed in 135 AD.
During his reign as emperor, Constantine ordered the construction of a church beside the excavated hill of the Crucifixion in 326 AD.The church, which was actually three connected churches built over the three different holy sites; The Rock of Calvary, remains of a cave identified as the burial site of Jesus, and the True Cross (said to have been the actual cross upon which Christ was crucified.) In the course of the excavations, it is thought that Constantine’s mother, St.Helena, discovered the True Cross, which was located near the tomb.She really uncovered three – the bodies of the two robbers and the body of Christ himself.When a sick man was brought to each of them to touch them in order to determine which was the one belonging to Christ, he was miraculously healed by one of them.
This is a relatively recent mythology, yet it was unknown to Eusebius, the historian and contemporary of Constantine, at the time of the Emperor’s death.In 614, a fire ravaged the church, causing significant damage.Even though the early Muslim authorities guarded the Christian sites, the doors and ceiling were destroyed during a disturbance in the year 966.The church, on the other hand, was entirely destroyed in 1009.
The foundations of the church were cut down to the underlying bedrock.The north and south walls of the cut-rock tomb were most likely shielded from further damage by rubble when the tomb was discovered.It was in 1027 that an agreement was made under which the new Caliph let Emperor Justinian to finance the reconstruction and redecoration of the Church.Till the advent of the Crusaders in 1099, control of Jerusalem, and hence of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, changed hands on a number of different occasions.The Greek Orthodox, the Armenian Apostolic, and the Roman Catholic churches are the three principal custodians of the church, who were initially selected while the Crusaders held control of Jerusalem.The three largest populations (Latins, Greeks, and Armenians) finally came to terms on a significant reconstruction plan in 1959.
The guiding premise was that only those pieces would be replaced that were unable to perform their structural role properly.Local masons were taught how to trim stone in the manner of the 11th century for the rotunda and in the style of the 12th century for the church, which were both built in the same year.The church’s tumultuous past is visible in the architecture that tourists witness today.It is a bizarre mash-up of styles, with aspects of Byzantine, medieval, Crusader, and modern architecture mixed throughout, and each controlling Christian group has embellished its shrines in their own peculiar fashion.
There are numerous ways in which the Church of the Holy Sepulchre does not live up to expectations as the holiest place in all of Christendom, and it is easy to be let down by it.However, because of its illustrious past and tremendous religious significance, a visit to the city might be extremely significant.According to a number of scholars, the identification of the Church with the actual site of Jesus’ crucifixion and burial was controversial in the nineteenth century because the Church was located within the city walls, whereas early accounts described these events taking place outside the walls of the city.General Gordon determined that a rock-cut tomb in a cultivated region beyond the walls of Jerusalem was a more plausible location for the burial of Jesus the following morning, upon his arrival in the city.
As a result, it is commonly referred to as the Garden Tomb in order to distinguish it from the Holy Sepulchre, and it continues to be a popular pilgrimage site for those (typically evangelical Protestants) who are skeptical about the authenticity of The Anastasis or who do not have permission to hold services within The Church itself.Since then, however, it has been shown that the location of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was outside the city walls during the time of Jesus’ crucifixion, contrary to popular belief.The walls of Jerusalem were finally completed by Herod Agrippa in 41-44, and it was only then that the location of the Holy Sepulchre was enclosed.
As for the Garden Tomb itself, it was discovered in 1867 and quickly recognized as the burial site of Jesus, mostly because it was located in the same region that had previously been designated as Calvary.Eventually, the Anglican Church recognized this location as the burial ground for the Lord Jesus Christ, and ″Gordon’s Tomb″ was renamed the ″Garden Tomb.″ However, despite the fact that the Church has removed its formal backing, the Garden Tomb continues to be associated with popular Protestant devotion.Why the Garden Tomb is a popular site for Protestant devotion is clear: it is clearly located outside the walls, it is next to a place that looks like the head of Christ, it is in accordance with what is imagined when reading the Gospel accounts, and it is far easier to pray and contemplate here than in the crowded Church of the Holy Sepulchre.Although there is disagreement among experts, most accept that the Garden Tomb was not the real place of Jesus’ burial.One issue with the Garden Tomb is that, based on its design, it appears to have been constructed during the late Old Testament period (9th-7th century BC).
As a result, it was not a brand-new tomb when Jesus was crucified at the time.Furthermore, during the Byzantine period (4th-6th century AD), the burial benches were chopped down to make way for rock sarcophagi, resulting in a significant disfigurement of the tomb.This obviously demonstrates that early Christians did not think that this was the location of Christ’s burial tomb.
- The property’s wardens (from the Garden Tomb Association, located in the United Kingdom) emphasize that it is the resurrection of Jesus, not the matter of locating the exact location of his burial, that is most significant.
- Regardless of whether or not it is historical, the Garden Tomb is a beautiful setting for pondering Christ’s death and burial, and it is unquestionably more in keeping with the Gospel stories than the dismal and urban setting of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.
|The Garden Tomb is one of two places identified as possible/probable sites of Christ’s crucifixion and burial. The area in front of the tomb has been identified as a grape orchard; possibly from the time of Christ. It is presently landscaped and offers a wonderful opportunity to sit, reflect and pray|
- Gordon’s Calvary is located next to the Garden Tomb, and the shape of a skull, or at the very least big eye sockets, may be seen carved into the cliffside.
- This steep cliff was utilized as a rock quarry at some point in history, maybe during the reign of Herod Agrippa the Great (37-44 AD).
- The garden tomb is about 100 yards west of the ″skull,″ in the same area as the ″skull.″ Several multilingual placards and a wooden door with the wording ″He is not here – because He has risen″ in English are used to identify the grave site.
- The entrance and windows on the tomb front were most likely built during the Byzantine or Crusader periods.
- Neither the date nor function of the deep channel running down the ground, which has been recognized as the groove for the rolling stone that was used to close the tomb, are known at this time.
- There are two rooms inside the tomb, which are next to one another.
To enter the burial room, one must turn right after entering the entryway.This design is characteristic of Iron Age tombs in the area that date from the 9th to 7th centuries.Each body bench (arcosolium) is positioned within an arch in tombs dating back to the time of Jesus, with the burial chamber beyond the vestibule in a straight line behind it.The body seats in the Garden Tomb are little more than extensions of the wall.An Anchorite cross, which was carved and subsequently painted, can be found inside the tomb.
On the left and right sides of the cross, you can clearly discern the emblems of Alpha and Omega beneath the bar of the cross.So, where precisely was Christ killed, buried, and raised from the dead?Perhaps it is appropriate for our religious beliefs that we do not have a ″precise and distinct″ spot to call home.It doesn’t seem to matter to me.
After all, Christianity is founded on the concept of ″faith.″ I hope that the tales from my tour have made the Bible come to life for you a little bit more.There is no going back, and there is no going back to how I used to read the Bible.Each time I open the door, I recall where I was and how I felt at the moment.Further information on Israel, as well as tour details, may be found at the following website: Here you will find the official website of the Israel Ministry of Tourism.They provide many ″virtual tours″ on the internet, and you may acquire detailed information as well as connections to assist you in making your travel arrangements.You could easily spend days just perusing the website in preparation for your ″vacation of a lifetime,″ as the saying goes.
|Stan Wilson is a lifetime journalist after graduating from college in 1970 with a B.A. in journalism. He worked in various positions in newspapers in Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska and Kansas prior to starting Southwest Kansas Faith and Family in 2001. Faith and Family is a monthly Christian newspaper serving Dodge City, Garden City and 18 other surrounding communities. He can be contacted by email at [email protected]|
** You may repost this article as long as you provide full credit to the author. Please share this story with a friend.
Where Was Jesus Crucified? – Golgotha ″the Place of the Skull″
- What was the location of Jesus’ crucifixion?
- The crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth is one of the most well-documented occurrences in ancient history.
- The truth has been confirmed by theologians as well as historians, among others.
- ″Even those scholars and critics who have been moved to depart from almost everything else within the historical content of Christ’s presence on earth have found it impossible to think away the factuality of Christ’s death,″ it has been stated without hyperbole: ″Even those scholars and critics who have been moved to depart from almost everything else within the historical content of Christ’s presence on earth have found it impossible to think away the factuality of Christ’s death.″ -John McIntyre, ‘The Uses of History in Theology,’ in his book of the same name.
- Bart Erhrman of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill provided an example of this type of affirmation in his affirmation letter.
Even though he was critical of the New Testament in many cases and denied the supernatural nature of Christianity, the renowned secular scholar supported this in his work, ‘The Historical Jesus: Lecture Transcript and Course Guidebook, Vol.2: The Life and Times of Jesus Christ.’ Jesus was crucified on instructions from Pontus Pilate, Roman administrator of Judea, according to one of the most known truths of history.The four Gospels all affirm that this is a watershed moment in redemptive history.It was validated by the secular authorities of the day.It was affirmed by the early church.
Millions upon millions of people believe it.But where exactly did the crucifixion take place?The answer to that question is strongly tied to God’s will as well as God’s methods of doing things.Simply said, the place of Jesus’ crucifixion is both known and mysterious at the same time.
Visit THIS LINK to download your FREE 8-Day Prayer and Scripture Guide – Praying Through Holy Week (PDF).Create your own copy of this wonderful daily devotional to use in the weeks leading up to Easter.
Where Was Jesus Crucified?
- What was the location of Jesus’ crucifixion?
- The Gospels confirm that Christ was crucified outside the city walls of Jerusalem, according to their accounts.
- Interestingly, this is something that both John the Baptist and the writer to the Hebrews affirm: ″Then many of the Jews read this title, for the site where Jesus had been crucified was close to the city; and it was inscribed in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin″ (John 19:20, NKJV).
- For this reason, Jesus likewise suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people with His own blood (Hebrews 13:12, NKJV).
- It also reveals that the crucifixion was carried out by authorities of the Roman Empire in collaboration with Jewish religious leaders, known as the Sanhedrin, according to the Bible.
- The presence of Roman military soldiers indicates the military nature of the mission as well as the significance of the execution to both people and the Roman provincial administration, which was forced to act as a result of local pressure (recommended book: Jesus: A New Vision).
One can imagine how terrifying it must have been to see the Roman execution on the cross from a long distance.″There were other ladies watching from a distance,″ we are told, ″among them were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome.″ -Matthew 15:40 The fact that we know the location of Jesus’ crucifixion is the most significant discovery.According to C.W.Wilson, ″It is apparent…
that Christ was crucified in a well-known location with a unique name……″ Because, after being ridiculed and tormented by furious bystanders as he carried his cross through the packed streets going to the execution site, Jesus of Nazareth was crucified at ″a spot named Golgotha, which is to say, the place of the skull,″ as the Bible describes it (Matthew 27:33 ESV).In the words of Wilson, Golgotha ″is the Greek transcription of the Aramaic Gulgulta, which corresponds to the Hebrew Gulgoleth.″ Kranion is the Greek word for kranion (from which the English word, cranial, is derived).Dr.Luke is the one who makes use of the Latin term calvaria.
Calvary is a well-known term in English, and its transliteration is Calvary.Actually, the correct translation into English would be ″skull or cranium″ (Carl Hensley, Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible).The Jewish Wars of Rebellion (A.D.66-73), which resulted in the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem by Titus (A.D.39-81) in A.D.70-71, probably contributed to the deviation of local landscape (Lawrence Schiffman, From Text to Tradition).
Finally, Eusibius, a well-known church historian from antiquity, traveled to Jerusalem in order to locate the location of the Lord’s crucifixion and death.It was there that the great church father and scholar traveled with Queen Helena (A.D.246-330), the Roman Empress and mother of Emperor Constantine the Great (A.D.272-337).
According to Jerome Murphy-The O’Connor’s Holy Land, the local Christians of Jerusalem guided Eusibius and Helena to a spot beyond the gates of the ancient city (the walls were expanded in the fifteenth century), a site where liturgical festivities had been performed until ″A.D.66.″ When Hadrian (A.D.36-138), in 135, constructed temples to Roman deities in the Aelia Capitolina, including Aphrodite and Jupiter, the environment underwent tremendous transformation (the new Roman name that Hadrian gave for Jerusalem).″Despite the evidence of Jerome and some late Byzantine sources, the Holy Sepulcher remains the most probable site of the Capitoline temple,″ writes Jerome Murphy-O’Connor.
And it is a rather extraordinary claim to make.The Church of the Holy Sepulcher was built to enclose both Golgotha (the site of the Crucifixion) and Joseph of Arimathea’s tomb (both the burial place and the site of the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ) in A.D.326 by Helena’s son, Constantine.
It was completed in A.D.326 and dedicated to the memory of our Lord Jesus Christ.A summary of the history and archeology of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, as well as alternate theories, was provided by Murphy-O’Connor in the Oxford Archeological Guide from the Earliest Times to 1700.He concluded that ″Is this the spot where Christ died and was buried?″ ″Yes, very likely,″ says the author.
What We Don’t Know About the Location of the Crucifixion – Where Was Jesus Crucified
- Accordingly, in response to the question above, and despite the categorical declarations of some, we must respond, ″a great deal.″ The things we don’t know are known to us, and we are confident that we do not know what we do not know.
- Take, for example, the unmistakable scriptural assertion that our Lord was crucified in Golgotha.
- Despite the fact that we know what the word Golgotha (or Calvary) means (it means ″skull″), we are unable to determine if it is referring to one of three possible origins for the name.
Golgotha Meaning: the Place of the Skull, Might Refer to the Legendary Place of Adam’s Skull
- Yes, you are correct.
- Adam’s skull was thought to have been buried at Golgotha, according to the Church Father Origen (A.D.
- 185-253), who was both a Hebrew scholar and a resident of Jerusalem at the time of Jesus’ death.
- For those who consider that Origen is a touch ″off,″ other early church leaders who held the belief that Jesus was crucified in the field of Adam’s burial may be able to refute your position.
- In this group would be the revered Athanasius (A.D.
- 296-373), Epiphanies (A.D.
312-403), and Basil of Caesarea, to name a few figures (A.D.329-379).The second interpretation of Golgotha is more rational, however it departs from the popular interpretation in the following ways:
What Do We Know about Where Jesus Was Crucified?
- What was the location of Jesus’ crucifixion?
- According to this narrative, the site of our Lord’s crucifixion served as a common ″killing ground″ for rebels and criminals who were antagonistic to Roman control.
- The result was that the region was covered with the heads of ″convicted criminals″ (Wilson, Golgotha and the Holy Sepulchre).
- Once the flesh had been removed from the skull and bones, the remains would be buried by the family members.
- Even the renowned Christian scholar and Bible translator, Jerome (A.D.
- 347-420), as well as the English historian and monk, Venerable Bede (A.D.
673-735), clung to this stance throughout their respective times.″Bunhill Fields″ is a well-known burial place in London that has been there for centuries (Alfred Light, Bunhill Fields).The term ″Bunhill″ refers to a slang pronunciation of the phrase ″Bone Hill.″ Nonconformist clergy and others who did not fall under the Church of England’s sphere of influence were buried there.Apparently, the hill where Christ was crucified was also known as ″Bunhill Fields,″ according to this second perspective of Calvary.Now.
You have probably heard someone express the third point of view.
Golgotha, the Place of the Skull, Might Refer to a Geological Formation Resembling a Skull
- Since at least the seventeenth century, this idea of the location of Golgotha has been the most widely accepted one in the world.
- As a result, some writers have described Golgotha as a bald hilltop with a rock feature that resembled a human skull.
- While we must realize that there are no allusions to this in the Bible, it is important to note that Yes, it was a prominent location that could be seen from a distance, but it was never referred to as Mount Calvary by any of the biblical writers, nor by any Greek, Jewish, or Roman witnesses.
- It appears to be a very recent Western concept (Wilson, Golgotha and the Holy Sepulchre).
- All of this, of course, may come as a shock to those who have held to one or another version of the events at Golgotha throughout their lives.
- Furthermore, the dispute serves to highlight the truth that we can only be certain of what the Bible says about some things.
And is that sufficient?
We Know All We Need to Know
- According to the Bible, our Lord Jesus Christ was crucified on a cross between two thieves, one of whom was remorseful and the other who was not.
- The Bible also informs us who was responsible for Christ’s death: a plot orchestrated by Roman rulers and Jewish religious leaders.
- To put it another way, both Gentiles and Jews were implicated in the cosmic crime of deicide (also known as ″the murder of God by Man″).
- We are aware that the cross may be seen from a considerable distance.
- We know that there were women present, including Mary the mother of Jesus, and that they were powerful.
- We are aware of the presence of the Apostle John.
We are aware that many people turned their backs on our Lord Jesus Christ during his time of greatest need.However, there is a great deal more that we do not know.It’s as if the Holy Spirit has slung a perpetual curtain over the entire area, obscuring everything.It is important to recall that the murder was so heinous that the earth trembled in horror and darkness descended upon the horrific spectacle, as if Creation itself could not stand the sight.However, we are unable to pinpoint the exact spot where Jesus Christ was crucified because of the nature of the evidence.
It is possible that the Church of the Holy Sepulcher encompasses the location of Calvary as well as the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea, where our Lord was risen from the dead, according to tradition.As a result, there are some things that we may deduce from the Bible.Furthermore, there is sufficient archaeological evidence and ancient literature to substantiate Christ’s crucifixion and to indicate a site for its occurrence.And there is a great deal that we do not understand.
It’s important to remember the warning from Deuteronomy 29:29: ″The secret things belong unto the LORD our God; but those things which are disclosed belong unto us and to our offspring forever, that we may perform all the words of this law,″ the Bible says.But we do know this: on the cross, at a site named Calvary, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ died for our sins.That is where the world’s creator, Jesus Christ, was crucified by people whom he had made.He died as a sacrifice for our sins and as a fulfillment of the Covenant of Works (which states that ″if you disobey, you shall die″).In his pure soul, Jesus bore the wrath of God, and he fulfilled all of the requirements of the Law for anyone who would accept him as their Savior (The Covenant of Grace).With nails made of iron that he produced, Jesus Christ was crucified on rough-hewn lumber from a forest he created, on a cross that he built himself.
″Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do,″ Jesus said as he gazed down on those who crucified him, spit on him, and attempted to humiliate him.″Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do,″ he said (Luke 23:34 KJV).In the life of our Lord, there is a story that is crucial to us as we proceed through our studies.When Moses and Elijah appear to Peter, James, and John during the transfiguration (Matthew 17:1-8; Mark 9:2-8; Luke 9:28-36), it is an affirmation of Jesus’ divinity and his relationship with the Father.
This is a significant theological turning point in the tale of redemption.The ″Law and the Prophets″ affirm the Person of Jesus as the One about whom they wrote; the Old Covenant yields to the New; ancient prophecies are fulfilled; Christ’s identity is fully revealed to the disciples and supernaturally confirmed; eternity touches time; heaven descends (once more) to the earth.It was, without a doubt, a magnificent spectacle.Peter desired to create three tents to serve as a memorial to the occasion (perhaps, to return to the tent markers and build a greater temple).
Peter was warned by our Lord Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration that he should not erect any kind of religious structure to commemorate the actual location of that great assembly, as Peter had desired to do.In John 4:21-23, the Lord also reminded the Samaritan woman at the well that from now on, Christians must worship God ″in spirit and in truth,″ not on this mountain nor on that mountain, as he had previously instructed them.It has nothing to do with a specific location.
It’s all about a certain individual.It is no longer about the physical—land, temples, and altars—but rather about the spiritual.It is all about the ineffable.It’s not about the signs, after all.It all comes down to the Savior.
It is possible that this is why we know enough about the place of his crucifixion, but not enough about the rest of his life.We gaze at that ancient, weathered cross with trust in order to choose where it should be placed: This cross marks the site of the ″Great Exchange,″ which took place here.For it is at this place that Jesus took upon himself the penalty for the sins of those who would come to him in repentance and faith, and it is also the place where the holiness of Christ was made available to sinners like me.
- Alternatively, as I used to teach our church’s youngsters in Confirmation Class, ″Jesus took your guilt upon himself upon the cross of Calvary.″ ″You’ve been given his ideal existence.″ This Easter and throughout our lives, the very location where Jesus was killed for you and me is the location where we come to Him in brokenness and love.
- ″Truly, this was the Son of God,″ the Roman centurion admitted, and it is at that point that we come together in faith with Mary and John (Matthew 27:54).
- That soldier was well aware.
- And you can find out as well.
- What place did Christ die on the cross?
- Christ was crucified at the intersection of God’s love and your brokenness, and he was crucified in your place.
- You may rest assured that this is true.
- Related: What Does the Bible Have to Say About the Resurrection of Jesus Christ?
What Place Did Jesus Get Crucified?- Golgotha (also known as ″the Place of the Skull″).References Chris Armstrong is a writer who lives in the United Kingdom.This is the most sacred place on earth is being divided.
- This page was last updated on April 8, 2019.
- Jesus: A New Vision (Marcus J.
- Jesus: A New Vision).
The year is 1991, and HarperSanFrancisco is publishing a book.B.D.
- Ehrman’s ″The Historical Jesus: Lecture Transcript and Course Guidebook, Vol.
- 2″ is available online.
- Chantilly’s Teaching Company is a non-profit organization (2000).
- Eusebius of Caesarea was a Roman historian.
- Onomasticon (1971) by C.
- Umhau Wolf, translated by C.
- Umhau Wolf.
- The first version was created in 330AD.
- This page was last updated on April 8, 2019.
- of the city of Antioch Saint Ignatius of Antioch to the Smyrnaeans (Roberts-Donaldson Translation),″ says the author.
The most recent modification was made in 110AD.This page was last updated on April 8, 2019.Alfred W.
- Bunhill Fields: Written in Honour and to the Memory of the Many Saints of God Whose Bodies Rest in This Old London Cemetery.
- Alfred W.
Bunhill Fields: Written in Honour and to the Memory of the Many Saints of God Whose Bodies Rest in This Old London Cemetery.CJ Farncombe & Sons, Limited was established in 1915.John McIntyre is the author of this work.
- ″The Uses of History in Theology (In Honour of A.C.
- Cheyne)″ is a paper written in honor of A.C.
- Studies in World Christianity, volume 7, number 1, April 1, 2001, pages 1–20.
This page was last updated on April 8, 2019.Jerome.The Holy Land: An Oxford Archaeological Guide from the Earliest Times to the Year 1700 is a book on archaeology in the Holy Land.Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome.
″The Location of the Capitol in Aelia Capitolina.″ Oxford University Press, 2008.Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome.″The Location of the Capitol in Aelia Capitolina.″ Revista Biblica (1946–), vol.101, no.3 (1994), pp.407–415.
This page was last updated on April 8, 2019.Grant.″Historicity of the Crucifixion.″ The Briefing, published on May 24, 2013.This page was last updated on April 8, 2019.From Text to Tradition: A History of the Second Temple and Rabbinic Judaism, edited by Lawrence H.
KTAV Publishing House, Inc.published this book in 1991.Wilson, C.W., ed., Golgotha and the Holy Sepulchre: Edited by Colonel Sir C.M.Watson.
New York: Harper & Row, 1911.In 1906, the Palestine Exploration Fund formed the Committee of the Palestine Exploration Fund.″Eusebius of Caesarea and the Onomasticon,″ by Carl Umhau, is available online.The Biblical Archaeologist, volume 27, number 3, 1964, pages 66–96.This page was last updated on April 8, 2019.
image courtesy of Unsplash/Alicia Quan
Where Is Golgotha, Where Jesus Was Crucified?
- Is it possible that the Church of the Redeemer has the answer?
- Staff of the Biblical Archaeology Society, October 26, 2021 151065 views and 20 comments What evidence is there to suggest that the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is the real site of Golgotha, where Jesus was crucified, based on the Church of the Redeemer (as depicted here)?
- What is the current location of Golgotha in Jerusalem?
- It was Golgotha, according to the New Testament, that served as the place of Jesus’ crucifixion and execution.
- In which part of Jerusalem is Golgotha located?
- According to Marcel Serr and Dieter Vieweger’s Archaeological Views column in the May/June 2016 edition of Biblical Archaeology Review, ″Golgotha: Is the Holy Sepulchre Church Authentic?″ they analyze historical and contemporary excavations into the spot where Jesus was crucified.
What is the current location of Golgotha?The actual site of Jesus’ crucifixion is a matter of controversy.Helena, emperor Constantine’s mother, recognized the location of Golgotha in the fourth century C.E., and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was erected there in the fourth century C.E.Scholars, however, began to doubt this identification as early as the nineteenth century, pointing out that the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is located within the city walls of the present-day Old City of Jerusalem.In line with Roman and Jewish traditions at the time, Golgotha would have had to be positioned outside of the city limits of Jerusalem.
The Gospels, on the other hand, appear to imply that Jesus was crucified outside of the city (Mark 15:20; Matthew 27:31ff; John 19:17ff).So, where exactly is Golgotha situated?What is the location of Golgotha?When the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the traditional location of Jesus’ crucifixion, was erected in the fourth century C.E., was it built within or outside the city walls of Jerusalem?
On the left is a representation of the present-day Old City of Jerusalem (which is tinted in gray), on the right is the suggested position of the so-called Second Wall, which would have existed during the time of Jesus.Leen Ritmeyer created the illustration.It is vital to remember that the existing Old City walls do not correspond to the walls that existed during Jesus’ time.″Efforts to find a so-called Second Wall south of the Holy Sepulchre Church that had served as the northern wall of Jerusalem in Jesus’ time (and would have moved the site of the church outside the city in Jesus’ time) proved elusive,″ write Serr and Vieweger in their Archaeological Views column.″Josephus, the knowledgeable first-century Jewish historian, does refer to such a wall (The Jewish War 5.146),″ they write.Distinguished academics Conrad Schick and Louis-Hugues Vincent were certain they had discovered the Second Wall in 1893, when a wall was discovered during the construction of the Church of the Redeemer, which is located directly south of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
As a result, for about a century, it appeared as though the problem of legitimacy had been solved: the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was built on the site of Jesus’ execution, Golgotha.
Our website, blog and email newsletter are a crucial part of Biblical Archaeology Society’s nonprofit educational mission
This costs substantial money and resources, but we don’t charge a cent to you to cover any of those expenses.
- If you’d like to contribute to making Bible History Daily, BiblicalArchaeology.org, and our daily newsletter possible, please consider making a donation.
- Even a small donation of $5 is appreciated: According to Ute Wagner-Lux of the German Protestant Institute of Archaeology in Jerusalem, who dug under the Church of the Redeemer in 1970, this wall could not have been the Second Wall.
- She concluded that this wall could not have been the Second Wall.
- In the words of Serr and Vieweger, ″this wall was just five feet thick—far too small to be used as a city wall.″ As a result, the search was restarted.
- However, everything was not lost in the end.
There are some hints from the Church of the Redeemer that the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is located outside the mysterious Second Wall, according to the findings of the excavations.You can read the full Archaeological Views column ″Golgotha: Is The Church Of The Most Holy Sepulchre Authentic?″ in the May/June 2016 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review to find out more about the evidence that leads Serr and Vieweger to believe that the Church of the Most Holy Sepulchre could be the authentic location of the Crucifixion.—————— Members of the BAS Library: Read the complete Archaeological Views column ″Golgotha: Is the Holy Sepulchre Church Authentic?″ by Marcel Serr and Dieter Vieweger in the May/June 2016 edition of Biblical Archaeology Review, titled ″Is the Holy Sepulchre Church Authentic?″ Not a member of the BAS Library yet?Become a member of the BAS Library now.
Related reading in Bible History Daily:
- The tour takes visitors through the ruins of Herod’s Jerusalem Palace, which may have served as the site of Jesus’ trial.
- The Terra Sancta Museum is a new stop on the Via Dolorosa that is open to the public.
- And Why It Really Does Make a Difference The ″Strange″ Ending of the Gospel of Mark and Why It Really Does Make a Difference What Day Did Jesus Rise From the Dead?
- During their journey to Byzantine Jerusalem, the pilgrims stop at the National Geographic Museum, where they may virtually see Jesus’ tomb.
- This Bible History Daily piece was first published on May 23, 2016, and has since been updated.
Dig deeper into biblical Archaeology with your All-Access Membership
- The universe of the Bible may be comprehended.
- Modern discoveries that give us with clues about the culture in which the ancient Israelites, and subsequently Jesus and the Apostles, lived allow us to get a better understanding of that civilization.
- The Biblical Archaeology Review serves as a guide on this interesting trip through time.
- Here is your invitation to come along with us as we learn more and more about the biblical world and its inhabitants.
- Each issue of Biblical Archaeology Review has papers that are richly illustrated and easy to read, such as the following: Discoveries from the time periods of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament are fascinating.
- The most recent research by some of the world’s most renowned archaeologists and outstanding scholars Color pictures, maps, and infographics that are both beautiful and educational BAR’s distinct divisions, such as First Person and Strata, are examples of this.
Book reviews of the most recent publications in biblical archaeology The BAS Digital Library contains the following resources: Biblical Archaeology Review has been publishing for more than 45 years.Bible Review has been online for more than two decades, presenting critical readings of biblical texts.The Archaeology Odyssey online series has been running for eight years, investigating the ancient origins of the Western civilization in a rigorous and engaging manner.The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land is a comprehensive resource on archaeology in the Holy Land.Experts from across the world deliver video lectures.
Complete online access to more than 50 well chosen Special Collections, Four highly regarded volumes were released in collaboration with the Smithsonian Institution: Aspects of Monotheism, Feminist Approaches to the Bible, The Rise of Ancient Israel, and The Search for Jesus.Aspects of Monotheism is a collection of essays on the history of monotheism.With the All-Access membership package, you can learn whatever you want about the Bible through biblical archaeology.
Where Were Jesus’ Death and Resurrection? – Conclusion
- Note: The following post is adapted from the book Mysteries of Jesus’ Life Revealed—His Birth, Death, Resurrection, and Ascensions, written by Joseph Lenard and published by Harper & Row.
- For a summary of this intriguing study, as well as a detailed chapter listing, please see the link below.
- In my topic, Where Were Jesus’ Death, Resurrection, and Ascensions, I have now examined the evidence representing eight different puzzle pieces.
- I believe that the evidence strongly supports the conclusion that Jesus was crucified and buried on the Mount of Olives, rather than at one of several more traditional sites elsewhere in and around Jerusalem.
- The Gospel of Matthew’s account of the crucifixion, as well as the writings of first-century historians and some extra-biblical sources provide the principal evidence in support of my position..
- As a bonus, having a solid understanding of the Hebrew roots of Christian faith – including a thorough understanding of Temple architecture as well as the Feasts of the Lord, among other things – greatly aided me in building my case for the location of what were arguably the most significant events in human history to take place in Jerusalem.
This presentation has examined eight distinct jigsaw pieces, and through each, I have attempted to show the flaws in orthodox thinking about the events that transpired towards the conclusion of Christ’s earthly existence.For millennia, the church has upheld the traditions surrounding the crucifixion, burial, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus without taking into account the fact that these traditions were founded on hearsay, disinformation, and sheer conjecture.Hopefully, I’ve been able to clear up some of the misunderstandings.In my quest for the truth, I’ve struggled with the way the jigsaw pieces fit together.As a result of reviewing important bits of information relating to the following, I feel the jigsaw is now complete and can be put together: A new crucifixion location, based on the account in Matthew in which the Centurion and others witness the tearing of the curtain in the Temple – something that would only have been possible from a location such as the Mount of Olives – is proposed.
* The problems associated with the traditionally-accepted locations for the crucifixion are discussed.* In accordance with Scripture, Jewish literature, and early Christian writings, the Mount of Olives is the location of the four Gospel accounts.* The correlation of the sacrifice of the Red Heifer on the Mount of Olives with the sacrificial death of the Messiah – as recorded in Scripture, Jewish literature, and early Christian writings The understanding that the official area designated for executions was east of the temple, on the Mount of Olives * The understanding that at the time of Jesus, executions were only performed outside the camp, at least 2,000 cubits from the Temple location of the Sanhedrin * The understanding that executions were only performed outside the camp, at least 2,000 cubits from the Temple location of the Sanhedrin Realizing that, according to God’s perfect plan, the cutting of the barley sheaves in the special field on the Mount of Olives during the Feast of First Fruits coincided with the resurrection of Jesus Christ, which, coincidentally, took place on the Mount of Olives * Recognizing that a Biblical pattern of movement exists, which involves the physical movement of people and events from/to Jerusalem and to/from the Mount of Olives * Recognizing that a Biblical pattern of movement exists, which involves the In this regard, it should be noted that, if the crucifixion of Christ took place on the Mount of Olives, as I believe this study has demonstrated, the Via Dolorosa (the Way of the Cross) must travel to the east from Jerusalem, across the Kidron Valley, and on to the Mount of Olives – rather than along the traditional path through Old Jerusalem.This may be difficult for some people to accept at first.
Furthermore, if my thesis is correct – and I believe it is – then the Mount of Olives will be connected with the following actions related with the final week of Jesus’ life as well as with his ultimate Second Coming: * The Triumphal Entry * The Prayer at Gethsemane * The Arrest * The Crucifixion * The Resurrection (Zechariah 14:4) I think this research has amply shown that the crucifixion, burial, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus all took place on the Mount of Olives; yet, it is reasonable to address the question: ″Where exactly did these events take place on the Mount of Olives?″ This, of course, would be dependent on the exact location of the Temple in question.As we’ve demonstrated, the position of the crucifixion in particular was dependent on the Temple being placed precisely due west of the crucifixion site, which was not the case.Almost all historians and archaeologists of today think that Herod’s Temple was built on the site of the original ″Temple Mount″ and that it was dedicated to the god Zeus.As a result, the crucifixion, burial, and resurrection places of Jesus would have been located on the southern peak of the ridge on the Mount of Olives, close to the southern summit of the ridge.A Book of Evidence: The Trials and Execution of Jesus (2013) by Nancy Kuehl asserts that there is historical evidence that the site east of the Temple on the Mount of Olives was also the location of Beth Pagi, which was located at the intersection of the path from Bethphage and the Jericho Road, as well as the site of Jesus’ trial and execution.A branch of Temple administration, Beth Pagi was the location where Jewish offenders were put to death after being sentenced by Temple officials to death.
In his book, The Temples that Jerusalem Forgot, Dr.Ernest Martin makes the argument for a distinct southern site for the temples (2000).According to Dr.Martin, the most plausible location for the site of the crucifixion would have been on the southern spur of the Mount of Olives, a few hundred yards south of the summit’s southernmost peak.
A high place for Chemosh, the hateful deity of Moab and Molech, would have been placed on the southern spur of Olivet, which is mentioned in I Kings 11:7 as the location where Solomon sinfully built a high place for him.Chemosh is a terrible god of Moab and Molech.In the Book of Enoch, the author of the Book of Enoch refers to this section of the Mount of Olives as ″…the Mount of Offense, stretching eastward from Zion over the Kedron Valley…″.
Despite the fact that Enoch is not a part of the Holy Scriptures, he is mentioned favorably in the New Testament Book of Jude.Simon the Hasmonean was alive at the time of the writing of this piece (Second Century BC).In II Kings 23:13, the southern spur of Olivet – the ″Mount of Offense″ – is referred to as the ″Hill of Corruption,″ referring to the corruption of the people of Israel.
Specifically, according to the scripture from II Kings: ″…and the high places that stood before Jerusalem, which stood on the RIGHT HAND Don the Hill of Corruption…″ This, according to Dr.Martin, is most likely the place of Jesus’ crucifixion, which is directly east of the southernmost Temple position.Dr.Martin’s theory that Herod’s Temple was built above the Gihon Spring in the old City of David will be discussed in further detail in my next series of posts, Where Was Herod’s Temple?As we will see, this is an extremely contentious legal situation.
For example, in his book, The Temples that Jerusalem Forgot, Dr.Martin makes use of a topographical map from the late 1800s to support his claim that the Jewish Temple was once located in the city of Jerusalem.In the words of Dr.
- Martin, up to the reign of Simon the Hasmonean, the borders of the city of Jerusalem were defined by a crescent-shaped ridge on the city’s southeast side.
- It was Dr.
- Martin’s proposal for the Temple’s site that it be built within this crescent ridge in the historic Mount Zion region of the old City of David.
- In his book, Secrets of Golgotha – The Lost History of Jesus’ Crucifixion (Second Edition), Dr.
- Martin presents the argument that Jesus was buried and later raised in a cave near the site of the Pater Nostra Church, which is located at the top of the southern slope of the Olivet Ridge.
- However, there are some issues with the chosen location for Jesus’ burial that I have concerns about.
- The first issue is that the Pater Nostra Church is placed quite close to the southern crest of the ridge on the Mount of Olives, which poses a significant challenge.
- Unlike Martin’s predicted crucifixion site on the southern spur of the Olivet mountain, this burial place would have been several thousand feet away from the site of the Pater Nostra Church, which is located few hundred feet away from the burial site.
According to the gospel of John, the tomb must be in close proximity to the scene of the crucifixion: ″At the location where Jesus was crucified, there was a garden, and in the garden there was a fresh tomb, in which no one had ever been placed.″ They placed Jesus in the tomb since it was the Jewish day of Preparation and because it was close by.″ (See also John 19:41–42.) In light of the fact that we know from scripture (John 19:38-40) that Jesus’ corpse was claimed by Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, the second dilemma emerges.There are no further names given.To believe that these two men could bring the body of Jesus several thousand feet up the Mount of Olives to the purported burial place at the Pater Nostra and complete this accomplishment before sundown on the day of Jesus’ crucifixion would be a stretch of the imagination.The endeavor fails to pass both the biblical (proximity burial) and the logical (contemporary burial) tests (time and distance).
- As Dr.
- Martin has postulated, the crucifixion took place on the southern spur of the Olivet hill.
- As a result, the tomb of Jesus would most likely have been in the same general region.
- For the purpose of supporting this stance, I have supplied the diagram below, which displays the course of the Bethany-Jericho road as it crosses the southern spur of the Olivet mountain.
Dr.Martin’s planned crucifixion site, in my opinion, would be more in accord with Scripture if it were to be placed in this area.It would also have been more consistent with documented reports if a crucifixion site had been located on the southern spur near this road, rather than on the northern spur far away from this road.
- Jewish visitors heading to Jerusalem for the Passover/Unleavened Bread Feasts would have been able to witness the crucifixion location and mock Jesus as he hung on the ″cross″ if they had traveled this way during their journey (Matthew 27:39, Mark 15:29, John 19:20).
- As an added bonus, this location would have been directly east of Dr.
- Martin’s proposed southern temple location, which would have been directly above the Gihon Spring and within the confines of the crescent-shaped ridge that defined the ancient City of David, which was located to Israel’s south of the traditional ″Temple Mount.″ These considerations are also depicted in the diagram.
- Shortly stated, the great majority of contemporary theologians and religious archaeologists think that the Temple of Jesus was positioned on the conventional ″Temple Mount″ during his day.
- But there is now an increasing number of experts who believe that the Temple was in fact placed 900 feet south of the southern wall of the Haram, within the ancient City of David in Jerusalem’s ″Mount Zion″ neighborhood, above where the Gihon Spring is still found today.
- This is the stance espoused by Dr.
- Martin, and it is the position that I will be delving into in greater depth in a number of subsequent posts.
- There is a sense that God has placed a veil over mankind’s eyes when it comes to the events surrounding Jesus’ death, burial, resurrection and ascension, and this is especially true in light of the most recent controversy surrounding the true location of the Jewish Temples.
- After reading these posts with me, you will understand even better why I believe it is so important to study scripture, research reliable history, and critically evaluate religious writings in an effort to ″lift the veil″ – so that we may behold the truth with our eyes wide open – in order to ″lift the veil.″ However, even as we try our best, God will disclose certain things in His own perfect timing, regardless of our efforts.
- It is important to note that in my next post, I will begin a new topical study in which I will investigate the contentious topic of ″How Did Jesus Really Die?″
Where was Jesus Crucified?
- What was the location of Jesus’ crucifixion?
- Abdullah Smith contributed to this article.
- According to the Gospels, Jesus was crucified on the day of the Passover and subsequently arose from the dead.
- However, no one observed Jesus’ resurrection, and the stone was moved, indicating that it was not a miraculous occurrence.
- Obviously, one of Jesus’ closest disciples was responsible for removing the stone (Luke 10:1).
- The majority of those who witnessed Jesus’ crucifixion were his adversaries.
The crucifixion was observed from a distance by the disciples Mary Magdalene and Mary.And there were many women there, watching from a distance, who had followed Jesus from Galilee and were ministering to him: among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedee’s children, to name a few.(Matthew 27:55-56; Mark 10:55-56; Luke 10:55-56) Scholars have concluded that the crucifixion was a private event that was only observed by a small number of individuals as a result of this verse.It’s also odd that Jesus was crucified just next to a garden and a tomb, the latter of which was at least partially owned by Joseph of Arimathea, as if by coincidence.All of this is, to put it mildly, quite handy.
Is it possible that the crucifixion itself took place in private?Perhaps this was done in order to maintain control over witnesses to what was taking place?According to Luke (23:49), the people who were observing were standing at a safe distance.Is it possible that they were kept at a distance?
Michael Baigent’s The Jesus Papers (The Jesus Papers, p.130) is a book on the life of Jesus.As recorded in the Gospels, the 12 apostles ″forsook him and fled″ in Gethsemane in Matthew 26:56; as a result, they vanished from the narrative and did not see Christ’s death on the cross.None of Jesus’ followers were convinced that he had risen from the grave (Mark 16:14, Luke 24:11).This implies that the early Christians did not think that Jesus had to die in order to atone for their sins (Ps.20:6, Matt.
16:22).If the disciples were aware that Jesus would have to rise from the dead, why didn’t they return to Jerusalem to see the event?The Gospels, on the other hand, make it plain that no one was there at Jesus’ resurrection.It was impossible for Jesus to anticipate his rejection, death, and resurrection since Judaism had never heard of a suffering, dying, and rising Messiah or son of Man, and hence had no way of foreseeing what would happen to him.
2; see also Israel Knohl, The Messiah Before Jesus, The Suffering Servant of the Dead Sea Scrolls, p.2; and others.In addition, the crucifixion did not even take place in Jerusalem, as previously stated.Revelations states that Jesus was crucified at Rome: And their lifeless corpses will lay in the street of the large city, which spiritually is known as Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
(Revelations 11:8, King James Version) Even while Christians would most likely argue that the phrase ″great city″ refers to Jerusalem, the famous Bible scholar John Gill is of the opposite opinion.And their lifeless bodies strewn throughout the streets of the enormous metropolis.The great city in this book is not Jerusalem, which was destroyed when John had this vision, and which will not be rebuilt at the time of the event it refers to; nor is it ever referred to as such, even though it is the city of the great King; however, the new Jerusalem is so designated in Revelation 21:10; but that can never be designed here; rather, the great city in this book is the city of Rome, or the Roman jurisdiction, the entire empire of the Romish antichrist, which is frequently (From an internet source) Tom Harper, a biblical scholar, has the following to say: In Revelation 11:8, there is a section that is quite perplexing, in which two ″witnesses″ are to be assassinated.
As the Bible states, ″their lifeless corpses shall lay in the street of the large city, which spiritually pneumatikos is known as Sodom and Egypt, and at the place where also our Lord was crucified.″ It must be emphasized once more that the author is plainly not interested in historical events…but rather in symbolism and metaphor, as seen by the title.(Page 212 of The Pagan Christ) The only possible solution to this conundrum is that Jesus Christ was never crucified in the first place.The following facts should be brought to light: According to Jesus, the aim of his death was not the crucifixion (Matt.9:13, 12:7, Mark 1:38, Luke 4:43, 19:10) The apostles were not convinced that Jesus had risen from the grave (Matt.28:17, Mark 16:14, Luke 24:11).
The apostles did not anticipate Jesus’ resurrection from the grave (Matt.16:22, Mark 9:30-32) Jesus never prophesied that he would be crucified (Psalms 20:6, 18:50, Matt.26:39) Mark 14:26 and Luke 22:42-43) both state that Jesus did not want to die and that he was hesitant to do so.
- God promised to preserve the Messiah (1 Chron.16:22, 2Chron.
- 6:42, Psalms 28:8) Christians have beliefs that are diametrically opposed to those found in the Bible (Proverbs 21:18) The Bible condemns the practice of human sacrifice (Deu.