Stable Where Jesus Was Born

Jesus was not born in a stable, says theologian

For a “Inn” or any other establishment where visitors are welcomed, a completely separate term, pandocheion, is used.

His family was in Bethlehem, and if he did have family there, the norms of first-century Palestine compelled him to remain with them rather than with strangers, which was the sole reason they traveled there for the census.

It’s possible that the place was already crammed with other relatives who had come before them.

There would typically be hollows in the ground filled with straw in the family living space where the animals would feed,” says the author.
This is hardly a novel way of looking at things.
Because of his suffering, he was denounced to the inquisition and admonished by them, albeit he was not really burnt, tortured, or imprisoned as would have happened to other heretics.
“In the Christmas tale, Jesus is not depressed and lonely, lying in a manger far away from us and requiring our sympathy.

If this occurred in a busy family house, the message is still intact. In his opinion, the fact that it took place in an isolated stable “only serves to demonstrate that the decline was from a respected human to a despised human.”

Was Jesus born in a stable?

Christmas nativity scenes across the world depict the birth of Christ, which may be the most famous Bible tale of all: Jesus was born in a stable because there were no rooms available at the inn when his parents arrived. Christian scholar Rev Ian Paul, on the other hand, has suggested that the entire tale of Jesus’ birth may be based on a misunderstanding of the New Testament, bringing back to life an ancient belief that Jesus was not, in fact, born in a stable. In a personal blog post, Rev Paul, a theologian and former Dean of Studies at St John’s theological college in Nottingham, apologized for “sabotaging your holiday preparations before the Christmas lights have even been turned on.” In contrast to this, Jesus was not born in a stable, and, in a weird twist of fate, the New Testament makes no mention of this possibility.” Rather than an inn, Paul claims that the Greek word kataluma, which is typically translated as “inn,” was really used to refer to a reception room in a private house — the same term is used to describe the “upper chamber” where Jesus and his followers ate the final supper, according to Paul.

To denote a “Inn” or any other location where visitors are welcomed, a completely separate term, pandocheion, is used: Paul contends that even if there had been an inn in Bethlehem at the time of Jesus’ birth, Joseph and Mary would not have taken use of it.
In that case, the kataluma where he remained would not have been an inn, but rather a guest room in the home of the family where Joseph and Mary were visiting.
“The real architecture of Palestinian dwellings (even up to the current day) makes sense of the entire scenario,” Paul says in his article.
This is not a novel interpretation.
Because of his suffering, he was denounced to the inquisition and admonished by them, though he was not really burnt, tortured, or imprisoned, as would have happened to heretics.

It was Paul himself who initially wrote on the misuse of the phrase back in 2013, and he re-posted his hypothesis this year “because I have been struck anew by how often the message of Christmas gets summed up as “Jesus was born in a stable,” both within and outside the church.” The relevance of Paul’s retelling of the event is that it undercuts the notion that the fact that Jesus was born to lowly, outcast parents was what distinguished him from other people in his day.

Jesus is not unhappy and lonely in the Christmas narrative, lying in the manger far away from us and requiring our compassion.

If this occurred in a busy family house, the message is still intact. ‘ In his opinion, the fact that it took place in an isolated stable “only serves to demonstrate that the descent took place from a respected human to a despised human.”

Was Jesus Born in a Stable, a Cave or a House?

Is it possible that Jesus was born in a stable? Is it possible that it was a cave? Alternatively, how about a house? The simple answer to this question is that we do not know. Unfortunately, we can’t be positive because the Bible does not expressly address this issue. We can, however, reason our way through this using the Bible, and we may speculate on where Jesus might have been born as well. A stable is where it is said that Jesus was born, according to tradition. That assertion is founded on the fact that Jesus was laid in a manger at the time of His birth.

Also, the following will serve as a sign unto you: you will discover the child lying in a manger clothed in swaddling cloths.

A Stable or a Cave?

A manger (also known as a phatne) was a sort of animal feed trough. As a result, nativity representations that portray a baby in a straw-filled feeding trough are largely realistic in terms of biblical interpretation (during that time feed troughs were made of stone, not wood). Due to the fact that Jesus was “laid in a manger” (Luke 2:7), it is likely that there were animals around, as depicted in traditional nativity scenes. The Bible, on the other hand, does not inform us that there were any animals there or that His birth took place in a barn.

Historical documents reveal that animals were also maintained in caves around the first century AD, according to historical archives.

A manger, a phatne, a fodder crib, or a cattle stall are the only things that are mentioned.

A House?

Other theories about Jesus’ birth include that he was born in the basement of a house, which is highly plausible and perceptive, although it is not frequently accepted. According to the Bible, Joseph journeyed to Bethlehem, the city of their forefather David, with his betrothed bride Mary in order to comply with the census mandated by Caesar Augustus, who was then in power (Luke 2:1). This would have been a significant difficulty for Mary and Joseph – physically for Mary because of her pregnancy, and financially for Joseph because they had few financial resources at the time.

As a result of this reasoning, it is possible that Joseph and Mary sought accommodation with a relative in Bethlehem.

We should also examine the fact that their journey to Bethlehem was likely to have been extremely delayed due to Mary’s condition, which was that she was almost full term pregnant.

Consequently, if they traveled to the home of a cousin, it is possible that the house had already been occupied by other relatives who had also come to comply with the census.

The Inn?

What about Luke 2:7, on the other hand? It is stated in the verse above that they went to an inn rather than a relative’s house. Luke 2:7And she gave birth to her firstborn son, wrapped him in swaddling cloths, and placed him in a manger, because there was no space for them at the inn where they were staying. The English term “inn,” which appears in Luke 2:7, is often taken as meaning paid accommodation; nevertheless, it might be referring to something different. Do you think it’s the residence of a relative?

Strong’s Dictionary defines Kataluma as follows: from G2647; prop.
(by implication) a lodging-place: –guestchamber at a hotel.
In Greek, kataluo means to loosen up (disintegrate), which means to demolish (literally or figuratively) anything; specifically, to halt for the night:–destroy, dissolve; be guest; lodge; come to naught; overturn; hurl down; to loosen up (disintegrate); to loosen up (disintegrate).
As a place of rest, accommodation, or guest quarters it is defined as follows: Neither public lodgings nor paid accommodations are mentioned in this section.
The innkeeper is an addition to the story, and he is frequently shown in nativity plays.
The suggestion of an innkeeper really adds to what is already stated in the biblical text.

The Guest Chamber?

The upper room serves as a guest chamber, while the lower level serves as a shelter for animals from the first century. The term kataluma is also used in the book of Luke. In this passage, a different word is used to translate the same phrase: 22:11 (Luke 22:11) In such case, you will inform the housekeeper that “the Master has asked thee, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall eat the Passover with my disciples?” will be spoken to him. The word “kataluma” is translated as “guest room” in this context.

This is a reference to a room on the second floor of a home.

An allusion to a guest chamber may also be found in the Gospel of Mark: 14:14 (Mark 14:14) Then, whenever he enters a home, tell the goodman of the house: “The Master asks, “Where is the guestchamber, where I shall enjoy the Passover with my disciples?” It is in the upper room, as described in these passages from Luke 22 and Mark 14, that Jesus shared His final supper with His disciples on the night before He was betrayed.

No, this was not an apartment; it was an upstairs room, a guest chamber (katalu), located in the home of an acquaintance. It was not a “inn” in the traditional sense of a place where people paid to stay or be accommodated.

When an Inn is Really an Inn

The term “inn” is also used in the parable of the Good Samaritan, which is an English word. As implied by the paragraph, this certainly denotes paid lodgings. Although it is a translation from a Greek term with an entirely different meaning, 10:34 (Luke 10:34) And went to him, bandaged up his wounds with oil and wine, and placed him on his own beast, escorting him to aninn, where he was cared for by the villagers. 10:35 (Luke 10:35) And the next morning, before he left, he took out two pennies from his pocket and gave them to the host, telling him to take care of him and that anything he spent in excess of that would be reimbursed to him when he returned.

The Greek word for “host” in verse 35, according to Strong’s Concordance, is described as “an innkeeper (warden of a caravanserai)–host.” There is clear doubt that the inn where the Good Samaritan slept in Luke 10 was a paying establishment, and the host was an innkeeper who was compensated for his services by the Good Samaritan.

If it had been a paid accommodation, why wouldn’t Luke have used the right phrase to express that it was a paid accommodation?
His works are meticulous and exacting in both concept and word choice.
Most scholars believe the Greek word “kataluma” in Luke 2:7 was intended to refer to a “guest chamber” in a residence.
Even after taking into consideration the fact that Mary and Joseph were most likely turned away from a relative’s house, the question of where they found shelter remains unanswered.

Upper Room vs Lower Level

During biblical times, the upper level of a two-story house would have served as the dining and sleeping facilities for the family. During severe weather, the bottom floor was frequently utilized as a shelter for the cattle on the property. Our knowledge of the situation is that Mary and Joseph were turned away because there was no room in the guest chamber (the top room, known in Greek as the kataluma), although it is possible that they were provided sanctuary at the lower level among the animals.

This does raise the question of why a relative would refuse to let a pregnant lady into their home.
Before she married Joseph, Mary had discovered that she was pregnant.
Because betrothal was legally binding, much like marriage, Joseph even had the authority to put Mary to death (Matthew 1:18-19) for having committed adultery, despite the fact that the relationship was not legally binding.
It was only after he made the choice to “send her away quietly” (Mat 1:19) that an angel appeared to him and revealed the news of Jesus’ pregnancy.

Because they were unaware of what had been revealed to Mary and Joseph, the family would have assumed Mary was pregnant with Joseph’s illegitimate child, as would have been the case (or another). Nobody knew she was expecting the genuine Son of God since they had no means of knowing.

Rejected by His Own

Possibly, this should be seen as the first instance of Jesus’ rejection by the people. In the same manner that Mary and Jesus were turned away, Jesus himself was turned away. Even before He was born, He was rejected by those closest to Him: ‘He came to his own, and his own did not accept him,’ says John 1:11.

Still Only A Theory

This notion of Jesus being born at a lower level of a house is both plausible and quite likely to be correct. But keep in mind that this is still simply a theory. The Bible merely mentions that they were turned down for a room in a guest chamber and that Jesus was put in a manger after being rejected by them.

40+ Days Later

It has been reported that “after the days of purification according to the law of Moses had been completed, they transported him to Jerusalem, to bring him before the Lord.” (See Luke 2:22.) It had been more than 40 days since the birth of Jesus when this occurred. According to Luke 2:21, Jesus’ circumcision would have taken place eight days after birth, while Mary’s purification would have taken 33 days (Leviticus 12). It was only after these 40+ days that they were able to travel to Jerusalem and visit the Temple.

The landowner (perhaps a relative?) may have felt sympathy for Mary, Joseph, and Jesus following the departure of the upper room occupants and offered them to relocate from the lower to the higher level.

Conclusion

I cannot emphasize enough that this hypothesis is based only on God’s Word and not on any other sources. The Bible doesn’t tell us what sort of shelter Jesus was born in, so we have to guess. The fact that, at the outset of Jesus’ life, He was turned away from an upper room because the people did not know that Mary would give birth to the Messiah is fascinating to contemplate. They had no idea who her kid was, and they were not willing to create place for Him in their lives. Even while still in the womb, Jesus was rejected by His family, and only a handful of loyal witnesses were present to witness the birth of the Christ Child.

During their time in the upper room, they were in close company, and following Judas’ departure, Jesus revealed to the faithful eleven astounding revelations and bestowed several rewards.

This hypothesis of Jesus’ birth at a lower level of a house provides answers to numerous problems while also posing a number of new questions.

God sent His son to earth, to be conceived in the womb of a young woman, to be born in humble circumstances, to live a sinless human life, and then to present Himself to the world as the sinless Lamb of God, thereby completing the work His Father had commissioned Him to do—to atone for the sins of the entire world.

Remember that the sacrifice of the cross began in the cradle, and that we would not have the Calvary Cross if it were not for the Christmas Cradle.

In Isaiah 9:6, the Bible says In fact, God loved the world so much that he gave his only born Son, in order that whomever believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life with him.

Because God did not send his Son into the world in order to condemn the world, but in order that the world could be saved through him. (See also John 3:16-17.) THE REASON FOR THE SEASON IS JESUS CHRIST! *}}}

Jesus wasn’t born in a stable—and that makes all the difference

Putting up Christmas decorations (which I always do far too early), finding a Christmas tree, preparing for carol services, and deciding where to buy your turkey are all part of the annual Christmas routine, which also includes my posting the argument that Jesus did not come into the world in a stable. I intend to continue with this annual ritual since it is, in fact, rather significant in my life. In doing so, it reveals how much we interpret Scripture through the prism of our own preconceptions, culture and traditions, as well as how difficult it may be to read well-known verses carefully and attentively, paying attention to what they truly say.

To put it another way, the belief that Jesus was lonely and dejected at his birth, cast out amongst the animals and sidelined, actually distorts the meaning of the birth narratives, in which (contrary to this tradition) Jesus and his birth are a powerfully disruptive force, bursting into ordinary life and offering the possibility of its transformation.

We find it difficult to maintain our usual routines and customs, especially when we must leave our homes in order to travel to a cold and drafty structure in order to make the once-a-year journey to a site of devotion, as so many people do, as we have done (and mostly do not return in the New Year).

So let’s get started.
It is important to note that Jesus was not given birth in a stable and that, oddly enough, the New Testament makes no mention of this possibility.
There are three factors that I would attribute as the source: conventional elaboration, grammatical and semantic difficulties, and a lack of understanding of first-century Palestinian society.
The ox recognizes its master, and the donkey recognizes its owner’s manger, but Israel does not recognize, and my people do not comprehend.
After all, isn’t that where animals are kept?
This is likely the crux of the problem.
(AV).

In addition, the word’s etymology is fairly broad in scope.

However, its application in other contexts has provided some rather conclusive evidence in the other direction.

This appears to be a reception room in a private residence.

The following pair of definitions clearly illustrates the distinction: In Greek, the term kataluma refers to “the spare or upper chamber in a private house or in a community where travelers enjoyed hospitality and for which no money was expected” (ISBE 2004).

The pandokeion consisted of a communal refectory and dormitory, with no private rooms assigned to passengers (Firebaugh 1928).

The fact that Joseph was welcomed by family members upon his return to his ancestral home, even if they were not close relatives, would have been unimaginable in the first instance.

” “Can we be of assistance to you?” Regardless of whether or not Joseph had a member of his extended family living in the hamlet, he felt obligated to seek them out out of respect.

Furthermore, the real architecture of Palestinian homes (which continues to this day) helps to make sense of the entire event.

Hollows in the ground, stocked with hay, would typically be found near the family living space, where the animals would be fed while the family was at home.

In Matthew 5.15, Jesus makes the following observation: “Neither do people light a lamp and place it beneath a bowl.” Instead, they place it on a stand, and it illuminates the entire home, illuminating everyone.

Jesus makes the following observation after curing a lady on the Sabbath (Luke 13.10–17): “Doesn’t everyone of you on the Sabbath take your cow or donkey out of the stable and lead it out to give it water?” Not surprisingly, none of Jesus’ detractors react with the words “No, I don’t handle animals on the Sabbath,” since they would have had to remove their animals from the home if they had.

It indicates that a large number of people, including Joseph and Mary, have traveled to Bethlehem, and that the family guest room is already filled, most likely due to the arrival of other relatives who arrived earlier.
The hay-filled depressions at the bottom end of the house, where the animals are fed, are the most natural places to put the newborn.
In truth, it’s difficult to be alone in such situations in the first place.
Every day and night, one cannot be alone since there is no such thing as a private room.
In the Christmas tale, Jesus is not depressed and lonely, sitting in a barn some distance away and requiring our sympathy.
This should have a significant impact on our approach to enacting and preaching on the Christmas story.
This view of the tale, which is well-informed and convincing, has been around for a very long time, even in Western academics.

So, why has the incorrect, conventional view endured for such a long period of time?

In the first place, we find it very difficult to read the story in its own cultural terms, and constantly impose our own assumptions about life.

Well, if you live in the West, especially in an urban context, away from the family of course!

I remembering noticing the place for cattle underneath the family home in houses in Switzerland.

Dick France explores this issue alongside other aspects of preaching on the infancy narratives in in his excellent chapter inWe Proclaim the Word of Life.

This is subversive stuff.

So is it worth challenging people’s assumptions?

France continues: The problem with the stable is that it distances Jesus from the rest of us.

But the message of the incarnation is that Jesus is one of us.

And who knows?

If you would like to see how it might be possible to re-write the Christmas story for all ages in a way which is faithful to this, seethis excellent example from Stephen Kuhrt.

Additional noteI am grateful toMark Goodacrefor drawing my attention to an excellent paper on this by Stephen Carlson, one of his colleagues at Duke.

Carlson presses the argument even further by arguing three points: 1.

Firstly, we have no record of any Roman census requiring people return to theirancestralhome.

We already know this is Mary’s home town, and it would be usual for the woman to travel to the man’s home town (Joseph’s Bethlehem) to complete the betrothal ceremonies.

Thekatalumawas therefore in all likelihood the extra accommodation, possibly just a single room, perhaps built on the roof of Joseph’s family’s home for the new couple.

It was small, and there was certainly no room to give birth in it!

The site includes the view we had from the roof!) If you enjoyed this, doshare iton social media (Facebook or Twitter) using the buttons on the left.

Like my pageonFacebook.

If you have valued this post, you can make a single or repeat donation through PayPal: Comments policy: Good comments that engage with the content of the post, and share in respectful debate, can add real value.

Seek first to understand, then to be understood. Make the most charitable construal of the views of others and seek to learn from their perspectives. Don’t view debate as a conflict to win; address the argument rather than tackling the person.

Was Jesus Born in a Barn, Cave, or House? · Living Theologically

Other Christmas traditions include putting up the Christmas decorations (which are usually done far too early), finding a Christmas tree, getting ready for carol services, and deciding where to get your turkey. One of my annual Christmas rituals is posting the argument that Jesus was not born in a stable. Due to the fact that it is quite important, I intend to continue with this annual tradition. In doing so, it demonstrates how much Scripture is read through the lens of our own assumptions, culture and traditions, and how difficult it can be to read well-known texts carefully and attentively, paying attention to what they actually say.

And, more specifically, the belief that Jesus was lonely and dejected, cast out among the animals, and sidelined at his birth, actually seriously distorts the meaning of the birth narratives, in which (contrary to this tradition) Jesus and his birth are a powerfully disruptive force, bursting into the middle of ordinary life and offering the possibility of its transformation.

The continuation of our normal routines and traditions is difficult, especially when we must leave our homes to travel into a cold and drafty building to make the once-yearly pilgrimage to a place of devotion, as so many people do (and mostly do not return in the New Year).
So, let’s get this party started!
It is important to note that Jesus was not born at all in a stable; in fact, the New Testament makes no mention of this possibility at all.
There are three things that I would attribute as the source: traditional elaboration, grammatical and semantic issues, and a lack of knowledge about first-century Palestinian culture.
Due to Luke’s use of the word manger to refer to animals, medieval illustrators depicted the ox and the ass as being able to recognize the baby Jesus, implying that the stable was the most natural setting for the birth of Jesus.
(Response: this is not always the case!
This is perhaps the crux of the issue.

(AV).

In addition, the word’s etymology is quite broad in scope.

However, its use in other contexts provides some fairly compelling evidence in the opposite direction.

Clearly, this is a reception area in a private residence.

This pair of definitions makes the distinction crystal clear: In Greek, the term kataluma refers to “the spare or upper chamber in a private house or in a community where tourists enjoyed hospitality without expecting money” (ISBE 2004).

The Greek words pandocheion, panokeion, and panokian are all forms of the word pandocheion, which means “pandokeion, or pandokian” (i) The term “pandokian” refers to an inn that was used to house guests in the 5th century BC.

Another point to consider is our grasp, or rather lack thereof, of the historical and social background of the narrative (you guessed it).

As Kenneth Bailey, an expert on first-century Palestinian society, points out, “Even if he has never visited the place before, he can come unexpectedly at the home of a distant relative, recount his ancestry, and immediately find himself among friends.” When Joseph introduced himself by saying, “I am Joseph, son of Jacob, son of Matthan, son of Eleazar, son of Eliud,” it is likely that the first reaction was, “You are welcome.” “Can we assist you in any way?” If Joseph had any extended family members living in the hamlet, he owed it to them to go out of his way to find them.

For the sake of David, even if he did not have relatives or acquaintances in the village, as a member of the illustrious house of David, he would be welcomed into practically any local home, for the “sake of David.” The physical architecture of Palestinian homes (which continues to this day) also helps to make sense of the entire narrative.

Hollows in the ground, stocked with hay, would normally be found near the family living space, where the animals would be fed while the family was at home.

As Jesus points out in Matthew 5.15, “nor do they light a lamp and place it under a bowl.” Instead, they place it on a stand, and it illuminates the entire home, providing illumination for everyone.

Jesus also remarks on the Sabbath in Luke’s account of Jesus curing a woman on the Sabbath (Luke 13.10–17), saying, “Don’t everyone of you on the Sabbath untie your cow or donkey from the manger and carry it out to give it water?” Not surprisingly, none of Jesus’ detractors answer with the words ‘No, I don’t handle animals on the Sabbath,’ since they would all have had to remove their animals from the premises.

As a matter of fact, one late manuscript version reads, ‘bring it out of the home and give it water.’ As a result of having ‘no room,’ what does it mean for thekataluma?
Because of this, Joseph and Mary must remain with the family, in their home’s main room, where Mary is delivered.
Although grammatically and culturally dubious, the notion that they were in an isolated stable, apart from others, alone and ostracized does not hold water.
“Anyone who has stayed with Palestinian peasants knows that their generosity is unparalleled, but the lack of solitude is unimaginably agonizing,” Bailey quips, quoting an early researcher.
To be able to think clearly, I myself have frequently sought refuge on the country side.
But rather than being isolated, he is surrounded by his family and all of their visiting relatives, right in the middle of everything and demanding our attention.
Nevertheless, there is one more question.

Among those quoted by Bailey is William Thomson, a Presbyterian missionary to Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine who wrote in 1857: “I have the impression that the birth took place in an ordinary house of some common peasant, and that the baby was laid in one of the mangers, such as are still found in the dwellings of farmers in this area.” Moreover, Bailey points out that Alfred Plummer, in his renowned International Court of Justice commentary, which was first published in the late nineteenth century, concurred with this.

So, why has the incorrect, customary perception endured for such a long period of time.
What kind of facilities do you have for keeping animals?
So, despite the fact that many people who live in rural areas have a different experience, that is where Jesus must have been.
For the second time, it is easy to underestimate how strong a grip tradition has on our interpretation of Scripture.

He describes his own personal experience with the consequences of this: Advancing this understanding is to rip the rug out from under not only many well-known carols (such as “a lowly cattle shed” and “a draughty stable with an open door”) but also a popular Christmas sermon theme: the exclusion of the Son of God from human society, who is referred to as “Jesus the refugee.” This is extremely subversive material.

Initially, when I began defending Bailey’s view, it was picked up by a Sunday newspaper and subsequently broadcast on different radio programs as a typical example of theological wrecking, on a par with the Bishop of Durham’s then-famous debunking of the reality of the resurrection.
Yes, if you believe that what people need to hear is the actual story of Scripture, rather than the tradition of a children’s play, then yes, it is appropriate.
Even his birth is placed in a unique context, in some ways as removed from everyday life as if he had been born in Caesar’s Palace itself.
He came to be what we are, and it is consistent with that theology that his birth took place in a regular, busy, warm, and loving Palestinian family, just like many other Jewish boys of his day, just like many other Jewish boys of his time.
Even strangers may begin to inquire as to how we read the Bible and comprehend it for ourselves.
This was the subject of a sermon I delivered at a Carol Service, which you can read here.
The paper was originally published in NTS in 2010, but it is now available for free on Carlson’s blog.

He examines the word kataluma in a broad sense, noting in particular that it is used to translate a wide variety of Hebrew terms for ‘places to stay’ in the Septuagint (LXX, the Greek translation of the Old Testament from Hebrew in the second century BC), which was written in the first century BC.

2.
In his opinion, two factors lead him to conclude that Bethlehem was not only Joseph’s ancestral home, but also his real family home.
Second, he contends that the term in Luke 2.39’to a place of their own, Nazareth’ does not suggest that they were returning to their home town, but rather that they had moved to this town and made it their permanent residence there.
After Jesus is born, they return together to Mary’s hometown to establish a house near her relatives.
After reading this, I remembered that I had stayed in exactly such a roof-room in 1981, which had been jerry-built on the roof of a hotel in the Old City of Jerusalem, near the Jaffa Gate, and had been a jerry-built roof-room in 1981.
(You may book a room there as well, by clicking here.) On the site, you can see the view from the roof that we had!) If you found this article useful, please consider sharing it on social media (Facebook or Twitter) using the buttons on the left.
Like my Facebook page if you like it.
If you found this post useful, you can make a one-time or recurring payment through PayPal by clicking on the following link: Policy on comments: Good comments that interact with the substance of the post and participate in a polite argument may bring significant value to the conversation.

Make the most generous interpretation of other people’s points of view and endeavor to learn from their experiences and viewpoints. Don’t think of discussion as a battle to be won; instead, focus on the issue at hand rather than the individual involved.

Born in a Barn (Stable)?

Is it possible that Jesus was born among the animals in the stable because there was no room at the inn for Joseph and Mary? In this article, Tim Chaffey of AiG–US investigates this widely believed idea. Misconception: Jesus was born in a stable among the animals because there was no room at the inn for Joseph and Mary and they had to stay with the animals. Several years ago, I was in attendance at a Christmas performance put on by members of a local congregation. The innkeeper was the major character in the play.

The innkeeper, on the other hand, was able to get them a place to stay at one of the nearby stables.

The following information is recounted in the second chapter of Luke regarding Christ’s birth: The other day, Joseph traveled from Galilee, away from the city of Nazareth, into Judea, to the city of David, which is known as Bethlehem because he was descended from the house and lineage of David, in order to be registered with Mary, his betrothed wife, who was expecting a child with him.

Her firstborn Son was born, and she cradled Him in her arms and put Him in a manger because there was no room for them at the inn where they had been staying.
(Luke 2:4–7) Many people may be surprised to learn that the Bible does not offer us with many additional information concerning the birth of Jesus Christ than what we have already learned.
According to Matthew 1:24–25, Joseph chose Mary as his wife “She was his wife, but he did not know her until after she had given birth to her firstborn Son.
We must consider a few factors when contrasting the modern recounting of the birth of Jesus with the historical accuracy of the Bible.
It is exceedingly improbable that the two would try the grueling 70-mile journey from Nazareth when she is in the latter stages of her pregnancy, as she is in the final stages of her pregnancy.
Second, there is no reference in the Bible of any innkeeper who informed them that the inn was completely booked for the night.
1 When Jesus spoke of a “guest chamber” inLuke 22:11, he was using the same Greek term.

Most individuals who are familiar with the conventional telling of the Christmas story will find this to be unconvincing at best.

35) to care for the guy.

Why didn’t Luke use the right phrase for an inn in his account of Jesus’ birth, given that he was well-versed in the language of hospitality?

There was no place for them in thekataluma, which would be a better translation of “guest chamber” in the Bible, according to the Bible.

2 Many Jewish families would have needed to come to Bethlehem during this time period, and they would have stayed with relatives who lived in the town because the census had been announced across the Roman Empire.

The result would have been that Joseph and Mary would have been confined to residing on the bottom floor of the house.

Archaeologists have discovered first-century dwellings in the Judean hill area, which they believe to be from the Roman period.

In order to protect the more fragile animals from the cold and theft, it was common practice to bring them in during the night.

The notion of keeping animals in the house is supported by the Scriptures in several ways.

He appeared to be anticipating the arrival of a wild animal outside his home.

As a result, there appears to be biblical precedence for keeping animals in the home.

Mary most likely gave birth to Jesus on the lowest floor of a busy house, where some of the animals had been brought in for the night before she gave birth.

4 Of course, we should never become so preoccupied with the little aspects of this narrative that we lose sight of the main message.

Because of this, the descendants of Adam have a chance to be spared from an eternity of being separated from their Creator.

Because God delivered His Son to our planet in the form of a human being, it is the greatest gift that could ever be offered. Let us rejoice in this fact and spread the word of God’s incredible love across the world.

Was Jesus Really Born in a Stable?

If you have already completed your nativity scene, you have most likely placed the figures in a charming, wooden stable shed. They take refuge there under a flimsy roof and rough timbers, with the animals, the shepherds, Mary and Joseph, and the three wise men who came to worship at Bethlehem. But hold on a sec. Was Jesus actually born in a barn because there was no room in the inn where his parents were staying? Understanding the birth of Jesus better comes from a thorough study of the Scriptures, as well as further knowledge of the historical and cultural contexts in which they were written.

When they learned that the infant was born in a stable, they immediately thought of a “humiliating cattle shed,” as well.

Francis was the first to set up a Christmas creche complete with a stable scene.

It was decided to create carols and retell the event, and as the stories grew in popularity, more delightful details were added: the cow and ass knelt down to adore the Lord, and a tiny shepherd lad played his drum for the Christ child.

The Upper Room

Was there “no room at the inn” as the saying goes? The Greek term kataluma, which is rendered as “inn” in the older copies of the English Bible, means “innkeeper.” This is the same word that was used to refer to the “upper room” where the Last Supper took place. It might simply refer to an upstairs room or an additional area that was utilized as a guest room, depending on the context. It’s for this reason that current translations of the Bible will read things like “There was no place for them in the guest room of the home.

It is quite doubtful that there was any form of business inn on the premises.

Instead of being confined to a drafty outbuilding by strangers, Mary and Joseph were treated much like any other large family having overnight family guests and setting up a few extra mattresses in the den or the basement.

The Stable and the Cave

During the time of Justin Martyr, who lived in the vicinity of Judea and wrote just 80 or 90 years after the death and resurrection of Jesus, it was said that Mary gave birth in a cave in Bethlehem, and that the local people in Bethlehem were aware of the location. After Justin Martyr finished writing, the Roman emperor Hadrian constructed an Adonis temple on the site of Christ’s birth in Bethlehem in order to discourage the Christian worship that was already taking place there. This was not long after Justin Martyr finished writing.

Helena, the mother of the emperor Constantine, converted to Christianity some two hundred years after that event had place.

Pilgrims may still visit the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, where they can see the cave where Jesus was born on the church’s lower level, which is still standing today.

What is the significance of the fact that Jesus was born in a cave?

He certainly wasn’t a caveman! It is true that cave dwelling people have been in the Middle East since antiquity, and the Bethlehem region is one of the regions where cave dwellings have been not just the most prevalent, but where some Palestinians continue to live in cave dwellings now.

The Cave Dwellers of Bethlehem

Shepherds’ Caverns Still Dot the Holy Land, a 1987 article, tells us about the people who live in caves near Bethlehem and how they came to be there. These Arabs live solitary, pastoral lifestyles that, with a few exceptions, have changed little since the time of Jesus, says Nissim Krispil, 39, an Israeli expert of Arab folklore, history, and traditions in the West Bank who has written a five-volume encyclopedia on the topic. A seventeen-year-old shepherd from near Bethlehem, Mohammed is interviewed by the author of the article.

The elevated section, known as amastaba, in the cavern where Mohammed and his family dwell has been constructed by humans and serves as a sleeping and dining place.
A weekly application of ammonia to the cave floor helps to disinfect it while also neutralizing the unpleasant stench left by the animals.
The stable is located at a lower elevation.
It was already full with family members when Mary and Joseph arrived at the cave residence, so they were granted space in the bottom room, which was also warm and home to the animals when they arrived.

The Real Details Fit Perfectly With the Gospel Accounts

Is it more likely that Jesus was born in a barn or a cave? “Both” is the correct answer. He was born in a cave that had formerly used as a stable. These particulars assist us in reaching additional conclusions. First and foremost, in order to comprehend the Bible, we must attempt to strip away the 2,000 years of traditions that have built as we read the Bible from the perspective of our own culture and period. The images of the Christmas narrative that we have in our brains are muddled with imagery from medieval Europe, which is not surprising.

Rather of staying at a hotel or inn, they were most likely hosted by Joseph’s family in Bethlehem, where they were welcomed with open arms.

In fact, some academics think that Bethlehem was truly Joseph’s original home, and that he moved to Nazareth as a migrant laborer to find work in the towns that Herod was constructing across Galilee.

Matthew, Mary and the little child were in a dwelling.

Finally, while the real-life facts of life in Bethlehem may not correspond to the medieval stories that provide color to the delightful Christmas cards and songs that we enjoy, these elements do correspond completely to the descriptions in the gospels.

Dwight Longenecker is a Catholic priest who serves in the state of South Carolina, among other places.

Visitdwightlongenecker.com. Do you agree with the article? Please forward this to your friends! And don’t forget to join or start the conversation on our social media platforms! You may find us on social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Parler, Instagram, MeWe, and Gab.