Why Do People Say “Jesus H. Christ,” and Where Did the “H” Come From?
Spencer Alexander McDaniel (A.M.D. ): So let’s start with the origins of the name “Jesus Christ” and discuss it from there. The name is a formal title. “Jesus” is an Anglicized form of the Latin nameIesus, which is in turn a Latinized form of the ancient Greek name o (Isos), which is in turn a Hellenized form of Jesus’s original name in ancient Palestinian Aramaic, which was “yă’,” a shortened form of the earlier Hebrew name “Yahweh is Salvation,” which literally translates as “Yahweh is Salvation.
Therefore, throughout the early part of the first century CE, while Jesus was living, the name yă’ was one of the most frequent male given names in Judaea and Galilee.
Despite the fact that many people now regard the word Christas as if it were Jesus’ last name, it is actually an insult rather than a proper name (i.e.
An Anglicized version of the Latin wordChristus, which is in turn a Latinized form of the ancient Greek term (Christós), which means “anointed one,” the English wordChrist is derived from the Latin wordChristus.
- It was not uncommon in antiquity for the title ofmîa to be granted to more than one individual; rather, it was a generic title that might be bestowed to anybody who was seen as fulfilling the function of God’s anointed.
- Now that we’ve covered the basics, we can move on to explaining where the term “Jesus H.
- The Chi Rho monogram is well-known to most Christians throughout the world.
- In early Christianity, it was a kind of ingenious shorthand that was used to express “Jesus” without having to write his whole name out in front of them.
- Here’s an example of one type of it: While the Chi Rho monogram is composed of the capital forms of the first two letters of the Greek word, the IH monogram is composed of the first three letters of, which, as you may recall, is the Greek spelling of the nameJesus.
- This is the initial letter, the Greek letter iota I, which appears similar to the Latin letter I and produces the sound of the letter mach ine, or the consonantal sound of the wordy ellow, depending on how it is spoken.
- Finally, there is the lunate sigma, a variant of the Greek letter sigma that looks strikingly similar to the Latin letter c and produces the same sound as in the words oft and etymology.
When the letters of the IH monogram were mistaken for the Latin letters J, H, and C at some point in history, most likely somewhere in the early nineteenth century, illiterate Americans who were accustomed to the Latin alphabet and who understood nothing about the Greek alphabet made this mistake.
- Apparently, several individuals came to the conclusion, “Hey, I think H must be his middle initial!” after seeing his name.
- Christ” came to be seen as a bit of a joke, and it was even used as a minor profanity on occasion.
- He recalls a comical account of how the evangelical preacher Alexander Campbell, the head of the “Restoration Movement,” ordered the young Samuel Clemens to print some pamphlets for one of his sermons while he was apprenticed to a printer about 1847, when he was still a teenager.
- C.” at one point in the text in order to avoid having to reprint three entire pages of material.
- Instead of simply amending the wording of the leaflet to say “Jesus Christ,” however, the printer modified it to say “Jesus H.Christ,” perhaps because he was irritated by the reverend’s behavior.
The tale told by Mark Twain is not the origin of the term, but it is an early example of the phrase being used, which is crucial to remember. This post first published on the Quora discussion forum. To see, please click here.
r/explainlikeimfive – ELI5: Why do people from USA say “Jesus Christ” or “Jesus” when they are surprised, startled, or amazed?
While in Western society, where the Abrahamic faith has historically prevailed (especially the Christian version), it is common practice to include different theological techniques into everyday speech and conversation. When we sneeze, we say “bless you” or equivalents, and when we are shocked, we exclaim the name of the Christian saviour, Jesus Christ. Less frequently, we indicate agreement with the word “amen” or enthusiasm with a “praise” style motion towards the sky, as shown in the video below.
There was no legal way for someone to be prosecuted for practicing their other religious beliefs, but if you weren’t a Protestant Christian, you had well keep your garbage to yourself because your neighbours would not be pleased.
Religious religions other than Christianity are growing more numerous, and non-faiths such as Atheism and Deism are becoming increasingly popular.
ELI5: A piece of history that has remained with us solely because of the power of our habits.
What Do Americans Believe About Jesus? 5 Popular Beliefs
Throughout the religious landscape of the United States, Jesus Christ continues to be a key figure and a perennial person of interest, particularly in the days leading up to Easter. And the year 2015 is no different. To a record-breaking audience of 3.7 million people on Sunday, March 29, the National Geographic Channel launched their version of Bill O’Reilly’s bookKilling Jesus. It was the channel’s most watched premiere in its history. The Finding Jesus miniseries on CNN has likewise maintained a high level of popularity.
- What, on the other hand, do Americans believe about Jesus?
- According to current Barna Group study, the following are five prevalent American conceptions of Jesus: 1.
- A cameo appearance by Jesus Christ has appeared in hundreds of pop culture productions, ranging from The Da Vinci Code toSouth Park.
- More than nine out of ten Americans believe that Jesus Christ was a genuine person who lived on the earth (92 percent ).
- While the historicity of Jesus is not in dispute for most Americans, people are becoming increasingly skeptical about Jesus’ divinity.
- One in every six people still does not believe that Jesus was divine, according to the poll (18 percent ).
Approximately one-third of young individuals (35 percent) believe that Jesus was only a religious or spiritual leader, with the remaining 17 percent unsure of his identity.
Americans are divided on whether Jesus committed sins during his earthly existence, which may be a reflection of their skepticism regarding Jesus’ divinity.
Only slightly more than half of those polled reject, either strongly or moderately, that Jesus committed sins while on earth (46 percent), with the remaining 2 percent unsure.
Sixty-six percent of Millennials consider this to be true.
America, as a whole, continues to be devoted to Jesus Christ.
Despite the fact that the vast majority of Americans claim to have made such a commitment, some groups are much more likely than others to have done so.
White Americans are the ethnic group most likely to have made a personal commitment to Jesus: Only six out of ten white Americans (60 percent) report having done so, compared to eight out of ten black Americans (80 percent) and almost two-thirds of all non-white Americans (60 percent) (65 percent ).
- A last point to mention is that Millennials are far less likely than any other generation to have made a personal commitment to Jesus that is still relevant in their lives today.
- Adults who have made a personal commitment to Jesus think that Jesus is the only way to get to heaven, according to the majority of those who have done so.
- Only 2 percent of those who have made a personal commitment to Jesus say they do not believe they will go to paradise when they die.
- In general, nearly two out of every five Americans have acknowledged their wickedness and declared trust in Christ (a group known as “born again Christians,” according to Barna Research).
- Only 56 percent of Millennials who have made a personal commitment to Jesus think they will go to paradise as a result of confessing their sins and accepting Jesus Christ as their Savior, according to a recent survey.
- Many adults, on the other hand, feel that they will be admitted to paradise as a consequence of their good deeds.
- Most of those who fall into this group think that they will get to paradise because they have attempted to observe the Ten Commandments (5 percent), because they are fundamentally decent people (8 percent), or because God loves all people and would not allow them to perish (7 percent ).
- For example, Jesus already has a captive audience.
- While this is an outstanding amount, it raises the question of how well this commitment is communicated.
“These tendons include institutional, cultural, and family tendons.” The question of whether Millennials will become more serious about church and faith as they grow older has been debated extensively, but the reality is that younger Americans are not as attached to Christ as older generations are.
- Comment on this research and keep up with our progress: Twitter:@davidkinnaman|@roxyleestone|@barnagroup The Barna Group is on Facebook.
- The first online research was performed between September 2 and September 10, 2014, among a nationally representative sample of 1,036 individuals in the United States.
- The first phone research was performed between August 25 and September 10, 2014, among a nationally representative sample of 1,001 persons in the United States.
- From February 3 to February 11, 2015, a second online research was performed among 1,000 persons in the United States who were selected from a nationally representative sample.
- During the period of January 8 to January 20, 2015, the second phone research was performed among a nationally representative sample of 1,010 persons in the United States.
- Millennials are defined as those born between 1984 and 2002; Gen-Xers as those born between 1965 and 1983; Boomers as those born between 1946 and 1964; and Elders as those born in 1945 or before.
- It is a non-volunteer access panel that operates on the basis of chance.
- When sampled non-Internet households are recruited, they are provided with a netbook computer as well as free Internet access in order to participate as online panel participants.
- Barna Group’s Background Barna Group (which includes its research branch, Barna Research Group) is a private, non-partisan, for-profit company that operates under the umbrella of the Issachar Companies.
- For more than three decades, Barna Group has conducted and analyzed primary research to better understand cultural patterns linked to values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors.
If you would like to get free e-mail notifications on the release of each update on the most recent research findings from Barna Group, you can sign up for this free service on the Barna website by entering your e-mail address (). Barna Group published a report in 2015 titled
Is there a difference in meaning between Jesus Christ and Christ Jesus?
QuestionAnswer When the Son of God became incarnate and was born to Mary, he was given the human name Jesus, which means “God with us.” ‘Christ’ is a term that might imply ‘Messiah,’ ‘Anointed One,’ or ‘Chosen One,’ among other things. Sometimes a New Testament writer may use the termJesus Christ, putting the personal name first (e.g., Jude 1:1), while other times a writer will use the termChrist Jesus, placing the title first (e.g., Romans 1:1). (e.g., 2 Timothy 1:1). Some have questioned if there is a distinction between the two appellations: what is the significance of pronouncing “Jesus Christ” as opposed to “Christ Jesus,” for example?
- In English, words that are put at the beginning or conclusion of a phrase normally attract more attention than ones that are placed in the middle of the sentence.
- To place the titleChriston either side of the personal nameJesusmeans to accord Him the same level of respect and esteem.
- In this chapter, Paul speaks of what we refer to as thekenosis, which is the “emptying” of Jesus Christ when He took on human form during His earthly ministry.
- Jesus accomplished this in order to reconcile us to God, and in doing so, he ascended to a new level of splendor that everyone on the face of the earth will recognize one day.
- The change from Christ Jesus to Jesus Christi is referred to as the Christi changeover.
- As a result, the song opens with God becoming man—hence, the name “Christ Jesus” (the heavenly title, then the human name).
- The designations made by the Lord represent the direction in which He is moving.
- John, on the other hand, never writes “Christ Jesus,” but instead always begins with the human name.
- To summarize, the distinction between Jesus Christ and Christ Jesus is subtle and, in most cases, unimportant.
In any case, Jesus is the Christ, the Messiah, and the Anointed One of God, according to the Bible. Questions regarding Jesus Christ (return to top of page) Is there a difference between the names Jesus Christ and Christ Jesus in terms of meaning?
Subscribe to the
QuestionAnswer When the Son of God became incarnate and was born to Mary, He was given the human name Jesus. Christ is a title that can imply “Messiah,” “Anointed One,” or “Chosen One.” It is derived from the Greek word for “Christ.” It is common for a new testament writer to use the termJesus Christ, placing the personal name first (e.g., Jude 1:1), whereas other times a writer will use the termChrist Jesus, placing the title first (e.g., 1 Peter 1:1). (e.g., 2 Timothy 1:1). Some have questioned if there is a distinction between the two appellations: what is the significance of pronouncing “Jesus Christ” as opposed to “Christ Jesus,” for instance.
- Generally speaking, in English, words that are put at the start or end of a phrase attract more attention than ones that are placed in between.
- When the titleChrist is used alongside the personal nameJesus, it is implying that He is being shown the same respect.
- We refer to this as thekenosis, which means “emptying,” and it refers to Jesus Christ’s “emptying” of Himself when He took on human form.
- In order to bring us back into relationship with God, Jesus went to great lengths to do so, and in doing so, he gained a new splendor that all people will recognize one day.
- The change from Christ Jesus to Jesus Christi is referred to as the Christus change.
- Beginning with God becoming man (thus the name “Christ Jesus”), the song moves on to other themes (the heavenly title, then the human name).
- The Lord’s designations are a reflection of the direction in which He is moving.
- John, on the other hand, never writes “Christ Jesus,” but instead always begins with the personal name of the individual.
- All of this is to imply that the distinction between Jesus Christ and Christ Jesus is nuanced and, in most cases, inconsequential.
Whichever way you look at it, Jesus is the Messiah, or the One God has chosen. to:Jesus Christ: Do You Have Any Questions? When it comes to the meaning of Jesus Christ, is there a distinction between him and Christ Jesus?
Why Is “Jesus Christ” Used as “Blasphemous Profanity”?
This is an honest and courteous inquiry from a man who does not profess any religious beliefs. The biblical answers to his inquiries, I reasoned, would be of use to my readers, so I provided them.
Warning / Disclaimer
Gordo Laidlaw use vocabulary that I would not ordinarily associate with him, and he employs “words rhyming with” to allude to language that I would like not to associate with him (or yours). His blog is rated “PG,” but mine is rated U (Universal) or U-c (suitable for young children). As a result, if you click through, you will not be directed to the normal fare. I’ll quote just enough to give you a feel of what he’s saying, but here’s the link to the full article: Blasphemy against Jesus Christ is a kind of profanity.
If Gordo and I ever got together, I am confident that we would have a lot to talk about.
Why Don’t Christians Care?
This isn’t the first or most important question Gordo asks, but it’s the one I’ll start with. And why do so many Christians appear to be unconcerned about the name of Jesus Christ, their savior, being used as a slang term for a casual profanity? To be honest, it appears that some Christians are more outraged if someone pokes fun at the Catholic Pope than they are if the name of Jesus Christ is blasphemed in a curse, which is understandable. Not for nothing, but adherents of Islam become extremely agitated if the name of Allah or the last prophet Muhammad is disparaged in any manner.
- It’s simply weird to me that so many people appear to be cool with it.
- I published an article called “OMG” — and Other Ways Christians Use God’s Name in Vain a while back.
- A large number of individuals search for “using God’s name in vain” and come across that post, which continues to get fresh shares on Facebook all the time.
- It does make a difference to them.
- If Christians are truly serious about their faith and the Bible, they should be very concerned about this type of behavior.
- Even the word “OMG” irritates a large number of people.
However, we are not going to say anything about it, and we are not going to start killing people.
If someone deliberately offends us, Jesus instructed us to love our enemies.
That does not imply that we are uninterested.
After all, there is a significant distinction between our faith and Islamic beliefs.
Some may consider me to be judgmental, but that’s fine with me.
Our God is a patient and merciful God toward those who show Him reverence and obedience.
We want them to experience His patience and mercy, rather than inflaming the wrath of Almighty God against themselves and their actions.
Gordo’s decision to stop referring to our Savior by his given name as blasphemy is a wise one.
It will not transform him into a Christian, nor will it lessen his need for faith in Jesus Christ. Despite the fact that it will have no effect on his eternal destiny and that he may not be doing it for all of the right reasons, it is a positive development.
The “Oddity” of “Jesus Christ” as Blasphemous Profanity
Despite the fact that this isn’t the first or most important question Gordo poses, I’ll begin with it. In addition, why do so many Christians appear to be unconcerned about the name of their savior, Jesus Christ, being profaned in passing? Actually, it appears that some Christians are more outraged when someone pokes fun at the Catholic Pope than they are when the name of Christ is blasphemed in a curse, which is a little surprising. The fact is that adherents of Islam become extremely outraged when the name of Allah or the last prophet Muhammad is disparaged.
- That so many people are seemingly cool with it is just puzzling to me.
- OMG and Other Ways Christians Use God’s Name in Vain was a piece I wrote some time ago.
- A large number of individuals search for “using God’s name in vain” and come across that post, which continues to get fresh shares on Facebook all the while.
- To them, it is really important.
- Evangelical Christians, who are serious about their faith and the Bible, are understandably alarmed by this sort of activity.
- Our annoyance extends to even the word “OMG.” Christian leaders should refrain from making such a meaningless, hollow allusion to God.
Our expectations of non-Christians are that they will behave in a similar manner to Christians.
It would be insane to lash out at someone for abusing His name; rather, we should honor His name by loving those who have offended us intentionally.
Possibly, the Christians who don’t appear to notice are being too casual and don’t really care; nevertheless, it’s possible that they are simply being patient and kind, and living the way God intends for them to do so.
Non-Christians should treat Christians with courtesy and consideration.
The patience and mercy of our God are boundless when it comes to people who honor Him.
To avoid inciting the wrath of Almighty God against themselves, we urge them to have His patience and kindness on them.
A wise choice was made by Gordo to refrain from referring to our Lord and Savior by his given name.
His lack of trust in Christ will neither convert him to Christianity, nor will it diminish his need for faith in Christ. Despite the fact that it will have no effect on his everlasting fate and that he may not be doing it for the best of motives, it is still a positive development.
Some Reasons, From a Biblical Perspective
The Desire to Embarrass or Offend Take a look at the sentence I highlighted in blue. Gordo’s idea may not be offensive to everyone, but some individuals enjoy being offended. They have no regard for others, and they despise God. Romans 1:29-30 (29, 30) 29 All unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, and malice; full of envy, murder, deception and malignity; whisperers,30 spies, and assassins; spies, spies, spies, spies, spies Backbiters, God-haters, despiteful, haughty, boasters, creators of ill things, disobedient to parents, and others like them In these words, God, truth, and righteousness are all described as being entirely rejected by those who believe in them.
- Sometimes individuals are despiteful, wishing to offend others, and they are proud of the fact that they may do so if they so want, and proud that no one will tell them what to do in the future.
- It is possible that some individuals use the name of our Savior as blasphemy because they are conceited about offending others and wanting to demonstrate how big and tough they are.
- People using Jesus’ name in this manner, however, does not surprise Christians, who understand that some people despise God and wish to be disrespectful of him.
- Take a look at the following verse: 2 Timothy 3:2 (NIV) Men will be lovers of their own self, covetous, boastful, haughty, blasphemers, and blasphemers.
- All of these things may be summed up with the phrase “I want to be significant.” Using blasphemy or any other form of vulgarity is a means of expressing, “Pay attention to ME.
- I’m the one who’s unhappy right now.
- Just pay attention to the manner I’m expressing myself.
Pay attention to what I’m saying.
Children that have a temper tantrum are attempting to be too vocal.
It is common for people to have temper tantrums in order to influence others by assaulting them or something they are concerned about.
Christians aren’t astonished when individuals blasphemously use the name of Jesus as profanity because it is an act of prideful selfishness that elevates the significance of one’s own person above the importance of one’s relationship with the Lord.
A Battle for the Soul Finally, Christians believe that this sort of blasphemy is a result of wicked spiritual influences on the perpetrator.
II Corinthians 4:4 (New International Version) Those in whom the god of this world has blinded the minds of those who do not believe, lest the beautiful gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine upon them.
He despises Jesus and desires for others to stand in opposition to Him.
The contempt and scorn he has for the Lord has inspired many to imitate him, and it has helped to keep them ignorant to the Gospel message.
Why do nonbelievers use the phrase “Oh my God” so frequently?
We know why — the god of this world is pushing people to adopt language that diminishes respect for the Almighty God.
Specifically, Satan does not want people to conceive of our Lord as a real person, who genuinely loved them, genuinely died for their sins, and genuinely resurrected from the grave.
‘Absolute Hell’ is another illustration of this that I wrote about today (30 September 2019).
It just does not happen — but even the most ardent doubters must acknowledge that Jesus did in fact exist.
He is neither Mohammed, Buddha, the pope, or Joseph Smith, to name a few.
As Gordo pointed out, there is no legitimate reason for the term “Jesus Christ” to be considered blasphemous vulgarity — or, at the very least, no legitimate explanation that the unbelieving world can provide for it.
His almost unique position in this topic is overwhelming proof that He possesses something special that no one else possesses.
Jesus is, without a doubt, our Lord and our God. He uses His name as blasphemy and profanity because it is the only explanation that makes any sense, and it is the only one that is available. Following up on the previous point: God With Us explains why the name “Jesus” is so important.
Blasphemy: How to respond when God’s name is used as a swear word
I have a strong desire to offend others. Pay attention to the sentence that I highlighted in blue. However, some individuals enjoy being offended, thus Gordo’s idea may not upset anybody. And they despise God. They have no regard for anybody else. Verse 29-30 of Romans 1:29-30 The presence of unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, and malignity, as well as the presence of murderous intent, deceitful discussion, and malignity. Whisperers, for example, are among those who are filled with all unrighteousness and fornication.
- In these words, God, truth, and justice are described as being entirely rejected by humans.
- Everyone and everything but themselves are treated with contempt, arrogance, and a malicious lack of concern for anybody or anything but themselves.
- Of course, it’s foolish and immature – there’s nothing spectacular about causing others offense.
- Being driven by a sense of importance Blasphemy is defined as any act that uses the name of Jesus in an offensive manner.
- Take note of the items that come just before the word “blasphemers”: self-love, bragging, and being proud of one’s accomplishments.
- ” Rather than others, I am the one who is making an essential statement.
- Interested in how upset I am?
Listen to the way I’m putting it across right now.
Pay attention to what I’m telling you!
In order to be heard over the din, children throw temper tantrums.
When someone throws a temper tantrum, it is usually an attempt to control them by hurting them or something they value.
Because it is an act of prideful selfishness that elevates the significance of self above reverence for the Lord, Christians are not astonished when individuals blasphemously use Jesus’ name as profanity; in fact, they expect it.
The Fight for the Spirits At the end of the day, Christians believe that this sort of blasphemy is the result of demonic spiritual influence.
II Corinthians 4:4 (New International Version).
He despises Jesus and desires for others to stand in opposition to His teachings and actions.
The contempt and disgust he has for the Lord has inspired many to imitate him, and it has helped to keep them ignorant to the gospel message.
Nothing like “Oh my Satan” or a diluted “Oh my Santa” are ever said.
The phrase “Oh my God” is used by nonbelievers almost exclusively.
I don’t see why Christians should even try to imitate it with a diluted “Oh my god” response.
He wants to make Jesus into a meaningless, empty vulgarity, which is not what you do with real people, and he wants people to treat the Saviour with contempt as a result.
No one’s name is ever used in a profane manner in real life.
This indirectly acknowledges, whether consciously or unconsciously, that Jesus is more than a nice guy and a religious teacher, and that He is more than just a religious figure.
The use of one’s own name as a profanity is not common amongst people.
If He is precisely who He claims to be — the Son of God, the Lord of all things, the One who is to be worshiped in the same way that the Father is honoured, and the One who will judge — there are several reasons (I’ve listed three).
God and our Lord, Jesus, truly are one. He uses His name as blasphemy and profanity because it is the only explanation that makes any sense, and it is the only explanation that is available. The next step is to. God with us explains why the name “Jesus” is so important.
‘Of little concern’
This type of occurrence is getting more and more common throughout the world. Blasphemy appears to be entirely normal in today’s society, whether it’s on the bus or at the store, when conversing with a friend or while watching television. Several terms, such as “Jesus Christ” and “goddamn,” are deemed just slightly offensive by the public, according to the most recent Ofcom research on the public’s attitude toward particular words. The study, which is completed every five to six years, serves to shape the Broadcasts Standards Authority’s reaction to complaints from viewers about what they see and hear on television and radio broadcasting.
Generally, the words “Jesus Christ” were “of little worry when used to express emotion,” but they were “of great concern for older or more religiously sensitive individuals when employed as an obscenity,” according to the findings of the survey.
“.broadcasters should be aware that the use of bad language directly coupled with holy names may have a particular impact on people with strongly held beliefs that goes beyond any offence that may be caused by the bad language itself,” the FCC states in its guidance notes on how to apply its rules around offensive language.
Simon Calvert, deputy director of the Christian Institute, feels that broadcasters have a responsibility to Christian listeners and that they might often exhibit double standards when it comes to religious beliefs.
“However, they have no problem with performers and comedians profaning the name of Christ,” he said to me.
The moment has come to put an end to this.” Following my request for further information, Ofcom’s communications staff carried out a search, which revealed that just 35 complaints were received in 2018 that contained the phrase “blasphemy,” and only 50 complaints that included the words “Jesus” or “Christ.” The last time it garnered a significant amount of criticism from Christians was in 2005, following the broadcast of Jerry Springer: the Opera on BBC Two.
- During its run, the show aroused widespread outrage for its depiction of God, Jesus, Mary, and Adam and Eve as combatants on a Jerry Springer show set in hell.
- Ofcom received hundreds of emails from readers of this magazine and listeners of Premier Christian Radio expressing their dissatisfaction with the broadcaster.
- Jerry Springer: The Opera got 55,000 complaints, according to the BBC.
- The evidence suggests that they do, and Ofcom’s own study backs up this assertion.
- Ofcom ruled in favor of broadcasters in the two most recent instances in which Christians complained en masse about blasphemous content – the second of which was in 2008 when 540 individuals replied to Rowan Atkinson’s depiction of a clergyman – and the first was in 2007.
- Ofcom is not obligated to establish whether the ITV was guilty of blasphemy, but rather if the rules of its Code had been violated in this particular instance.
“Ofcom believes that the context of this show was apparent and that the airing of this item was justified,” the regulator said. Perhaps we’ve come to the conclusion that this is a struggle we will not win.
Changing the law
It should come as no surprise that, as Christians, we often feel demotivated when it comes to advocating for ourselves and our beliefs. It might sometimes feel as though we’re yelling into a furious storm with all of our power. Standards have shifted so dramatically that articulating our concerns might seem futile – or even pernickety – in this day and age. In many respects, the United Kingdom is post-Christian; on a daily basis, its residents appear to be embracing more and more of the trappings of secularism.
After the legalization of homosexual marriage as well as the liberalization of abortion laws, this decision was considered as more evidence that Ireland had abandoned its Christian past.
Those rules, however seldom applied in recent times, provided a measure of protection and favor for Christianity.
So, what should our response be?
Perseverance, truth and love
For starters, we may consider that God gave the Ten Commandments to the people of God, rather than to the surrounding countries, and that one of those commandments was a warning against abusing the name of the Lord. We cannot expect others who do not share our views to adhere by our laws; rather, it is our responsibility to fulfill God’s instructions. The author Lois Tverberg, who has written numerous volumes on the Hebraic foundations of Christianity, notes, “In terms of how these beliefs connect to language today, Christians are asked to emulate Christ, and he held God’s name in high esteem.” Despite the fact that Tverberg acknowledges that the third commandment contained more than just speech, she believes that “to use God’s name in vulgar and crass ways demonstrates a terrible lack of respect for God.” Even worse, it implies that you are a functional atheist, that is, that you do not truly think that God is there and listening to what you are saying when you speak.
- You wouldn’t talk of your mother in such a derogatory manner, so why would you speak of your devoted Father in such a manner?” We must continue to make our views known, even if we feel that we are being ignored.
- Perhaps we could even channel our dissatisfaction into successful evangelization?
- This may entail filing a formal complaint with Ofcom regarding blasphemy that we witness on television or hear on the radio.
- However, most of the time, it will simply include being obedient to God in the way we talk and behave ourselves as his representatives on this planet, day in and day out, without fail.
- They will be, though, one day.
- Christians living in Babylon will have to rely on the grace of God to get them through until that day arrives, if they are to survive.
Did you take pleasure in it? Every print edition of Premier Christianity magazine contains additional articles spanning news, culture, faith, and apologetics. Subscriptions are now available at HALF PRICE (limited offer)
“The Humanity and Divinity of Jesus”
Originally prepared at the beginning of Davis’s course Christian Theology for Today’s second term, this article demonstrates King’s growing disillusionment with conservative Baptist theology that he absorbed as a boy. In the same way that he had done in his earlier outline of William Newton Clarke’sAn Outline of Christian Theology, King dismisses the notion that Jesus possesses inherent divinity and concludes, “The true significance of the divinity of Christ lies in the fact that his achievement is prophetic and promissory for every other true son of man who is willing to submit his will to the will and spirit of God.” By presenting Jesus as a human being, King opens the door to the prospect of gradual development in earthly civilization as a result of individual effort.
Davis made the following observation on the essay: “You should proofread your papers before sending them in.” Take note of the revisions on page 4.” The essay was still given a B +, with the professor hailing the paper as presenting “a solution that would appeal to the liberal mind.” A question was posed by a young Jewish leader to his followers many years ago that seemed almost unbelievable at the time.
- He’d been putting in a lot of time and effort with them.
- However, one day he brought the subject up closer to home.
- Who do you think I am, exactly?
- 1 Numerous people have sought to provide an answer to this issue by giving to Jesus complete divinity while showing little regard for his humanity.
- Others have sought to answer the question by viewing Jesus as both completely human and fully divine at the same time.
- Modern Christian thought is unequivocal in its presentation of Jesus’ entire humanity when confronted with the topic of his person, but Christians have not been content to stop there in their deliberations.
- Having reached this stage, we may proceed to a more in-depth consideration of Jesus’ humanity and divinity.
3 All docetist, Eutychean, and Monophysite fallacies that attempted to explain away our Lord’s humanity have now been discarded by all serious theological thinking.
All we have to do is read the Gospels to see that Jesus was truly human in every way.
He became hungry, just like the rest of us.
When he became exhausted, he need rest and sleep.
When his followers became disloyal to him, it was a very painful experience for him.
In the garden, he went through the same suffering that any other person would go through in the same position.
5 Take note of how the anonymous author of the Epistle to the Hebrews refers to Jesus’ humanity throughout his writing.
His agony is shown in prayer (5:7), and we see him embracing the Cross with gladness and trust (12:2).
He was enticed in the same way that every other man was.
There is no other place in the New Testament where we may find such a direct focus on Jesus’ humanity as we do here.
6Once again, it should be noted that Jesus was by no means omnipotent.
As early as 1912, the distinguished theologian H.
Mackintosh asserted that this was indeed the case.
Not only is it mentioned that Jesus asked questions in order to obtain information—for example, about the location of Lazarus’ tomb, the quantity of loaves, or the name of the crazy Gadarene—but there is also a clear admission of ignorance at one point.
‘Not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, nor the Father, but only the Father knows.’ If Jesus could be so ignorant of a matter that was in some way relevant to his redeeming mission, it is inevitable to conclude that His understanding of secular concerns was limited to the knowledge of His time.” On page 397 of the same book, it says: Again, we can see the human nature of our Lord’s moral and religious life in his teachings and actions.
- His religious experience took place in the domain of the human.
- “Our Lord’s life on earth was a life of faith, and His victory was a victory won through faith,” as Dr.
- His temptations were genuine temptations, and He found it difficult and agonizing to overcome them.” God was in Christ, p.
- Jesus conquered his temptations not by relying on an inherent supernatural component, but rather by being true to his own will throughout the process.
- Jesus’ Divinity is a subject of debate.
- To consider Jesus to be a “mere” decent guy in the same way that all previous prophets were is insufficient to understand him.
However, they alone do not provide a solution to one important question: what makes him different from everyone else in the same situation?
It is possible that these will explain why Jesus was a certain sort of Jew, but they will not explain why some other Jews were not Jesus.
The distinctiveness of Jesus’ spiritual existence has led Christians to consider him not just as a human person, but also as a human being who has been enveloped by the presence of divine.
“The fact that God was in Christ is at the very heart of the Christian faith,” Dr.
The ever-repeating antinomy of the world is given in a living representation in this holy human person—the antinomy of the eternal in the temporal, of the infinite in the finite, and of the divine in the human.” Page 9 of W.
Brown’s book How to Think of Christ.
His divinity, according to the more orthodox Christians, was an inherent attribute that had been metaphysically conferred.
He is the manifestation of the word made flesh.
He is the very God of the very Gods, of one substance with the Father, who, for our salvation, came down from Heaven and took on the form of the Holy Ghost in the person of the Virgin Mary, who is the Son of God.
The merging of the human and divine in a metaphysical incarnation is not something that most of us are willing to accept.
We must have a Christology if we are to remain within the bounds of the Christian faith itself.
Baille that we cannot have a sound theology without first having a proper Christology.
In Christ’s filial consciousness and his one-on-one dependence on God, rather than in his substantive union with God, we might discover the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Yes, it was the warmth of his love to God and the intimacy of his confidence in God that accounted for his status as the highest revelation of the will of the Father.
It is the accomplishment of a man who, to the best of our knowledge, has entirely surrendered his life to the power of the heavenly spirit.
In fact, asserting that the Christ, whose example of living we are expected to emulate, is divine in an ontological sense is harmful and detrimental.
Consequently, the orthodox position of Christ’s divinity is, in my opinion, simply disproved by the evidence.
Christ was to be simply the prototype of one of many brothers who would follow in his footsteps.
This divine character or this union with God was not something that was imposed upon Jesus from on high; rather, it was something that was achieved via a process of moral struggle and self-abnegation on Jesus’ part.
Baille, God was in Christ, published by Scribner’s in 1948.
Brown, William A., “How to Think of Christ,” Scribner’s New York, 1945.
George Hedley’s The Symbol of the Faith, published by Macmillan in 1948.
The following is taken from William Adams Brown’s How to Think of Christ (New York: Scribner, 1948), p.
The questions he was asking them were about what his contemporaries were saying about him, and they had given him a variety of responses.
It’s all very well to tell me what other people think of me, but it’s not really helpful.
It has been that way ever since.
King’s bibliography includes a reference to Baillie’s God Was in Christ (New York: Scribner, 1948).
6–7: “If there is one thing about which Christians have always been certain, it is that Jesus is true man, bone of our bone, flesh of our flesh, tempted in every way that we are.” According to Bailie, God Was in Christ, p.
He was starving, just like the rest of us.
When he became exhausted, he need rest and sleep.
He was a lifelong learner who didn’t just learn from books.
By the disciples’ lack of trust, he was deeply wounded in the heart.
He was moved to tears by the blindness of the city he wished to see restored.
On the Cross, Jesus added to the misery of all the bodily tortures the agony of feeling abandoned by God.” 6.H.
Mackintosh, The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ (Edinburgh: T.T.
79: “The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ” (Edinburgh: T.T.
“Nowhere else in the New Testament is the humanity of Christ demonstrated in such a striking manner.
He was born into the tribe of Judah and went through the usual growth of human life, learning obedience, despite the fact that He was a Son, via the things that He endured (5:8).
“His human virtues are emphasized in a straightforward manner that is unprecedented in the New Testament.” 7.Baillie, God Was in Christ, p.
147: “God was in Christ, and Christ was God.” His consistency of will enabled him to overcome them in the same way that every other man who does so has overcome temptation.” 8.Davis underlined the phrase “surrounded by divinity,” and he wondered aloud, “Was not divinity ‘within’ him?” 9.Baillie, God Was in Christ, pp.
247 in this book).