What Is Jesus In Aramaic

Jesus in Aramaic.

The word mshikha (משיחא)-the Messiah is related to the word mishkha (מישחא) which means oil or olive oil in Aramaic.

“He will be referred to as a Nazarene.” Matthew 2:23 (KJV) netiqre dnoroyo netiqre dnoroyo netiqre dnoroyo Natzrat (Jesus Nazarene) is an Israelite who was born in the city of Nazareth, which was a town in Galilee. He was known as a Nazarene because of his religious beliefs. The city of Nazareth gets its name from the Hebrew word Nazara, which means “truth.” Jesus was fluent in Galilean Aramaic, which was the native language of the people who lived in the area at the time. By that time, Hebrew had been virtually extinct as a spoken language since the period of the expulsion of the Jews from Babylon, and it was being utilized almost exclusively as a liturgical language.

When they returned to Judaea, they carried their newly learned language with them.

The historical name of Jesus (Jesus) in Amaraic was Yeshua, while the historical name of Jesus (Jesus) in Classical Syriac was Yeshua.

• The name of Jesus is also commonly abbreviated as, which stands for Jesus Christ.
• In many parts of the Middle East, anointing with oil was a typical part of the inauguration rite for new rulers.
• The act of anointing with oil was significant in the ceremonies of many ancient Middle Eastern peoples, and it had the symbolic significance of elevating anything to the status of something sacred or heavenly.
• Jesus the Messiah was anointed at the same time as he was elevated to the position of new king of his heavenly kingdom.
• It derives from the Greek term X, which literally translates as ‘the anointed one,’ and is a translation of the Aramaic Msheekha (Messiah).
• It is possible that the term mshikha (), which signifies Messiah, is derived from the word mishkha (), which means oil or olive oil in Aramaic.
• In Biblical times, it was the act of being anointed for royalty.
• As with every language, there are variations: Yeshuo Msheekho in Western Syriac and Yeshua Msheekha in Eastern Syriac, for example.
• The video below demonstrates how to write Jesus’ name in the Estrangeloscript font.

Written in the Herodian script, which is a form of the square Aramaic alphabet that was in use in Judea during Herod’s time, is the name Yeshua. Herod was a client king of the Romans in the kingdom of Judea, and he governed during the period when Jesus was on the earth ministering to the people.

The name Jesus written in the Imperial Aramaic script. The Imperial Aramaic script is written as follows: Yeshua. Because it was the primary Aramaic script in the Persian Empire during the time of Jesus, the Imperial Aramaic alphabet was not in use during Jesus’ lifetime. I’m using it here retroactively just to provide as an example of how the script should be written. Now, have a look at this video, which explains the origins of the name Jesus.

Jesus (name) – Wikipedia

Jesus

Pronunciation
Gender	Male
Origin
Word/name	Hebrew
Other names
Related names	Joshua,Yeshua,Isa

Isous(o; Iesus in Classical Latin) is an ancient Greek version of the Hebrew and Aramaic names Yeshua and Y’shua (Hebrew: ). It is used as a given name for boys and men. Because its origins lay in the name Yeshua/Y’shua, it is etymologically connected to another biblical name, Joshua, because both names derive from the same root. “Jesus” is not commonly used as a given name in the English-speaking world, but its equivalents, like as the SpanishJesus, have had long-standing popularity among persons from other language backgrounds.

Etymology

There have been a number of different hypotheses as to the actual etymological meaning of the nameYhôua(Joshua,Hebrew:), includingYahweh /Yehowah saves, (is) salvation, (is) a saving-cry, (is) a cry-for-help, (is) my aid, andYahweh /Yehowah saves, (is) salvation, (is) a As may be seen in the Hebrew text of Ezra 2:2, 2:6, 2:36, 2:40, 3:2, 3:8, 3:9, 3:10, 3:18, 4:3, and 8:33, as well as in the Biblical Aramaicat text of Ezra 5:2, Ezra 3:19, 7:7, 7:11, 7:39, 7:43, 8:7, 8:17, 9:4, 9:5, 11:26, 12 These Bible passages are about 10 different people (in Nehemiah 8:17, the name refers toJoshuason ofNun).

1. This historical transition may have occurred as a result of a phonological shift in which gutturalphonemes, such as, were diminished.
2. However, this has changed recently (-yah).
3. During the Second Temple era, the name Yeshua/Y’shua was widely used by Jews, and numerous Jewish religious luminaries, including Joshua in the Hebrew Bible and Jesus in the New Testament, were known by this name.
4. In contrast, both the Western Syriac Christian tradition and the Eastern Syriac Christian tradition employ the Aramaic names (in Hebrew script: )Yeshu and Yisho, respectively, which include the ayin.
5. Earlier, in the 3rd century BCE, theSeptuaginthad already transliterated the Hebrew name (Yeshua) into Koine Greek as nearly as possible, resulting in the name (Isous).

When speaking Hebrew or Aramaic during this period, the diphthongalvowel of the Masoretic name Yehoshua or Yeshua would not have been present in the pronunciation of the word, and some scholars believe some dialects dropped the pharyngealsound of the final letter ayin, which had no equivalent in ancient Greek in any case.

• According to thePanarionofEpiphanius of Salamis, the nameIsous is derived from Hebrew/Aramaic and means “healer or physician, and savior,” and that the early Christians were known as Jessaeans before they were known as Christians.
• From Greek, (Isous) made its way into Latin, at the very least by the time of theVetus Latina.
• The word (Isous) was transliterated into the Latin word IESVS, where it remained for centuries.
• Minuscule(lower case) letters were formed about the year 800, and a little time later, theUwas invented to separate the vowelsound from the consonantalsound, and theJwas invented to distinguish the consonant from the vowelsound.
• The name Jesus comes from the Middle English word Iesu, which means “Jesus” (attested from the 12th century).
• Because of this, early 17th century works such asthe first edition of theKing James Version of the Bible(1611) continued to print the name with an I, as did the Frenchman Pierre Ramus in the 16th century.

The English language borrows the Latin names “Jesus” (from the nominative form) and “Jesu” (from the genitive form) (from the vocative and oblique forms). “Jesus” is the most often used version, with “Jesu” appearing in a few older, more ancient manuscripts as well.

Declension

Many different interpretations have been offered for the exact etymological meaning of the nameYhôua (Joshua, Hebrew:), includingYahweh /Yehowah saves, (is) salvation, (is) a saving-cry, (is) a cry-for-help, (is) my aid, andYahweh /Yehowah saves, (is) a cry-for-help, and (is) This early biblical Hebrew name (Yehoshua) was shortened to later biblical (Yeshua / Y’shua), as evidenced by the Hebrew text of Ezra 2:2, 2:6, 2:36, 2:40, 3:2, 3:8, 3:9, 3:10, 3:18, 4:3, 8:33; Nehemiah 3:19, 7:7, 7:11, 7:39, 7:43, 8:7, 8:17, Each of the 10 persons mentioned in these Bible scriptures is referred to as (in Nehemiah 8:17, the name refers toJoshuason ofNun).

1. In other cases, as as in the case of gutturalphonemes, a phonological shift may have caused this change in history.
2. It is possible that the effect of the triliteral rooty—- has caused the fronting of the vowel in the contraction ofYehoshuatoYeshua.
3. While Hebrew language Jews began to use the more condensed formYeshuto refer to the Christian Jesus throughout the post-biblical period, the longer formYehoshuaremained in use for the other persons known as Jesus during this time period.
4. Earlier, in the 3rd century BCE, theSeptuaginthad already transliterated the Hebrew name (Yeshua) into Koine Greek as nearly as possible, resulting in the name (Isous).

When speaking Hebrew or Aramaic during this period, the diphthongalvowel of the Masoretic name Yehoshua or Yeshua would not have been present in the language’s pronunciation, and some scholars believe some dialects dropped the pharyngealsound of the final letter ayin, which had no equivalent in ancient Greek.

1. According to thePanarionofEpiphanius of Salamis, the nameIsous is derived from Hebrew/Aramaic and means “healer or physician, as well as savior,” and that the early Christians were known as Jessaeans before they were referred to be Christian.
2. At the very least, by the time of theVetus Latina, the word (Isous) had made its way into Latin from Greek.
3. After being transliterated into LatinIESVS, the word (Isous) remained in use for several centuries.
4. Minuscule(lower case) letters were formed about the year 800, and a few years later, theUwas invented to separate the vowelsound from the consonantalsound, and theJwas invented to distinguish the consonant from the vowelsound.
5. The name Jesus comes from the Middle English word Iesu, which means “Christ” (attested from the 12th century).
6. 1200).

Despite the fact that the Frenchman Pierre Ramusfirst distinguished the letter J from the letter ‘I’ in the 16th century, the letter did not become common in Modern English until the 17th century, resulting in early 17th century works such asthe first edition of theKing James Version of the Bible(1611) continuing to print the name with the letter I.

The English language borrows the Latin names “Jesus” (from the nominative form) and “Jesu” (from the genitive form) for their respective deities (from the vocative and oblique forms). Although the name “Jesus” is the most often used, the name “Jesu” may be found in certain older manuscripts.

	Latin	Greek
nominative	Jēsūs	Iēsūs(Iēsus)	Ἰησοῦς
accusative	Jēsūm	Iēsūm(Iēsum)	Ἰησοῦν
dative	Jēsū	Iēsū	Ἰησοῦ
genitive
vocative
ablative	–

Biblical references

Jesus (Yeshua) appears to have been in common usage in the Land of Israel around the time of Jesus’ birth, according to archaeological evidence. As an added bonus, Philo’s reference to Joshua (o), which means redemption () of the Lord inMutatione Nominumitem 121 suggests that the etymology of Joshua was known outside of Israel. Jesus Barabbas, Jesus ben Ananias, and Jesus ben Sirach are some of the other characters with the name Jesus. In the New Testament, an angel advises Mary to name her child Jesus inLuke 1:31, and an angel tells Joseph to name the kid Jesus in Matthew 1:21, both of which occur during Joseph’s first dream.

“You shall call his name Jesus, for he will rescue his people from their sins,” the angel says.

At the same time, it accomplishes the dual objectives of recognizing Jesus as the savior and emphasizing that the name was not chosen at random but rather in response to a divine order.

Other usage

During the 1380s, John Wycliffe used the spellingIhesusand also used the spellingIhesu(the letter ‘J’ was then awash glyphvariant of ‘I’, and was not considered to be a separate letter until the 1629 Cambridge 1st RevisionKing James Biblewhere the name “Jesus” first appeared) in oblique cases and also in the accusative, and sometimes, seemingly without reason, even for the nominative. Unlike Tyndale, who used Iesuin oblique cases and in the vocative on occasion in the 16th century, the 1611King James Version uses Iesus throughout, independent of syntax and case.

Jesu (pronounced JEE -zoo; derived from the Latin Iesu) is a pronoun that is sometimes used to refer to Jesus in English.

Other languages

The nameJesus is used in numerous languages, including East Scandinavian, German, and several others. Other examples of language use are as follows:

Language	Name/variant
Afrikaans	Jesus
Albanian	Jezui
Arabic	ʿIsàعيسى(Islamic or classical arabic) /Yasūʿيسوع(Christian or latter Arabic)
Amharic	ኢየሱስ(iyesus)
Aragonese	Chesús
Aramaic / Syriac	ܝܫܘܥ(Isho)
Arberesh	Isuthi
Armenian	Հիսուս (Eastern Armenian) Յիսուս (Western Armenian)(Hisus)
Azerbaijani	İsa
Belarusian	Ісус(Isus) (Orthodox) /Езус(Yezus) (Catholic)
Bengali	যীশু(Jeeshu/Zeeshu) (Christian)’ঈসা(‘Eesa) (General)
Breton	Jezuz
Bulgarian	Исус (Isus)
Catalan	Jesús
Chinese	simplified Chinese:耶稣;traditional Chinese:耶穌;pinyin:Yēsū
Coptic	Ⲓⲏⲥⲟⲩⲥ(Isos)
Cornish	Yesu
Croatian	Isus
Czech	Ježíš
Dutch	Jezus
Estonian	Jeesus
Filipino	Jesús(Christian and secular) /HesúsorHesukristo(religious)
Fijian	Jisu
Finnish	Jeesus
French	Jésus
Galician	Xesús
Garo	Jisu
Georgian	იესო(Ieso)
German	Jesus
Ewe	Yesu
Greek	Ιησούς(Iisúsmodern Greek pronunciation)
Haitian Creole	Jezi
Hausa	Yesu
Hawaiian	Iesū
Hebrew	Yeshua /Y’shuaיֵשׁוּעַ
Hindustani	ईसा / عيسى (īsā)
Hmong Daw	Yexus
Hungarian	Jézus
Icelandic	Jesús
Igbo	Jisos
Indonesia	Yesus (Christian) / Isa (Islamic)
Irish	Íosa
Italian	Gesù
Japanese	イエス (Iesu)/イエズス (Iezusu)(Catholic)/ゼス(zesu) ゼズス(zezusu)(Kirishitan)イイスス(Iisusu)(Eastern Orthodox)
Jinghpaw	Yesu
Kannada	ಯೇಸು (Yesu)
Kazakh	Иса (Isa)
Khasi	Jisu
Khmer	យេស៑ូ (Yesu), យេស៑ូវ (Yesuw)
Kikuyu	Jeso
Kisii	Yeso
Korean	예수 (Yesu)
Kurdish	Îsa
Latvian	Jēzus
Ligurian	Gesû
Limburgish	Zjezus
Lithuanian	Jėzus
Lombard	Gesü
Luganda	Yesu
Māori	Ihu
मराठी-Marathi	येशू – Yeshu
Malagasy	Jeso, Jesoa, Jesosy
Malayalam	ഈശോ (Īsho), യേശു (Yēshu), കർത്താവ് (Kartāvŭ) (Karthavu is the literal translation of ‘Lord’)
Mirandese	Jasus
Maltese	Ġesù
Mongolian	Есүс
Neapolitan	Giesù
Norman	Jésus
Occitan	Jèsus
Piedmontese	Gesù
Polish	Jezus
Portuguese	Jesus
Romanian	Iisus (Eastern Orthodox) / Isus (other denominations)
Russian	Иисус (Iisus)
Sardinian	Gesùs
Serbian	Isus / Исус
Sicilian	Gesù
Sinhala	ජේසුස් වහන්සේ – Jesus Wahanse (Catholic Church), යේසුස් වහන්සේ – Yesus Wahanse (Protestantism)
Shona	Jesu
Slovak	Ježiš
Slovenian	Jezus
Somali	Ciise
Spanish	Jesús
Swahili	Yesu
Tajik	Исо (Iso)
Tamil	Yesu (இயேசு)
Telugu	యేసు – ఏసు -Yesu
Thai	เยซู – “Yesu”
Turkish	İsa
Turkmen	Isa
Ukrainian	Ісус (Isus)
Urdu	عیسیٰ
Uzbek	Iso
Venetian	Jesu
Vietnamese	Giêsu, Dêsu
Welsh	Iesu
Xhosa	Yesu
Yoruba	Jesu
Zulu	uJesu

See also

• Name of Jesus
• Isa (name)
• Joshua (disambiguation)
• Holy Name of Jesus

References

1. AbLiddell and Scott are two of the most well-known names in the world of sports. An Aramaic–English Lexicon, p. 824
2. AbcCatholic Encyclopedia: The Origin of the Name Jesus Christ
3. Robinson 2005
4. Stegemann 2006
5. “”, Ernest Klein,A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language(New York: Macmillan Publishing Company 1987)
6. Talshir, M. H. Segal,A Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew(Tel Aviv: 1936), p. 146
7. Brown, Driver, Briggs, Ges The Talmud and other Jewish sources, where Jesus is referred to as Yeshu and other Jews with the same name are referred to by the fuller names Yeshua and Yehoshua, “Joshua,” suggest that this is the case
8. Jennings and Brown Driver Briggs Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon
9. Hendrickson Publishers 1996
10. “Strong’s Hebrew: 3467. yasha – to deliver”.biblehub.com
11. “Strong’s Hebrew: 3467. yasha – to deliver”.biblehub.com Brown Driver BriggsHebrew and English Lexicon
12. Hendrickson Publishers 1996ISBN1-56563-206-0
13. Brown Driver BriggsHebrew and English Lexicon
14. “1. The Proto-Semitic root *y’ appears to have preceded Hebrew, as evidenced by the fact that it is found in proper names in NWSem and most of the ESA languages. According to the Ug evidence, the second consonant is pronounced as (Sawyer 1975:78). This new evidence calls into question several previous interpretations based on Arb (see B.1). A.3, A.4, B.3), the collocation of y’ phrases with deities’ names (as with y
15. See A.1, 3, 5, 7-10
16. Also Syntagmatics A.1), historical evidence (see A.5, 7-10
17. Also Syntagmatics A.1), and phonetic equivalence are the key points presented by Sawyer (1975). (B.1). It had been previously endorsed by KB (412, together with wasia), Huffmon (1965: 215), and Stolz (1971: 786, citing Sawyer 1965:475-76, 485)
18. And at the conference where Sawyer first presented his article, T.L. Fenton and H.W.F Saggs had stated their great agreement with it (Sawyer 1975: 83-84). The most notable example of this viewpoint is that it was adopted in the newest Hebrew lexicon in order to accommodate philological facts (Ges18: 510).” (AitkenDavies, 2016)
19. Philo Judaeus, “De ebrietate” in Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunted (Philo Judaeus, “De ebrietate” in Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunted (Philo Judaeus, “De ebrietate” in Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunted (Philo Jud P. Wendland, Berlin: Reimer, 1897 (repr. De Gruyter, 1962), vol. 2:170-214, Section 96, Line 2
20. Williams, Frank
21. Translator. P. Wendland, Berlin: Reimer, 1897 (repr. De Gruyter, 1962), vol. 2:170-214, Section 96, Line 2. “Introduction”. Book I of Epiphanius of Salamis’ Panarion (Panarion of Salamis) (Sects 1-46). 1987. (E.J. Brill Publishing, Leiden) This image depicts a page from the very first edition of the King James Version of the Bible, which contains the Gospel of Luke. ISBN90-04-07926-2 From. Matthew, who was able to get a hold of the information on March 28, 2006
22. By Douglas Hare 2009ISBN0-664-23433-Xpage 11
23. Matthew 1-7by William David Davies, Dale C. Allison 2004ISBN0-567-08355-1page 209
24. Bible explorer’s guideby John Phillips 2002ISBN0-8254-3483-1page 147
25. The Westminster theological wordbook of the Bible2003 by Donald E. GowanISBN0-664-22394-Xpage 453
26. Who Te Aka Mori Dictionary is a free online resource for Mori language learning. Retrieved on June 10th, 2021

Bibliography

• Graham DaviesJames K. AitkenJames K. Aitken (2016). “Another ‘Deliverance’ Word from the SAHD” “Lexeme: (from the SAHD ‘Deliverance’ Words” (PDF). Robinson, Neal’s Semantics of Ancient Hebrew Database is 15 pages long and has 15 entries (2005). “Jesus”. Jane Dammen is a character in McAuliffe (ed.). The Qur’an is an encyclopedia of knowledge. Brill, doi: 10.1163/1875-3922 q3 EQCOM 00099
• Stegemann, Ekkehard (Basle)
• Stegemann, Ekkehard (Basle) (2006). “Jesus”. Hubert Cancik and Helmuth Schneider published a book titled (eds.). Brill’s New Pauly (doi: 10.1163/1574-9347 bnp e522560)
• Brill’s New Pauly (doi: 10.1163/1574-9347 bnp e522560)
• Bri

Jesus’ Name and its Meaning in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic

In the New Testament, the power of Jesus’ name is a major theme that runs throughout the entire book. Demons flee, the sick are healed, and all of creation bows its head in adoration as the name of Jesus is invoked. When it comes to language, the name Jesus carries a great deal of significance in its original culture, and this is true both in the Greek and in the Hebrew languages. When you say Jesus’ name in English, you’re saying Isus, which is a transliteration of the GreekIesous, which is a transliteration of the Aramaic nameYeshua, which is a transliteration of the HebrewYehoshua, or Joshua, which comes from the Hebrew A combination of the Hebrew verbyasha, which means “he saves,” and the proper name Ya, which is short for Yahweh, gave rise to this moniker for God.

When taken as a whole, Jesus’ given name means “Yahweh saves” or “Yahweh is salvation” in the original languages. Learn more about the linguistic shift from Yehoshua to Jesus and why we say “Jesus” today rather than “Joshua” by continuing to read this article.

From Joshua to Yeshua: Jesus’ Name in His Native Tongue (Aramaic)

As a second temple Jew growing up in early first century Israel, Jesus’ native language would have been Aramic, as would have been expected of him. Thus, his given name would have beenYeshua, which is merely the Aramaic version of the Hebrew nameYehoshua (Jesus Christ) (Joshua). The sound -h was omitted from the name Yehoshua at some time throughout the history of the Hebrew language, resulting in the spellingYeshua. This is the form that appears to have been chosen in later Hebrew, and it is the one that has made its way into Aramaic and other languages.

But how did we get from Yehoshua and Yeshua toJesus in the first place?

From Yeshua to Iesous: Jesus’ Name in the Langua Franca (Greek)

However, while Aramaic would have been Jesus’ native language, he would very have have comprehended and spoken Greek, as it was the dominant language at the time. With this in mind, Greek is the universal language that would have been used by everyone in the Mediterranean region for the sake of trade and other social interactions. The possibility that Jesus would have been addressed as Iesous by anybody, even by Greek speakers, is extremely remote. It’s likely that people still referred to him as Yeshua.

• This means that they were only able to write in the Greek Alphabet.
• Y-e-sh-u-aI-e-s-o-u-s The first three letters are understandable.
• The final three letters require a little further explanation.
• This indicates that the termination of a noun varies based on its case or function in the phrase, as indicated above.
• So, in order to translate the Aramaic name Yeshua into Greek, you cannot simply transliterate it.
• As a result, Yeshua became Iesou+, a Greek masculine noun with the ending-os.
• Jesus’ given name is often spelt IesounorIesou.
• The ending -s was added to the nominativecase, or default case, in the Greek spelling ofYeshua, andYeshuawawas typically spelledIesous, as previously stated.

From Iesous to Jesus: Why We Don’t Call Him Joshua

It was the LatinIesus who succeeded the GreekIesous, and it is from this that we derive our spelling Jesus. Understanding why we spell and pronounce particular names in the Bible the way we do requires some background knowledge of the historical context in which our Bible was written. At first appearance, the solution appears to be rather straightforward. Our Old Testament is derived from the Hebrew Bible, while our New Testament is derived from the Greek texts of the early Christian church. Yes, that’s correct.

1. What we have are copies of copies of copies of copies of copies of copies of the originals.
2. Textual criticism, which is used to identify what the original texts most likely stated, is used in our most contemporary translations such as the NIV or the ESV, which go back as far as possible to the original sources in order to get the most accurate translation possible.
3. Nevertheless, for hundreds of years, this was not the case with Bible editions.
4. The Latin Vulgate had a significant effect on the textus receptus.textus receptus Therefore, the Latin transliteration of the Greek is preferred by many of our English spellings and pronunciations above the Aramaic and Hebrew transliterations and pronunciations of the Greek language.

For this reason, the Latin spellingIesus is preferred over the Aramaic spellingYeshua and the HebrewJoshua in our English Bibles. At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how we pronounce the name; it still means the same thing: Yahweh rescues.

A Rose By Any Other Name

This has been a fairly nerdy post about one of my favorite subjects, which you can read about here. It doesn’t really matter if we call Jesus or Joshua by their given names at the end of the day, though. What matters is that Jesus’ name, and indeed his whole identity, is founded on the reality that Yahweh is a God who heals people from their sins. Yahweh is a God who is defined by his ability to save people. That is the name that was given to Jesus by the angel as well as by his father and mother.

• And it is in the name of Jesus that every knee will bend in heaven, on earth, and under the surface of the earth.
• And that is the name that we, as Christians, are called to bear with us on a daily basis throughout our lives.
• Please let me know if I’ve missed anything in the comments section below!
• Hello, my name is Tyler Martin.
• I have a bachelor’s degree in biblical languages and a master’s degree in biblical interpretation.

“Saying Jesus’s Name Wrong”: A Fallacy of “Hebrew Roots”

Ecce Homo (Ecce Homo, 1502) by Andrea Mantegna (WikiArt). “Jesus’s name is wrong,” according to one of the most common and persistent tropes of the ” Hebrew Roots ” movement, which asserts that the majority of Christians around the world are “saying Jesus’s name wrong,” that the name “Jesus” itself is improper, a Westernization and a corruption of the Messiah’s true name. These individuals contend that the genuine name of our Lord, and the correct manner to approach Him, is by His original Hebrew name, (ya), which is most commonly transcribed in English asYeshua (Jesus).

Prior to dismissing traditional Christians who praise our LordJesus, however, there are a few points you should take into consideration.

1. When you refer to the Lord asYeshua (or Y’shua, orY’shua, orYah’shua, or any variety), there is nothing “traditional” about it. There is nothing “improper,” no sort of syncretism, fabrication, or corruption in the traditional name of Jesus
2. There is nothing “improper” in the traditional name of Jesus. In reality, to argue that Yeshuais the only suitable name by which to call our Lord is to reject the whole established Christian tradition, to disavow the Apostles and Evangelists, and even to deny Scripture itself — and to contradict the basic message of the Gospel

An Invented Tradition

Proponents of “Hebrew Roots” frequently buttress their views with assertions that they are returning to the “genuine traditions” of the early Jewish Christians, which they believe to be true. Is this, however, a true statement? Tradition refers to something that has been passed down from generation to generation. And the truth is that until the beginnings of the “Messianic” movement in the nineteenth century, there was no tradition — no writings, no hymns, no inscriptions, no traditional teaching or custom — of our Lord being addressed asYeshua, passed down by the earliest Christians or by anyone else at all.

1. But they didn’t leave us any documentation or tradition of it.
2. In contrast to the Aramaic version of Yeshua, the Hebrew version of Yeshua is based on Hebrew pronunciation.
3. The rabbinical pronunciation of the biblical texts served as the basis for our transcription of Hebrew text.
4. In this case, the pronunciation of the word would be radically different between a first-century Jew on the street speaking Aramaic and reading the same characters and a rabbi reading from a biblical text.
5. Even if one accepts the rabbinic tradition of pronunciation —Yeshua is, like any other rendition, only a rough approximation in terms of meaning.

It is true that there have been Christians who have been speaking Aramaic for the past two thousand years, since the time of the Apostles, who have passed down the Christian faith in what can be considered its native language: the Syrian Christians, whose liturgical language is essentially Aramaic as Jesus would have spoken it —but they pronounce the Lord’s name ” Isho” instead of ” Yeshua.” Yeshuawas not passed down by anybody at all, but was created in contemporary times from imagined traditions.

This is what the Apostles left us, the earliest written documents of the Christian Church that have survived to this day: the New Testament Scriptures, which were written in Greek, not Hebrew or Aramaic, as was the case with the Old Testament.

The Name of Jesus

It is not true that the name Jesus was introduced by “Rome” in a late, syncretistic manner, nor that it is a “corruption” of true Hebrew teaching, nor that there is any other attempt to pull true Christians away from the “Hebrew Roots” of Christianity, as I am hearing more and more often from supporters of the “Hebrew Roots.” They transcribed His name aso(Isous) when the Apostles and their companions composed the New Testament Scriptures in Greek, under the direction and inspiration of the Holy Spirit, under the guidance and inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

• This is supported by the fact that every manuscript of every book of the New Testament confirms it.
• The name Joshua had already been in use in Greek for several centuries as the traditional transliteration of the Hebrew name (which is also often transliterated in English).
• Greek-speaking Christians were adhering to long-established norms when they addressed the Christ with that name before He arrived on the scene.
• With the translation of the Bible into English, the nameIesuswas a natural transcription of the Greek name into Latin, and then into English, as was the nameJesus.
• Is it possible that the Apostles were agents of syncretization or dilution, and that they were responsible for steering the followers of Christ away from His “Hebrew Roots”?
• Clearly, if there had been any difficulty, any heresy, corruption, or dilution in the process of translating the name of the Lord into the local languages of each of His peoples, the Apostles themselves would not have undertaken the project.

Every Tongue Shall Confess

Mikhail Nesterov’s painting Resurrection (ca. 1892). God has elevated him and given him the name that is above all names, so that at the mention of Jesus’ name, every knee should bend, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father, as St. Paul himself explains. —Philippians 2:9–11, emphasis added In Greek, which at the time was the lingua franca of the civilized world, the apostle Paul said, “Every tongue must acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord.” Similarly to the Latinlingua, the wordtonguein Greek,orglssa, could refer to language as well, just as we continue to use the wordtonguein English.

Without a doubt not: in that same line, Paul refers to Him as “Jesus in Greek.” Those who argue that only ” Yeshua,” or any other rendition of the name, is the correct and proper address for our Lord, are denying the entirety of received Christian tradition, as well as the transmission of the faith to all peoples, as the Apostles and their spiritual descendants have done for centuries.

In the same way that the Greek people received the name of the Lord aso, the English people accepted Him asJesus, the Spanish people received Him asJesus, and so on:

Names of the Lord in Various Languages

Language	Name	Transliteration
Albanian	Jezusi
Amharic	ኢየሱስ	Iyesus
Aramaic	ܝܫܘܥ	Isho
Arabic	يسوع	ʿĪsā
Aragonese	Chésus
Bengali	যিশু	Jishu
Chinese	耶稣
Greek (Koine)	Ἰησοῦς	Iēsous
Greek (Modern)	Ιησούς	Iēsous
Hebrew (Modern)	ישו	Yeshu
Hindi	ईसा	Jesu
Hungarian	Jézus
Irish Gaelic	Íosa
Italian	Gesù
Korean	예수
Latin	Iesus	Jesus
Romanian	Isus
Russian	Иису́с	Iisús
Church Slavonic	Їисъ
Slovak	Ježiš
Tagalog	Hesus
Tamil	இயேசு
Turkish	İsa
Vietnamese	Giê-su
Yiddish	יעזוס	Yezus

… I believe you have grasped the concept, and I’m having much too much fun with it. Only a few languages are represented here, and they are all taken from the Wikipedia page on Jesus. The point is as follows: Are any of these languages considered to be “wrong”? Were the apostles, missionaries, evangelists, and translators who transported the religion of Christ “to the ends of the world,” to each and every one of these peoples, “in the wrong?” By claiming that there is only one proper name by which Jesus can be addressed, one is denying the universality, the catholicity, of Christ’s message of salvation; one is also rejecting the very message of the Gospel, which is one of forgiveness, acceptance, and inclusion into Christ for all peoples.

Is Jesus a Jewish-only savior, or does he save all people?

The biggest risk that the “Hebrew Roots” movement has, in my opinion, is that it is essentially reviving the error of the Judaizers by claiming that the only real way to be a Christian is to be a Jew—an argument that Scripture rejects time and time again.

This Is What Jesus’ Friends And Family Actually Called Him — And No, It Wasn’t Jesus

Even among people of different religious beliefs, the name “Jesus” is almost universally recognized. It may come as a surprise, however, that the name “Jesus,” which millions of Christians all over the world are urged not to use in vain, was not in fact the name of the historical figure. Despite the fact that the assertion appears to be controversial, the truth is that it is more of a translation issue.

What Was Jesus’ Real Name?

Commons image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons “Isous” is the Greek transcription of Jesus’ given name, whereas “Yeshua” is the late Biblical Hebrew form of Jesus’ given name. Of course, neither English nor Spanish existed in their present forms during the time when the genuine Jesus was living, nor was the New Testament written at the time that the original Jesus was alive. Jesus and his followers were all Jewish, and as a result, they all received Hebrew given names – despite the fact that they would have spoken Aramaic.

As a result, the majority of academics think that the Christian Messiah’s given name was really “Yeshua,” which was a very popular Jewish given name during Jesus’ lifetime.

This raises the question of how the name “Jesus” got to be unique in the first place, given that there were apparently so many individuals called “Yeshua” moving around at the time.

How “Yeshua” Became Lost In Translation

Commons image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons Because of this, the King James Bible was written in the “I” spelling rather than the “J” spelling. Given the fact that not every language has the same sounds, people have traditionally adopted their names in order to be able to pronounce them in a number of different languages. Even in modern languages, there are discrepancies in how Jesus is pronounced from one dialect to another. In English, the name is pronounced with a hard “J,” yet in Spanish, the name is pronounced with what would be a “H” in English, despite the fact that the spelling is the same.

The New Testament was initially written in Greek, which not only has a completely different alphabet than Hebrew, but also does not include the “sh” sound present in the Hebrew word “Yeshua,” which means “Yeshua.” After deciding to use the Greek “s” sound instead of the “sh” sound in the name Yeshua, the New Testament authors added a final “s” to the end of the name to make it more masculine in the original language.

When the Bible was translated into Latin from the original Greek, the term “Iesus” was used by the translators to refer to the person who had given the name.

For decades, this inscription has been a typical feature of portrayals of the crucifixion in Western Christianity as “INRI,” an acronym for the LatinIesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum, or “Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews,” which translates as “Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews.” Because Latin being the main language of the Catholic Church, the Latinized form of the name “Yeshua” was used to refer to Christ across the rest of Europe and beyond.

Even the King James Bible, which was first published in 1611, utilized the “Iesus” spelling.

How “Yeshua” Eventually Became “Jesus”

It’s difficult to identify precisely where the “Jesus” spelling originated, while some historians believe that a variant of the name that originated in Switzerland is the most likely candidate. It is more common for the “J” in Swiss to be pronounced like an English “Y” or the Latin “Ie” as in “Iesus.” In 1553, when the Catholic Queen “Bloody” Mary ascended to the English throne, thousands of English Protestant intellectuals fled, with a large number eventually settling in Geneva. It was at Geneva that a group of some of the best English minds of the day collaborated to create the Geneva Bible, which was the first to utilize the Swiss spelling of the name “Jesus.” Commons image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons A significant contribution to the popularization of the “Jesus” spelling was made by the Geneva Bible.

Eventually, it was transported to the New World on the Mayflower, which arrived in 1620.

As a result, the name used by English speakers today is an English adaption of a German translation of a Latin transliteration of a Greek transliteration of an initially Hebrew name, which was then adopted by the English language.

Then read about Jesus’ tomb being opened after it had been sealed.

What name was Jesus originally called?

The moniker ‘Isho’ that Jesus was given while still alive was a nickname. The language he spoke was referred to as ‘Aramaic.’ More specifically, he spoke an Aramaic dialect known as Jewish Palestinian Aramaic, which is a dialect of the Hebrew language. When it comes to names like “Joshua”, “Yeshua”, “Jesus”, and so on, there is nothing like “Yahoshua.” When the Hebrew language was employed to write about him, his given name, ‘isho,’ was spelled as ‘Yeshu,’ which had the same sound. Some varieties of the Aramaic language are still spoken in some regions of Syria today, and the name ‘Isho’ is still a common surname there.

1. Some Bible translations use the name ‘Isho’ instead of the name ‘Jesus’ in order to preserve the original name of the Savior.
2. Take a look at the attached image.
3. To be sure, you are correct in saying that the name is an alternate pronunciation of the given name ‘Isho’.
4. However, the guy who claimed to be the son of God went by the name of “Isho.” Isho and Joshua are both referring to the same thing; they are just speaking in separate but related languages.

It’s much more poignant now that you know the genuine name he was referring to when he declared, “Whatever you ask in my name, this I will accomplish, so the Father may be exalted in the Son.” 14:13 (John 14:13) Allow me to pose a hypothetical question here: If you are confident in your ability to pronounce the original name, why are you sticking with the contaminated one?

What Language Did Jesus Speak?

Assuming, as most academics do, that Jesus was a genuine historical man, there has long been controversy about the events and conditions of his life as described in the Bible. In particular, there has been considerable debate in the past over what language Jesus used while he was a man living during the first century A.D. in the kingdom of Judea, which is now located in what is now the southern portion of the Palestinian territory. WATCH: JESUS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Vault The topic of Jesus’ favourite language was brought up at a public meeting in Jerusalem in 2014 between Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, and Pope Francis, who was visiting the Holy Land at the time.

1. Netanyahu, speaking to the Pope through an interpreter, declared: “Jesus was here, in this country.
2. ‘Aramaic,’ he replied, referring to the ancient Semitic language that emerged among a group of people known as the Aramaeans about the late 11th century B.C.
3. According to the Washington Post, a dialect of it is still used today by groups of Chaldean Christians in Iraq and Syria, but in a different form.
4. with an Aramaic inscription that reads “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus” on the lid.
5. Photograph from the Biblical Archaeology Society of Washington, DC (Courtesy of Getty Images).
6. Despite the fact that both the prime minister and the Pope were likely correct in their interpretation of the language, the news of the linguistic difference made headlines.

Jesus Was Likely Multilingual

The vast majority of religious academics and historians agree with Pope Francis that the real Jesus spoke primarily a Galilean dialect of Aramaic during his lifetime. By the 7th century B.C., the Aramaic language had spread far and wide, and it would eventually become the lingua franca throughout most of the Middle East as a result of trading, invasions, and conquering. According to scholars, it would have been the most widely used language among ordinary Jewish people in the first century A.D.

Netanyahu, on the other hand, was technically accurate.

Hebrew was the language of religious experts and sacred books, notably the Bible, in the ancient world, similar to how Latin is used now (although some of the Old Testament was written in Aramaic).

In the first four books of the New Testament, the Gospels of Matthew and Mark both record Jesus speaking in Aramaic vocabulary and phrases, but in Luke 4:16, he is portrayed reading from the Hebrew Bible in a synagogue (Matthew 4:16; Mark 1:11).

Alexander the Great Brought Greek to Mesopotamia

Alexander the Great is a historical figure who reigned from 323 to 323 BCE. Getty Images/CM Dixon/Print Collector/CM Dixon/Print Collector Other languages spoken at the time of Jesus were Aramaic and Hebrew, as well as Greek and Latin. Following Alexander the Great’s conquest of Mesopotamia and the remainder of the Persian Empire in the fourth century B.C., Greek became the official language in most of the region, displacing other languages in the process. As early as the first century AD, Judea was a province of the eastern Roman Empire.

1. According to Jonathan Katz, a Classics lecturer at Oxford University, Jesus was unlikely to have known more than a few phrases in Latin at the time of his death.
2. I am certain that he did not speak Arabic, which was a different Semitic language that did not arrive in Palestine until well into the first century A.D.
3. As is likely the case with many multilingual persons, the language in which he spoke varied on the context of his words as well as the audience to whom he was addressing at the time.
4. Is there any further evidence?

What Language Did Jesus Speak?

Most scholars agree that Jesus spoke predominantly Aramaic, while Hebrew and Greek were also widely spoken across the Middle East and beyond throughout his day. In this lesson, you will learn about the use and effect of many languages used by Jesus and the people surrounding him throughout his time on Earth.

TheLanguage of Jesus

Aramaic Religious scholars and historians are generally in agreement that Jesus and his disciples predominantly used Aramaic, which was the established language of Judea in the first century AD, as their primary language. Their Aramaic was most likely spoken with a Galilean accent as opposed to a Jerusalem accent. During his stay in Galilee, he spent the most of his time in the villages of Nazareth and Capernaum, which were Aramaic-speaking settlements. According to this interpretation, Jesus used many Aramaic phrases, including talithakoum (Mark 5:41), ephphatha (Mark 7:34), eloieloilamasabachthani (Matthew 27:46; Mark 15:34), and abba (abbah) (Mark 14:36).

It was extremely similar to Hebrew, but it had many phrases and idioms that had been borrowed from other languages and civilizations, particularly Babylonian, and thus was called “Aramaic.” Hebrew and Greek are the two languages used.

Because Hebrew was most likely spoken and read in the synagogues, it is likely that the majority of the population could communicate and comprehend some Hebrew.

Being able to communicate in Greek was a very valuable skill at the time because it was the universal language.

According to Yigael Yadin, an archaeologist who studies the Dead Sea Scrolls, Aramaic was the language of the Hebrews until Simon Bar Kokhba’s insurrection.

Yigael Yadin writes in his book that, “It is noteworthy to notice that the early records are written in Aramaic, whilst the later ones are written in the Hebrew language.

According to what we know, it seems probable that Jesus talked in whatever of the three languages was most appropriate for the people He was dealing with at the time. Photograph courtesy of Getty Images/Ioshertz