What Ethnicity Was Jesus

Jesus wasn’t white: he was a brown-skinned, Middle Eastern Jew. Here’s why that matters

The portrait of Jesus on my bedroom wall was a reminder of my upbringing in a Christian family. It’s still in my possession. It’s a little schmaltzy and tacky in that 1970s kind of way, but it was one of my favorites as a small child. Jesus appears to be kind and friendly in this photograph, and he smiles tenderly down at me. He has also been described as having light hair, blue eyes, and being exceedingly white. The difficulty is that Jesus was not of European descent. If you’ve ever been inside a Western church or walked through an art museum, you could be forgiven for believing differently.

Although this is not a contentious issue from an academic standpoint, it is a fact that many of the millions of Christians who will meet to celebrate Easter this week seem to have forgotten.

A white man, a guy who looks like Anglo-Australians, a guy who other Anglo-Australians can easily connect with, will be presented as Jesus in the majority of these churches, according to the report.

He is a good example of what I mean.

• Alternatively, consider some of the most renowned paintings depicting Jesus’ crucifixion – Rubens, Grunewald, Giotto – and we can see the European prejudice in presenting a white-skinned Jesus once more in action.
• Taking the myth of the contrite prostitute and putting it to rest All of this is irrelevant, isn’t it?
• When it comes to representation and the necessity of varied role models, we as a culture are fully aware of their relevance.
• In interviews since then, Nyong’o has expressed her sentiments of inferiority as a young lady, claiming that she felt this way since all of the ideals of beauty she saw around her were of women with lighter skin tones.
• If we can acknowledge the value of racially and physically diverse role models in our media, why can’t we do the same for religious role models as well?
• The Passion of the Christ, a 2004 film directed by Mel Gibson, starred Jim Caviezel.
• Orthodox Christian iconography differs significantly from that of European art – for example, if you walk into a church in Africa, you’re likely to encounter an African Jesus on the walls of the building.
• It enables members of the mainstream Christian community to distinguish between their commitment to Jesus and their sympathy for persons who are physically different from themselves.
• It also has consequences for the theological premise that people are created in the image of God.
• It has been historically documented that Christians have been among the most virulent perpetrators of anti-Semitism, and it continues to show itself in the “othering” of non-Anglo Saxon Australians.
• It would be devastating if we were forced to face the truth that the body that rested on the cross was a brown body: one that had been broken, tortured, and publically killed by an authoritarian state.

How might this change our attitudes? Finally, and perhaps most radical of all, I can’t help but wonder what could happen if we were more conscious of how God in the flesh and savior of the entire world was not a white guy, but was rather a Middle Eastern Jew who lived thousands of years ago.

What Was Jesus’ Ethnicity and Nationality?

Activists are attempting to steal Jesus’ race and country for their own ends, but the Bible is clear about His lineage and upbringing. When considering the Lord’s origins and why His ethnicity and national origins matter in our lives today, it’s necessary to consider where He originated from.

What Is the Difference Between Ethnicity and Nationality?

Before we explore the ethnicity and nationality of Jesus, it is important to clarify those terms since many people are unsure of what those phrases refer to. Ethnicity is mostly a cultural concept. People who belong to specific groups are defined by their cultural features. Language and accent may assist determine a person’s ethnicity, and religion can also play a role in determining ethnicity. Social norms, clothing trends, haircuts, favourite cuisines, and dietary limitations or preferences are all factors that contribute to a person’s ethnic identity.

1. The legal perception of a person’s belonging to a specific nation has everything to do with his or her citizenship, which can be acquired either by birthright or by adoption.
2. Physical traits might differ significantly across various ethnic groups.
3. Dr.
4. Baucham, Jr., an apologist and former pastor, asserted that the concept of race is not a biblical concept, with the exception of the fact that we are all “one race in Adam.” According to him, from a biology standpoint, we are all different shades of the same hue – varied degrees of melanin.
5. Only ethnicity and nationality are taken into consideration in this article.

What Does the Bible Say about Jesus’ Nationality?

Jesus’ nationality, according to the law, was Jewish. He was born to Jewish parents in Bethlehem, which is located in the southern region of the Judean Mountains in what is now known as the West Bank of present-day Israel, and was raised by them. In Jesus’ earthly claim to Messiahship, which was a fulfillment of prophesy 600 years earlier, Bethlehem’s rich history as the “city of David” (Luke 2:4) — King David’s hometown — was a key aspect of his earthly claim to Messiahship (Micah 5:2). The Bible records His birth (Matthew 1:18-25, Matthew 2:1-2, Luke 1:26-28; Luke 2:1-20) under the reign of Herod the Great (Matthew 1:18-25, Matthew 2:1-2, Luke 1:26-28; Luke 2:1-20).

They proceeded to Bethlehem in Judea as inhabitants of Nazareth in order to participate in a census ordered by Roman Emperor Caesar Augustus (Luke 2:1).

When it comes to Jesus’ bloodline, Matthew 1:1-17 traces His lineage back to Abraham via David (Joseph’s lineage), whereas Luke 3:23-38 traces His lineage back to Adam and ultimately to God (Mary’s lineage).

At His birth (Matthew 2:2) and at His death (Luke 23:43), Jesus was referred to be “King of the Jews,” which is an interesting distinction (John 19:19).

What Does the Bible Say about Jesus’ Ethnicity?

Keeping in mind that ethnicity is a cultural word, we can determine which cultural group Jesus belonged to in the first place. According to the Scriptures, Jesus was born, lived, and died as a Jew during his entire life and ministry (Matthew 2:1-12;Romans 9:4-5;John 4:9;Luke 21:37;Matthew 27:35-37). He was the “son of David, son of Abraham” (Matthew 1:1), and he was descended from Judah, according to the Bible (Hebrews 7:14). His father taught him much more than just carpentry skills. He studied the beliefs of His spiritual forefathers and foremothers, as well as the Hebrew scriptures, and He used them in His work.

1. He worshipped alongside Jews, celebrated their festivals with them, and lectured in temples and synagogues throughout his life (Luke 21:37;Matthew 13:54;Luke 6:6;John 18:20).
2. The veneration of Jesus among the Jews was reported.
3. His first sermon, in Matthew 5:17-18, argued for the observance of Jewish law, but also advocating a higher standard than simple external obedience to it (Matthew 5:17-18).
4. He was opposed to reinterpretations of the Jewish faith as well as pharisaical additions to the religion.
5. As a multi-ethnic Jew, Jesus’ ancestors came from a variety of distinct Middle Eastern cultures, as evidenced by his ancient bloodlines.
6. Rahab was a Canaanite lady who served as a shield for Joshua and his troops during the conquering of Jericho in the Old Testament (Joshua 2:1-21; 6:25).
7. It is possible that the two ladies in Matthew’s story were Gentiles, although this has been contested.
8. According to some academics, Tamar was also from Canaan, however the Bible does not specify what ethnicity she belonged to.
9. According to some sources, she was an Israelite, although her nationality is unclear based on the biblical record.

Why Was Jesus Not a Palestinian?

Linda Sarsour, an American-Muslim political activist, attempted to culturally hijack Jesus’ history in order to further her own political goals in 2019. In her words, “Jesus was a Palestinian from Nazareth” and just a disciple of Judaism, not a Jew, and that he was not a Jew. It was she who said Jesus had “copper complexion and woolly hair” similar to that of the Palestinians. Three months previously, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar made the same claim about Jesus being Palestinian; and for years, others, including Yasser Arafat, Mahmoud Abbas, and Hanan Ashmwari, have made the same claim about Jesus being Palestinian.

• Those who promote this false narrative aim to supplant historical Jewish links to the land of Israel with an invented history by promoting a fake narrative.
• In the first century, Jews would never have referred to their homeland as “Palestine,” as it is now.
• However, Jesus could not have been a Palestinian.
• In his article “Was Jesus a Palestinian?” Dr.
• First and foremost, he asserted, the activist’s assertion is historically outdated.
• Sarsour, he claims, misunderstands Jewishness biblically by asserting that Jewish people are not an ethnic group but rather adherents to the religion of Judaism rather than a separate ethnic community.
• The term “Jewishness” refers to an ethnicity rather than just to a religious affiliation, according to him.

In addition, Sarsour’s claim regarding Jesus’ physical appearance is based on the Quran, which was authored at least 700 years after the gospels were published. “Even the Quran acknowledges that Jesus is a Jew,” Rydelnik continued, to emphasize his case even further.

What Did Jesus Look Like?

While Jesus had a special affection for tiny children — “red and yellow, black and white” — this does not imply that He was represented by all of those hues. People today, for a variety of reasons, have a tendency to perceive Jesus as a reflection of themselves. Joan Taylor, a professor of Christian Origins and Second Temple Judaism at King’s College in London, explained that the Byzantine period is responsible for the majority of the representations of Jesus that are recognizable today. All of these photos were inspired by an image of the Emperor on his Throne, who was depicted with a beard and long hair.

1. “Forensic anthropologist Richard Neave created the model in 2001,” Taylor explained.
2. It was a surprise to many that Neave’s image of Jesus did not resemble the well-known Scandinavian-looking Jesus with blonde hair and blue eyes!
3. He was believed to have had short hair and a short beard, as were the majority of Jews in His day.
4. Some people have incorrectly assumed that Jesus made a Nazarite vow — which would imply that He would have long hair — throughout history; however, Jesus was referred to as a Nazarene, not a Nazarite.

According to Edward J Blum, co-author ofColor of Christ: A Story of Race and Religion in America, Jesus was unlikely to have been “chiseled” in the manner of the imposing character Jim Caviezel portrayed inThe Passion of the Christ, but rather short to average in height with the physique of a typical carpenter, according to the Bible.

With the growth of identity politics, his physical appearance has become a point of contention, as some people refer to Jews as “white Jews” vs Jews as “people of color.” They point to African Jews who are darker in complexion.

If Jesus were to be described as humanly speaking, He would have olive complexion, dark brown to black hair, and brown eyes comparable to Neave’s depiction, and would have been a reflection of the Jewishness of His time and place.

Why Does Knowing Jesus’ Ethnicity and Nationality Matter?

Understanding Jesus’ race and nationality is more than just a historical curiosity. It is significant from a theological standpoint since it has an impact on mankind’s salvation. At the end of the day, God’s selection of the Jews as His chosen people was based on their ability to produce the Messiah, the Savior of the world. It did not imply that Jews were superior or inferior to others; rather, it implied that Jesus had to be born into a community of people, and God picked the Jewish people as “his people, his prized possession” because they were “his people, his treasured possession” (Deuteronomy 7:6).

1. According to John Piper’s book “Why Was Jesus Born a Jew?” the significance of this is explained.
2. God concentrated His “saving participation” with the world on Israel for those 2,000 years, rather than on the rest of the world, according to Piper.
3. In Piper’s words, “Clearly, the life, death, and resurrection of this Jewish Messiah were pointing the way to the redemption of the Gentiles, the nations.” This was also said by Jesus during his lifetime (Matthew 8:11-12; 21:43; 28:19).
4. Non-Jews who placed their faith in Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection on their behalf were grafted into the Jewish covenant by the Holy Spirit, who is also known as the Holy Spirit (Romans 11:7-18; 2:28-29).
5. Jesus was born as a Jew in order to demolish any claim to ethnic supremacy.
6. A Biblical Perspective on Races Caesar Augustus: An Archaeological Biography is a book about the Roman emperor Caesar Augustus.
7. Jesus was not a Palestinian in any way.
8. What Did Jesus Look Like in His Real Life?
9. iStock/Getty Images Plus/Rastan are credited with this image.
10. They are the parents of two married sons and three grandchildren.

She is the creator and director of Heart Choices Today, as well as the publisher of Upgrade with Dawn and a contributor to Crosswalk.com and Christianity.com, among other publications. Dawn and her husband are also involved in ministry with Pacesetter Global Outreach, which they travel with.

Was Jesus Black Or White? How One Church Leader Just Changed The Debate

Was Jesus of Nazareth, one of the most important characters in human history, a member of a race other than the Jewish race? There is no way to know for certain, but recent statements made by the leader of the Church of England indicate that it is past time to reconsider whether or not Jesus should be shown as a white male. When asked about the way the western church presents Jesus’ race in an interview with BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby responded affirmatively.

“Of course it does,” Welby responded, stressing that Jesus was already depicted in a variety of ways other than as a white guy in various areas around the Anglican church.

As many different representations of Jesus as there are cultures, languages, and understandings, you will see a Fijian Jesus.” This comes at a time when a national discussion over institutional racism is raging in both the United States and the United Kingdom, with questions of race and class taking center stage.

Getty Images’ image of Jesus Jesus’s color and ethnicity have long been a source of contention — since the beginning of the spread of Christianity, the manner in which the faith’s primary figure has been depicted has been a source of both historical and aesthetic conflict.

“Jesus of Nazareth likely had a darker complexion than we imagine, similar to the olive skin common among Middle Easterners today,” wrote social psychologist and theologian Christena Cleveland in Christianity Today in 2016.

The Eurocentric image of Jesus, according to many opponents, has been utilized to propagate white supremacy and reinforce racist tropes that deify whiteness while denigrating Black people.

Recent days have seen a deterioration of the dispute about the race of Jesus, with political activist Shaun King igniting controversy when he tweeted on Monday that “the monuments of the white European they believe is Jesus should also come down.” “They are a manifestation of white supremacy,” he asserted.

It’s true that King expressed himself in a much more nuanced manner regarding the image of Jesus in other places, but it was his early Tweets that grabbed the public’s attention and turned the discussion into a political tempest.

Perhaps, by engaging the discourse concerning Jesus’ race, the Archbishop of Canterbury recognizes that the subject should be explored through the lens of religion rather than politics, and that delicacy rather than flame-throwing should be demanded.

In actuality, even the world’s most brilliant minds will never be able to determine whether Jesus was of African or European descent.

by starting a conversation about how the representation of Jesus can be more inclusive to those seeking faith and fortitude, the Archbishop of Canterbury is expressing his hope that the conversation about Jesus can shift from a fight about what should be torn down to more of a discussion about what can be constructed.

In such case, it would be worthwhile to place confidence in Jesus, regardless of his physical appearance.

What race was Jesus?

QuestionAnswer We know that Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem and raised in the town of Nazareth in the Galilee region of northern Israel, even though the Bible does not describe His physical appearance as a human (Matthew 2:1; Luke 2:4–7; 4:16; John 7:42). As a result, Jesus Christ was a Hebraic Jewish guy from the Middle East. When we trace Christ’s lineage back to his father, we see that he was a multi-ethnic Jew, as well. Various races and cultural lines were represented in his lineage, including Moabite via Ruth and Canaanite through Rahab, as well as characteristics from other races and cultural lines.

• As time passed, however, painters began to depict Him with European characteristics like as pale complexion, a beard, and long light brown hair.
• And, as the son of a carpenter, he was almost certainly very browned as a result of his exposure to the sun.
• Possibly, this is one of the reasons why God chose to remain mute in His Word on the subject of the hue of Jesus’ skin.
• Our Lord, Jesus Christ, came to identify with people of all races and ethnic backgrounds (Matthew 28:19).
• In fact, comprehending Christ’s mission—which includes becoming part of the human race (John 1:14; Philippians 2:6–7)—is far more significant than defining His racial ethnicity (or lack thereof).
• God desires that we accept one another despite our differences (Galatians 5:22).

In that case, we may agree with the apostle Paul, who stated, “There is no distinction between Jew and Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor between male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (there is no distinction between male and female in Christ Jesus) (Galatians 3:28; see also Ephesians 2).

There is no such thing as a Jew or a Gentile, nor is there such such thing as black, white, yellow, or red.

He was neither.” It was he who came from that area of the world that straddles Africa, Asia, and Europe.

He is a citizen of the entire world.” Instead of asking “What race was Jesus?” it would be more appropriate to ask “What race was Jesus for?” The emphatic answer is, “the whole human population.” Questions regarding Jesus Christ (return to top of page) What ethnicity did Jesus belong to?

Subscribe to the

Get our Question of the Week emailed to your inbox every weekday morning! Got Questions Ministries is a trademark of Got Questions Ministries, Inc., registered in the state of California in the year 2002. All intellectual property rights are retained. Policy Regarding Personal Information The information on this page was last updated on January 4, 2022.

What race was Jesus?

For most of history, people have represented Jesus as a mirror of their own ethnicity or color. A large number of painters began representing Jesus as a Caucasian guy with light brown, wavy hair and blue eyes during the Middle Ages. However, this is a distorted representation of reality. The Bible is unambiguous about Jesus’ ancestry; his lineage is not a mystery. The genealogy of Jesus is traced in Matthew 1:1–17 from Abraham to David to Joseph, and in Luke 3:23–38, it is traced all the way back to Adam.

1. (Luke 4:16).
2. Jesus’ physical appearance as a man is unknown; he would have had olive-brown complexion, brown to black hair, and brown eyes, but the Bible does not include any information about his physical appearance.
3. It is possible that Judas was forced to point out which man Jesus was among His followers to the Roman soldiers who had come to capture Him because Jesus appeared to be the same as the rest of them (Matthew 26:47–49) played a factor in this.
4. It is beneficial to have a realistic knowledge of Jesus’ race in order to avoid misrepresenting Him to the rest of the world.
5. In Acts 4:12 and John 3:16–18, it is said that Jesus is the sole Savior for all people, regardless of their ethnicity.
6. Any individual, regardless of race, who turns away from sin and toward Jesus in faith has the potential to be forgiven of his or her sins and to be adopted into God’s family (John 1:12–13).
7. However, the Bible teaches us that race is not the most essential factor in life.

Each and every human being has sinned and has been estranged from God (Romans 3:23; 6:23).

Ephesians 2:8–9 states that those who are adopted as children of God through faith in Jesus Christ are family with one another and are a member of the body of Christ.

It is written in the Bible that God desires all peoples to unite under His wing: ‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus,’ says the Bible (Galatians 3:28).

Even throughout His public ministry to the Jews, Jesus was outspoken in his opposition to their racial views.

According to Acts 8:14–17 and 10:44–48, his followers discovered that the Holy Spirit was given to everyone who placed their faith in Jesus, even Samaritans and Gentiles.

Jesus has the ability to bring all people together, regardless of their differences; he welcomes the outsider into His family.

He himself is our peace, who has united us both in his flesh and has destroyed the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, in order that he might create in himself one new man instead of the two, thus making peace, and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing hostility.

Truths that are related: Was Jesus a Jew or a non-Jew?

Was Jesus of Nazareth a black man? What was Jesus’ physical appearance like? What do we know about the historical Jesus, the one who lived and died? Who exactly is Jesus? What is the identity of Jesus Christ? Return to the page: The Truth About Jesus Christ.

“Race, Ethnicity, and Hope in a Hebraic Jesus” by Joshua Canada

What do we think of when we think about Jesus’ race? What does it mean to have pictures of a White Jesus, an Asian Jesus, or any other kind of Jesus? Most of the time, we don’t give much thought to how we portray Jesus, but it may be necessary that we do so with greater intention in the future. The most popular representation of Jesus throughout history has been that of a white, western European-looking man. One example is Arthur Maxwell’s “The Bible Story,” and another is the Hanna-Barbera video series “The Greatest Adventure Stories from the Bible.” Both of these works are instances of how mainstream Evangelical Christianity has portrayed Jesus white.

Unfortunately, we make Jesus into a representation of ourselves.

As a Hebraic Jew, Jesus was born in Bethlehem, but his earthly mother, Mary, and his earthly father, Joseph, were both from the northern portions of Galilee, where they had come to live with their relatives.

In current day and age, the closest equivalent would be Middle Eastern Arabs or Middle Eastern ethnic Jews, who are both from the Middle East.

He would have most likely exhibited Jewish characteristics such as a prominent nose and jaw and dark hair, but he would also have exhibited characteristics and blood from a variety of ethnic and cultural lines (consider the inclusion of Ruth (a Moabite), Rahab (a Canaanite), and others in Jesus’ genealogy, for example).

• He was also somewhat short (as compared to us) and, on the whole, he appeared to be a fairly ordinary looking guy.
• When we build in our own image, what is the motivation behind it?
• To mainstream and legitimize our own race, ethnicity, and/or heritage, we must first normalize and validate that of others.
• Although it is not a pleasant reality, a white Jesus normalizes Christianity as a “white man’s religion,” which is a positive development.
• Native-Americans/First Nationers, Black Americans, and Asian-Americans have all battled with the prospect of becoming Christians, in part because it implied that they would have to follow a “white man” in order to be accepted.
• However, this is not a “black and white problem.” It is a Christian matter, after all.
• We had Aryan representations, which helped to drive Nazi Germany.

We have European representations of the Crusades that inspired them.

The Color of Christ, a book by Ed Bloom, examines the actual Jesus as well as the images that have been manufactured and used in the United States’ racial history.

For example, the artistic image of Jesus as an African-American slave conveys far more than the fact that Jesus is black — in fact, it conveys no such message at all.

The portrayal of Jesus as an Italian immigrant might allude to Jesus’ extraterrestrial isolation from his own land in this realm.

The art of Jesus should be recognized.

It is important to know what Jesus looks like, but is it necessary?

The cultural background of Jesus, as well as his physical appearance, had an influence on his social surroundings.

That implies that he was handled as if he were a Jew.

We wish we didn’t see a difference, but that is not the case in reality.

Pretending that my race hasn’t influenced both my perspective of my own place in the world and the way the world responds to me is absurd.

There are many different types of people that identify as European-American: Kenyan, Black Jamaican, Chinese-American, and so on and so forth.

As a result of his “Jewishness,” Jesus was linked to the rest of humanity: to those who had suffered, who had reigned, who had been in God’s favor, and who had felt the presence of the Holy Spirit.

What’s the big deal?

That is a difficult question to answer.

However, here are some straightforward thoughts.

Black Jesus relating with liberation from American slavery equates with Jesus liberating us from the slavery of sin) 4- Recognize how wrong images associated with power (e.g., the KKK, Nazi Germany) distort the Gospel and cause others to be hindered by them.

Seeing Jesus as a Jew frees us from the clutches of political authority.

The degree of comprehension required if “salvation comes from the Jews” (John 4:22) must be recognized.

It was Jesus who introduced a multi-cultural extension to the scope of where and with whom God would be working.

In many respects, this is self-evident.

Yes, there are prophetic allusions to the coming of Christ, and reading the Old Testament provides us with a wide grasp of God’s character.

God, on the other hand, has designated a specific people group to operate through.

We read the Old Testament with them and feel a sense of belonging, in part because we, too, are God’s people, based on their ethnicity and history. “Your people shall be my people, and your God shall be my God,” we declare to Jesus, the Christ, in the same way that Ruth spoke to Naomi.

What race can Jesus be?

The controversy about the ethnicity of Jesus Christ has raged for a very long period, probably hundreds, if not thousands, of years, according to some estimates. In popular culture, Christ is frequently represented as a white man, with the Washington Post citing Warner E. Sallman’s 1940 painting “Head of Christ”– which has since been replicated a billion times ­– as having played a crucial part in this representation. Given the biblical description of Christ’s family’s origins in the Middle East, the depiction of Christ as a man with white complexion and blue eyes appears to be at odds with what is most realistic.

This is despite the fact that a Jesus from the Middle East is the one who makes the most sense to the majority of Britons.

This is a tiny increase above the number of Britons who believe it is acceptable for the Son of God to be shown as being white (63 percent ).

There is a significant age difference in attitudes toward these two characteristics: whereas attitudes toward a Middle Eastern Jesus are nearly identical across all ages, younger Britons are less accepting of a White savior (51 percent of 18-24 year olds, 61 percent of 25-49 year olds) than their elders (61 percent of 18-24 year olds) (66-67 percent of those aged 50 and above).

1. Ethnic minority Britons are far less inclined than the general population to believe that painting Jesus as white is appropriate, with only 40% of them agreeing (including 36 percent among Christians from ethnic minority groups).
2. The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has previously said that Jesus is shown as having certain racial traits in numerous sites around the Anglican church.
3. Other racial portrayals of Jesus are acceptable to a far smaller proportion of Britons, however they are nevertheless more likely than not to be considered acceptable.
4. While Christian Britons are roughly as likely as the general public to believe that such views of Jesus are acceptable, they are also 5-6 points more likely than the general public to believe that they are objectionable.

See the whole set of findings here and here. See also: Does God have a gender?

‘Color Of Christ’: A Story Of Race And Religion In America

What was Jesus’ physical appearance like? The numerous distinct representations of Christ convey a tale about race and religion in the United States of America. In their latest book, The Color of Christ: The Son of God and the Saga of Race in America, Edward J. Blum and Paul Harvey delve into the history of race in America. Different races and ethnic groups have claimed Christ as their own throughout history, and representations of Jesus have both inspired civil rights crusades and been used to justify the murder of white supremacists.

In an interview with Fresh Air’s Terry Gross, Blum explains that “the conviction, the value, that Jesus is white gives them with a picture in place of text.” “It keeps them from having to quote chapter and verse, which they are unable to do effectively in order to make their case,” says the author.

However, when waves of Catholic and Jewish immigrants poured into the United States, some Americans “began to worry that it was altering the face of America too much, changing it ethnically, changing it religiously,” according to the New York Times.

Those who were lobbying for immigration limits, such as religious authors and painters, began to picture Jesus as having blond hair and blue eyes.

Interview Highlights:

In regards to how slave owners portrayed the idea of a white Jesus “When slave owners attempt to Christianize their slaves, they bring Jesus in two forms: one is as a servant, and this is to say, ‘Hey look, service is good, service is godly, therefore your job service is good.’ The other is as a master, and this is to say, ‘Hey look, master, your work service is nice.’ They do, however, portray Jesus as a master.

You must follow his example and refrain from lying or stealing. As a result, when slaves accept Jesus as their master, they connect the dots by saying: ‘Okay, well, if Jesus is master, then my earthly owner isn’t my only one, and he’s certainly not my most powerful one; in fact, I have a master above my master.’ .

He too suffered.

But that wasn’t the end of his narrative.” Following that, he was resurrected, and not only was Jesus revived, but he also resurrected his friends, as in the account of Lazarus.'” So, for African-Americans who are constantly surrounded by death — and not only actual death, but also the death of families, as in seeing your wife or child transported away — this is a difficult time.

So what slaves do is basically take those models of master and servant and connect them in a different way than the slave lords intended, resulting in a brand new kind of Protestant Christianity that is very different from the one the slave masters intended.” Edward Blum is a professor of history at San Diego State University who specializes in the history of race and religion in the United States.

His earlier publications include W.E B.

(Photo courtesy of Iris Salgado/UNC Press) Specifically, how the Mormons claimed a hallowed America in which the image of a white Jesus Christ was displayed “When it came to geography, one of the issues that Americans had previously was that they wanted to stake their faith on a Jesus who had never lived in this area, and therefore had never lived in this place.

It predates Columbus, and the fact that this Jesus is white with blue eyes — it gives Americans a lengthy history; it is not a reclaiming of territory from the Indians, but rather a reclaiming of land from the Native Americans.

Smith himself claims that he is not explaining anything because these are revelations to him from on high.

Nonetheless, there is an underlying belief in Mormon theology that one’s skin tone symbolizes one’s wickedness prior to this life.” When Joseph Smith looked around at Native Americans, black Americans, and white Americans, the revelation told him that the lighter the skin, the more blessed and less sinful the individual had been in a pre-life state.

• And he truly believed that cultures would become more tolerant.
• However, people of African-American heritage are subjected to a severe curse.
• As a result, although Native Americans may be rehabilitated over time, African-Americans, or persons of African heritage, were seen as the ultimate outsiders.
• Du Bois’ group in the 1920s and 1930s, who depicted Jesus as a Southern black man who gets lynched, to put it bluntly.
• He might have an Afro or he could be dressed in a dashiki.

The term ‘African’ becomes significant culturally, and as a result, doing this to Jesus occurs at the same time.” NPR 2022 has copyright protection.

Jesus wasn’t white: he was a brown-skinned, Middle Eastern Jew. Here’s why that matters

The portrait of Jesus on my bedroom wall was a reminder of my upbringing in a Christian family. It’s still in my possession. It’s a little schmaltzy and tacky in that 1970s kind of way, but it was one of my favorites as a small child. Jesus appears to be kind and friendly in this photograph, and he smiles tenderly down at me. He has also been described as having light hair, blue eyes, and being exceedingly white. The difficulty is that Jesus was not of European descent. If you’ve ever been inside a Western church or walked through an art museum, you could be forgiven for believing differently.

• Although this is not a contentious issue from an academic standpoint, it is a fact that many of the millions of Christians who will meet to celebrate Easter this week seem to have forgotten.
• A white man, a guy who looks like Anglo-Australians, a guy who other Anglo-Australians can easily connect with, will be presented as Jesus in the majority of these churches, according to the report.
• He is a good example of what I mean.
• Alternatively, consider some of the most renowned paintings depicting Jesus’ crucifixion — Rubens, Grunewald, Giotto — and we can see the European prejudice in presenting a white-skinned Jesus once more in action.

The importance of diverse role models

Lupita Nyong’o (left) has consistently stated her sentiments of inadequacy as a young lady since all the ideals of beauty she saw around her were of lighter-skinned people. (Reuters: Eduardo Munoz) All of this is irrelevant, isn’t it? Yes, it does, in a very genuine way. When it comes to representation and the necessity of varied role models, we as a culture are fully aware of their relevance. After winning the 2013 Oscar for Best Supporting Actress for her portrayal in 12 Years a Slave, Kenyan actress Lupita Nyong’o soared to popularity.

• It wasn’t until she witnessed how the fashion industry embraced Sudanese model Alek Wek that she realized that black might be attractive as well as white.
• (Supplied: Tony Bransby) If we can recognise the importance of ethnically and physically diverse role models in our media, why can’t we do the same for faith?
• Many faiths and cultures represent Jesus as a brown or black guy, and this is not uncommon.
• However, these are rarely the pictures that we see in Protestant and Catholic churches in Australia, and it is to our detriment.
• I would even go so far as to claim that it causes a cognitive mismatch, whereby one might feel intense compassion for Jesus while feeling minimal empathy for someone from the Middle East.

It likewise has implications for the theological claim that humans are made in God’s image. If God is constantly shown as white, then the default human becomes white as well, and such thinking is at the heart of racist ideology.

What if Jesus resembled an asylum seeker?

It has been historically documented that Christians have been among the most virulent perpetrators of anti-Semitism, and it continues to show itself in the “othering” of non-Anglo Saxon Australians. What if the historical Jesus had more in common with Indigenous Australians or asylum seekers than with everyone else? (Source: Romeo Ranoco of Reuters) What would our church and society look like if we simply remembered that Jesus was brown — and if we were confronted with the reality that the body hung on the cross was an oppressive regime’s brown body that had been broken, tortured, and publicly executed — is something I can’t help but wonder about this Easter.

How might this change our attitudes?

Robyn J.

The original version of this article published on The Conversation.