What Jesus Really Looked Like On Cross

What Was the Shape of Jesus’ Cross?

An interesting topic regarding the form of the Crucifixion cross of Jesus came to my attention recently after I delivered a keynote address at an international conference. In an attempt to dispute the customary form of the cross, he had been approached by Jehovah’s Witnesses. As they pointed out, “cross” (stauros) is merely a Greek word that may signify any of three things: a “upright pole,” a “upright stake,” or a “torture stake.” His Jehovah’s Witness guests reported that Jesus was indeed nailed to a straight stake with a single spike through his hands and another through his feet, as described by the visitors from the organization.

There are a number of evidence indicators provided in the scripture to assist us in understanding the real form of Jesus’ crucifixion, despite the fact that the Greek terms used for the cross in the New Testament are not precise about its shape (“stauros” = stake / pole and “xulon” = timber / tree).

“(The Jews caught outside the walls of Jerusalem) were first whipped, and then tormented with all kinds of tortures, before they died, and were then crucified before the wall of the city.”, Josephus wrote about the siege of Jerusalem in 70AD.

The first-century Roman philosopher Seneca the Younger described crucifixion in a variety of ways, saying, “I find in front of me crosses not all alike, but made differently by different people: some hang a man head downwards, some force a stick upwards through his groin, some stretch out his arms on a forked gibbet” (Seneca the Younger, “To Marcia on Consolation,” in Moral Essays, 6.20).

  • It is possible to bind or fasten the victim’s hands with a single piece of rope or a single nail if the wood is cut into this shape, as many Jehovah’s Witnesses believe.
  • There are other names for this cross, including “St.
  • This building was built from a horizontal beam that was joined at the top of a vertical stake, resulting in a “T” shape when assembled.
  • It was either fastened jointly or individually to the bottom of the vertical pillar where their feet rested.
  • Using a vertical stake, a horizontal cross beam (referred to as a “patibulum”) was put across the upper section of the stake, leaving a “tip” that extended above the patibulum to complete the construction.
  • On either side of the patibulum, victims were nailed to the structure with their arms spread in front of them.
  • Crux Decussata is the letter X.

Andrew’s Cross”) takes its name from the Roman numeral ten (“decussis”), which means “decus” in Latin.

Their feet were either fastened to the bottom ends of the X or tied to the bottom ends of the X separately.

Despite the fact that the data is restricted, I believe that the conventional form (the “Crux Immissa”) is the most reasonable inference from the facts because of the following reasons.

The original meaning of the terms “stauros” and “xulon,” like the meaning of other words in other languages, has evolved with time.

For him, the name “stauros” literally translated into the Greek word for “pole.” However, during the time of Christ, the Romans were still employing the Greek language, albeit with certain modifications to give the terms a larger meaning.

When the Romans utilized this kind of punishment, they had to alter the existing Greek language to make it more appropriate for their needs.

David Black explains that “(the original meaning of a word) employed alone cannot effectively account for the meaning of a word since meaning is constantly susceptible to change.

Therefore, it is essential for the New Testament student to understand if the original meaning of a term has survived to a later period.

As a result, according to Kittel’s Theological Dictionary, “stauros” is defined as follows: “There are three main types in terms of shape.

Alternatively, it was made consisting of an upright with a cross-beam above it.

572).

572).

Descriptions of ancient non-biblical sources include the following: An extensive collection of ancient, nonbiblical materials eliminates or at least complicates one form of the cross (“Crux Simplex”) and makes the possibility of another shape (“Crux Decussata”) highly improbable.

Having stretched out both of his arms and bound them to a piece of wood that spanned over his breast and shoulders as far as his wrists, the men who were assigned to escort the slave to his punishment trailed after him, shredding his nude body with whips.” VII, 69:1-2.) (Roman Antiquities, VII, 69:1-2) The word “xulon” was employed by Dionysius to refer to the horizontal “patibulum.” The Epistle of Barnabas is a letter written by Barnabas (90-135AD) In this pseudepigraphic letter, which was employed by many Christians in the early Church to depict the form of the cross as it was understood at that time in history, we may read: And Abraham circumcised eighteen males and three hundred females from among his family, according to the Torah.” So, what exactly was the wisdom that was imparted to him?

Understand you that He speaks the eighteen first, and then after an interval three hundred In the eighteen ‘I’ stands for ten, ‘H’ for eight.

And because the cross in the ‘T’ was to be graced, He says three hundred in addition to that.

According to one author, the cross of Jesus was supported by a cross beam similar to the “Crux Commissa” or “Crux Immissa.” The author of The Epistle of Barnabas also made reference to Exodus 17:11-12, writing: “And He saith again in Moses, when war was waged against Israel by men of another nation, and that He might remind them when war was waged against them that for their sins they were delivered unto death; the Spirit saith to the heart of Moses, *that he should make a type of the cross and of Him that was to suffer, that unless, saith He, The result was that Moses piled his arms on top of each other in the heart of the battle, and standing on higher ground than anybody else, he reached out his hands, and Israel was triumphant yet another time.

They were murdered with the sword whenever he brought them down from their height.” (12:2) (Barnabas 12:2) (Barnabas 12:2) In this section, the author compares the cross of Jesus to a passage from the Old Testament (this time from the story of Moses), interpreting the shape of Jesus’ cross as compelling him to “reach out his hands,” as required by the shape of the cross.

  1. Solomon’s Odes are a collection of eulogies (1 stto 3 rdCenturies) These odes, which are generally regarded as having Christian origins, were written by a number of authors over the course of the first three centuries.
  2. “For the expansion of my hands is His sign, and my extension is the straight cross,” the author wrote.
  3. Justin Martyr (100–165 AD) was a Christian martyr who lived between 100 and 165 AD.
  4. For one, a spit is transfixed entirely through the lamb’s body from the lower regions to the head, and another is transfixed across the back, to which the lamb’s legs are linked.” The dialogue with Trypho in Chapter XL is an example of this.
  5. Other texts by Justin Martyr describe the cross of Jesus in a similar manner, drawing analogies between it like a sail mast and staysail, or portraying the posture of Jesus on the cross with outstretched hands.

Oneirocritica (“The Interpretation of Dreams”), a five-volume Greek book, in which he portrayed prisoners being crucified: “Because he is a criminal, his height and the extension of his hands will be used to crucify him” (Oneirocritica 1:76) In this era of time, according to Artemidorus, offenders were crucified by the Romans on a cross that was double the width of it and twice the height of it.

  • Lucian(125-180AD) This early Greek rhetorician produced a multitude of aesthetic, sarcastic, and cynical works that have survived to the present day.
  • The trial at the Court of Vowels took place on 12.4-13.
  • In addition, the “Crux Decussata” is usually omitted because of the allusions to certain “T” forms in the literature.
  • It is past time to investigate the most reliable source of knowledge we have concerning Jesus’ death on the cross: the historical record.

Here are some hints from the New Testament; perhaps the most obvious is Jesus’ description of crucifixion in the Gospel of John, when he tells Peter how he will die in a manner similar to Jesus’ death: John 21:18-19 (KJV) As a child you used to gird yourself and walk wherever you pleased; as an adult, however, you will stretch out your hands and someone else will gird you and transport you to a location you do not wish to visit.” This, he explained, was a reference to the manner in which he would glorify God through death.

  1. Peter was warned by Jesus that he would die with his hands held out in front of him.
  2. If Peter died on the cross in the manner of Jesus, his cross would have to be one of three types: a “Crux Commissa,” a “Crux Immissa,” or a “Crux Decussata” in order for his hands to be stretched out in prayer.
  3. If the “Crux Simplex” had been used to crucify Jesus, it is likely that his hands were fastened in place with a single nail, according to tradition.
  4. For the second time, this implies that Jesus’ crucifixion would have had to be either a “Crux Commissa,” a “Crux Immissa,” or a “Crux Decussata” in order for more than one nail to be used to secure Jesus’ hands together.
  5. The location of the sign identifying Jesus at the site of crucifixion was recorded by the Gospel authors as follows: Matthew 27:37 (KJV) It was written above His head, “THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS,” and the allegation against Him was leveled against Him.
  6. The old “Crux Immissa” is the best inference.
  7. To send a tweet, simply click here.
  8. The design of the cross is not important to our Christian faith, but it does offer us with a fascinating opportunity to apply our investigative Case Making abilities.
  9. This book teaches readers the ten principles of cold-case investigations and then applies these concepts to the claims of the gospel authors in order to investigate them.

The book is complemented by an eight-sessionCold-Case Christianity DVD Set (as well as a Participant’s Guide) that may be used to assist individuals or small groups analyze the evidence and make their case for Christianity.

What did Jesus really look like?

Everyone is familiar with the appearance of Jesus. He is the most portrayed character in all of Western art, and he is easily recognized by his long hair and beard, as well as his long robe with long sleeves (typically white) and a cloak, which he wears everywhere (often blue). As a result, Jesus may be recognized on pancakes and slices of bread. But did he truly have this appearance? In truth, this well-known image of Jesus dates back to the Byzantine period, from the 4th century onwards, and Byzantine portrayals of Jesus were symbolic rather than historically accurate – they were concerned with symbolism rather than factual accuracy.

  • Image courtesy of Alamy Caption for the image Although the halo derives from ancient art, it was originally a characteristic of the sun deity (Apollo, or Sol Invictus), and was later put to Jesus’s head to demonstrate his celestial nature (Matthew 28:19).
  • A statue of long-haired and bearded Olympian Zeus on a throne is well-known across the globe; in fact, the Roman Emperor Augustus had a duplicate of himself built in the same manner.
  • Alamy/Getty Images is the image source.
  • This depiction of the heavenly Christ, which is occasionally updated in hippy fashion, has evolved into our typical model of the early Jesus as a result of historical development.
  • Let’s take it from top to bottom.
See also:  Why Did Jesus Bring Lazarus Back To Life

1. Hair and beard

In those instances where early Christians did not depict Christ as the celestial king, they depicted him as a regular man with a short beard and short hair. Yale Collections/Public Domain is the source of the image. Caption for the image Ancient paintings of Jesus, from the church of Dura-Europos on the Euphrates River, which is the world’s oldest surviving church (dating from first half of the 3rd Century AD) Nevertheless, as a traveling sage, it is possible that Jesus wore a beard, for the simple reason that he did not visit barbers.

  1. Epictetus, a Stoic philosopher, thought it was “acceptable in accordance with Nature.” Being clean-shaven and having short hair was thought extremely necessary in the first century Graeco-Roman civilization, if for no other reason.
  2. Even a philosopher wore his hair in a rather short style.
  3. In reality, one of the difficulties for oppressors of Jews at various eras was distinguishing them from everyone else when they looked the same as everyone else (a point made in the book of Maccabees).
  4. So Jesus, as a philosopher with a “natural” appearance, may have had a short beard, like the men represented on Judaea Capta coinage, but his hair was most likely not extremely long, like the males depicted on Judaea Capta coinage.
  5. When it came to Jewish males, those who had untidy beards and slightly long hair were instantly identified as those who had taken a Nazirite vow stood out.
  6. However, Jesus did not adhere to the Nazirite vow, as evidenced by the fact that he is frequently spotted drinking wine – his enemies accuse him of consuming an excessive amount of it (Matthew chapter 11, verse 19).

If he had long hair and looked like a Nazirite, we would have expected someone to point out the contradiction between what he appeared to be doing and what he was actually doing – the problem would be that he was actually drinking wine.

2. Clothing

During the time of Jesus, affluent men wore long robes on important occasions in order to flaunt their social standing in front of others. The following is from one of Jesus’ teachings: “Be wary of the scribes, who seek to stroll around the temple courts in long robes (stolai), to be saluted in the markets, to have the most important seats in the synagogues, and to be seated in the places of honour at feasts” (Mark chapter 12, verses 38-39). Because the sayings of Jesus are widely believed to be the more accurate sections of the Gospels, we can infer that Jesus did not actually wear such clothes.

  • As a result, when Thecla, a woman, dresses in a short (male) tunic in the 2nd Century Acts of Paul and Thecla, it comes as a bit of a surprise.
  • It was customary to wear a mantle over the tunic to protect one’s shoulders from the elements, and we know that Jesus wore one of them since it was this that a lady touched when she desired to be cured by him (see, for example, Mark chapter 5, verse 27).
  • Histation, which could be worn in a variety of ways, including as a wrap, would fall beyond the knees and entirely cover the short tunic.
  • Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
  • The quality, size, and color of these mantles all served as indicators of power and status in their respective societies.
  • Because the dyes used to create these colors were extremely uncommon and expensive, they were referred to as “royal colors.” Colors, on the other hand, might signify something else.
  • Real men, unless they were of the greatest social position, should, according to this, dress in undyed garments.
  • A notable feature of this hairstyle was that it required bleaching or chalking, and it was linked with a sect known as the Essenes, who adhered to a stringent interpretation of Jewish law.

As Mark describes it, Jesus’shimatia (which may refer to “clothing” or “clothes” rather of particularly “mantles”) began to shine “glistening, exceedingly white, as no fuller on earth could bleach them,” and eventually became “glistening, extremely white.” As a result, before his transfiguration, Jesus is depicted by Mark as an average man, dressed in ordinary garments, in this instance undyed wool, the kind of material that would be sent to a fuller for processing.

More information regarding Jesus’ attire is revealed after his death, when the Roman soldiers split his himatia (in this context, the term most likely refers to two mantles) into four portions, each of which contains a different piece of clothing (see John chapter 19, verse 23).

This cloak with tassels (tzitzith) is expressly mentioned by Jesus in Matthew 23:5 when he speaks of the kingdom of God.

A lightweight himation, typically constructed of undyed creamy-colored woollen material, and it was likely embellished with some sort of indigo stripe or threading, as was the case here.

3. Feet

Jesus would have walked about with sandals on his feet. Everyone walked about in sandals. Sandals from the time of Jesus have been discovered in desert caverns between the Dead Sea and Masada, allowing us to observe firsthand what they were like during the time of the Savior. The soles were made of thick strips of leather that were sewed together, and the top sections were made of leather straps that went through the toes. They were extremely plain and straightforward. Gabi Laron is the photographer that captured this image.

Exhibition catalogue for The Story of Masada, published by G.

The Hebrew University, the Israel Antiquity Authority, and the Israel Exploration Society are all located in Jerusalem.

4. Features

And what about Jesus’s physical characteristics? They were of Jewish descent. The fact that Jesus was a Jew (or a Judaean) is unquestionable since it is repeated in a variety of literary sources, including the writings of Paul, provides more evidence. Furthermore, as stated in the Letter to the Hebrews, “it is unmistakable that our Lord was descended from the tribe of Judah.” So, how do we see a Jew at this time, a guy who, according to Luke chapter 3, was “around 30 years of age when he began,” in this situation?

  1. He did not assert that it was the face of Jesus.
  2. Image courtesy of Alamy Caption for the image Despite what some painters, such as the artist who created this fresco in Crete, may believe, Jesus did not have blue eyes as others have imagined.
  3. Moses is depicted in undyed garments, and his one cloak is in reality a tallith, since tassels (tzitzith) can be seen at the corners of the Dura depiction of Moses splitting the Red Sea.
  4. Image courtesy of Alamy A tallith (used as a cloak) with blue ornamentation seems to be worn by Moses in the image description; the blue in both garments is most likely the result of indigo dye being applied to them.

If you subscribe to the BBC News Magazine’s email subscription, you will receive items delivered directly to your inbox.

What Did Jesus Really Look Like? New Study Redraws Holy Image

Following new study by Joan Taylor, it has been suggested that Jesus was of normal height, with short black hair and brown eyes, as well as olive-brown complexion. (Image credit: Painting by Cathy Fisher, depicting Jesus with shorter garments and hair in conformity with the latest results.) Quickly searching for “Jesus” on Google will provide a range of photos depicting a tall, white person with long, blondish hair and a beard, with a beard. But what didJesus look like in his natural state? According to a recent book by a professor, Jesus most likely did not look anything like the image we have today.

  • in Bethlehem and spent a brief period of time in Egypt as a kid before settling in Nazareth with his family.
  • (T T Clark et al., 2018) “It’s very interesting how little is made of it, and what he looked like,” Taylor said in an interview with Live Science.
  • Additionally, Taylor writes in her book that the oldest creative portrayals of Jesus date back at least two centuries after he died, and that they give little trustworthy information about what Jesus may have looked like.
  • She also looked at beautiful images on coins as well as Egyptian mummy paintings for more inspiration.
See also:  In What Water Was Jesus Baptized

Average, short-haired guy

According to Taylor’s study, rather than towering over his contemporaries in Judea, Jesus was around 5 foot 5 inches (1.7 meters) tall, which corresponds to the typical height observed in skeletal remains of males from the region at the time of his death. As evidenced by the presence of archaeological remains, historical writings, and portrayals of individuals in Egyptian mummy pictures, Taylor asserts that people in Judea and Egypt tended to be of dark complexion with brown eyes, black hair, and olive-brown skin, among other characteristics.

  • Taylor discovered that because Jews in Judea and Egypt preferred to marry among themselves at the period, Jesus’ complexion, eyes, and hair were most likely similar to the skin, eyes, and hair of the majority of the people in Judea and Egypt.
  • According to Taylor, historical records also revealed that individuals in Judea tended to maintain their hair (and beards) moderately short and well-combed, most likely in order to keep lice out, which was a major problem at the period.
  • In order to cut his hair and beard, he might have used a knife, according to Taylor, who pointed out that individuals in the ancient past were generally more competent with knives than people are today.
  • This busy lifestyle, combined with a lack of regular eating, resulted in his being likely lean but slightly muscular, according to Taylor.
  • In any case, he shouldn’t be portrayed as someone who was content with his lot in life; unfortunately, that’s the type of picture we sometimes receive.” Taylor stated that other elements of Jesus’ face, such as his lips and cheeks, are a mystery at this time.

She expressed skepticism about representations of Jesus in which he is shown to be particularly attractive. Taylor asserted that if Jesus had been attractive, the gospel authors or other early Christian writers would have stated as much, just as they did for Moses and David.

Jesus’ tunic

A few suggestions regarding Jesus’ attire may be found in the gospels, as well as in archaeological remnants that have been discovered. He was most likely dressed in a woolen, undyed tunic that exposed his lower legs; a loincloth; and a “mantle,” or outer cloak, to keep warm. His shoes would have looked like modern-day sandals, and because clothing was so expensive at the time, it is probable that Jesus performed a lot of repairing. Furthermore, unless someone gave him with new clothing, the clothes he was wearing would get increasingly damaged with time.

  1. Taylor’s book received generally excellent reviews from biblical experts who have studied it, including Helen Bond, a professor of theology at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland, and Jim West, an adjunct professor of biblical studies at Ming Hua Theological College in Hong Kong.
  2. Aside from that, she expressed excitement at the prospect of seeing additional artists attempt to rebuild depictions of Jesus in light of her results.
  3. The original version of this article appeared on Live Science.
  4. A bachelor of arts degree from the University of Toronto and a journalism degree from Ryerson University are among Owen’s qualifications.

What did Jesus look like?

  1. Describe what Jesus looked like on the cross
  2. Describe what Jesus looks like in paradise.

Jesus’ lineage

According to the stories in the New Testament, Jesus was reported to have slipped away into the throng on multiple occasions and was unable to be discovered (Luke 4:30). Also in Matthew 1:1-17, we learn about Jesus’ pedigree, which begins with Adam and Abraham and ends with his parents, Joseph and Mary. What is the significance of this? There wasn’t much that distinguished him from the other Jews who were living in Israel at the time, and as a result, he didn’t stand out much from the rest of the throng.

His career was a good indicator of his physical appearance.

Where Was Jesus Born?

Was Jesus Beautiful?

In Isaiah 53, the prophet foretold that Jesus would have no exterior traits or attractiveness that would allure people to Him or entice them to Him. As an additional point of clarification, Isaiah says that Jesus will sprout up like a plant out of dry ground, without any type of kingly grandeur. The bottom line is that Jesus seemed to be a normal guy with no distinctive qualities. There was no reason for the people to follow Jesus just because he appeared to be a rock star or a model on the outside.

He was followed instead because of the words, lessons, and theology he preached. Jesus’ teachings were different from those of the religious authorities of the day; rather, He spoke with authority (Matthew 7:28-29).

What Did Jesus Look Like on the Cross?

Additionally, the Bible states in Isaiah 52 and 53 that Jesus was subjected to excruciating physical and mental agony in the days leading up to his crucifixion. According to Isaiah 53:4-5, Jesus bore our anguish and sorrows, and He was lashed, wounded, and bruised as a result of our transgressions. You can only imagine what Jesus must have looked like after all of that suffering. You can only imagine the expression on His face when the nails were pressed into His hands. You can only imagine the expression on His face when the crown of thorns was put on His head.

Assume the look of love on Jesus’ face when He meets you, over 2,000 years later, and accepts your repentance for everything you have done.

What Does Jesus Look Like in Heaven?

Following his ascension to heaven in a glorified body, Jesus is described in detail in the book of Revelation. In two primary locations, Revelation 1 and 19, John had a vision of Jesus and records what he sees. The following description is taken from the vision. Jesus seems to be the “Son of Man,” who is dressed in a garment that extends all the way down to His feet with a golden belt around His breast (Revelation 1:13). In the book of Revelation, his head and hair are white as snow, and his eyes are like flames of fire (Rev 1:14).

As seen by John in Revelation 1:16, Jesus is holding seven stars in His right hand, and His feet appear to be highly polished brass from a furnace (Rev 1:15, 2:18).

Revelation 19 also offers an image of Jesus returning to earth, adorned with many crowns and riding on a white horse with a name inscribed on it that no one could read before (Rev 19:11-12).

According to the Book of Revelation, the voice of Jesus sounds like a trumpet, and the sound of many rivers is heard (Rev 1:10,15; 19:6).

Jesus in Daniel’s Visions

It’s fascinating to observe that Daniel identifies Jesus as having attributes that are practically identical to those of Jesus. According to Daniel 10:5-6, Jesus is described in the following way:

  • Daniel 10:5 describes him as being dressed in linen, with a pure golden ribbon around his waist (Daniel 10:5), and with a body that looked like Beryl (Daniel 10:6). Daniel 10:6 describes the face as being like flashes of lightning
  • The eyes as being like fiery torches
  • The arms and feet as being like polished bronze
  • The voice as being like the sound of a multitude (Daniel 10:6).

What Did Jesus Look Like?

Many people have pondered, “What did Jesus look like?” after reading the Bible or hearing someone speak about Jesus. Given that Jesus lived more than 2,000 years ago, we don’t have any photographs or even sketches of what he looked like. We may, however, draw some broad conclusions about Jesus’ physical appearance based on his society and archeological evidence, which we will discuss below. Professor Joan Taylor of Christian Origins and Second Temple Judaism at King’s College London conducted research for her book What Did Jesus Look Like?

She believes that Jesus had a physical appearance similar to that of the majority of people in the Middle East throughout the First Century.

The majority of first-century Jewish men, according to archeological data, stood around 5’5″ tall and had brown eyes. Another school of thought holds that Jesus was 5′ 1″ tall and weighed 110 pounds.

Jesus Likely Had Black Hair and a Beard.

“And do not swear by your head, for you will not be able to make even one hair white or black,” Jesus instructed his disciples (Matthew 5:36). Jesus most likely wore a beard and short curly hair with long sideburns or “payot,” as the Greeks called them. “You shall not round off the hair on your temples or ruin the corners of your beard,” according to Leviticus 19:27, therefore Jesus adhered to the rules of grooming. In modern times, Orthodox Jewish men continue to have a lengthy beard on the sides of their heads.

“Does not the very nature of things tell you that if a man has long hair, it is a source of embarrassment for him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is a source of pride for her?” Paul says to early Christians in Corinth.

Jesus Was neither Tall nor Remarkably Good Looking.

They would have made a comment if Jesus’ arrival had been noteworthy in any manner, according to the gospels’ writers. For example, in the Gospel of Luke, a tax collector by the name of Zachaeusas short is described. “Jesus was on his way to him, and Zacchaeus was interested in seeing what he was like. Zacchaeus, on the other hand, was a small man who couldn’t see above the crowd. As a result, he went ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree,” says the author. (Luke 19:3-4, Christian Standard Version) If Jesus had been taller than the average person in the throng, Zacchaeus would have been able to see him clearly over the rest of the people.

“Kish had a son named Saul, who was better-looking and more than a head taller than everyone else in all of Israel,” according to the story.

See also:  What Did Jesus Say About The Holy Spirit

The giant Goliath was mentioned in 1 Samuel 17:4 as being six cubits and a span tall, which equates to more than nine feet tall.

Jesus Was Not Beautiful and Wasn’t Considered Majestic.

When the disciples were writing their personal narrative of Jesus’ life and career, they drew on prophecy from the book of Isaiah 53 to inspire them. This chapter of Isaiah, according to many Christians, is a description of Jesus’ coming to earth as the Messiah and the suffering He would face. “Because he sprang up before him like a young plant, and like a root emerging from parched earth; he has neither shape nor grandeur that we should admire, nor beauty that we should love him,” he said. He was hated and rejected by mankind; he was a man of sorrows and acquainted with sadness; and like one from whom folks hide their faces, he was despised, and we did not see him as someone to be respected.

(Isaiah 53:2–3, Isaiah 53:5) The Matthew Henry Concise Commentary on Isaiah 53:1-3 draws a connection between this prophetic scripture and Christ’s lack of beauty and appearance, as well as his suffering and ministry, according to the commentary.

According to Jewish tradition, the Messiah’s lowly status and public appearance did not comport with their conceptions of him.

In his explanation, he stated that “it is written of the Son of Man that he should endure many things and be regarded with disdain.” He added that (Matthew 9:12) According to Matthew 8:17, Jesus cured those who were demon-possessed as well as all others who were sick in order to “fulfill what was declared by the prophet Isaiah: ‘He took our ailments and bore our diseases.'” “He Himself bore our sins in His body on the tree, so that we may die to sin and live to righteousness,” Peter wrote.

“You have been healed by His stripes” (1 Peter 2:24).

Why Aren’t There Pictures of Jesus from His Lifetime?

Jesus’ ministry and message had a profound impact on the entire globe. People were martyred and died as a result of their faith in him, but we have no physical evidence of what he seemed to be like. Throughout the First Century, carvings, sculptures, and mosaics representing military commanders like Caesar as well as ordinary people have been discovered. Why didn’t early Christians erect portraits or sculptures in Christ’s honor? What was the reason for this? Having been raised as Jews, Jesus and the earliest followers observed the Law and relied on Old Testament principles to guide them in every aspect of their life, including marriage.

God’s people were not allowed to worship any other gods.

A carved figure or any likeness of anything in the heavens above, or anything in the earth beneath, or anything that is in the sea under the ground shall not be made for yourself” (Exodus 20:4).

A critical instruction with far-reaching implications was issued.

“So that you do not become corrupt and create for yourselves an idol, an image of any shape, whether formed in the shape of a man or a woman, or in the shape of any animal on the earth, or in the shape of any bird that flies in the air, or in the shape of any creature that moves along the ground, or in the shape of any fish in the waters beneath” (Deuteronomy 4:15-18).

Why Do We Have Pictures of Jesus If Early Christians Didn’t Create Images?

The images of Christ in stained glass, icons or sculptures in the sanctuary, or depictions of Jesus in your Children’s Bible may have been a part of your childhood experience. These are examples of the artist’s imaginative abilities. One of the earliest known depictions of Jesus goes back to 235 years after his death and resurrection. This painting of Jesus curing the paralytic was discovered on a wall at Syria’s Dura-Europos church, which is one of the world’s earliest Christian churches and is considered to be the oldest in the world.

  • It wasn’t until the fourth century C.E.
  • The Bible was taught to Christians via the use of art in the early church.
  • Art was an important aspect of Roman civilization, and it was later absorbed into early Christian culture.
  • Ancient artwork, paintings, and even current visuals are representations of an artist’s imagination as well as the culture in which they were created.

We can easily see how the artist’s point of view and society impacted the attire, hair color, and even hairdo that Jesus wore in this painting.

What Does All This Mean for Us Today?

Knowing that no images or sculptures of Jesus were created during his lifetime serves as a reminder to us that God looks at the heart and not the external appearance of a person. Once, when God enlisted the prophet Samuel to pick the king of Israel, God gave him extremely precise instructions to avoid Saul, who had the appearance of a king but did not have a desire to serve the Lord. In response, the Lord instructed Samuel to disregard his outward appearance or the height of his stature because he had been rejected by Me.'” Because the Lord views things differently than men do: men gaze at the external appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart.” (1 Samuel 16:7; 1 Samuel 16:8) It is critical that we learn from this and refrain from judging ourselves or others based on our external looks.

  • Similarly to what Jesus instructed his followers, “Do not judge by appearances, but judge with sound judgment” (John 7:24).
  • Considering that none of the texts written by Jesus’ disciples contain any description of his looks, it is astonishing that they do not.
  • Whenever we feel unattractive or unattractive, or when people detest or criticize us because of our appearance, we must remember that Jesus himself was unattractive and unattractive; he wasn’t regarded good-looking or handsome; and people laughed at him and even spat on him (Matthew 26:67).
  • This is not the behavior that Christians should exhibit.
  • According to James 3:9, our value is founded on God’s love for us, for he created every human being in His image.Sources: BibleStudyTools.com, Baker’s Evangelical Dictionary.
  • Isaiah 53, according to BiblicalArchaeology.org “Can you tell me what Jesus looked like?” CNN.com, “A New Face of Jesus emerges from the realms of science and computers.” Jeordan Legon’s work from 2002.
  • TimesOfIsrael.com, “During a forensic pilgrimage, a researcher inquires, ‘What did Jesus look like?'” the article states.
  • Penny Noyes, M.Ed., is the author of Embracing Change – Learning to Trust God through the Women of the Bibleas well as two books on Hezekiah.
  • Penny Noyes may be found on her blog and on Instagram, where she goes by the handle @pennynoyes.
  • Bethany Pyle is responsible for the design.

‘Scarred and disfigured!’ This is what Jesus REALLY looked like

GETTYCan you tell me what Jesus looked like? Sign up HERE to get science discoveries in health, business, and other areas that are important to you. Invalid email address We use the information you submit about yourself to serve you with material in ways that you have consented to and to enhance our knowledge of you. This may contain advertisements from us as well as advertisements from third parties depending on our understanding. You have the option to unsubscribe at any time. For further information, please see the following link: She feels that the paucity of specifics about Jesus’ looks in the Gospels actually says a lot about him.

  • As an outdoor carpenter, it is likely that Jesus’ face became leathery as a result of his prolonged exposure to the scorching heat of the Middle East throughout his working day.
  • Broken limbs and scarring would have been typical occurrences for this trade at the time, and without contemporary medical treatments, the bones would not have been able to set correctly and the scars would not have healed completely, resulting in deformity.
  • The gospels, on the other hand, give no such indications about Jesus.
  • GETTYJesus Christ would not have been a good-looking man if he had been alive today.
  • “What I have discovered is that Judaeans of this period were the closest physiologically to Iraqi Jews of the modern world,” the historian said in an article for the Irish Times.

What did Jesus look like?

QuestionAnswer When it comes to Jesus’ physical appearance during His incarnation, there is no bodily description provided in the Bible. According to Isaiah 53:2b, “He had no beauty or grandeur to entice us to Him, nothing in His appearance that we might want Him.” This is the closest approximation we have to a description. All this tells us is that Jesus’ physical appearance was no different than that of any other man — He was unremarkable. He was prophesying that the coming suffering Servant would come in lowly circumstances and would not wear any of the traditional symbols of monarchy, revealing His actual identity only to those with a keen spiritual discernment and a strong faith.

“His appearance was so deformed that it could not be mistaken for that of a man, and his form was so ruined that it could not be mistaken for that of a human” (Isaiah 52:14).

People were taken aback by His appearance, which caused them to stare at Him in disbelief.

Because Jesus was a Jew, it’s likely that He had dark complexion, black eyes, and dark hair to match.

One thing is certain: if it were vital for us to know what He looked like in person, Matthew, Peter, and John, who spent three years with Him, would undoubtedly be able to provide us with an accurate description, as would His own brothers, James and Jude, who also spent three years with Him.

Despite this, the writers of the New Testament provide no information on His physical characteristics. Questions regarding Jesus Christ (return to top of page) What was Jesus’ physical appearance like?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.