How Many Times Was Jesus Whipped Catholic?

The Exact Number of Wounds Suffered by Christ, As Revealed to a Medieval Saint –

1. Considering that you’ve most likely heard of the ″five wounds of Christ,″ you may assume that’s what the answer to the issue of how many wounds Christ sustained during his passion would be.
2. That, however, is incorrect.
3. The ″five wounds of Christ″ relate to the wounds he sustained directly as a result of his crucifixion: one for each hand and foot, and then the piercing of his side with a spear, which is referred to as the ″fourth wound of Christ.″ This does not represent the actual amount of wounds he received over his whole passion.
4. Remember that, in addition to the crucifixion itself, Christ was flogged, beaten, crowned with thorns, and forced to carry his own cross.
5. For the sins of the world, that’s a great deal of pain.
6. St.

1. Gertrude the Great, a remarkable Benedictine nun, mystic, and theologian who lived during the 13th century in Germany, provides us with an estimate of how many wounds Christ has sustained in all.
2. Over the course of her 46 years on this earth, she had several miraculous encounters with Christ and played an important role in the formation of devotion to Christ’s Sacred Heart.
3. When she was in one of these spiritual experiences, Christ revealed to her the entire number of wounds he got throughout his passion: 5,466.

Consequently, she repeated a specific prayer of thanksgiving to God 5,466 times each day in recognition of each pain that had been suffered for our redemption.In the aftermath, another devotion emerged in which a person would recite a prayer 15 times a day for a year, or 5 days a day for three years, both of which would result in reciting the prayer 5,475 times, which is near to the total number of wounds on the body of Jesus.

Comments

1. Considering that you’ve most likely heard of the ″five wounds of Christ,″ you may assume that’s what the answer to the issue of how many wounds Christ sustained during his passion would be.
2. That, however, is incorrect.
3. The ″five wounds of Christ″ relate to the wounds he sustained directly as a result of his crucifixion: one for each hand and foot, and then the piercing of his side with a spear, which is referred to as the ″fourth wound of Christ.″ This does not represent the actual amount of wounds he received over his whole passion.
4. Remember that, in addition to the crucifixion itself, Christ was flogged, beaten, crowned with thorns, and forced to carry his own cross.
5. For the sins of the world, that’s a great deal of pain.
6. St.

1. Gertrude the Great, a remarkable Benedictine nun, mystic, and theologian who lived during the 13th century in Germany, provides us with an estimate of how many wounds Christ has sustained in all.
2. Over the course of her 46 years on this earth, she had several miraculous encounters with Christ and played an important role in the formation of devotion to Christ’s Sacred Heart.
3. When she was in one of these spiritual experiences, Christ revealed to her the entire number of wounds he got throughout his passion: 5,466.

Consequently, she repeated a specific prayer of thanksgiving to God 5,466 times each day in recognition of each pain that had been suffered for our redemption.In the aftermath, another devotion emerged in which a person would recite a prayer 15 times a day for a year, or 5 days a day for three years, both of which would result in reciting the prayer 5,475 times, which is near to the total number of wounds on the body of Jesus.

Did the Romans give Jesus 39 lashes?

1. Answer to the question The Romans scourged Jesus just before He was crucified, just before His death (John 19:1).
2. The number of lashes that Jesus got is not specified in the Bible explicitly.
3. According to Deuteronomy 25:3, an offender should not be subjected to more than forty lashes in one session.
4. In order to prevent accidently breaching this mandate, the Jews would only inflict a criminal 39 lashes in order to avoid breaking it on purpose.
5. According to 2 Corinthians 11:24, the Apostle Paul got ″five times from the Jews the forty lashes minus one,″ a procedure that is still in effect today.
6. However, once again, the Romans were the ones who scourged Jesus, not the Jews.

1. There is no reason to suppose that the Romans would adhere to a Jewish tradition in this instance.
2. Scourging was the penalty authorized by Pontius Pilate for Jesus: he was to be flogged (Matthew 27:26), but he was not to be executed in this manner.
3. After being scourged, he was to be executed by crucifixion, according to the plan.

It’s difficult to comprehend the depth of hatred required to condemn an innocent man to such a destiny, yet it exists.Despite this, the Jewish authorities and Pilate acted in this manner, despite the fact that Jesus was innocent.Even worse, the man they chose to be flogged and crucified was none other than the Son of God himself.We hear and allude to the account of Jesus’ death so frequently that we forget to take a step back and consider how cruelly He was treated by people who were supposed to be saving us.

It was foretold in Isaiah that He would suffer: ″He was wounded for our trespasses, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him, and with his stripes we are healed″ (Isaiah 53:5).The ″stripes″ that are mentioned in this prophesy are a clear allusion to the lashes that Jesus was subjected to.No matter whether there were 39 or 40 lashes or whatever other number, the scourging was a horrendous and excruciating experience.The death of Christ, in a very genuine sense, resulted in spiritual healing for those who were willing to trust in him.A flock of sheep that has gone away from the Shepherd, with each animal going its own way, is compared to humanity by Isaiah, representing a vision of disarray and peril.

• ″However, the Lord has thrown on him the iniquity of us all,″ the Bible says (Isaiah 53:6).
• In His human form, Jesus Christ possessed the qualities of complete purity, knowledge, and creative power, all of which were present in His divine nature.
• In order to safeguard His sheep, the faultless Shepherd opted to endure an unfair and horrible death rather than risking his life.
• This was also foretold by Jesus in the Bible.

″I am the good shepherd,″ He declared just before being arrested.The good shepherd is willing to lay down his life for his flock….I am the good shepherd, and I am here to help you….I am familiar with them, and they are familiar with me, just as the Father knows me and I know the Father; and I lay down my life for them….To demonstrate his love for me, the Father has allowed me to lay down my life so that I may pick it up again.

No one can take it away from me, but I choose to put it down of my own free will.I have the authority to put it down and I also have the authority to pick it up and put it down again.John 10:11, 15, 17, and 18 state that ″I have received this charge from my Father.″ Jesus made the decision to bear our punishment.The Father made the decision to nail Jesus on the cross.They worked together to save everyone who would believe and to demonstrate through Jesus’ awful wounds both the seriousness of our sin and the depth of His love for us.

• Return to the previous page: Questions regarding Jesus Christ Is it true that the Romans whipped Jesus 39 times?

Subscribe to the

Question of the Week

1. Answering the question The Romans scourged Jesus just before He was crucified, just before He died (John 19:1).
2. How many lashes Jesus received is not specified in the Bible explicitly.
3. A offender shall not be beaten more than forty times, according to Deuteronomy 25:3.
4. The Jews would only inflict a criminal 39 lashes in order to eliminate the possibility of unwittingly breaching this law.
5. According to 2 Corinthians 11:24, the Apostle Paul got ″five times from the Jews the forty lashes minus one,″ a punishment that is still in use today.
6. However, once again, the Romans, not the Jews, were the ones who scourged Christ.

1. There is no reason to suppose that the Romans would adhere to a Jewish custom in this situation.
2. Scaurging was the punishment decreed by Pontius Pilate for Jesus: he was to be flogged (Matthew 27:26), but he was not to be executed in this manner.
3. He was to die by crucifixion after being scourged, and this was to be his final punishment.

In order to condemn an innocent man to such a destiny, one must first comprehend the depths of hate that exist.But while knowing Jesus was innocent, the Jewish authorities and Pilate proceeded to do just this.Even worse, the man they chose to be flogged and crucified was none other than the Son of God himself!As Christians, we read and allude to the account of Jesus’ death so frequently that it is easy to lose sight of the fact that people whom He came to redeem treated Him with such malign disregard.

The suffering He underwent was predicted by the prophet Isaiah: ″He was wounded for our trespasses, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him, and by his stripes we are healed″ (Isaiah 53:5).It should be noted that the ″stripes″ mentioned in this prophesy are a clear allusion to the lashes Jesus endured on the cross.This torture was horrific and excruciating, regardless of whether there were 39 lashes or 40 or some other amount.The death of Christ, in a very genuine sense, resulted in spiritual healing for those who were willing to accept it.A flock of sheep that has gone away from the Shepherd, with each animal going its own way, is compared to humanity by Isaiah, representing a vision of disarray and peril in the world.

• The iniquity of all of us, however, has been placed on him by God (Isaiah 53:6).
• In His human form, Jesus Christ possessed the qualities of complete purity, knowledge, and creative power, all of which were manifested in one person.
• In order to preserve His sheep, the perfect Shepherd opted to endure an unjust and painful death.
• Similarly, Jesus foretold this event.

″I am the excellent shepherd,″ He declared just before His arrest.He who is a good shepherd is willing to lay down his life for his flock….It is I, the good shepherd, who will lead you safely home….I am familiar with them, and they are familiar with me, just as the Father knows me and I know the Father; and I lay down my life for the sheep…Since of this, the Father loves me, because I lay down my life in order to be able to pick it back up.

I don’t give it up on my own initiative; no one takes it away.I have the authority to put it down and I also have the authority to pick it up and put it back down again.″ In John 10:11, 15, 17, and 18, Jesus says, ″I have received this command from my Father.″ Our penalty was accepted by Jesus in exchange for his own.The Father made the decision to nail Jesus on the cross….They collaborated to save everyone who would believe and to demonstrate through Jesus’ awful wounds both the seriousness of our sin and the depth of His love for anyone who would believe.back to the previous page: Questions regarding Jesus Christ Were Jesus’ 39 lashes administered by the Romans?

How many times is Jesus whipped?

Every Easter, we are reminded that Jesus was whipped/flogged/scourged 39 times before being crucified; that the maximum number of strokes allowed was 40; and that they would stop at 39 just in case they miscounted one and went over the limit, in which case the flogger could be punished even with being flogged himself for breaking the rules.

How many stripes was Jesus whipped?

They were lashed with a cat’s nine tails as punishment (a whip with nine lashings embedded with bits of metal or bone). According to an ancient Roman rule or legend, forty lashes constituted a death sentence.

What time was Jesus crucified in the Bible?

According to Mark’s Gospel, Christ suffered the agony of crucifixion from the third hour (between around 9 a.m. and noon) until his death at the ninth hour, which corresponds to approximately 3 p.m., according to the Hebrew calendar.

What year did Jesus die Catholic?

Based on these approaches, the majority of experts believe that Jesus was born between 6 and 4 BC, and that his teaching began about AD 27–29 and lasted between one and three years. They estimate that Jesus’ death took place between AD 30 and AD 36, depending on the source.

Will 100 lashes kill you?

In most cases, sentences of a hundred lashes would result in the death penalty. Whipping was employed as a form of punishment for serfs in Russia.

What did Jesus say on the cross?

To put it another way, he was saying, ″My God, my God, why have you left me?″ And at the ninth hour, Jesus cried out in a loud voice, ″Eloi Eloi lama sabachthani?″ (Lord, have mercy on me, O Lord, have mercy on me).Essentially, it means, ″My God, my God, why hast thou abandoned me?″ This is the only quotation from the Bible that appears in more than one Gospel, and it is taken from Psalm 22:1 (NIV) (or probably Psalm 42:9).

Who helped Jesus carry his cross?

Simon of Cyrene

What happened to the soldier that stabbed Jesus?

The ″Letter of Herod to Pilate″ from the sixth or seventh century claims that Longinus suffered for having pierced Jesus’ side, and that he was sentenced to be imprisoned in a cave where a lion came every night and mauled him until dawn, after which his body healed back to normal, in a pattern that would later be repeated.

How heavy is the cross?

The weight of a whole cross would be much over 135 kg (300 lb), although the weight of the crossbeam would be considerably less, at around 45 kg (100 lb).

What day is Jesus birthday?

December 25

Why did Jesus have to die to save us?

They believed that Jesus’ death was a necessary element of God’s plan to rescue humanity. The death and resurrection of this one man is at the very center of the Christian faith, and his story is told throughout the Bible. People’s shattered connection with God is repaired, according to Christians, as a result of Jesus’ death on the cross. The Atonement is the term used to describe this.

How old was Jesus when he was crucified?

The majority of experts believe Jesus was crucified between 30 and 33 AD, which corresponds to 1985 to 1988. Given that we may infer Jesus was around 30 years old when he was baptized and began his ministry, we can safely presume he was well into his 30s when he was killed.

What was Jesus height?

about 5 foot 5 inches

When was God born What year?

He was born between 6 and 4 BC, according to some researchers, who believe this is based in part on the biblical account of Herod the Great.

What is God’s age?

The biblical account of Herod the Great may have influenced certain academics’ beliefs that he was born between 6 B.C. and 4 B.C.

Did Jesus use a cat of nine tails?

Cat-O-Nine-Tails. This type of whip was employed by the Romans. It was almost certainly the type of scourge that was used on Jesus during his scourging.

How many stripes did Jesus receive?

Cat-O-Nine-Tails. This type of whip was popular among the Romans. With a high degree of certainty, it was the type of scourge that Jesus received.

What kind of whip was Jesus scourged with?

Before Christ was brought to the cross, the Roman soldiers whipped Him with this lead-tipped whip, known as a flagrum or sometimes a flagellum, to prepare him for death.

How many times was Jesus whipped on his back?

Some claim that the exact amount is unknown. According to this website, Jesus was probably scourged 39 times. 2 Corinthians 11:24 describes St. Paul getting ″forty lashes less one″ as a result of his actions. Whipping a person 39 times was considered ordinary practice at the time of the NT.

Who wiped Jesus face?

Veronica, (flourished 1st century ce, Jerusalem; feast day July 12), renowned legendary woman who, moved by the sight of Christ carrying his cross to Golgotha, gave him her kerchief to wipe his brow, after which he returned it to her with the image of his face imprinted on it. Veronica is commemorated on the feast day of St. John the Evangelist on July 12.

What did Jesus say on the cross?

″Father, pardon them, for they are completely unaware of what they are doing.″ Then Jesus says to one of the two thieves crucified next to him, ″Truly, I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.″ ″Father, into your hands I submit my spirit,″ he says to the other of the two thieves. (Finally, some words)

Was Jesus’s heart pierced?

The fact that Jesus was already dead when they arrived meant that they did not have to break His legs (John 19:33). The soldiers wounded His side, rather than His neck, to ensure that He was no longer alive (John 19:34). It is said that ″blood and water flowed forth″ (John 19:34), alluding to the watery fluid surrounding the heart and lungs, as a result of this action.

How old was Jesus when he was crucified?

The majority of experts believe Jesus was crucified between 30 and 33 AD, which corresponds to 1985 to 1988. Given that we may infer Jesus was around 30 years old when he was baptized and began his ministry, we can safely presume he was well into his 30s when he was killed.

Why did they pierce Jesus side?

It is believed that the Lance of Longinus was used to puncture Jesus’ body in order to confirm that he had died. The last wound occurred in the side of Jesus’ chest, according to the New Testament. As recorded in the Gospel of John, both blood and water gushed forth from one wound (John 19:34).

Who was the person that was chosen to be freed instead of Jesus?

Last but not least, a piercing wound was made in the side of Jesus’ chest by the Lance of Longinus, which, according to the New Testament, was done to ensure that he was dead. According to the Gospel of John, blood and water gushed forth from the cut on his side (John 19:34).

What did they hit Jesus with?

When Jesus was brought before Pilate, his fault was that he claimed to be the King of the Jews. As a result, the Roman soldiers mocked Jesus by dressing him in a red robe, which was a reference to this claim. They crowned him with thorns and hung him from a cross. They put a stick in his hand and then whacked him with it to knock him unconscious.

Why does Mary Clean Jesus Blood?

Mary cleans the Blood of Christ from her hands. According to tradition, it was the responsibility of Jewish priests to wipe away the blood of temple sacrifices. A great deal of sacrifice was taking place in the temple, and it was believed that you could smell Jerusalem before you could see it due to the large number of sacrifices being carried out there.

How many lashes can kill you?

In most cases, sentences of a hundred lashes would result in the death penalty. Whipping was employed as a form of punishment for serfs in Russia.

How long did Jesus walk with the cross?

Nonetheless, according to the Gospels, all of the walking between Jesus’ arrest and his Crucifixion might have taken between one and one and a half and hour.

How many lashes did slaves get?

After he was apprehended, he was subjected to 107 lashes. After receiving 200 lashes, Moses Roper’s punishment was only brought to an end when the master’s wife appealed with the authorities that his life be spared.

How many times was Jesus whipped?

2 Corinthians 11:24 New International Version – Five times I received the forty lashes minus one from the Jews.KJV – I received fortysave one from the Jews, five times in all.ASV – I received forty’stripes’ from the Jews five times, with the exception of one.When Jesus was beaten, it was done in order to prevent him from dying.If he died while the soldiers were beating him, they would be put to death too.The second chapter of Corinthians was written by Paul, therefore Patty’s response is really referring to the incorrect author.

• Paul was defeated 39 times, five times in a row, on five consecutive occasions.
• Jesus was scourged only once during his life.
• Although the Bible doesn’t specify how many times he was scourged, it does state that he was scourged.
• Messiah was beaten by Roman ″lictors″ in the wilderness.
• In Pilate’s presence, Jesus / Yeshua declared Himself to be the King of the Jews, and Pilate’s bodyguards were present to hear Him / Yeshua declare Himself to be the King of the Jews.

In spite of the fact that he was not a Roman citizen, it was legitimate for Pilate to publicly flog any accused person in order to obtain a confession.Messiah, on the other hand, was without sin, and thus He stayed silent.This infuriated the lictors, who despised Jews and were angry that one of their own had dared to question their own power and pride.They were on the verge of killing Him because He didn’t say anything.A typical situation was that two lictors addressed the accused, who was bound so that his arms were wrapped around a big rock; one had a whip (flagrum) with iron or bone connected on one side, while the other had an iron bar on the other side.

• There were no restrictions on Romans, and individuals did occasionally die as a result of being flogged in this fashion.
• The bar caused severe bruising, which the flagrum ripped open with its teeth.
• To represent the affliction coming from both sides of Reality: Man’s wrath as well as God’s, matza is white (sinless) and pierced with nails and thorns and stripes (flogging); it is burned on both sides (bruises) to represent the affliction coming from both sides of Reality: Man’s wrath as well as God’s.
• According to Jewish law, a maximum of 40 lashes might be administered.
• If the guy who was whipped died after the 40, the person who whipped him may be held guilty of manslaughter because punishment, not execution, was the intended result.
• As a result, wisdom won the day, and 39 lashes became the standard.

The Jewish whip was composed of three leather straps from three distinct types of cowhide, and it was used to administer a total of 39 stripes with 13 hits to the skin.This is according to Edersheim, a Messianic (Christian) Jewish author who lived in the late nineteenth century.Learn more about Jewish culture and practice by downloading free e-books from the following websites.

Did Jesus receive thirty-nine (39) lashes from the Romans?

During the weeks leading up to His crucifixion, the Romans whipped and beat Jesus (Matthew 27:24–31; John 19:1), and He died as a result.However, because it is not written expressly in the Bible, we are unable to determine how many lashes He got with certainty.It is really Jewish, not Roman, in origin, that the notion of giving someone no more than thirty-nine lashes is used.The Israelites were instructed in Deuteronomy 25:3 that a criminal should receive a maximum of forty lashes as punishment, and ″not more,″ lest ″if one should go on to beat him with more stripes than these, your brother be degraded in your sight,″ if they went on to beat him with more stripes than these.This prompted the Jews to devise a way of administering no more than thirty-nine lashes to a criminal in order to avoid the possibility of violating the commandment in question.We know that delivering thirty-nine lashes was still a prevalent practice among the Jews at the period of the New Testament because the apostle Paul describes being given thirty-nine lashes by the Jews on many occasions during his ministry.

• ″Five times I was subjected to the forty lashes minus one″ by the Jews, he recounts in his autobiography (2 Corinthians 11:24).
• As a result, when Jesus was executed by the Romans, there is no reason to suppose that the Romans would adhere to Jewish disciplinary traditions just because Jesus was Jewish.
• Despite the fact that the Jewish authorities and Pilate were aware that Jesus was an innocent man, they consented to put Him to death.
• Pontius Pilate ordered that Jesus be flogged, although he did not specify the amount of lashes to be administered.
• We do know that Jesus was not going to be killed by the beatings He experienced since His final death was going to be via crucifixion, which we will discuss later.

As a result, the scourging served as a prelude to the crucifixion.It was not intended to murder Jesus, but rather to torment Him, according to tradition.Jesus came to the planet with a specific goal in mind: to bring redemption to the entire world.In the crucifixion and agony of Jesus, ″the LORD has put on him the guilt of us all,″ says the Bible (Isaiah 53:6; see also John 14:6; Titus 2:11).″Jesus is the propitiation for our sins,″ according to First John 2:2, and ″not only for our sins but also for the sins of the whole world,″ according to Second John 2:2.

• When Jesus died voluntarily, it was so that we may be rescued (John 10:11, 15, 17–18).
• The sacrifice of Jesus on the cross atones for our sins, and we give thanks to God for His kindness and mercy.
• ″For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whomever believes in him may not perish but have eternal life″ (John 3:16).
• (John 3:16).
• Truths that are related: What transpired in the final hours before Jesus’ death is unknown.
• What was the point of Jesus having to suffer so much?

What is the root cause of Jesus’ suffering and death?Who has responsibility for the killing of Jesus Christ?Is it more necessary to remember Jesus’ death than to remember His resurrection?What is the best way for me to embrace Jesus as my personal savior?Return to the page: The Truth About Jesus Christ.

How many lashes did Christ receive, and what was the reason for t.

I realize this question is rather ancient, but the issue itself is also quite old, thus it is timeless.In an effort not to repeat what has already been said, there are just a number of distinguishing factors to examine in order to determine the correct response.First and foremost, the Mosaic Law, which was established via Moses, stipulated that 40 lashes were the maximum punishment, provided the crime merited such a punishment at all.Less was almost probably possible, but only at the judge’s discretion and only on the basis of the seriousness of the offence.Only 40 could be used, although the reason given was that doing so would publicly humiliate and degrade the individual, not that it would kill them, which the whips used could in no way accomplish.This legislation was in existence from around 1400 B.C.

• to the present.
• The Romans, on the other hand, had something very different.
• The whip they employed for scourging punishment was a flagellum whip (which was akin to the British cat-o’-nine-tails) (called verberatio).
• With this whip, ball bearings were employed in conjunction with shards to contact the surface first with the ball, generating an immediate swell, followed by the barb/shard, which shredded the flesh.
• A number of cases, arteries were exposed and the skin was hanging loose.

It was intended to be horribly nasty and demeaning in every way.Its purpose was to bring someone to the verge of death, if possible (but often would kill the offender as there was no definitiveof lashes).They created the 40-1 merely because they believed it was implausible that anyone would live to be 40 or older – period.However, it was occasionally used as an outright manner of imposing a death sentence.Two completely distinct approaches and objectives.

• The Romans, much alone the flagellum that was utilized, did not even exist at the time of the giving of the Mosaic Law.
• Furthermore, the Romans used the crucifixion as yet another extremely terrible tool in their arsenal.
• Because they were so vicious, neither of them could be convicted to a death penalty by a Roman court of law.
• The fact that Jesus was under Roman control, having been turned up by the Jews, meant that the Mosaic Law was not enforced.
• Unfortunately for Jesus, He was subjected to two separate penalties at the same time.
• As far as we know, no one has ever been sentenced to both verberatio and crucifixion at the same time.

Pilate just scourged Jesus in order to placate the Jews who wanted to assassinate Jesus.He didn’t think Jesus was guilty of anything, and he was right.To try to please them and subsequently release Jesus, he scourged Him in an attempt to placate them.Since a result, it is likely that he did not even receive 39, or at the very least only if the lictor believed it would not kill Him, as that was not the intention.It is important to note that Pilate did not believe Jesus merited any punishment during the entire process.

The Jews, on the other hand, erupted when Pilate brought Jesus out after the scourging, but humiliated him as the centurions would frequently do (in this case, by dressing him up like a king).To prevent a riot and the realization that he was going nowhere, Pilate grudgingly consented to have Him crucified as well, claiming that the blood of Jesus would be on their own heads (the Jews).I hope this has been of assistance.Bible is one of the sources (Deuteronomy 25:1-3, John 18-19, Mark 15, Matthew 27) There are reams of history about the laws and administration of the Romans.MrNobody97’s response was last updated on February 20, 2017.

By his stripes, you are healed

Isaiah 53:5 is the key verse.″But He was wounded for our iniquities, He was bruised for our trespasses; the chastisement for our peace was laid on Him, and it is by His stripes that we have been healed.″ (NKJV) Not divine cure, but divine health is the ultimate goal of God’s design for mankind.Divine health is your inheritance as a follower of Jesus Christ.Resist the temptation to live a life of disease or any other sort of weakness, for in Christ, there is no sickness at all.3 In the book of John, verses 2 and 3, the author says, ″It is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book of John, and it is written in the book The following: ″Dear friend, I wish that you may flourish in every manner and that you will have physical health in the same way as you are spiritually blessed″ (Holman Christian Standard Bible Version).Do you think it’s feasible to have heavenly health while on the planet?

• Yes, this is due to the fact that the ″Zoe″ exists inside a child of God.
• ″Zoe″ is an abbreviation for ″God’s way of life.″ When we were reborn, we were given divine life – the type of life that only God can provide – which now resides inside us.
• The resurrection power that resurrected Jesus from the dead is represented by the divine life that dwells in us.
• ″Zoe″ was transferred into our souls, and our bodies were immunized against illnesses and diseases as a result of this transference.
• As a result, it follows that no illness can endure in the presence of the divine life that resides inside us.

In Romans 8:11, the Bible says As a result, if you are living in the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead, he who resurrected Christ from the grave will also give life to your mortal bodies as a result of his Spirit residing within you.We may thus experience divine health since the power of resurrection is within us, and this is a good thing!Furthermore, God had promised miraculous healing in the event that any portion of our bodies became ill.According to the Bible, we are healed because of His stripes (Isaiah 53:5).Using the past tense, the phrases ″we are healed″ indicate that our healing was completely achieved on the cross by Christ 2,000 years ago.

• As a result, we are not praying for Christ to heal us, but rather for healing to come to us, which Christ has already secured for us; we are not praying for victory, but rather praying from victory to victory; and we are not praying for Christ to save us, but rather for Christ to save us from ourselves.
• You must live your life with the idea that God has already cured your illness, whatever it could have been called, and all that is left is for you to declare your health over that illness.
• The cost of your recovery was entirely covered by Jesus Christ’s death on the cross..
• You don’t have to pay for a thing more than once.
• ″By His Stripes We Are Healed″ proclaims that Christ did not only come to redeem us from sin, but He also came to restore us to wholeness and health.
• Jesus was flogged 39 times with a ″Roman Flagrum,″ which was one of the various torture implements used by Roman soldiers to inflict pain on their victims (2 Corinthians 11:24).

The Roman flagrum is a weapon with jagged bones and irons on it that rend the flesh from the victim’s body every time they are struck.Jesus was subjected to some of the most famous tortures of His day.It was the Roman flagrum that was used to flog Jesus 39 times that left bodily marks/stripes on Him.Each of the 39 strokes took care of a different illness, and the 39 strokes took care of all of our illnesses and ailments together.The Bible expresses this truth in the following words: ″By His stripes we are healed.″ Among the illnesses and diseases treated by Jesus’ stripes were cancer, HIV, stroke, high blood pressure, and a slew of other ailments.

The fact that Jesus took away our illnesses and diseases and placed them on Himself gives us confidence that we have been cured.In the words of the Bible, ″Surely our diseases have been carried, and our pains have been carried by him″ (Isaiah 53:4).What ever condition or disease you may be suffering from, in the name of Jesus Christ, AMEN, I declare that you are healed right now.The Nugget for Today: The stripes of Jesus were a panacea for all illnesses and ailments.Prayer: Please accept your healing today, in the name of Jesus, Amen.

Prayer lines are available at [email protected] is the email address.Evangelist Chidi Okoroafor, General Superintendent of the Assemblies of God in Nigeria

Flagellation of Christ – Wikipedia

The Flagellation of Christ as shown by Rubens This scene from the Passion of Christ, also known as Christ at the Column or Christ being Scourged at the Column, is one of the most commonly shown in Christian art, whether as part of a cycle depicting the Passion or as part of a wider theme depicting Christ’s life as a whole.There are four contemporary alternate Stations of the Cross, and it is a Sorrowful Mystery of the Rosary, making it the fourth station of the modern alternate Stations of the Cross.The Arma Christi includes components such as the column to which Christ is traditionally bound, as well as ropes, scourges, whips, and birches.In Rome, the Basilica di Santa Prassede claims to be the location of the original column.The theme is also shown in individual paintings from the 15th century, rather than as part of a cycle of Passion scenes.At the history of art, the most debated single piece is the mysterious treatment on a tiny panel in Urbino by Piero della Francesca (1455–60), which has baffled generations of art historians for its specific meaning.

• A parallel development was the development of Christ at the Column or Christ at the Stake, which was a depiction of Christ alone chained to a column or stake.
• This was very popular in Baroque sculpture, and it was also associated with the topic of Christ in the Dungeon, which was not contained in the canonical Gospels.
• It is sometimes difficult to discern between the two, as well as between Christ at the Column and a Flagellation….
• The Church of the Flagellation, which stands on the alleged location of the Crucifixion in Jerusalem, was restored in 1839 and then again in 1929.

Gospels

During the time of the Romans, flagellation was the most common preliminary to crucifixion and is recorded in three of the four canonical Gospels: John 19:1, Mark 15:15, and Matthew 27:26.It was also the most common prelude to crucifixion under Roman law.Neither of the other two stories is any more comprehensive than John’s ″Then Pilate seized Jesus and had him flogged,″ which concludes the story (NIV).According to Luke, the High Priest’s guards beat and mocked Jesus in Luke 22:63-65, which is a parallel incident.During the Crucifixion, this scene takes place before to the Mocking of Christ and the Crowning with Thorns, which, according to the Gospels, took place at the same time or soon after.To be clear, these were not part of the typical Roman court procedure, in contrast to the flogging.

In art

It occurs in Western art for the first time in the 9th century.As a result, it is nearly never encountered in Byzantine art and continues to be extremely rare in Eastern Orthodox art at any time in history.It was originally discovered in illuminated manuscripts and little ivories, although there are surviving massive wall-paintings from approximately 1000 that date back to Italy.From the beginning, there are usually three figures: Christ, two employees of Pontius Pilate who lash him, and the audience.From the 12th century onward, it has been conventional that Christ wears a loincloth (perizoma) and faces out towards the audience in his portrayals.Christ may be nude or dressed in a long robe, facing out or viewed from behind in early depictions.

• In most depictions of Christ, his face is visible, which presents painters with the ″technical issue″ of depicting him suffering the strokes on his back – which is the customary location – but yet allowing his face to be seen.
• He looks to be receiving the blows on the front of his body on a regular basis.
• On occasion, Pontius Pilate is depicted watching the scene, and his wife’s servant may approach him with her message.
• In the later Middle Ages, most likely as a result of the influence of Passion plays, the number of men beating Christ may be three or four, who are increasingly caricatured in the North as grotesque figures dressed in the uniforms of contemporary mercenaries.
• Occasionally, another person, who may or may not be Herod, appears.

The flagellation was carried out by people working for Pontius Pilate, however the floggers may occasionally wear Jewish caps to distinguish themselves from their victims.As dictated by the Maestà of Duccio, the scenario may take place in public, in front of an audience of Jewish people, or in private.In Italy, the Franciscans, who encouraged self-flagellation as a way of identifying with Christ’s suffering, are thought to be responsible for a number of enormous processional crosses in which the Flagellation is depicted on the back of the cross and the Crucifixion is depicted on the front.Flagellants, who were able to view Christ’s suffering in front of them, were most likely occasionally accompanying them in processions.

In film

Christ being flogged has been represented on screen in contemporary times by filmmakers. It appears in Mel Gibson’s 2004 film The Passion of the Christ and is a pivotal moment. Alexandre imagines himself as a Roman soldier whipping Jesus in Stanley Kubrick’s film A Clockwork Orange.

Notable examples

• Single works include: The Flagellation of Christ (Piero della Francesca) 1455–60
• Christ at the Column (Antonello da Messina) ca. 1475
• The Flagellation of Christ (Caravaggio) 1607
• Christ at the Column (Caravaggio) 1607
• The Flagellation of Christ (Caravaggio) 1607
• The Flagellation of Christ (Caravaggio) 1607
• The Flagellation of Christ (Caravaggio

In cycles:
• Maestà (Duccio)
• Scrovegni Chapel by Giotto

Gallery of art

• Christ at the Column, Italian sculpture, 1817

See also

• Life of Jesus in the New Testament

References

1. Page 626 of the Encyclopedia Britannica’s The Encyclopedia of Visual Art, Volume 4 by Lawrence Gowing
2. page 70 of the Old Master Paintings and Drawings by Roy Bolton 2009 ISBN 1-907200-01-0
3. Iconography of Christian Art: The Passion of Christ by Gertrud Schiller 1972 ASIN: B000KGWGH4 pages 66–68
4. Schiller, 69
5. Schiller, 66–67
6. Hall, James, The Dictionary of Subjects and (2004-02-04). ″The Passion of the Christ,″ as the title suggests. Admissions are accepted at all hours of the day and night. Poop Shoot for a Movie The original version of this article was published on September 8, 2012. On November 6, 2009, I was able to obtain information.

G. Schiller’s et al (1972). In Lund Humphries’ Iconography of Christian Art, Vol. II, pp. 66–69, figures 225–234 and other illustrations. ISBN 0-85331-324-5. Translation of a German text into English.

ANE TODAY – 201812 – What Do We Know about the Scourging of Jesus? – American Society of Overseas Research (ASOR)

By Andrea Nicolotti

Before his crucifixion, the Gospels claim that Jesus was subjected to flagellation; nevertheless, the writings make no mention of the scourge.Based on the evidence from ancient Greek and Roman literature, as well as subsequent artifacts, modern writers have theorized on the plague.But do these things bring us any closer to the scourging of Jesus, or do they do the opposite?A variety of physical punishments were employed by the Romans, including flagellation, which was an element of criminal law and was used in the household, military, and public spheres.The lorum (whip), habena (strap), scutica [lash], stimuli [goad], fustis [staff], virga [rod], catenae [chains] and, lastly, the flagrum and flagellum are all mentioned as distinct forms of beating implements in ancient sources (scourge).Milder penalties, such as the ferula (stick) employed by schoolteachers, were also in use at the time.

• When it came to beating his slaves at home, the master might chose between the stick, the lash, and the scourge.
• There were many types of punishments that were administered on the bare body, with some being more severe and humiliating than others.
• Because the terrible scourge (horribili flagello) produced deeper wounds and even lacerated the skin, Horace advocated for ″a law to assign equitable penalties to offenses, lest you flay with the dreadful scourge (horribili flagello) people who are just deserving of lash (scutica)″ in one of his satires.
• People who committed unique crimes such as patricide, treason, and the violation of Vestal virgins were flogged to death as far back as the fifth century BCE according to ancient sources.
• Traitors, magicians, and those who committed unique crimes such as treason and the violation of Vestal virgins were flogged to death as far back as the fifth century BCE.

By the time of Jesus, there had been a long-standing rule that free Roman citizens were immune from the use of scourges and rods, which were only to be used on foreigners, slaves, and gladiators, and that this practice continued until the present day.Even in the military, the rod could only be used when the soldiers were not nationals of the country in question.Cicero accused the former governor of Sicily of unjustly beating Roman civilians with rods in 70 BCE, and the accusation was proven.This rule was likewise applicable in the case of Judea.As soon as the tribune in Jerusalem ordered Paul to be tied with straps in order for the apostle to be interrogated under the scourge, Paul appealed on the basis of his Roman citizenship and was liberated from his bonds.

• One exception occurred when the Roman Senate suggested that Nero be beaten to death with rods in the year 68 C.E.
• Flagellation was dreaded because of its brutality: it caused deep wounds and may possibly result in death as a result of it.
• In contrast to Jewish law, which stipulated a maximum of forty lashes, Roman law did not stipulate a limit.
• Several stories from Flavius Josephus describe flagellations carried out in Palestine, in which the blows were inflicted with such force that they exposed the victim’s internal organs, according to the historian.
• He also reveals that scourging was used as a preparation to the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
• However, the extent to which Jesus was scourged is uncertain.

This incident is barely mentioned in the gospels, and some scholars argue that it was not even significant enough to warrant a description.Although there is little material available, contemporary commentaries on the Passion and Biblical dictionaries offer a full account of the scourge, as well as photographs and illustrations.

Scourges from Herbert Haag and Adrian van dem Born, Bibel-Lexikon (Einsiedeln, Benziger, 1956), p. 527.

At least, that’s how it appears.The Greek verb ó is used to describe Jesus’ scourging in the Gospels of Mark and Matthew, which is a loan translation of the Latin flagellum, but the Greek verb ó is used in the Gospel of John, which is a loan translation of the Latin flagellum.Likewise, Pilate’s men used a scourge made of ropes, leather, chains, wood, or whatever else to whip the ground.The scourge, however, is not mentioned in the Bible save for a chapter where John claims that when Jesus ″had created a scourge of cords, he drove them all out of the temple.″ Much more evidence exists regarding the flagellation that Jews performed in synagogues, which was done using a leather strap that was separated into thongs.However, the public’s fascination in the pandemic has not waned.Juan de Maldonado, a Jesuit from the sixteenth century, considered that identifying Jesus’ scourge was a ″inane curiosity″ because the Gospels were quiet on the subject.

• Others, on the other hand, came up with hypotheses.
• In 1416, Vincent Ferrer proposed that Jesus was scourged first with switches of thorns and brambles, then with whips with spiky tips, and ultimately with chains with hooks at the ends, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia.
• However, there is no proof that these three types of scourges were actually in use in ancient Rome at the time of Jesus, despite common belief to the contrary.
• The Shroud of Turin had a crucial role.
• It depicts the figure of a tormented man, whose lacerations are very similar to those that would have been sustained by the crucified Jesus.

The shape of the scourge has been attempted to be determined by numerous scholars who believe that the Shroud belonged to Jesus of Nazareth beginning in the 16th century.This sparked a quest for an item that could have been responsible for the wounds.The first printed book dedicated to the marks on the Shroud of Turin was published in 1598 and was authored by Alfonso Paleotti, the archbishop of Bologna, who was also the first to see the signs.In the following century, Daniele Mallonio translated Paleotti’s work into Latin and presented a description of the plague, which he derived from the markings on the Shroud.The Revelations of St.

• Bridget (1303–1373 CE) were also familiar to him, and they describe an unruly creature with spikes on a string.
• As a result of seeing a photograph of a flagellum aculeatum in Mallonio’s book, he concluded that ″the innumerable scars that the Shroud sustained from the body of Christ demonstrate that scourges of this sort were employed for the flagellation of Christ.″ ”

Shroud of Turin (

Alfonso Paleotti and Daniele Mallonio, Iesu Christi crucifixi stigmata Sacrae Sindoni impressa (Venetiis: apud Baretium, 1606), p. 68.

For historical knowledge, Mallonio turned to Justus Lipsius’s famous 1593 work De Cruce, which was written in Latin.By drawing on the writings of Athenaeus of Naucratis (2nd century CE) and Eustathius of Thessalonica (12th century CE), he detailed, among other things, an East Asian scourge fashioned of astragalus bones, among other things.Because of their almost cube form, the astragalus bones of sheep are used for a variety of purposes, the most well-known of which is as dice.However, when strung together on the cords of a scourge, these little bones dealt devastating blows to a victim.Astragalus scourge is best described in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses (second century CE), where the author refers to it as tesseratum, which means ″astragalus scourge″ (strung with tesserae, or small cubes).However, when Lipsius translated into Latin the Greek texts including descriptions of that type of scourge, he substituted the more contemporary term taxillatum, which means ″taxilla″ in Latin (from taxillus, i.e.

• small die, little cube).
• Unfortunately, as a result, many subsequent authors propagated the incorrect notion that the Romans were plagued by something known as flagrum taxillatum, which was a scourge of little cubes.
• So, what was the actual form of the flagrum of Jesus at that point in time?
• According to Mallonio, a part of the text has been preserved at Rome’s Santa Maria in Via Lata church, which was discovered by him.
• When I went in search of this fragment, I discovered that it was simply a little length of thin chain, with a twisted nail connected, and that it was housed in a cross-reliquary among other weird artifacts.

Paul Vignon, a Shroud researcher who lived at the turn of the twentieth century, conducted a new investigation into the plague.He also felt the need to corroborate the round form of the whip markings on the Shroud, so he went on a hunt for a particularly special scourge with blunt spherical things at the ends of its lashes, which he discovered.The designs for the Roman scourges in books such as the Dictionnaire des antiquités grecques et romaines by Charles Daremberg and Edmond Saglio and the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities by Anthony Rich were available to Vignon, unlike Mallonio, who had to rely on a single source: Mallonio’s own imagination.In particular, a flagrum talis tesseratum shown on a marble bas-relief from the second century, with three strings descending from the handle and twenty-four astragalus bones, was the most stunning..

Rome, Musei Capitolini, Inventario Sculture, s 1207. Photo: Valeria Pezzi.

However, this is the ceremonial flagrum of Cybele’s priests, not a scourge that is used to administer corporal punishment to those who disobey her.Furthermore, it does not correspond to the Shroud’s markings at all.What about the archaeological evidence, do you think it’s relevant?Vignon had to rely on the illustrations he discovered in the books, completely ignorant that they may be deceptive.Rich and Daremberg-illustrators Saglio’s had made an error in their reproduction of what seems to be a whip with nothing visibly connected to its ends, as was the case in the original.

Anthony Rich, Dictionnaire des antiquités romaines et grecques (Paris: Firmin Didot, 1859), p. 273.

Napoli, Museo Archeologico Nazionale, n. 69500. Photo: Valeria Pezzi.

The truth is that all of the designs on which Vignon relied were faulty.Where can we discover a comparison to the Shroud that is comparable?Some researchers propose the use of the so-called plumbatae, a torture tool dating back to the fourth century CE.However, in first-century Palestine, this was not the case.Other examples include an 18-karat-gold necklace with a spiral engraving and three chains, each of which has a charm selected from Rich’s lexicon, which was purportedly ″copied from an original unearthed at Herculaneum.″

Anthony Rich, Dictionnaire des antiquités romaines et grecques (Paris: Firmin Didot, 1859), p. 273.

However, nothing like has ever been discovered in Pompeii and Herculaneum, nor has anything similar ever been discovered at the Naples Archaeological Museum.Rich’s piece was really a copy of an eighteenth-century artwork that belonged to the Count of Caylus (1692–1765), who was a collector in his own right.Caylus claims to have purchased the scourge, as well as other objects, from a merchant in Rome, but he incorrectly labels them as scourges from the Roman period.I was fortunate in that the Caylus collection had survived, and I was able to trace down each and every item in it.The claimed scourge of Herculaneum is a ″piece of tack″ that goes back to the Iron Age, but the reported ″chain scourge″ dates back to the ninth-eighth century BCE, according to archaeological evidence.

Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Département des mon- naies, médailles et antiques, inv. bronze 1836. Photo: René-Ginouvès.

Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Dépar- tement des monnaies, médailles et antiques, inv. bronze 1837. Photo: René-Ginouvès.

Modern archaeology is significantly more careful in its approach.Because of the perishable nature of the materials, it is exceedingly difficult to locate and identify genuine scourges.Archaeologists must also use extreme caution when adopting previous categories, particularly when the item has been subjected to arbitrary modifications and restoration attempts by diggers and private collectors, among other things.The only thing that I have been able to identify as a scourge is a handle with 29 bronze balls strung on two strings.It is from Rome, although it is not known when it was made.

British Museum, Greek and Roman Antiquities, Bronze 2694.

However, the countless spheres on the Shroud are far bigger than those on the Shroud.A form akin to the supposed scourge of the Shroud has not been shown in any of the countless ancient pictures that have been offered.We were unable to discover a single one of them, either in real life or in drawings/carvings, that would leave markings that matched those visible on the Shroud, yet Vignon searched for hours.However, in medieval artistic portrayals, soldiers frequently strike Jesus with two separate scourges: one made of ropes tied together with knots or spherical weights, which is occasionally spiky, and the other made of a cluster of switches.These can be discovered as early as the first part of the ninth century, and both forms can be found as late as the thirteenth century, depending on the source.

Stuttgarter Psalter, Württembergische Landesbibliothek, Cod.bibl.fol.23, f. 43v.

Biblia de San Luis, Catedral de Toledo, vol. iii, f. 61v.

These two separate scourges are depicted in medieval art, not in Roman customs, and are hence distinct.Also noteworthy is that the Flagellants movement began to expand throughout Europe precisely in the middle of the fourteenth century.As a result, the wounds on the man covered in the Shroud correspond to wounds that were recognizable to painters of the Middle Ages and earlier.Everything appears to be consistent with the time period in which the Shroud was made, which is the first part of the fourteenth century.References to a Roman whip with pendants or round weights should be removed from Bible dictionaries and studies on the Passion of Christ.In this case, medieval beliefs, erroneous archeological identifications, and twentieth-century conjectures about the Shroud have combined to produce this result.

Flagrum: The Scourging Whip

Before Christ was sent to be crucified, the Roman soldiers beat Him with this lead-tipped whip, called a flagrum or sometimes a flagellum. On studying the Shroud of Turin, scientists have determined that the flagrum used to whip Our Lord consisted of three seperate thongs, each ending in a set of two lead balls. These roughly shaped balls added weight to the beating, but also would tear the flesh of the victim. This cruel torture was intended to weaken the person to be crucified to prevent any sort of resistance to the final execution. This reproduction is a full sized copy based on the sketches of experts who have studied both the Shroud of Turin as well as historical artifacts of the Roman Empire from the time of Christ. The wooden handle measures about 8″ long, while the leather thongs are of varying lengths (11″, 12″, 13″). The multiple lengths of the thongs were designed to prevent the balls from striking each other, thereby causing more damage to the victim. The overall length of the flagrum is about 24″. This second version of a Roman flagellum, although not accurate to the markings on the Shroud, is historically accurate. It is based on ancient carvings at Rome. The three leather thongs are varying lengths, have different sized and number of lead balls. The handle measures about 10″ (25cm) long.

Flogging as Criminal Punishment in the 21st Century

• A discussion between Shubhankar Tiwari and Kaartikay Agarwal, both students at the National Law University in Delhi, over the usage of flogging as an alternative form of criminal punishment in the twenty-first century.
• An activist and blogger known as Raif Badawi was publicly flogged on the 9th of January 2015, in front of the Grand Mosque in Jeddah, after being sentenced to one hundred and fifty lashes for ‘insulting Islam through electronic means,’ according to Saudi Arabian law.
• The terrible event went viral on social media almost immediately, and the #JeSuisRaif movement gathered steam as a result of it.
• Saudi Arabia received a massive amount of condemnation from the world community as a result of this egregious violation of human rights.
• Badawi was sentenced to death in 2012, but the Saudi Arabian Supreme Court affirmed his conviction in June 2015, igniting a protracted legal battle between the government and various human rights organizations.

For the first time in over half a decade, the Supreme Court of Saudi Arabia outlawed flogging as a form of punishment on April 25, 2020, as part of an effort to ″bring the country into compliance with international human rights.″ The fact that Saudi Arabia has taken such a step is much appreciated, but it has re-ignited the discussion regarding the appropriateness of such a penalty, which is still practiced in many areas of the world.In this post, we’ve taken a two-pronged approach to the subject.In the first part, we attempted to describe flogging by shedding light on its history, its current standing in the criminal justice system, and the number of nations that continue to utilize it as a form of punishment on a widespread basis today.Then, in the second leg (which comprises the last two parts), we have emphasized the international legal steps that can assist us in entirely ending this practice in the next years, as outlined in International Law.

Flogging has a long history that extends back to the time of the Roman Empire, when it was used to prepare people for death, including Jesus’ death on the cross.The revered Jewish source ‘The Torah’ also includes flogging as a kind of punishment, and it stipulates that no more than 40 lashes must be administered for an offense that does not warrant the imposition of the death penalty.The Whipping Act of 1530 in England enabled flogging for minor infractions such as stealing (for instance theft, poaching, blasphemy, etc.).To make matters worse, flogging was also utilized as a form of therapy for insanity under this Act.

• To discipline their slaves, their owners employed flogging as a form of corporal punishment during the Age of Slavery in the United States.
• The well-known image of ‘Whipped Peter’ from the American Civil War era offers clear testament to the existence of such a practice at the time.
• Until their abolition in 1845, knouts were used to lash political dissidents in the Imperial Russian Empire.
• Although flogging was formerly employed to punish dangerous criminals, it became increasingly rare as time went on, and authorities began to utilize private rather than public flogging in order to avoid public outcry.
• Eventually, the advent of a major anti-slavery and anti-corporal punishment wave resulted in the extinction of such practices in the aforementioned locations.

For example, in the United Kingdom, the Criminal Justice Act of 1948 outlawed this practice totally towards the middle of the twentieth century.However, there are still several nations, such as Indonesia, Iran, Sudan, and the Maldives, that practice flogging because Sharia law allows for the use of this punishment against those who commit specific infractions.During the previous decade, the Maldives had gained a reputation for publicly whipping battered and raped women on the pretext of adultery.Earlier this year, a female flogging squad was established in Aceh (the only Indonesian area that follows Sharia law), with the goal of punishing women who violate Islamic law.All of these instances provide a crystal clear picture of the scope of the crisis we are confronted with today.

1. We will thus present an overview of the international human rights standards that are now in effect in order to tackle this issue in the next section.
2. Remember that under international human rights law, judicial decisions ordering physical punishment (including flogging) are considered torture or cruel or degrading treatment and are thus prohibited from being implemented.
3. Corporal punishment is a violation of the internationally recognized human rights to be free from cruel, inhuman, or humiliating treatment or punishment, as well as to be free from physical violence, which are both protected under international law.
4. Torture and ″cruel, brutal, or degrading treatment or punishment″ are also prohibited under the Universal Decl