What Did Jesus Say About The Old Testament Law

What Does the Bible Say About the Old Testament Law?

  • Is there anything we should avoid eating? Is eating pork and shellfish against the law in the Bible? In what sense did Jesus say, “Nor the tiniest letter, not the slightest stroke of a pen, will by any way depart from the Law until everything is accomplished”? What has happened to all of the commandments and ordinances in the Old Testament
  • Do we have to follow the regulations in the Old Testament
  • And what has happened to all of the commandments and ordinances in the New Testament.

Introduction

During the time of the Old Testament, the Law of Moses governed practically every element of human existence. God, on the other hand, forged a new covenant of trust and love with people via the coming of Christ. Criminal and punishment laws, warfare, slavery, food, circumcision, sacrifices, feast days and keeping of the Sabbath, as well as tithe and ceremonial cleanness laws, are not essential for Christians to obey the Old Testament regulations. Even more self-discipline is required by Jesus and His apostles than by the teachings of the Old Testament when it comes to moral and ethical principles and teachings.

The Law of Moses

A law that governed practically every element of Jewish life throughout biblical times was known as theLaw of Moses (also known as the Old Testament Law, Mosaic Law, or simply The Law). Ten Commandments and a slew of additional regulations established the boundaries of morality, religious activity, and government. The army, criminal justice, trade, property rights, slavery, sexual relations, marriage, and social interactions were all governed by the constitution. For men, it demanded circumcision, animal sacrifices, and rigorous observance of the Sabbath (see below).

Animals were classified into two groups according to ceremonial rules: “clean” and “unclean.” Those that were clean could be eaten; animals that were not clean could not.

Many of the regulations were tailored specifically to the religious system and agricultural life of ancient Israel, and others were general in nature (Exodus 12:14-16, Leviticus 1:10-13,11:1-23, 15:19-20, 19:19, 19:27-28, 27:30-32, Deuteronomy 25:5-6).

However, there are several moral principles that serve as the foundation for Christian morality (Exodus 20:1-17,23:6-9, Leviticus 19:9-10, 19:18, Deuteronomy 6:5).

The Teachings of Jesus

After Moses received the Ten Commandments from God, hundreds of ceremonial laws were created in order to carry out the tremendous moral ideals God had imparted to him. People believed that if they just followed all of the laws, they were leading holy lives. Jesus, on the other hand, was of a different mind. He said that individuals discovered enough “loopholes” to follow all the regulations while continuing to live evil and selfish lifestyles (Matthew 23:23-28). “Do not imagine that Ihave come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them,” Jesus said in reference to the Law, which sometimes creates misunderstanding.

Matthew 5:17–18 (New International Version) Christians have struggled to comprehend exactly what Jesus was trying to convey.

However, many of those laws and ceremonies were not observed by Jesus and His disciples, thus this could not be the case at all. When it comes to the time of Jesus, it is commonly pointed out that the word “the Law” might imply a variety of distinct things. 1,2

  • The ceremonial regulations, which include “clean” and “unclean” lists, sacrifices, food restrictions, ritualwashings, and other practices. The civil law is a body of laws that governs social behavior and specifies crimes, penalties, and other requirements. For example, the Ten Commandments are examples of moral and ethical laws. The Pentateuch (the first five books of the Bible)
  • The Torah (the first five books of the Bible)
  • The scribal law – the 613 regulations (mitzvot) created by the scribes that were supposed to be followed by everyone
  • The scribal law The whole of the Scriptures

There was no change in the moral and ethical laws that had been in existence since the time of Moses because of Jesus. Those concepts were maintained and expounded upon by him, but he added that obedience must come from the heart (in the form of attitudes and intents) rather than merely technical observation of the law’s language (Matthew 5:21-22, 27-28, 31-32, 33-34, 38-42, 43-44, etc.). Jesus and His disciples, on the other hand, did not adhere to the stringent scribal prohibition against doing any labor on the Sabbath (Matthew 12:1-14, Mark 2:23-28, 3:1-6, Luke 6:1-11, 13:10-17,14:1-6, John 5:1-18).

  • According to Jesus, contrary to the dietary regulations of the Law, food cannot contaminate a person; rather, it is negative attitudes and acts that may render a person unclean (Matthew 15:1-20, Mark 7:1-23).
  • (John8:3-5, 10-11).
  • If such were the case, it would be consistent with His previous acts and teachings.
  • Additionally, it is pointed out that Jesus is the fulfillment of the Law (Matthew 26:28, Mark 10:45, Luke 16:16, John 1:16, Acts 10:28, 13:39, Romans 10:4).

The Council of Jerusalem

The early Christians came from among the Jews, and they maintained their observance of both the Law of Moses and their new Christian beliefs during this time. However, as the number of Gentiles (non-Jews) who converted to Christianity increased, there were disagreements about whether or not these Gentile Christians were required to keep the Law. The issues of circumcision and food were particularly contentious, and they posed a serious danger to the unity of Christianity. When Peter, Paul, Barnabas and James (along with other Christian leaders) convened in Jerusalem about the year 49 A.D., they were attempting to resolve the conflict (Acts 15:1-29).

The Gentile Christians, on the other hand, were instructed by the council to abstain from certain items that were particularly repulsive to their Jewish brothers and sisters – food dedicated to gods, blood, flesh from strangled animals, and sexual immorality, to name a few (Acts 15:29).

The New Covenant

God has made a new covenant with people as a result of the birth of Jesus Christ (Jeremiah31:31-34, Luke 22:20, 1 Corinthians 11:25, Hebrews 8:8-13, 9:11-15). Jesus and Hisapostles provided us with a fundamentally different view of the actual goal of the Old TestamentLaw; they heralded the beginning of a new period characterized by the rule of love for all people and spiritual truth, rather than the rule of law (Luke 10:25-28, John 13:34-35, Ephesians 2:14-18).

God, on the other hand, has not canceled His original bond with Israel and the Jewish people, as some believe (Luke 1:72, Acts 3:25, Romans 9:4-5, 11:26-29, Galatians 3:17). Although the New Covenant expresses no negative feelings toward Jews, it does not condone their persecution in any manner.

Conclusion

Jesus’ teachings, the Council of Jerusalem, and other New Testament teachings (John 1:16-17, Acts 13:39, Romans 2:25-29, 8:1-4, 1 Corinthians 9:19-21, Galatians 2:15-16, Ephesians 2:15) make it clear that Christians are not required to follow the Old Testament rules about crimes and punishments, warfare, slavery, diet, circumcision, animal sacrifices, feast days, Sabbath observance, ritual cleanness, and so on.

Christians are Old Testament scriptures continue to be relied upon by Christians for moral and spiritual direction (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

Christians, on the other hand, should not consider their liberation from the Old Testament Law to be a license to lower their moral standards.

Christian Practice

For example, below are a few instances of Old Testament commandments that Christians do not often follow:

  • Pork (Leviticus 11:7)
  • Certain other animals (Leviticus 11:4-6)
  • Shellfish (Leviticus 11:10)
  • Certain birds (Leviticus 11:13-19)
  • Certain insects (Leviticus 11:20-23)
  • Meat that has not been cooked yet (Leviticus 17:12)
  • Meat that has not been cooked yet (Leviticus 17:13)
  • Meat that has not been cooked
  • Male circumcision is compulsory on the eighth day (Leviticus 12:1-3)
  • The death penalty is applied to anyone who:
  • Exodus 21:15,17
  • Disobedience to parents (Deuteronomy 21:18-21)
  • Failure to confine a dangerous animal resulting in death (Exodus 21:28-29)
  • Witchcraft and sorcery (Exodus 22:18, Leviticus 20:27, Deuteronomy 13:5, 1 Samuel 28:9)
  • Having sexual relations with an animal (Exodus 22:19, Leviticus 20:16)
  • Working on the Sabbath (Ex
  • Observances of the Feast of Weeks or Pentecost(Shavuot)(Leviticus 23:15-21)
  • Observances of the Feast of Trumpets or New Year Festival(Rosh Hashanah)(Leviticus 23:23-25)
  • Observances of the Feast of Tabernacles(Sukkot)(Leviticus 23:39-43)
  • And Observances of the Feast of Tabernacles(S
  • The seventh-day Sabbath is observed on Saturday (Exodus 20:8-11
  • Exodus 35:1-3)
  • Animal sacrifices are performed.
  • For the forgiveness of sins (Leviticus 4:27-35)
  • For the commemoration of the Passover (Exodus 12:3-11)

1William Barclay, The Daily Study Bible, published by Westminster Press in several editions at various times. 2 Life Application Bible Study Notes, edited by Bruce Barton and published by Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. in 1991.

No, Jesus Did Not Soften the Old Testament-In Fact He Did the Opposite, and Here’s What That Means

Those who identify as moderate Christians are fond of pointing out how Jesus “changed the Old Testament,” or in other words, how he rendered obsolete the truly awful passages that deal about slavery, putting women in their place, executing gays, and so on. In reality, he accomplished nothing of the like. Specifically, I’ll be performing two things here:

  1. To demonstrate to you that Jesus completely endorsed everything in the Old Testament
  2. To demonstrate to you just how dreadful everything is

So, first and foremost, here is Jesus speaking directly about the teachings of the Old Testament:

The Law Stands

Because really, I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota or a dot will pass the law until everything is done. As a result, anybody who breaks even one of the smallest of these commandments, and teaches others to do similarly, will be regarded as the least in the kingdom of heaven; nevertheless, anyone who follows and teaches them will be regarded as the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.” — Matthew 5:18-19 (New International Version) “It is far simpler for Heaven and Earth to perish than it is for the tiniest portion of the wording of the law to be declared unconstitutional.

(See also Luke 16:17.) “Do not imagine that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets.

In the name of God, I declare to you that until heaven and earth pass away, not the least part of a letter, not the smallest part of a letter, will be removed from the law until all things have taken place.” (Matthew 5:17; Mark 1:17) “Did Moses not give you the law, and yet none of you obeys the law?” says the author.

Don’t just take my word for it; go ahead and look it up for yourself. Assuming, for the time being, that he completely embraced the teachings of the Old Testament, let’s look at what he specifically instructed us to uphold.

The Law That Stands

If someone curses the name of the LORD, they will be put to death; the entire crowd will stone the blasphemer as punishment. The death penalty will be applied to both foreigners and citizens who insult the name of God. Leviticus 24:16 (New Revised Standard Version)

See also:  What Town Was Jesus Born In

Cheaters Must Die

It is mandatory to execute both the adulterer and the adulteress if a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—in this case, with the wife of his next-door neighbor. (NIV) Torah 20:10 (Leviticus 20:10)

Dishonoring Your Mother or Father is Punishable by Death

No one should be allowed to live if they have dishonored their father or mother. A person who does such an act is guilty of a capital crime. Leviticus 20:9 (New Living Translation)

People Who Work on Sunday Should be Killed

It is OK for you to labor six days each week on your regular duties, but the seventh day must be a Sabbath day of total rest, a holy day devoted to the LORD. Anyone who is at work on that day shall be put to death immediately. Exodus 35:2 (New Living Translation)

If a Woman is Not a Virgin When She Gets Married, She Has to Die

“If any man takes a wife and enters her home and despises her, accuses her of disgraceful behavior, and casts a bad reputation on her, and claims, ‘I took this lady, and when I arrived to her, I discovered she was not a virgin,’ he is guilty of adultery.” In the event that no evidence of virginity is discovered for the young woman, she will be brought out to the front door of her father’s house, where the men of her city will stone her to death with stones.

(New King James Version) — Deuteronomy 22:13-14, 20-21

There’s Nothing Wrong With Slavery

Your male and female slaves will come from the countries in your immediate vicinity; you will be able to purchase slaves from them. Leviticus 25:44 (New International Version)

Gays Should be Put to Death

If a man sleeps with another man as if he were with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination, and they will both be put to death; their blood will be on their own shoulders. (NRSV) — Leviticus 20:13 (NASB).

Women Should Shut the Hell Up and Do as They’re Told

In order for a woman to learn, she must be quiet and fully submit. Female power or teaching authority over a guy are not allowed in my house; she must remain mute. Timothy 2:11-12 (New International Version) Please keep in mind that these are not recommendations. They’re not something you can do without. As Jesus stated, “Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches mankind in this manner will be considered least in the kingdom of heaven.” He also stated that they are not susceptible to any interpretation by the individual.

Atheists, on the other hand, should not be listened to; we are the last people you should trust.

All of the references are available to you.

But, fortunately, there is a simple solution: Consider which of the following is most likely:

  1. You may either believe that God and Jesus are bad (which the Bible’s own language reveals, if you open your copy and look) or. As it turns out, everything is a fabrication, and there is nothing to be concerned about

The solution is number two. God is not a bad person, and neither is his son, Jesus.

They were created by man in order to exert control over other men. There are few things that provide more compelling evidence of this than the actual teachings of the Bible. Those of you who are nice and considerate Christian friends don’t require this. You have risen above it all.

Notes

  1. Please accept my thanks for the list of Old Testament instructions provided by Christianity Disproved.com.

Does the Old Testament Law Still Apply?

Does the Old Testament law still apply? It’s a question we’ve all asked ourselves at some point or another. Do Christians adhere to the teachings of the Old Testament? Explore these questions further by reading the section below, which includes notes from The Chronological Life Application Study Bible to aid you in your investigation. What exactly is the Law of the Old Testament? Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy are the books that contain the Old Testament Law. This comprises the Ten Commandments, among other things.

  • “Please don’t get the wrong idea about why I’ve come.
  • No, I came to help them achieve their objective.
  • As a result, if you break the least commandment and encourage others to do the same, you will be referred to as the least in the Kingdom of Heaven.
  • You will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven unless your purity exceeds that of the teachers of religious law and the Pharisees, I warn you.

DOES THE OLD TESTAMENT LAW STILL APPLY?

If Jesus did not come to destroy the law, does this indicate that all of the laws of the Old Testament continue to apply to us in the modern era? The law in the Old Testament is divided into three categories: ceremonial, civil, and moral law.

ONE: Ceremonial Law

The ceremonial law dealt especially with Israel’s religious practices (seeLev 1:2-3, for example). Due to the major goal of these rules being to look forward to Jesus Christ, they were no longer essential following the death and resurrection of Jesus. While ceremonial law no longer binds us, the ideals that underpin it—to worship and adore a holy God—continue to be relevant. The Pharisees frequently accused Jesus of breaking the laws of the temple.

TWO: Civil Law

In Israel, civil law was applied to everyday life, and this was known as civil law (seeDeut 24:10-11, for example). Because current society and culture are so fundamentally different from those of that era and environment, it is impossible to adhere to all of these standards in their entirety. However, the concepts that underpin the commandments remain timeless and should serve as a guide for our actions. Jesus exemplified these ideals through his life and teachings.

THREE: Moral Law

It is God’s direct mandate to follow the moral code (such as the Ten Commandments), and it requires complete and total obedience (seeExod 20:13, for example). The moral code shows the character and will of God, and it continues to be relevant today. Jesus complied with the moral rule to the letter.

THE ULTIMATE GOAL

God created His rules in order to assist individuals in loving God with all of their hearts and thoughts. This legislation has, however, frequently been misquoted and misapplied over the course of Israel’s history. By the time of Jesus, religious authorities had twisted the laws into a jumble of contradictory regulations.

When Jesus talked about a new way to comprehend God’s law, he was actually attempting to bring people back to the law’s original intent and meaning. Jesus did not condemn the law in and of itself, but rather the abuses and excesses to which it had been subjected in the past (seeJohn 1:17).

OBEYINGEXPLAINING

Even if some of those in the audience were professionals at directing others what to do, they themselves failed to grasp the core essence of God’s rules. Jesus made it quite clear that keeping God’s rules is more vital than understanding them in their entirety. When it comes to studying God’s rules and telling people to observe them, it is much simpler than when it comes to putting them into practice. How are you doing in terms of obeying God on your own?

HEART CHANGEOBEYING

Pharisees were strict and meticulous in their efforts to uphold the laws that they had established. So how could Jesus possibly urge us to a higher standard of righteousness than they did? Pharisees’ shortcoming was that they were willing to only follow the commandments on the surface level without enabling God to transform their hearts and minds (or attitudes). They appeared to be religious, yet they were a long way from the Kingdom of Heaven. As well as judging our actions, God also examines our hearts, for it is in our hearts that our true allegiance rests.

It is necessary for our righteousness to (1) come from what God does in us, rather than what we can do on our own, (2) be God-centered rather than self-centered, (3) be based on reverence for God rather than approval from others, and (4) go beyond simply keeping the law to living by the principles that underpin it.

INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE?

All of the information in this post was taken directly from the Chronological Life Application Study Bible! Get this resource now to read through the Bible in chronological sequence, which will provide you with a new perspective on your Bible study routine. In addition, you’ll receive hundreds of notes like to this one to help you better grasp God’s Word.

Jesus Refuted Old Testament Laws

Despite the fact that it is evident that Jesus considered the Old Testament as God’s divine revelation, he also explicitly disputed elements of the law of Moses. To give an example, when Jesus supported his followers’ harvesting of food on the Sabbath, he was effectively repudiating Sabbath law (Mt 12:1-14; cf. Ex. 34:21). The disciples, according to some academics, were simply breaching a Pharisaical custom around the Sabbath, rather than breaking any specific OT commandment governing the Sabbath itself.

  1. While I acknowledge that this was undoubtedly a part of Jesus’ intention, I do not see how this exonerates his disciples from the charge of Sabbath-breaking in any way.
  2. Furthermore, Moses’ rule against working on the Sabbath specifically includes a restriction against gathering food (i.e., manna) on the Sabbath (Ex.
  3. So it appears that in this specific instance, the Pharisees had a scriptural foundation for their criticism of Jesus, at least in part.
  4. However, it appears that the genuine meaning of the Sabbath, as defined by Jesus, is at odds with some rigorous and severe restrictions concerning the Sabbath in the Old Testament.
  5. The fact that Jesus’ relaxed attitude toward some rigorous and/or severe commandments regarding the Sabbath as well as other topics was accepted and even elaborated upon by his first disciples should not be overlooked.
  6. 2:16) was entirely relativized by Paul (Col.
  7. We find early Christian leaders rejecting the Old Testament rules for God’s covenant people, both Jews and Gentiles, such as the command to be circumcised and to consume specific types of foods, among other things.
  8. In a similar vein, it appears that when Jesus skillfully spared a woman caught in the act of adultery from being killed, he was effectively repudiating an Old Testament rule (Jn 8:1-11, Cf.
  9. 20:10; Deut 22:22).
  10. Assuming that all people are sinners, the lesson Jesus is expressing in this story appears to apply not only to this specific accused sinner and this particular set of wicked accusers, but to all accused sinners and all guilty accusers in general.
  11. If the concept that Jesus explains in this tale is carried through to completion, it calls into question the moral legitimacy, if not the seeming divine authorization, of every human-on-human slaughter in the Bible.
See also:  When I Was 12 I Went To Hell For Snuffin Jesus

According to Graeme Goldsworthy, Jesus is “the culmination and completion of the entire Old Testament,” as well as “the key to the entire Scriptures.” Consequently, everything about these rules is reinterpreted since Jesus is the focal point of God’s revelation, and he is the one in whom the law is fully realized (Matt 5:17-18).

Painting byDaniel Bonnell

QuestionAnswer “Do not imagine that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them,” Jesus stated. Since I say this, I assure you that not even the tiniest letter, not the smallest stroke of a pen, will be removed from the Law until everything has been fulfilled” (Matthew 5:17–18). This significant remark by our Lord provides us with insight into His purpose as well as the nature of God’s written Word. Two affirmations are contained inside the same sentence in Jesus’ proclamation that He came to fulfillthe Law and the Prophets, rather than to abolish them.

  1. At the same time, Jesus underlined the fact that the Word of God is everlasting in nature.
  2. He did not come to abolish the Law, despite what the Pharisees said He was up to in the process.
  3. Take note of the characteristics that Jesus assigns to God’s Word, which is referred to as “the Law and the Prophets”: The Word of God is everlasting, and it will outlive the entire natural universe.
  4. 3) The Word has complete authority; even the tiniest letter of it has been proven as true.
  5. There was no way anybody could deny Jesus’ dedication to the Scriptures after hearing His statements in the Sermon on the Mount.
  6. In Matthew 5:17, Jesus declares that He did not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets, but rather to fulfill them.
  7. A fulfillment of the Prophets will occur; the Law will continue to serve the purpose for which it was given (see Isaiah 55:10–11 for more information.) After then, think about what Jesusdid.

Jesus’ mission was to establish the Word, to embody it, and to fully perform all that had been written about him.

As predicted by the Prophets, the Messiah would come in the person of Jesus; the holy standard of the Law would be flawlessly preserved by Christ, the rigorous requirements personally followed, and the ceremonial observances would be ultimately and completely accomplished.

As a teacher and as a doer, Jesus Christ fulfilled the Law in at least two ways: as a model and as a teacher.

(John 8:46; 1 Peter 2:22).

Christ did not come to demolish the previous religious system, but rather to build upon it; He came to bring the Old Covenant to a close and to create the New Covenant in its place.

It is true that all of the Old Covenant’s rituals, sacrifices, and other features were “just a shadow of the wonderful things that are to come—not the reality themselves” (Hebrews 10:1).

Because it was loaded with “external regulations that were in effect until the period of the new order,” the Law had an inherent expiry date built in (Hebrews 9:10).

In the book of Hebrews 10:8–14, it is said that priests were no longer necessary to offer sacrifices or enter the holy place.

Because of God’s kindness and faith, we are restored to good standing with him: “He forgave us all our sins, having erased the charge of our legal indebtedness, which stood against us and condemned us; he has taken that charge away, nailing it to the cross” (Colossians 2:14).

Others believe that the Law is still in effect and still obligatory on New Testament Christians.

After faith has been established, we are no longer under the authority of a guardian” (Galatians 3:23–25, BSB).

If the Law is still in effect today, then it has not yet achieved its goal—it has not yet been fully realized—and its purpose has not been fully realized.

Because of Jesus’ complete fulfillment of the Law, we now have the gift of His righteousness, which is a free gift from God.

As a result, we have placed our trust in Christ Jesus so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law, for no one will be justified by the works of the law” (Galatians 2:16).

Go back to the page with all of the Bible questions. What does it imply that Jesus fulfilled the law, yet did not abolish it, to explain this paradox?

Subscribe to the

Get our Question of the Week emailed to your inbox every weekday morning! Got Questions Ministries is a trademark of Got Questions Ministries, Inc., registered in the state of California in the year 2002. All intellectual property rights are retained. Policy Regarding Personal Information The information on this page was last updated on January 4, 2022.

What Was Jesus’ Relationship to the Law of Moses?

For the people of Israel, the law that God provided to Moses served as a foundational element of their existence. It was the ideal standard by which they were to live their lives from that point on. Despite the fact that the law was flawless, it exposed how flawed each human was. People had awareness of their sin through the law, but they did not get a solution. Consequently, no flesh will be justified in his sight by the acts of the law, for it is through the law that sin is discovered and understood (Romans 3:20).

  1. Jesus Was Born Under the Influence of the Law The Law of Moses was in effect when Jesus was born.
  2. According to the Law, he was sinless.
  3. Is it possible for any of you to establish that I am guilty of sin?
  4. (See also John 8:46) Jesus atoned for the sins of the world.
  5. He took the stand and testified.
  6. Quite the contrary.
  7. The Law Was Obeyed By Jesus Jesus is the only person who has ever done everything required by the law.

Being sinless, Jesus was able to fulfill the criteria of the law in order to be the ideal sacrifice since He was without fault.

As a result of his becoming a curse for us (because it is stated, ‘Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree,’) Christ has freed us from the curse of the law (Galatians 3:13).

The curse that the law had placed on humanity has now been lifted completely.

God sent his Son.

Due to the fact that you are sons, God has placed the spirit of his Son into your hearts, causing you to call out, ‘Abba, Father!’ As a result, you are no longer a slave but rather a son, and if a son, then you are an heir of God through Christ, who is your father (Galatians 4:4-7).

The Law Was Taught By Jesus The law was faithfully taught by Jesus.

On one occasion, a legal expert rose to his feet to put Jesus to the test.

“Can you tell me what is written in the Law?” he inquired.

Those who have accepted Christ as their Savior are now subject to the law of Christ.

You must love one another in the same way that I have loved you.

Share one another’s responsibilities and you will be able to meet the requirements of Christ’s law (Galatians 6:2).

Because He met all of the requirements of the law, Jesus was able to offer Himself as the only acceptable sacrifice for sin. Those who place their trust in Him are set free from the bonds of the law and are adopted as God’s children as a result.

Matthew 5:17 – Wikipedia

Matthew 5:17
←5:165:18→
Ecclesia et Synagoga, a medieval depiction comparing Jewish and Christian law on the façade ofNotre Dame Cathedralin Paris.
Book Gospel of Matthew
Christian Bible part New Testament

Matthew 5:17 is the seventeenth verse of the fifth chapter of the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament, and it is a part of the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7). This line, which is one of the most hotly discussed in the gospel, marks the beginning of a new section on Jesus and the Torah, in which Jesus examines the Law and the Prophets.

Content

In the originalKoine Greek language, according to Westcott and Hort, the phrase reads: “V” means “with” or “within” and “outside” means “outside” or “inside” means “within” or “outside” means “within” or “outside” means “within” or “outside” means “within” or “outside” means “within” or “outside” means “within” or “outside” means “within The verse from the King James Version of the Bible states: “Do not think that I have come to destroy the law or the prophets; I have not come to destroy, but to fulfill.” The text is translated as follows in the World English Bible: “Don’t get the impression that I’ve come to demolish the law or prophets.

I didn’t come to destroy, but rather to bring about fulfillment.” SeeBibleGateway for a selection of various translations and versions.

Jesus and Mosaic law

This passage is at the heart of the controversy about the link between the New Testament and the Old Testament, which was initially sparked by Marcion of Sinope and has continued ever since. It is possible to understand Jesus as rejecting some aspects of Mosaic law in various places in the New Testament, including the Gospel of John. The traditional interpretation of the Sabbath inMatthew 12:8, divorce rules inMatthew 5:31, and dietary prohibitions inMatthew 15:11 are among the topics discussed.

  • In this perspective, the Apostles described such a view in Acts of the Apostles, and Jewish Christians ignored such teaching because they continued to worship in Herod’s Temple, as required by the Mosaic Law even after the Resurrection, according to the proponents.
  • Antinomianism is the belief that the entireTorahLaw is still completely relevant to Christians – not for salvation, but rather for plain obedience.
  • (1 John 2:6).
  • Matthew 23:1–3 and Matthew 23:23, according to proponents of this viewpoint, provide proof that Jesus did not nullify any portions of the Biblical Torah Law for his disciples.

For further reading on this point of view, see Christian perspectives on the ancient covenant.

Early Christians

As a result, the Jewish Christians, of which Matthew is widely believed to be a member, would have accused the Pauline Christiansof abandoning Jewish doctrine, as evidenced by theCouncil of JerusalemandActs of the Apostles21:21: “They have heard about you that you teach all the Jews living among the Gentilesto forsakeMoses, and that you tell them not to circumcise their children or observe the customs.” NRSVAnother school of thought holds that antinomianism, the concept that everything was permissible since there were no laws, was held by a segment of the early Christian society.

  1. Using this line, the Gospel of Matthew openly challenges these points of view, asserting that ancient regulations such as the Ten Commandments remain in effect.
  2. The term “fulfill” is the source of the most of the debate around this text.
  3. A large variety of different readings of the wordpleroo, fulfill, have been developed and made available.
  4. These differing definitions, together with textual confusion over the validity of the law, have resulted in a variety of interpretations of the link between Mosaic law and the New Testament, as discussed below.
  5. These factions included the followers of Simon Magus, Marcionism, Gnosticism, Monasticism, Manichaeism, and others.
  6. Examples include Irenaeus’ rejection of Marcion and praise of the Apostles in hisAgainst Heresies3.12.12: The apostles preached the Gospel while still under the influence of Jewish beliefs, but they imagined that they had discovered something more than the apostles by discovering another god.
See also:  Who Baptised Jesus

St Augustine

Another major writer who opposed any separation between Jesus and Moses wasSt. Augustine, who articulated his position in hisReply to Faustus, a Manichaeist, which is available online. Augustine suggested six distinct ways in which Jesus fulfilled the law, including the following examples:

  • His personal obedience to the law was fulfilled in that he fulfilled the messianic predictions
  • He empowered his people to obey the law
  • He revealed its true meaning
  • He explained the true meaning behind the rituals and ceremonies
  • He gave additional commands that furthered the intentions of the Law
  • And he died in accordance with the Law.

Other writers

The sixth of these reasons, that Jesus enlarged the law rather than replacing it, was the most crucial. A lot of other people attempted to convey this concept through analogy. Christ was likened to a race, and Chrysostom remarked that while Jesus had extended the distance that the Christians had to run, the starting point had stayed the same. Theophylact of Bulgaria used the metaphor of an artist filling in an outline, while St. Thomas Aquinas viewed it as how a tree retains the seed even after it has been cut down and discarded.

Luther, Calvin, and Zwingl were among the leading Protestants who rejected the notion that Jesus had made any additions to the Law of Moses.

In contrast, the Anabaptists believed that Jesus had fundamentally revised the Law and that Old Testament commandments could only be valid if they had been confirmed by Jesus himself.

P.

Jesus, he said, had committed no transgressions or oppositions to the Mosaic law, and that the disciples had continued to observe it, as evidenced by their continuing worship in Herod’s Temple (e.g., Acts 3:1; 21:23–26), which he considered to be evidence of their continuous observance of the law.

  1. (See also Great Apostasy and Cafeteria Christianity for further information).
  2. First and foremost, He wanted to use these words to reprimand His followers, reminding them that just as He fulfilled the Law, so should they try to do the same.
  3. Saint Remigius (Saint Remigius): He maintains two things in this passage: he rejects that He was sent to pervert the Law, and he insists that He was sent to bring it to completion.
  4. Chrysostom: As a result, Christ fulfilled the Prophets by doing what was prophesied about Himself—and the Law, first and foremost by transgressing none of its prohibitions; secondly, by justifying through faith, something the Law could not do by the letter.
  5. Because the Lord has revealed to us that even a wicked motion of the thoughts directed toward the evil of a brother is to be considered a kind of murder under the law.

The Lord also teaches us that it is preferable to stay close to the truth without swearing than it is to come close to blasphemy with a real oath to avoid being exposed.

References

  • David Hill is a writer who lives in the United Kingdom. Matthew’s Gospel is a collection of stories about Jesus’ life and teachings. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, 1981
  • McArthur, Harvey King. The Sermon on the Mount: An Interpretive Guide Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 1978.

Jesus and the Old Covenant Laws

1.Did Jesus ever defy God’s commandments? Hebrews 4:15 is a verse from the book of Hebrews. Was he circumcised in accordance with the law by his parents? Luke 2:21 is a biblical passage. Is it possible that they followed the guidelines for cleansing after childbirth? Luke 2:22-27 is a biblical passage. Did they continue to hold the annual festivals? Luke 2:42 is a passage from the Bible that teaches that God is love. Is it possible that Jesus continued in this pattern of fulfilling the Father’s bidding?

  1. 2.Did Jesus instruct his followers to follow God’s commands to the letter?
  2. Did he urge people to follow the ceremonial laws that had been established?
  3. Matthew 5:17 is an example of a parable.
  4. He did not annihilate the books of the Old Testament.
  5. Many changes were brought about by Jesus’ mission, some of which were so significant that laws were “laid aside” or pronounced “obsolete” (Hebrews 7:18; 8:13).
  6. It was not Jesus’ intention when he declared, “I have not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets,” to imply that each single law would remain precisely the same.
  7. The Law and the Prophets all pointed to him, and it was always meant that he would be the one to bring about the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets.

Matthew 5:17 does not serve as a “evidence” of any particular law since it does not specify which specific laws are still in effect or which have been amended or abolished in the context of this verse.

He did not come with the intention of abolishing those rules, but rather with the intention of bringing their meaning to fruition.

These objects are no longer required since they have fulfilled their original function by pointing to Jesus.

Having arrived, they are no longer considered legally binding by the courts.

In fact, the commandments of sacrifice are “useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness,” according to the Bible (2 Timothy 3:16).

That did not rule out the possibility of his being dirty at some point in the future, as everyone with regular physiological processes would do from time to time (Deuteronomy 23:10).

Being unclean was not considered a sin.

He was holy on the inside, and he was set apart to accomplish the job of God.

Despite the fact that his crucifixion resulted in a shift in some of the specifics of how people should obey God, he did not eliminate the notion that people should do so.

Matthew 19:7-9 is a passage of scripture.

Matthew 5:20-22, 27-28; 6:20-22, 27-28.

I’m curious what Jesus had to say about their caution.

Is there any part of the law that is more important than another?

Is it correct to say that Jesus taught the same things that Moses taught, or that there was a contrast between the two?

When the disciples saw Jesus with Moses and Elijah, they were instructed to pay attention to whomever they saw.

Jesus did not emphasize the same things Moses did.

Jesus said that place did not matter (John 4:20-24).

Moses wrote many chapters about ritual uncleanness; Jesus was much less concerned about it.

The law of Moses required many animal sacrifices, but because of the sacrificial death of Jesus, the sacrifices are no longer required.

Jesus often told people to obey God, butMoses is not the standard by which obedience is now measured.

Matthew 7:21-29; 10:32-33, 39; 19:29; 28:18-20; John 3:25-26; 6:29; 14:21-23; 17:2-3.

(Hebrews 3:1-6).

Jesus could quote the law of Moses when it supported his point, and he could also criticize the law of Moses as not being strict enough.

Moses said one thing, but Jesus said another (Matthew 5:21-45).

Jesus presented himself as the greater authority, the perfect authority, the basis on which people will be judged.

In Christianity, some of the laws of Moses are still valid, and others are not (for an example of each, the law about murder and the law about tassels) (for an example of each, the law about murder and the law about tassels).

The New Testament is the authority by which the old covenant is to be understood.

Therefore, when it comes to understanding what is required for Christian behavior, the Old Testament must be interpreted in light of what the New Testament says — and the New Testament says that the old covenant is obsolete (Hebrews 8:13). (Hebrews 8:13). Here are the other studies in this series:

  • Christians are obedient to God. Laws of the Old Testament Prior to Moses
  • Moses and the Covenant of the Old Testament
  • The New Covenant and Jesus
  • The Early Church and the Law of Moses
  • The New Covenant and the Law of Moses
  • Paul and the Covenant of the Old Testament
  • A few examples of laws that are no longer in effect
  • There are seven annual Sabbaths, as well as dietary laws and uncleanliness. The Weekly Sabbath — Following in Jesus’ Footsteps
  • The Sabbath in the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistles
  • Commandments of the New Covenant
  • Grace is the means of salvation.

Michael Morrison is the author. Was this article of assistance?

Help us provide more content like this by giving today

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.